Archives‎ > ‎

Dominion Voting Systems is Deep state - Peter Myers Digest

(1) Dominion Voting Systems is Deep state. It is owned by Staple Street Capital, with ties to Carlyle Group & Soros(2) Elizabeth Warren to WSJ: "Private-equity firms ‘have taken over nearly all of the nation’s election technology."(3) Texas found that Dominion machines can be connected to internet, with risk of hacking(4) CIA's Scorecard & Hammer hack voting machines to change votes during data transfer(5) Whistleblower: election software was designed to "rig elections," "he saw it happen in other countries"(6) Dominion Voting used in EVERY SWING STATE! In Michigan it switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden(1) Dominion Voting Systems is Deep state. It is owned by Staple Street Capital, with ties to Carlyle Group & SorosSoros is a partner in Carlyle Group where he has invested $100 million<> counted the votes? Who are the stakeholders in Dominion Voting Systems?by WorldTribune Staff, November 10, 2020Dominion Voting Systems, which is at the center of the #Glitchgate scandal in the contested 2020 election, was acquired by private equity firm Staple Street Capital in July 2018.Staple Street Equity was founded by former members of the George Soros-funded Carlyle Group. Executive Director of Carlyle Group, William Kennard, is director of Staple Street Capital.Kennard was appointed FCC chairman during the Clinton administration and was appointed Ambassador to the European Union during the Obama era. On Nov. 6, Bloomberg reported that Kennard was named as the next chairman of AT&T Inc."Team Obama literally bought the voting machines and software being used to count the votes in this election," an independent media member noted.Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell said in a Fox News interview that Democrats had invested in the use of Dominion Voting Systems to commit "fraud" on elections."They have invested in it for their own reasons and are using it to commit this fraud to steal votes. I think they’ve even stolen them from other Democrats in their own party who should be outraged about this also," Powell said.Dominion has links to companies with deep ties to the Washington, D.C. deep state.A 2014 State of California document indicated that Dominion’s agent of record at that time was Boston lawyer Michael Bevilacqua of Wilmer Hale. Former special prosecutor Robert Mueller works for that firm.A 2020 filing lists Dominion’s registered agent as Florida-based Cogency Global. Its directors were listed as Hootan Yaghoobzadeh of Staple Street Capital, Stephen Owens, also of Staple Street, and Benjamin Humphreys. Yaghoobzadeh and Owens have past ties to the Soros-backed Carlyle Group.Federal Election Commission records show Dominion Voting Systems employees donated almost exclusively to Democrats in the 2020 election, with the majority of those donations going to ActBlue, a nonprofit technology organization established in June 2004 that enables left-leaning nonprofits.Dominion has a lock on a third of the voting machine market in the U.S., including all the battlegrounds states. The firm has come under scrutiny in the days following the Nov. 3 vote with voting problems reported in Michigan and Georgia. The glitches reported thus far only switched votes from Republican to Democrat.The New York Times reported that "Georgia records list eight registered lobbyists for Dominion. One of them is Lewis Abit Massey, a former Democrat Georgia secretary of state who once ran for governor."Problems with the Dominion system were documented in 2019 in Pennsylvania. reported that Jefferson County started using Dominion systems and "poll workers reported problems with Sharpie markers bleeding through the paper ballots and causing them to be rejected."Dominion Voting Systems is listed as a $25,000-$50,000 donor to the Clinton Foundation in 2014 and is listed on the Clinton Foundation website as one of their "commitments to action".Nadeam Elshami, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s former chief of staff who last year became a lobbyist for Dominion, and Richard Blum, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s husband, who she said is a significant shareholder in the company.In March 2019, Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, who ran for president in the Democrat primaries, and three other top Democrats sent a letter to the top executives of Hart InterCivic, Election Systems & Software and Dominion Voting Systems, saying the companies should do far more to upgrade their products."The integrity of our elections is directly tied to the machines we vote on — the products that you make," says the letter from Klobuchar, Mark Warner of Virginia, Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Gary Peters of Michigan. "Despite shouldering such a massive responsibility, there has been a lack of meaningful innovation in the election vendor industry and our democracy is paying the price."[Note: A Twitter thread on how to compromise Dominion’s systems is getting much attention.](2) Elizabeth Warren to WSJ: "Private-equity firms ‘have taken over nearly all of the nation’s election technology —
