CIA & Soros trying to get Electoral College to vote for Hillary, claim Russia hacked her emails. But former UK Ambassador says Whistleblower was the source..(1) The Jewish century is over?(2) CIA trying to get Electoral College to vote for Hillary, claims Russia hacked her emails. But former UK Ambassador says Whistleblower was the source(3) Former British ambassador to Uzbekistan: Clinton emails given by Whistleblower(4) Soros & Lessig try to sway Electoral College(5) Soros & Hillary trying to reverse the vote of the Electoral College(6) Deep State vs. Trump(7) Senate quietly Passes "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act" targeting Dissident News on Internet(1) The Jewish century is over?Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 21:55:30 -0800 Subject: Re: The Jewish century is over, with the election of Trump - Israel Shamir From: James Morris <justicequest2000@yahoo.com>Israel Shamir apparently doesn't know about the Jews advising Trump: http://america-hijacked.com/2016/08/01/who-is-running-trumps-campaign/(2) CIA trying to get Electoral College to vote for Hillary, claims Russia hacked her emails. But former UK Ambassador says Whistleblower was the source http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-14/former-uk-ambassador-says-source-clinton-emails-was-disgusted-democratic-whistleblowFormer UK Ambassador says Source of Clinton Emails was "Disgusted" Democratic Whistleblowerby Tyler DurdenDec 14, 2016 11:25 PMJust as the CIA/Democrat/Mainstream Media narrative of Russia's involvement in the election jumps the shark with fact-less accusations of Putin's personal involvement, The Daily Mail blows the entire 'hack' meme out of the water. As an evoy for Wikileaks, former UK ambassador Craig Murray claims he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one source, who "had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks... Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians."Murray, who blasted The CIA's "blatant lies" in a recent op-ed, has now come forward with more details on how he knows they are lying... (as The Daily Mail reports)     Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.     'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'While Murray is a controversial figure who was removed from his post as a British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct. He was cleared of those but left the diplomatic service in acrimony. His links to Wikileaks are well known.His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence.     Murray insisted that the DNC and Podesta emails published by Wikileaks did not come from the Russians, and were given to the whistleblowing group by Americans who had authorized access to the information.     'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,'  Murray said. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'     He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'     Murray said he retrieved the package from a source during a clandestine meeting in a wooded area near American University, in northwest D.C. He said the individual he met with was not the original person who obtained the information, but an intermediary [...].As Murray concluded in his recent op-ed, the continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of "Russia", while still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.It is terrible that the prime conduit for this paranoid nonsense is a once great newspaper, the Washington Post, which far from investigating executive power, now is a sounding board for totally evidence free anonymous source briefing of utter bullshit from the executive.The worst thing about all this is that it is aimed at promoting further conflict with Russia. This puts everyone in danger for the sake of more profits for the arms and security industries – including of course bigger budgets for the CIA. As thankfully the four year agony of Aleppo comes swiftly to a close today, the Saudi and US armed and trained ISIS forces counter by moving to retake Palmyra. This game kills people, on a massive scale, and goes on and on.(3) Former British ambassador to Uzbekistan: Clinton emails given by Whistleblowerhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html#ixzz4SrXxe0KDEXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers     Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com  he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails     He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources     The leakers' motivation was 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the  'tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders'     Murray says: 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'     'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,' Murray insists     Murray is a controversial figure who was relieved of his post as British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct but is close to WikileaksBy Alana Goodman In Washington, Dc For Dailymail.comPublished: 07:33 +11:00, 15 December 2016 | Updated: 10:01 +11:00, 15 December 2016A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whisteblowers - and not hacked by Russia.Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence.Murray is a controversial figure who was removed from his post as a British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct. He was cleared of those but left the diplomatic service in acrimony.His links to Wikileaks are well known and while his account is likely to be seen as both unprovable and possibly biased, it is also the first intervention by Wikileaks since reports surfaced last week that the CIA believed Russia hacked the Clinton emails to help hand the election to Donald Trump.Murray's claims about the origins of the Clinton campaign emails comes as U.S. intelligence officials are increasingly confident that Russian hackers infiltrated both the Democratic National Committee and the email account of top Clinton aide John Podesta.In Podesta's case, his account appeared to have been compromised through a basic 'phishing' scheme, the New York Times reported on Wednesday.U.S. intelligence officials have reportedly told members of Congress during classified briefings that they believe Russians passed the documents on to Wikileaks as part of an influence operation to swing the election in favor of Donald Trump.But Murray insisted that the DNC and Podesta emails published by Wikileaks did not come from the Russians, and were given to the whistleblowing group by Americans who had authorized access to the information.'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,'  Murray said. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'Murray claims he met with the person who passed the emails over in a Washington, D.C. part near American UniversityHis account cannot be independently verified but is in line with previous statements by Wikileaks - which was the organization that published the Podesta and DNC emails.Wikileaks published the DNC messages in July and the Podesta messages in October. The messages revealed efforts by some DNC officials to undermine the presidential campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders, who was running against Hillary Clinton.Others revealed that Clinton aides were concerned about potential conflicts and mismanagement at the Clinton Foundation.Murray declined to say where the sources worked and how they had access to the information, to shield their identities.He suggested that Podesta's emails might be 'of legitimate interest to the security services' in the U.S., due to his communications with Saudi Arabia lobbyists and foreign officials.Murray said he was speaking out due to claims from intelligence officials that Wikileaks was given the documents by Russian hackers as part of an effort to help Donald Trump win the U.S. presidential election.'I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.' [...](4) Soros & Lessig try to sway Electoral Collegehttp://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/09/activist-served-george-soros-financed-boards-behind-scheme-usurp-trumps-electoral-college-votes/Activist Who Served on George Soros-Financed Boards Behind Scheme to Take Trump’s Electoral College Votesby Aaron Klein9 Dec 20161,595NEW YORK – Harvard law professor and progressive activist Larry Lessig has announced that he is teaming up with a California-based law firm to offer "free and confidential" legal services to any members of the Electoral College who will vote against President-elect Donald Trump in violation of state law.Lessig, a one-time presidential candidate, has served on the boards of numerous groups financed by billionaire George Soros.Lessig’s Electoral College scheme, which is being called the Electors Trust, is a last-ditch effort to stop Trump from becoming president.It comes after a petition drive by the Soros-funded MoveOn.org activist organization sought to abolish the Electoral College altogether.Lessig’s project also follows the largely failed recount efforts of Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who was aided by Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Breitbart News reported that the lawyer representing Clinton’s recount efforts, Marc Elias, recently led legal battles against state voting laws with an infusion of funding from Soros.Lessig’s effort to help electors vote against Trump was first reported on Monday by Politico:     Lessig says his new effort, which he calls "The Electors Trust," will provide free counsel to electors, provided by the midsize firm, Durie Tangri, whose partner Mark Lemley is a longtime associate of Lessig’s.     More significantly, Lessig said, the Trust will offer a platform – with guaranteed anonymity – for electors to strategize about stopping Trump from taking the White House. It’s a platform, he said, that could help electors coordinate to determine whether they’ve gathered enough support to stop Trump from winning the presidency.     "It makes no sense to be elector number five who comes out against Trump. But it might make sense to be elector 38," Lessig said in a phone interview.Writing at Medium.com, Lessig elaborated on his electors plot:     With their permission, the electors can allow others to know that they are considering a vote of conscience. But that information will not include either their identity or their state. Our primary objective is to provide a safe and confidential legal context in which electors can seek advice and support, and depending on the facts, an opportunity to litigate to defend their freedom.Reached for comment, Lessig refused to provide Breitbart News with the specific numbers of electors who are allegedly considering switching their votes from Trump.""I’m not in the information flow for that. We’re being very careful to assure anonymity," Lessig said.Politico reported advocates of the bid to turn the votes of electors against Trump have briefed allies close to Hillary Clinton.Reported Politico:     Clinton’s team and the Democratic National Committee have steadfastly refused to endorse the efforts spearheaded by a group of electors in Colorado and Washington state. But, as with the ongoing recounts initiated by Green Party nominee Jill Stein, the Clinton team has not categorically rejected them, leaving the collection of mainly Democratic electors to push forward with no explicit public support from the failed Democratic nominee or any other prominent party leaders.Lessig launched his project after one Republican elector, Chris Suprun of Texas, published a news-making op-ed in the New York Times announcing his intentions not to vote for Trump when the Electoral College meets on Dec. 19 to formally elect the president.Lessig’s movement seems to be gaining some momentum, even if it is a long shot. On Tuesday, the New York Times published an opinion piece by Elizabeth Williamson citing Republican insiders saying there are other quiet "faithless electors" like Suprun plotting to vote against Trump. Still, Williamson, a Times editorial writer who specializes in national politics, admitted the chances of the effort succeeding amount to a "moon shot."Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker also advocated for the scheme in a piece titled, "The electoral college should be unfaithful."Parker claimed renegade electors would write a new history of "heroism":     Electors are scheduled to meet Dec. 19 in their respective states to cast their final ballots. If there are 37 Republicans among them with the courage to perform their moral duty and protect the nation from a talented but dangerous president-elect, a new history of heroism will have to be written. [...]With research by Joshua Klein and Brenda J. Elliott.(5) Soros & Hillary trying to reverse the vote of the Electoral Collegehttp://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-foreign-policy-and-the-electoral-college-vote-towards-a-december-19-surprise/5561928U.S. Foreign Policy and the Electoral College Vote. Towards a December 19 Surprise?By Prof Michel ChossudovskyGlobal Research, December 12, 2016In a previous article entitled Constitutional Crisis, Movement to Undermine President-elect Donald Trump’s Accession to the White House? I focussed on the process of confrontation between the Trump and Clinton factions leading up to the Grand Electoral College Vote on December 19th.While the Hillary Clinton faction supported by mainstream media propaganda is accusing Moscow of intervening in the US elections on behalf of Trump, they are  also intent upon shifting the Electoral College vote in favour of Clinton with a view to blocking president-elect Trump’s accession to the White House.If this were to succeed, the U.S. would be precipitated into a deap-seated political crisis. It should be noted that this process is also coupled with  extensive anti-Trump protests across America, organized by the Clinton faction.What is a stake: "are fundamental rivalries within the US establishment marked by the clash between competing corporate factions, each of which is intent upon exerting control over the incoming US presidency."  (Ibid)Rex Tillerson for Secretary of StateSince the publication of  my earlier article, ExxonMobil Chief Rex Tillerson has been chosen by Trump to occupy the key position of  US Secretary of State.  This appointment potentially points to a major shift in US foreign policy (including an openly anti-China stance by Trump).  It is also points to rising divisions within the US establishment.  Tillerson not only has a good relationship with president Vladimir Putin, ExxonMobil also has  sizeable business interests in the Russian Federation including drilling projects in the Arctic, Black Sea and Siberia in partnership with Russia’s Rosneft. Needless to say these projects have been affected by Obama’s economic sanctions regime directed against Russia.In response to this controversial appointment, the Neocon faction linked both to the bi-partisan "War Party" has promised to block the confirmation of  Tillerson’s candidacy in the US Senate.It should be noted that Wall Street is also divided. Financial institutions are engaged in an internal war. Donald Trump announced on December 12 his choice to head the White House National Economic Council (NEC): the appointee is Gary Cohn, Goldman Sachs President and Chief Operating Officer. The NEC director occupies a central advisory position regarding the formulation of government economic policy. Ironically, Cohn is a Democrat and Goldman Sachs is known to have supported the Hillary Clinton campaign.Global Military AgendaWe are not dealing with "class conflict". What is at stake are rivalries, confrontations and deep divisions within the elite structures with regard to America’s global military agenda. [...]The fake Moscow interference in the US elections is being used as a propaganda ploy to shift the Electoral College vote in favour of Clinton on December 19th. [...]The political implications are potentially devastating.