(1) CIA vote altering software, used in Color Revolutions, revealed by Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney(2) 'Hammer' and 'Scorecard': CIA software for hacking elections, used in Michigan and Wisconsin(3) CNN: Why mail-in ballots in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania were counted so late(4) Rudy Giuliani: Trump campaign has enough evidence to change Pennsylvania election results(5) Giuliani: First Fraud Elex Lawsuit Will Be Filed in Pennsylvania(6) Here’s Why Biden’s Pennsylvania Numbers Are Raising Voter-fraud Concerns(7) Evidence Mounts of a Stolen Election - Paul Craig Roberts(8) Off-Guardian: CNN suddenly attributed 138,339 votes to Biden in Michigan, not a single Trump vote(9) McConnell: Trump is "100% within his rights" to question election results and consider legal options(10) Ohio AG Asks Supreme Court To Overturn PA Ballot Ruling; GOP 'Observer' Challenge To Be Heard(11) Censoring Donald Trump is more "dangerous to democracy" than anything he says - Off-Guardian(1) CIA vote altering software, used in Color Revolutions, revealed by Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerneyhttps://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/the-cia-ability-to-hack-the-vote/{video: Steve Bannon interviews Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney}The CIA Ability to Hack the VotePosted Nov 3, 2020 by Martin Armstrong(2) 'Hammer' and 'Scorecard': CIA software for hacking elections, used in Michigan and Wisconsinhttps://wentworthreport.com/2020/11/07/Hammer-and-Scorecard-lt-gen-mcinerney-explains-the-election-hack-by-democrats/'Hammer' and 'Scorecard': Lt. Gen. McInerney explains the election hack by Democrats.  By JD Rucker.The Democrats are either cheating or powers above them are cheating on their behalf. Either way, the election is in the process of being stolen if we're to believe Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney during his most recent interview with Two Mikes.The General described "Hammer" and "Scorecard," a pair of programs initially designed for the CIA before being privatized by Deep State players from the Obama administration. We explained how they work in an article last week, but the gist is this:"Hammer" or "THE HAMMER" is a counter-intelligence surveillance program used to spy on activities on protected networks (like voting machines) without detection …"Scorecard" is a vote-manipulation application that changes votes during transfer. It's the least detectable form of election manipulation because it works during data transfer between voting stations and data storage hubs. Unless both sides are looking for irregularities, it's impossible to catch. If nefarious forces had people on one side or the other (or both) during data transfer, it cannot be exposed. …What we're seeing happening in Michigan and Wisconsin have all of the trademarks of a "Hammer" and "Scorecard" operation.Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney exposes 'Scorecard,' the Democrats' voter fraud superweapon. by Scott Boyd.Voter fraud is happening right now. We all know it; one would be hard pressed to find a single American on either side of the aisle who would not acknowledge that it's taking place. Around half the country realizes (or is willing to admit) it's happening in favor of Democrats, but very few realize just how deep this particular rabbit hole goes. …A CIA program known as "Scorecard" allows its users to change voting outcomes by hacking into the transfer between local reporting stations and state or national data centers.According to McInerney, it's a small amount, under 3%, to keep it from triggering any alarms. He would know. He served in top military positions under the Secretary of Defense and the Vice President of the United States.Using software for elections is a grave error, if you want a honest and reliable count. Paper ballots filled in under supervision at a polling place after an ID check are relatively secure and can be recounted.UPDATE: Sidney Powell discusses Hammer and Scorecard with Lou Dobbs here. Explosive.(3) CNN: Why mail-in ballots in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania were counted so latehttps://www.cnn.com/2020/11/04/politics/why-mail-in-ballots-were-counted-late-in-states-like-pennsylvania-and-michigan/index.html Why mail-in ballots in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania were counted so lateBy Fredreka SchoutenUpdated 2253 GMT (0653 HKT) November 4, 2020How mail-in voting worksKeilar sounds off on Trump's response to election defeat(CNN) Early vote totals on Tuesday night in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin appeared to give President Donald Trump a comfortable edge over former Vice President Joe Biden.But those numbers were never complete, and those tallies were changing overnight and into Wednesday as mail-in ballots from heavily Democratic areas in those states were counted.A big reason for the delay: Laws in each state barred election officials from getting a head start on processing and counting the record number of mail-in ballots voters used amid the Covid-19 pandemic.Take Pennsylvania. The Republican-controlled legislature refused to change state law to allow county election officials to start processing mail-in ballots until 7 a.m. on Election Day. That left local election officials with mountains of absentee ballots to process and count on top of the in-person vote cast on Tuesday.Overall, Pennsylvania received nearly 2.6 million mail-in ballots, according to the state's election website. Officials say that's 10 times the number of absentee ballots it receives in a normal election. In the Democratic stronghold of Philadelphia alone, officials received more than 350,000 absentee ballots that they could not start processing until polls opened Tuesday.Further delaying results in the Keystone State: Nine Pennsylvania counties, according to CNN's reporting, opted to not start processing and counting ballots until Wednesday morning.Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar on Wednesday tried to publicly nudge lagging counties to speed up reporting totals after a number of them appeared to have counted 0% of mail-in ballots on the state's website. "We're going to be following up with all those counties to say, 'Hey, make sure you get us the files,' " she told reporters.Biden's campaign encouraged Democrats to vote early -- while in-person votes likely favored Trump -- so it's no surprise that the former vice president's vote tally would grow as officials count more mail-in votes.The shifting count angered the President."They are finding Biden votes all over the place -- in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan," he tweeted Wednesday "So bad for our Country!"But Richard Hasen, an expert on election law at the University of California Law School at Irvine and a CNN analyst, said "there is nothing sinister going on.""In those three states, election officials begged for extra time" to process ballots and largely were thwarted by state legislators, he said."Ballots aren't processed randomly, so you get swings in outcomes" once election officials add absentee ballots to the count, Hasen said.Michigan, which received more than 3.1 million absentee ballots, faced similar restrictions in the run-up to Election Day.A new state law gave cities with at least 25,000 residents a little more time than usual to process, but not count, mail-in ballots -- an extra 10 hours on November 2, the day before the election. (Processing includes removing ballots from their outer envelopes and preparing them for tabulation.)The short window to process mail-in ballots in states such Pennsylvania and Michigan stands in sharp contrast to Florida, where officials began processing ballots weeks before Election Day, allowing them to swiftly report results.That's a part of the reason Trump was quickly projected as the winner in Florida.In Wisconsin, election workers had to wait until 7 a.m. Tuesday to begin most processing on nearly 2 million absentee and early vote ballots.A surge in Wisconsin results overnight that largely favored Biden raised conservative ire, but it reflected the Democratic stronghold of Milwaukee reporting more than 169,000 absentee votes.A separate battle between the political parties could play out in the weeks ahead over another batch of ballots: Mail-in votes that arrive after Election Day. Trump has railed against a Supreme Court decision that allows Pennsylvania to count ballots that arrive up to three days after the election.But on Wednesday, election officials were scrambling to count the ballots they already had in hand.Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, told reporters Wednesday morning the system is working as it should, even if full results weren't available by day's end."We have to be patient but confident that these votes are going to be counted, they're going to be counted accurately and they will be counted fully," he said. "The delay that we're seeing is a sign that the system is working."CNN's Kelly Mena, Ellie Kaufman, Konstantin Toropin and Casey Tolan contributed to this story.
(4) Rudy Giuliani: Trump campaign has enough evidence to change Pennsylvania election resultshttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/rudy-giuliani-trump-campaign-has-enough-evidence-to-change-pennsylvania-election-resultsby Anthony Leonardi, Breaking News Reporter  | November 08, 2020 12:34 PMPresident Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani said he has evidence that may change the results of the presidential electoral map.In a Sunday interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Giuliani said the lawsuits being filed by the Trump campaign might reveal that up to 900,000 invalid ballots were cast in the state of Pennsylvania, a key election swing state several news outlets projected presumptive President-elect Joe Biden would win. "Do you believe that you have enough to actually change the fate of the election?" Bartiromo asked."Well, I think we have enough to change Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania election was a disaster," Giuliani said. "We have people that observed people being pushed out of the polling place. We have people who were suggested to vote the other way and shown how to do it. I'm giving you the big picture."Giuliani described details of its investigation in Pennsylvania, which may translate to new lawsuits this week, as early as Monday. He alleged Republican observers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, were "kept out of the room or kept away from the room" for 24-hours where mail-in ballots were counted, adding that 135,000 ballots were counted during that time period."Even though we went to court, and we were allowed to move 6 feet closer, the Democrat-machine people moved the counting place six feet further away. This is documented on videotape. There are upwards of 50 witnesses," Giuliani said, which would be the subject of a Monday civil rights lawsuit on Monday.Giuliani said the Trump team was also looking into whether ballots were cast in the name of people who are already dead and if ballots were "back-dated.""We have evidence now, from not only the Post Office but from others, that there was back-dating. I can only tell you right now that that amounts to about 2,000 or 3,000 votes," Giuliani said.In a statement released on Saturday through his campaign, Trump declared, "This election is far from over.""Joe Biden has not been certified as the winner of any states, let alone any of the highly contested states headed for mandatory recounts, or states where our campaign has valid and legitimate legal challenges that could determine the ultimate victor," the statement reads.On Friday, Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito ordered all Pennsylvania county boards of elections to segregate late-arrival ballots from the rest of the mail-in ballots during the counting process. However, Democrats in the state have said the Supreme Court should not involve itself in the election and that the election's outcome would be unlikely to change.According to Fox News chief White House correspondent John Roberts, sources tell him the president would "graciously concede" the election if unsuccessful in his legal efforts. "I’m told that, you know, in addition to the president wanting to see this done, the president is really being supported and being pushed to some degree by his family who want to make sure every legal vote was counted and that no illegal votes were counted," Roberts said.He added that if Trump "does not see a path to continuing in as the president of the United States, he will graciously concede and work on a peaceful and appropriate transfer of power," according to words given to him.