and how they do business is clouded in secrecy." Democrats Raised Concerns About Dominion Voting Technology in 2019ASHLEY OLIVER13 Nov 2020Democrat leaders, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (MA), Amy Klobuchar (MN), and Ron Wyden (OR), wrote a letter in December 2019 to the private equity firms controlling the United States’ three leading election technology companies, expressing concern in the letter about the election technology industry’s "vulnerabilities" and "lack of transparency."The letter was sent on December 6, 2019, to three private equity firms, taking issue with "vulnerabilities and a lack of transparency in the election technology industry and the poor condition of voting machines and other election technology equipment," Warren’s office said of the letter. The letter sought information about what role the firms had in perpetuating the technology issues.The letter was sent to the following:H.I.G. Capital, investing in Hart InterCivicMcCarthy Group, investing in Election Systems & SoftwareStaple Street Capital, investing in Dominion Voting SystemsAt the time, those three election technology companies facilitated 90 percent of voters, the letter noted, citing the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.Today, Election Systems & Software and Dominion Voting Systems facilitate more than three-quarters of voters, while Hart InterCivic was "quietly sold" by its owner, H.I.G. Capital, in April of this year, according to an October 28, 2020, report from the Wall Street Journal, which also cited Wharton School.Dominion entered the spotlight in the days following the election after unofficial results were reported erroneously in Antrim County, Michigan — one of many locations that utilizes Dominion’s software for its elections. The results attracted attention late on election night after showing presidential candidate Joe Biden (D) leading President Donald Trump in the heavily red county. A statement from Michigan’s secretary of state explained the error was an "isolated user error" and not a software error.Gwinnett County, Georgia, which also utilizes Dominion’s software, experienced a delay in vote counting because of an unknown issue with the software. The county reported that Dominion technicians had resolved the issue by November 8 and that the county was able to count its remaining ballots that day.Trump’s campaign and many Republican pundits have sounded alarms over the voting technology, but the letter from leading Democrats in 2019 indicates concerns may be bipartisan.The Democrats’ letter identified a multitude of issues, at one point referencing a Vice report, saying, "In 2018 alone ‘voters in South Carolina [were] reporting machines that switched their votes after they’d inputted them, scanners [were] rejecting paper ballots in Missouri, and busted machines [were] causing long lines in Indiana.’"The letter also noted that around 20 election technology vendors had competed in that market in the early 2000s but that the vendors have since consolidated to where only a few control the "vast majority of the market."Warren told the Journal in an email, "Private-equity firms ‘have taken over nearly all of the nation’s election technology—and how they do business is clouded in secrecy.’" Staple Street Capital, which purchased Dominion in 2018, reportedly partially responded to the Democrats’ letter at the time, while the other two firms did not respond.Dominion issued a vehement statement Friday fully rejecting various accusations that have been circulating about the company since the election. Dominion said that it "categorically denies false assertions about vote switching issues with our voting systems," that the company is nonpartisan, and that "assertions of voter fraud conspiracies are 100% false."Write to Ashley Oliver at Texas found that Dominion machines can be connected to internet, with risk of hacking Does A "Glitch" Become A Coup? It's Time to Regulate America's Fly-by-Night Voting Machine MonopolyNovember 15, 2020Robert BridgeIt’s a frightening thing to consider, but the ultimate success of democracy in the United States largely hinges on the integrity of just three voting machine companies, which conduct their affairs with almost no government oversight and regulation. Unless that changes, the greatest democracy will start looking like a banana republic in the eyes of the world.In January 2020, the CEOs of the three companies that produce over 80 percent of voting machines in the U.S. – Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Dominion Voting Systems and Hart InterCivic – were grilled by members of Congress over the question of security at the ballot box. Perhaps it would surprise exactly nobody that the 90-minute discussion focused almost entirely on the possibility of foreign actors, specifically China and Russia, interfering in the U.S. election system. Within such a predictably narrow frame of reference – Russia! Russia! Russia! – it becomes much easier to eliminate the possibility that