(6) Deep State vs. Trumphttp://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/12/virgil-the-deep-state-vs-donald-trump/Virgil: The Deep State vs. Donald Trumpby Virgil12 Dec 20164,1501. The War Against TrumpDo the Democrats want Donald Trump to become the 45th president?  Of course not.  And how about the Democrats’ handmaiden, the Main Stream Media?  Do they want Trump in the White House?  Of course not.  And how ‘bout all the other affluent residents of the Washington "swamp," which Trump has pledged to drain—do you think any of them want Trump? Of course not.  Together, these anti-Trump constituencies help form what has been called the Deep State, which is a real and serious thing, and which we will explore further in a moment.Yet first, we can take a look at the latest news, because let’s not kid ourselves: These anti-Trump constituencies might have lost the 2016 presidential election at the ballot box, but they don’t intend to lose their power.  And to that end, they have real clout, and they are using it.In particular, wily in the ways of Washington, the anti-Trumpers are operating behind the scenes, using their well-greased legal and political machinery to block the President-elect, or at least to discredit and de-legitimize him, such that his presidency is crippled. And as a part of that backroom effort, the MSM is always ready with a supportive, momentum-building headline or two—or two thousand.We all remember the anti-Trump protests that immediately erupted after the election—some of them, it would seem, funded by George Soros and his ilk. But such "guerrilla theater" in the streets was just an overture; the real battle, today, is in the suites.So on Saturday, December 10, Sen. Harry Reid, the outgoing leader of the Senate Democrats, helped set the new anti-Trump agenda in an appearance on MSNBC; hence this headline: "Reid: Russian Involvement In Election ‘A Hanging Chad 1,000 Times Over,’ Trump ‘Lost the Election.’"  The words "hanging chad," of course, are a reference to the 2000 presidential election—that being another time when the Democrats lost and responded by seeking to derail the victor, Republican George W. Bush.Today, the looming flashpoint, of course, is the December 19 convening of the electoral college.  Normally, these sessions in the 50 states are just a formality, in which the 538 electors ratify the candidate who won the most electoral votes as the next president.  And since Trump won 306 electoral votes in November, a clear majority, there should be no doubt as to who will be inaugurated on January 20—but maybe there is.Yes, we must ask: What will actually happen on the 19th of this month?For weeks now, Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig has been agitating to overturn the presidential election results.  Back on November 24, he wrote in The Washington Post that the electoral college should meet and vote Hillary Clinton into the White House.Since then, Lessig has helped to form a group, HamiltonElectors.com, aimed at encouraging "faithless electors," of which there have been a few over the years, to be faithless, now, in record numbers.  Today, Lessig’s website says merely that it wants the electors to break from Trump and vote for a "qualified Republican alternative."But of course, in such a chaotic situation, if the electors feel free to break faith with their commitment to Trump, anything could happen. And Lessig himself is just as much of a Democrat as ever and so, too, we can assume, are his financial backers.  (Interestingly, the site is rather coy about the identity of its funders.)As the Lessig site declares, "Together We Can Stop Trump."  Yes, that’s one goal, and yet it’s also safe to assume that if Lessig & Co. get what they really want, then Hillary will become the 45th president.And in fact, one Republican elector, Christopher Suprun of Texas, has already declared that he won’t vote for Trump next week.  And guess what: Suprun has become a hero to The New York Times and the rest of the MSM.So in the meantime, for the next week or so, the anti-Trump goal is simply to encourage chaos because from their point of view, only good things could happen.  And here, once again, the always dutiful Politico is happy to help; hence this trio of headlines, which are just a sampling: "Rogue electors brief Clinton camp on anti-Trump plan," "Washington state presidential electors file third lawsuit in anti-Trump effort," and "Dem congressman: Electoral College has ‘right’ to weigh Russian hacking."And just on December 12 came the news—or perhaps we should we put "news" in quotes, since it’s just a press release—that the Hillary Clinton campaign wants the electoral college to be "briefed" on the Russia hacking allegations—which presumably means rehashing all the news stories.  In other words, the Clinton campaign wants yet another chance to rehash the same suppositions and suspicions, as opposed to actual facts, of which there seem to be none.  Again, the mission is simple: throw sand in the gears of the constitutional machinery.Meanwhile, others are joining the anti-Trump effort.  