(5) Giuliani: First Fraud Elex Lawsuit Will Be Filed in Pennsylvaniahttps://www.newsmax.com/politics/giuliani-fraud-election-pennsylvania/2020/11/08/id/996014/By Cathy Burke    |   Sunday, 08 November 2020 02:13 PMPresident Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, said Sunday the first lawsuit claiming election fraud will be filed in Pennsylvania.In an interview on Fox News’ "Sunday Morning Futures," Giuliani called the election in the key battleground state "a disaster.""I think the first lawsuit will be Pennsylvania," he said. "The second will either be Michigan or Georgia, and over the course of the week we should get it all pulled together … those are facts of fraud.""I think we have enough to change Pennsylvania," he added, "The Pennsylvania election was a disaster. …We have people that observe people being pushed out of the polling place. We have people who were suggested to vote the other way and shown how to do it.""I’m giving you the big picture, where the numbers are such that you could reverse the call," he asserted. "That is the 450,000 that were not observed of mail ballots."He charged the count was "handled like a star chamber proceeding.""They literally counted these ballots in secret and they counted these ballots in secret for only one reason. These ballots were always the ballots they were going to use to try to catch up if they were behind," he charged.He said the case against Michigan will be similar."We have big numbers, definitely in Michigan. Not quite the numbers that we have in Pennsylvania, but enough to overturn the result there," he said."It looks like we'll have very big numbers in Nevada. We have pretty big numbers in Wisconsin. We have four or five witnesses already in Georgia. We have similar numbers in Arizona, so we got five states in which we have the same three issues."(6) Trump Campaign Files Lawsuit on Rejected Arizona Ballotshttps://www.newsmax.com/headline/rnc-maricopa-county-ballots-arizona/2020/11/07/id/995949/By Sandy Fitzgerald    |   Saturday, 07 November 2020 07:02 PMPresident Donald Trump's reelection campaign, along with the Republican National Committee, have filed a lawsuit against Maricopa County, Arizona, that accuses poll workers of improperly rejecting in-person votes on election day.In their lawsuit, the Republicans claim, when an overvote was detected on a ballot, poll workers were to inform voters and allow them the opportunity to fix the error, reports NBC affiliate KPNX in Phoenix.Instead, the lawsuit claims, when issues with the vote tabulation machines happened, the poll workers would push a green button to override the error, or voters were asked to push the button. This caused an override that resulted in the vote not being counted.The lawsuit states:"Qualified electors casting ballots in person on Election Day in Maricopa County submitted their completed ballot to an electronic tabulation machine. Numerous voters were alerted by these devices to a facial irregularity in their ballot—frequently an ostensible 'overvote' — but were induced by poll workers to override the tabulator's rejection of the ballot in the good faith belief that their vote would be duly registered and tabulated. In actuality, overriding the electronic tabulator's alert automatically disqualifies the putative 'overvotes' without additional review or adjudication.?"The campaign says several county voters have complained about the issue."Poll workers struggled to operate the new voting machines in Maricopa County, and improperly pressed and told voters to press a green button to override significant errors," Trump 2020 campaign's general counsel, Matt Morgan said in a statement. "The result is that the voting machines disregarded votes cast by voters in person on Election Day in Maricopa County."The lawsuit demands overridden ballots be inspected manually, in the same way elections officials examined mail-in or drop-off ballots that were overvoted, KPNX reported.The campaign contended voters' choices were disregarded in those races, saying new voting machines were used on Election Day on Tuesday. The lawsuit suggested those votes could prove "determinative" in the outcome of the race between Trump and Democrat Joe Biden, who was declared the winner Saturday by major television networks.The Maricopa County Elections Department and a spokesman for Biden did not immediately respond to requests for comment.Biden currently leads Trump by 0.65%, or just over 21,000 votes in Arizona.The Trump lawsuit, whose plaintiffs include the Arizona state Republican Party and the Republican National Committee, cited declarations by some poll observers and two voters that claimed the problem led to rejected votes.Information from Reuters was used in this report.(7) Here’s Why Biden’s Pennsylvania Numbers Are Raising Voter-fraud Concernshttps://thenewamerican.com/heres-why-bidens-pennsylvania-numbers-are-raising-voter-fraud-concerns/by Luis Miguel November 8, 2020An analytical look at votes cast for Joe Biden, as well as the turnout itself, show several anomalies that put the legitimacy of the votes in doubt as the mainstream media has nearly universally declared the Democrat to be the "president-elect" of the United States.Two reports that together provide more than 10 pages of statistical analysis of raw voter data signal irregularities in the votes that boosted Biden’s vote tally in the crucial swing state of Pennsylvania.For example, in Philadelphia, the likelihood of the city’s voting outcome is as likely as someone flipping a coin 100 times and landing on heads every time, according to one of the reports.One point of note is that Biden strangely beat Barack Obama’s popular vote record and received several tens of thousands of more votes than registered Democrats in numerous counties. In some counties, the hike in Biden support totaled over 65,000 votes.In Montgomery County, where Obama/Hillary Clinton vote counts ranged from 233,000 to 256,000 votes, Biden received 313,000. Together, the 10 outlier counties provide 244,237 votes."The votes for Biden are unusually high for ten counties, reporting an excess of ~244,000 votes in excess of expectation. These deviations are legitimate reasons to insist on closely monitored recounts," the report reads.The second report comes to similar conclusions, specifically with regard to Montgomery, Chester, Cumberland, and Pike counties."But Biden soared in three predominately R counties, by 1.24 to 1.43 times greater than either Obama run or Hillary. This is a likely absurd result, that Biden would get that much more in these almost 50-50 D/R counties," the report asserts.Another key insight: Biden got the votes of 115 percent of registered Democrats. Usually the number hovers around 70 percent in national elections."Normally 70%± of PA registered voters vote in a national election. After elimination of Allegheny County, 115% of PA registered Democratic voters voted for Biden. That is a serious statistical aberration."Then there’s the fact that, per data provided by the State of Pennsylvania, a dramatic number of individuals cast ballots only for the presidential race; analysis shows this occurred exponentially more with Biden voters."Another way to track down fraudulent votes is to look closely at how many of the votes did little or no down-ticket voting. When manufacturing votes, it is too time consuming to vote for other office holders," the report states.This phenomenon occurred in other states; in Arizona, double the number of Biden voters as Trump voters only voted for the top of the ticket. In Michigan, it was triple the number.Additionally, the numbers for Biden in Allegheny County appear to violate Benford’s Law, a "standard voter fraud" identification method.Both reports urge recounts and close monitoring:Based on the concerns outlined herein, to correct any honest errors, and to eliminate the possibility of fraud, a well-supervised recount (where every vote is verified as being legitimate) is necessitated in at least these three Pennsylvania counties: Montgomery, Chester and Cumberland.Another oddity of the election: Only four incumbent presidents since 1912 did not win reelection. Yet in all cases, they lost with less votes than in the previous election.For example, President Taft’s votes fell from seven million to three million; Hoover’s went down from 21 million to 15 million; Carter’s from 40 million to 35 million; and George H.W. Bush’s from 48 million to 39 million.By contrast, if President Trump really does lose, he will be the first incumbent president to gain votes, almost seven million, and still lose reelection.What’s more, in all the key battleground states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Florida) the president increased his vote from 2016, in some cases considerably. In the case of the above-mentioned four failed incumbents, their vote decreased in all of these key states.As the old adage goes, "The numbers don’t lie." There are more than enough aberrations to prompt anyone serious about election integrity to want to take a deeper look at the numbers — and the ballots.If the Trump team can get the courts to take such a look, what will they find? And will it be sufficient to turn out a win for the sitting president?https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/rudy-giuliani-trump-campaign-has-enough-evidence-to-change-pennsylvania-election-resultsRudy Giuliani: Trump campaign has enough evidence to change Pennsylvania election resultsby Anthony Leonardi, Breaking News Reporter  | November 08, 2020 12:34 PMPresident Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani said he has evidence that may change the results of the presidential electoral map.In a Sunday interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Giuliani said the lawsuits being filed by the Trump campaign might reveal that up to 900,000 invalid ballots were cast in the state of Pennsylvania, a key election swing state several news outlets projected presumptive President-elect Joe Biden would win. "Do you believe that you have enough to actually change the fate of the election?" Bartiromo asked."Well, I think we have enough to change Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania election was a disaster," Giuliani said. "We have people that observed people being pushed out of the polling place. We have people who were suggested to vote the other way and shown how to do it. I'm giving you the big picture."Giuliani described details of its investigation in Pennsylvania, which may translate to new lawsuits this week, as early as Monday. He alleged Republican observers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, were "kept out of the room or kept away from the room" for 24-hours where mail-in ballots were counted, adding that 135,000 ballots were counted during that time period."Even though we went to court, and we were allowed to move 6 feet closer, the Democrat-machine people moved the counting place six feet further away. This is documented on videotape. There are upwards of 50 witnesses," Giuliani said, which would be the subject of a Monday civil rights lawsuit on Monday.Giuliani said the Trump team was also looking into whether ballots were cast in the name of people who are already dead and if ballots were "back-dated.""We have evidence now, from not only the Post Office but from others, that there was back-dating. I can only tell you right now that that amounts to about 2,000 or 3,000 votes," Giuliani said.In