For example, here’s another one of CNN’s contributions to the anti-Trump cause, focused on the words of Robert Baer, who made a name for himself as a critic of George W. Bush in the ‘00s: "Ex-CIA operative: We may need a new vote."There’s nothing in the Constitution, of course, about a presidential-election do-over, and so there’s zero precedent for any such national re-vote, and yet, as we have seen, the minimum goal of the anti-Trump forces is to sow massive confusion. [...](7) Senate quietly Passes "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act" targeting Dissident News on InternetFrom: Outlook Team <timos2003z@hotmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:49:46 +0000http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-02/house-quietly-passes-bill-targeting-russian-propaganda-websitesSenate Quietly Passes The "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act"by Tyler DurdenDec 10, 2016 7:13 PMWhile we wait to see if and when the Senate will pass (and president will sign) Bill  H.R. 6393, "Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017", which was passed by the House at the end of November with an overwhelming majority and which seeks to crack down on websites suspected of conducting Russian propaganda and calling for the US government to "counter active measures by Russia to exert covert influence … carried out in  coordination with, or at the behest of, political leaders or the security services of the Russian Federation and the role of the Russian Federation has been hidden or not acknowledged publicly," another, perhaps even more dangerous and limiting to civil rights and freedom of speech bill passed on December 8.On November 30, one week after the Washington Post launched its witch hunt against "Russian propaganda fake news", with 390 votes for, the House quietly passed "H.R. 6393, Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017", sponsored by California Republican Devin Nunes (whose third largest donor in 2016 is Google parent Alphabet, Inc), a bill which deals with a number of intelligence-related issues, including Russian propaganda, or what the government calls propaganda, and hints at a potential crackdown on "offenders."A quick skim of the bill reveals "Title V—Matters relating to foreign countries",  whose Section 501 calls for the government to "counter active measures by Russia to exert covert influence … carried out in coordination with, or at the behest of, political leaders or the security services of the Russian Federation and the role of the Russian Federation has been hidden or not acknowledged publicly."The section lists the following definitions of media manipulation:   Establishment or funding of a front group.   Covert broadcasting.   Media manipulation.   Disinformation and forgeries.   Funding agents of influence.   Incitement and offensive counterintelligence.   Assassinations.   Terrorist acts.As ActivistPost correctly notes, it is easy to see how this law, if passed by the Senate and signed by the president, could be used to target, threaten, or eliminate so-called "fake news" websites, a list which has been used to arbitrarily define any website, or blog, that does not share the mainstream media's proclivity to serve as the Public Relations arm of a given administration.Curiously, the bill which was passed on November 30, was introduced on November 22, two days before the Washington Post published its Nov. 24 article citing "experts" who claim Russian propaganda helped Donald Trump get elected.As we reported last week, in an article that has been widely blasted, the WaPo wrote that "two teams of independent researchers found that the Russians exploited American-made technology platforms to attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment, as an insurgent candidate harnessed a wide range of grievances to claim the White House. The sophistication of the Russian tactics may complicate efforts by Facebook and Google to crack down on "fake news," as they have vowed to do after widespread complaints about the problem."The newspaper cited PropOrNot, an anonymous website that posted a hit list of alternative media websites, including Zero Hedge, Drudge Report, Activist Post, Blacklisted News, the Ron Paul Report, and many others. Glenn Greenwald penned an appropriate response two days later in "Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady Group."PropOrNot has pushed a conspiratorial thesis, without any actual proof, that the listed websites have been either used directly or covertly by the Russians to spread propaganda.While the bill passed the House with a sweeping majority, it is unknown if and when the bill will work its way through the Senate and be passed into law, although one would think that it has far higher chances of passing under president Obama than the President-Elect. It is also unclear if it will be used to shut down websites anonymously characterized as "useful idiots" or subversive elements used in disseminating supposed Russian propaganda.Those interested can read the full "H.R. 6393: Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017" at the following location" bill that may soon proclaim much of the internet to be criminal "Russian propaganda" at the following link. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr6393/text-- Peter MyersAustraliawebsite: http://mailstar.net/index.html