a statement released on Saturday through his campaign, Trump declared, "This election is far from over.""Joe Biden has not been certified as the winner of any states, let alone any of the highly contested states headed for mandatory recounts, or states where our campaign has valid and legitimate legal challenges that could determine the ultimate victor," the statement reads.On Friday, Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito ordered all Pennsylvania county boards of elections to segregate late-arrival ballots from the rest of the mail-in ballots during the counting process. However, Democrats in the state have said the Supreme Court should not involve itself in the election and that the election's outcome would be unlikely to change.According to Fox News chief White House correspondent John Roberts, sources tell him the president would "graciously concede" the election if unsuccessful in his legal efforts. "I’m told that, you know, in addition to the president wanting to see this done, the president is really being supported and being pushed to some degree by his family who want to make sure every legal vote was counted and that no illegal votes were counted," Roberts said.He added that if Trump "does not see a path to continuing in as the president of the United States, he will graciously concede and work on a peaceful and appropriate transfer of power," according to words given to him.Antifa Attacks Pro-Trump Stop the Steal Demonstratorshttps://thenewamerican.com/bidens-enforcers-antifa-attacks-pro-trump-stop-the-steal-demonstrators/Biden’s Enforcers? Antifa Attacks Pro-Trump Stop the Steal Demonstrators  by Luis MiguelNovember 9, 2020If this is how the Left reacts when they win, just imagine the anarchy that will ensue if President Trump pulls through.Violence erupted over the weekend between Antifa and supporters of the president at the Washington State capitol building. The pro-Trump crowed had gathered there to bring attention to the alleged voter fraud believed to be contributing to Joe Biden’s current electoral lead.They were in Olympia as part of the nationwide Stop the Steal movement. At one point, a clash broke out between the Trump supporters and members of Antifa who arrived on scene. Cellphone video posted by local citizen journalist Katie Daviscourt captured the moment when police use tear gas and less-lethal munitions to break up a fight.In a second video, two women tell Daviscourt that they were attacked by a man wearing a "gay pride" facemask and a Black Lives Matter agitator who began punching them until the man in the black sweatshirt stepped in to protect them before he, too, was assaulted.This comes as the mainstream media has by-and-large crowned Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 race and is even referring to him as "President Biden" and the "president-elect."In fact, no states have thus far certified their results. Counts, recounts, and legal challenges will all take place before the Electoral College selects the winner of the race in December, as established in the Constitution. [...](8) Evidence Mounts of a Stolen Election - Paul Craig Robertshttps://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/11/05/evidence-mounts-of-a-stolen-election/November 5, 2020Evidence Mounts of a Stolen ElectionPaul Craig RobertsUnited States Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney explains a special software developed by the National Security Agency that can be used to alter vote counts in elections. He explains the software and its use in this 7 minute video: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/the-cia-ability-to-hack-the-vote/ In this article, the Off-Guardian explains the use of the software to alter the outcome of the vote in Wisconsin and Michigan: https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/03/discuss-election-day/In this article the Fake News Site, CNN, attempts to explain away the obviously altered vote: https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/04/politics/why-mail-in-ballots-were-counted-late-in-states-like-pennsylvania-and-michigan/index.html Voting by mail greatly facilitates the use of the vote-altering software and the use of ballot dumps.  One reason for the mask mandate and Covid fear was to justify mass voting by mail.The media speaks with one voice.  The print, TV, NPR, social media, and the anti-Trump Internet sites exercise censorship and control the explanations.We are experiencing a well designed and successful coup against American democracy and accountable government.No, this is not a conspiracy theory.  It is a revolution against red state America.Republicans are too establishment to effectively fight back.  They fear that exposing and resisting a stolen election would discredit American democracy.  In effect, patriotism makes them impotent.Republicans should think instead what it means to be governed by a President covered in criminal scandal who also seems to be suffering mental confusion and is likely for one or both of these reasons to be moved aside.  If Kamala Harris becomes president, we will have in the Oval Office a female of color who hates white people and is vindictive against them.The Democrat Party is now in the hands of indoctrinated leftists who despise the working class and champion "oppressed minorities." Immigration floodgates will be thrown open. Red states will be cut out of the federal budget.  Gutsy Republicans such as Devin Nunes and Jim Jorden will be falsely investigated, and Trump will be falsely prosecuted.  The rest of us will be silenced in one way or the other.Think about how unlikely the Biden/Harris ticket is for success. Everyone knows that Biden suffers mental confusion. His campaign events were barely attended.  Harris had so little support in the Democrat primaries that she was the first to drop out.  Even the Democrats didn't want her; yet she ends up the Democrat VP choice. Americans watched as Democrat regimes in Minneapolis, Seattle, Portland, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and other cities responded to rioting and looting by hampering and defunding the police.How can such an unattractive party whose elected officials refused to enforce law and order win the presidential election?The answer is fraud.Whether or not you believe this report from a US Postal Service employee that he was ordered to backdate late mail-in ballots in Michigan, it serves as an example of how easy voting by mail makes vote fraud: https://www.rt.com/usa/505653-project-veritas-whistleblower-mailin-ballots/The threat posed to democracy by the software described by General McInerney is devastating. With such software in the hands of intelligence services, every election in every country can be decided behind the scenes.This makes it easier for elites to rule. The vote altering software turns democracy into a cover for self-interested rule.  Yes, elites have always tried to purchase elections, but now they can program them.I have often written that the digital revolution was the greatest threat humanity faces.  Proof piles up every day.Further reading:https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/trump-legal-adviser-jenna-ellis-discusses-magical-138000-michigan-biden-votes-appeared-nowhere-middle-night-video/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-michigan-county-discovered-omitting-votes-trump/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/going-minnesota-wisconsin-89-90-turnout-something-highly-unlikely/ (9) Off-Guardian: CNN suddenly attributed 138,339 votes to Biden in Michigan, not a single Trump votehttps://off-guardian.org/2020/11/03/discuss-election-day/Nov 3, 2020UPDATED: Election Day!Polls are open on the "battle for the soul of the nation", but who will win? And does it matter? [...]UPDATE 4/11/20: Trump held leads in five undeclared states – Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania and North Carolina – when all five stopped (or dramatically slowed) counting votes. Since then, a surge of postal votes wiped out Trump's lead in Wisconsin, giving the Biden the state by as few as 6000 votes.Pennsylvania's governor has stated there are "over a million" postal votes yet to be counted.Trump has declared that he should have won the election by now, and has hinted at a Supreme Court challenge. It certainly looks like we will see a "red mirage" – an appearance of a Trump win and then sudden Biden recovery, entirely due to postal ballots. Needless to say, rather suspicious.In this context it's a good time to revisit the "Transition Integrity Project", a series of exercises carried out over the summer of 2020 backed by the Protect Democracy foundation. Their alleged aim was to "ensure a peaceful transfer of power", but it doesn't take a genius to read between the lines here.Especially when you see the list of names involved – all current/former DNC employees and/or vociferous Trump opponents: Donna Brazille, John Podesta, Max Boot and Bill Kristol to name a few.In this document, released August this year, they lay out their conclusions. Including (bold in the original):The concept of "election night," is no longer accurate and indeed is dangerous. We face a period of contestation [sic] stretching from the first day a ballot is cast in mid-September until January 20. The winner may not, and we assess likely will not, be known on "election night" as officials count mail-in ballots.Remarkably prescient of them. *UPDATE 4/11/20 15:00: Are these signs of potential electoral fraud?Early in the morning CNN's rolling coverage map suddenly attributed 138,339 votes to Biden in Michigan, without recording a single vote Trump or any of three independent candidates:[click to enlarge]This jump almost completely destroyed Trumps 5% lead.Nate Silver's statistics and analysis website fivethirtyeight.com has been plotting the votes on graphs. Both Wisconsin and Michigan have sudden, vertical jumps for Biden at around 4am:It has been suggested that these are counties returning their results en masse,, which is technically possible, but if that were the case you'd expect a corresponding jump for Trump, even the most Democrat friendly areas of the country don't give Biden 100% of their votes.The best illustration of just how bizarre these events are, is the reaction of the CNN anchors. Watch how they handle Biden suddenly getting 109,000 new votes, and totally wiping out Trump's 4 point lead in Wisconsin in an instant:Video Player00:0001:11"Where did it come from?" Indeed. *Are social media going to clampdown on dissent or accusations of fraud? Last night, in a long-expected move, Twitter finally banned David Icke from posting. Whilst this was never explicitly said to be about the election, the timing was certainly suspect. (Whether you have any time for Icke or not, censorship is never OK).However, we are now beginning to see some election-related moves on social media.When Sean Davis, editor of The Federalist, pointed out the odd jumps in Biden's votes, Twitter slapped a warning on his tweet. Calling it "disputed" and "potentially misleading":If you see any similar examples of discussion of the election being controlled/censored, do please post them in the comments below or email them to us.(10) McConnell: Trump is "100% within his rights" to question election results and consider legal optionshttps://www.newsmax.com/us/mcconnell-trump/2020/11/09/id/996186/McConnell: Trump Legal Challenges Not the End of the RepublicMonday, 09 November 2020 04:08 PMDespite President-elect Joe Biden's victory, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Monday President Donald Trump is "100% within his rights" to question election results and consider legal options.The Republican leader's remarks, his first public comments since Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election, come as Trump's allies on Capitol Hill have been reluctant to congratulate Biden or push the president to accept the outcome.McConnell said the process will play out and "reach its conclusion."Trump has declined to concede the presidential race and is mounting legal fights, but there has been no indication or evidence of voter irregularities or widespread fraud in the election."Our institutions are actually built for this," McConnell said as he opened the Senate. "We have the system in place to consider concerns and President Trump is 100% within his rights to look into allegations of irregularities and weigh his legal options."Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said the Republicans' refusal to stand by the election results is "extremely dangerous, extremely poisonous to our democracy."Schumer said election lawsuits can be valid but they must be based in evidence and facts."Joe Biden won the election fair and square," Schumer said.(11) Ohio AG Asks Supreme Court To Overturn PA Ballot Ruling; GOP 'Observer' Challenge To Be Heardhttps://www.zerohedge.com/markets/giuliani-says-over-50-witnesses-600k-unlawful-ballots-pa-nevada-poll-worker-attestsby Tyler DurdenMon, 11/09/2020 - 16:35Ohio Attorney General has joined a bid to ask the US Supreme Court to toss the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's late-October ruling allowing late ballots to be counted.Two Georgia GOP Senators call on Republican Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger to resign over failure 'to deliver honest and transparent elections.'Pennsylvania Supreme Court agrees to hear GOP challenge over dozens observers who claim they were 'corralled' and unable to view count, which may invalidate up to 800,000 ballots.Nevada poll worker attests to outright fraud.Update 1635ET: Monday just keeps getting more and more interesting. As claims of fraud and invalidated ballots pile up, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) threw their support behind election challenges (implying there's a 'there' there).For starters, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has filed a 'friend of the court' brief with the Supreme Court in support of Pennsylvania Republicans, who want the USSC to overturn the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's late October ruling allowing absentee ballots which arrived up to three days after election day."The States need an answer to that question, which is certain to arise again in future elections. And it is important to provide that answer now because, without a ruling from this Court, doubts will continue to linger about whether the vote count in Pennsylvania was performed in conformity with the Constitution," reads the filing by Yost, which was also signed by Ohio Solicitor General Benjamin Flowers and Chief Deputy Solicitor General Michael Hendershot. (source: cleveland.com.Read the filing here.Next, two GOP Senators from Georgia have called on the state's Republican Secretary of State to resign over his alleged failure 'to deliver honest and transparent elections.'And as we noted earlier:*  *  *The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to consider a GOP challenge claiming that Republican observers were unable to oversee ballot counting, thereby invalidating hundreds of thousands of votes, according to Reuters.The decision to hear the case is separate from a challenge to the PA Supreme Court's ruling regarding ballots received after election day.The news comes as Rudy Giuliani says at least 50 GOP witnesses say they were 'corralled' by Philadelphia election officials on election day and 'weren't able to see a single ballot' counted behind closed doors. He claims that the roughly 800,000 votes counted after that 'are invalid.'Giuliani detailed the claims in an interview with Newsmax - where he announced that the first of five lawsuits will be filed on Monday in Pennsylvania 'challenging the entire vote on a number of grounds.'Pennsylvania prevented us from watching much of the Ballot count. Unthinkable and illegal in this country. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 9, 2020"In this lawsuit we have over 50 witnesses who will say that the vote count, particularly once the election ended that night and President Trump was ahead by 800,000 votes in Pennsylvania, the count thereafter was unlawful," said Giuliani, adding: "It was counted behind closed doors. Republicans were not given an opportunity to see any of the mail-in ballots as required by Pennsylvania law. Pennsylvania law requires that for a ballot to be valid, a mail ballot to be valid, it has to be observed by both sides.""We have 55 Republicans ready to testify that they were uniformly corralled and weren't able to see a single ballot. They saw a lot of activity, but no ballot. Every one of those ballots that was cast that was not examined, is now an illegal ballot - an unlawful vote. -Rudy GiulianiGiuliani continued: "Not just in Philadelphia, however, precisely the same thing was done in Pittsburgh. The only difference is - when a court intervened in Philadelphia they didn't follow the court order, and our people were threatened with arrest if we tried to look at the ballots. Whereas in Pittsburgh, halfway through, they allowed some observation. So the numbers of unlawful ballots in Philadelphia are about twice the number in Pittsburgh.""In this lawsuit we have over 50 witnesses who will say that the vote count was over 800,000 in Pennsylvania and the count was unlawful," @RudyGiuliani tells Newsmax TV."We have 55 Republicans ready to testify." https://t.co/ srdu4pta pic.twitter.com/faBDeJhvqk — Newsmax (@newsmax) November 9, 2020Over the weekend, Giuliani told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo "This is documented on videotape. There are upwards of 50 witnesses. And this will be the subject of a lawsuit that we file tomorrow for violating civil rights, for conducting an unfair election, for violating the law of the state, for treating Pittsburgh and Philadelphia different than the rest of the state, which is an equal protection violation, which goes under Bush vs. Gore."Meanwhile in Nevada, a Clark County poll worker has claimed in a sworn affidavit that proof of residence data was fabricated for illegal voters, among other claims.The whistleblower claims that they worked 13 out of 14 days during early voting 'from October 17th - 30th,' where they 'had concerns over election polling place intimidation and voter fraud.'In a new sworn affidavit, a whistleblower with the Clark County Elections Department in Nevada claims Nevada poll workers fabricated proof of residence data for illegal voters. So far, Nevada Attorney General @AaronDFordNV has taken no action to investigate credible fraud claims. pic.twitter.com/GVdBiRHlGq— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 9, 2020Among the whistleblower's claims:Voters without valid ID were told to go to the parking lot and simply 'make an appointment with the DMV' - after which they were allowed to vote."We were told by [redacted] (my team leader), and two other assistants to advise people who wanted to register to vote and did not have the proper Nevada ID/Driver's license that they could go out in the parking lot and make an appointment with the DMV to get a Nevada ID/Driver's License, and then bring in proof of their appointment confirmation (either a paper copy or show it on their phone to us) and then they would be registered.""We were told to add two zeroes ("00") to the DMV confirmation number and put it where the Driver's License/ID number was supposed to go when we filled in the registration form on line."A 'Biden/Harris bus, tent, or table was in the parking lot' with 'speakers, dancers, music and other festivities' and were offering 'food, drink, and political memorabilia to voters.'"Our team leader [redacted] had to go out several times a day to tell the Biden/Harris team they had to stay 100 feet from the location doors. As they would give folks signs to carry up to the door coming to vote. The Biden/Harris bus and/or van was there 7-8 days out of the 14 days."Unopened ballot envelopes were opened and filled out against the side of the Biden/Harris van."I personally witnessed two people handing multiple unopened mail in ballot envelopes to two other people who then opened and filled out the ballots against the side of the Biden/Harris van. The same two people who marked the ballots then put the marked ballots in official pink and white envelopes. These individuals were not poll workers." ..."By my final walking lap, there were 5 or 6 additional people who formed a human wall, which moved as I walked by, apparently in an attempt to block my view of the four people who were opening envelopes, marking ballots, and placing those ballots in the pink and white return envelopes."On Saturday, the Clark County Registrar of Voters, Joe Gloria, acknowledged that his office had received reports of potential voter fraud, but that they wouldn't investigate them until after the election is completed."We do have some reports that have come in that we're logging for reporting. But we're definitely going to do an investigation, and we'll deal with them once the canvass is finished," said Gloria. "The votes are in the system at this point, so we'll have to after the election, post-election, go after anything that's been reported at this time."(12) Censoring Donald Trump is more "dangerous to democracy" than anything he says - Off-Guardianhttps://off-guardian.org/2020/11/08/censoring-donald-trump-is-more-dangerous-to-democracy-than-anything-he-could-ever-say/Censoring Donald Trump is more "dangerous to democracy" than anything he could ever sayOligarchs and social media giants are now claiming a monopoly on "the truth", that should worry everyoneKit KnightlyThe media have called the election for Biden, but the counting goes on and there is a legal case in the offing. But whoever emerges from this deluge of sludge, fraud and propaganda to become president of the United States, there has undoubtedly already been one big loser – freedom of speech.Late on Tuesday night/early Wednesday morning, Donald Trump – the elected President of the United States – emerged from the White House to make a speech.He accused the Democratic party, the political establishment, the media and tech giants/social media companies of working together to steal the election and put Biden in the Whitehouse.You likely didn’t see all of it, because most of the mainstream news channels simply refused to broadcast it. Watch this clip:Video Player00:00 00:21Earlier that night, MSNBC had cut away from Trump’s first speech claiming victory, with anchor Brian Williams claiming it was "not rooted in reality" and "dangerous".Social media companies were doing the same thing. Within hours of it being set up Facebook deleted a group protesting the election result, while twitter reduced the President’s timeline to this:  This isn’t about defending Donald Trump, or even agreeing that the election was rigged (although there is plenty of evidence to suspect as much). This is about a principle. Donald Trump is the elected head of state, and he is being denied a platform to address the people he represents by the faceless servants of corporate media oligarchs.This is a terrible, terrifyingly awful precedent to set.The owners of Comcast or Warner Bros or Disney or Facebook or Twitter are not elected officials. They have no legal authority, and thus no accountability. Yet they are claiming the right to determine what elected officials can and cannot say to the people who elected them.There is a strain of thought that this kind of censorship is justified. "Spreading disinformation puts lives at risk", they say. "If the media stopped people lying we wouldn’t be in this mess" or "the news should only broadcast the truth!".The argument goes that "allowing Donald Trump to "publicly undermine our democratic institutions will erode the public trust and could lead to violence."But I would argue that empowering billionaires to hold a monopoly on "the truth" is far more dangerous to democracy than anything Trump could ever say.To people inclined to disagree, I leave these five questions. Answer them, if you can:Who made the decision to censor the elected President of the United States? Who granted them this power? Whose interests do they serve? To whom are they accountable? In the future, who gets to decide "the truth"?