domestic actors may also be tempted to tamper with the vote. At the same time, Russia provides the perfect smokescreen in the event someone gets caught with their hand in the election cookie jar. But already I digress.Currently, Dominion Voting Systems, the supplier of voting machines in 28 states, is coming under fierce scrutiny after it was reported that thousands of votes in one Michigan country intended for Donald Trump went to his challenger, Joe Biden. Officials were quick to point out that the ‘glitch’ was due to silly "human error," as opposed to any mechanical flaws with the voting machines.According to Michigan state government website, "[T]he erroneous reporting of unofficial results … was a result of accidental error on the part of the Antrim County Clerk (who) accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results."While I am no computer specialist, it is hard to imagine how a software update would have done anything to prevent one candidate from receiving the votes intended for another unless it was originally programmed to behave that way. But again, I am no expert.Another state that relies heavily on Dominion Voting Systems is Georgia, which received 30,000 new voting machines last year – "the largest rollout of elections equipment in U.S. history," according to the Government Technology newsletter. Following the announcement of the $107 million contract, the same newsletter foretold of problems down the road, saying the "new voting system is expected to be quickly challenged in court by voters who say it remains vulnerable to hacking and tampering, despite the addition of paper ballots."Those fears were quickly realized on the morning of Nov. 3, Election Day, when a technological glitch wreaked havoc on voting in two Georgia counties (a side note to this story is that Georgia officials blamed the abrupt pause in vote counting on a burst pipe at Atlanta’s State Farm Arena. Thus far, however, officials have not been able to produce any evidence that such an incident took place).While the source of the ‘glitch’ is still under investigation, one state ballot supervisor, Marcia Ridley, initially told POLITICO on Nov. 3 that Dominion, which prepares the poll books for counties before elections, "uploaded something last night, which is not normal, and it caused a glitch." That reported incident prevented staff from programming the voter smart cards for the voting machines. Ridley continued, "That is something that they don’t ever do. I’ve never seen them update anything the day before the election."However, Dominion officials, while admitting there was a problem with the poll books, deny there was any last-minute update made to the poll books after Oct. 31 (a press release by Dominion countered this and other allegations, including that the Pelosi family, the Feinstein family, or the Clinton Global Initiative has any relationship with the company).And here is where things get interesting.Ridley went on to say that Dominion assured her that "no system can be updated remotely without the knowledge of [the company]," indicating that an update could not have been made without detection. In other words, there appears to be a backdoor channel for Dominion Voting Systems to connect to the internet, and, as everybody knows, whatever appears on the internet is fair game for hackers.Has Pennsylvania ever sent blank ballots to constituents? If yes, what eventually happened to those blank ballots?— Ron (@CodeMonkeyZ) November 12, 2020In fact, it was exactly that concern that helped dissuade the state of Texas from also purchasing the dodgy Dominion system.In a letter from Brandon Hurley, a voting systems examiner, addressed to Keith Ingram, Director of Elections in Texas, it was determined that "some of the hardware in the Democracy 5.5-A System can be connected to the internet through Ethernet ports."Later in the letter, it was emphasized again that "[W]ithout question, one or more of the components of the 5.5-A System can be connected to an external communication network and this can only be avoided if the end-user takes the proper precautions to prevent such a connection."On Wednesday, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced the state would perform a hand-recount of presidential ballots before certifying the results of its election. According to the New York Times, Biden leads the incumbent Trump by 14,000 votes.In hindsight, how could voting software named Dominion not have a nefarious purpose?— Keith Preston (@KeithPreston) November 12, 2020Whatever the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, which also had to wrangle with the influx of millions of mail-in ballots amid a pandemic, it will certainly go down in the history books as one of the most chaotic, controversial and fraud-prone contests in U.S. history. The tragedy is that this fiasco, which is making America look ridiculous on the global stage, could have been avoided. There have been numerous attempts to sound the alarm on the vulnerability of voting machines to accurately tabulate the results of an election, and not least of all the ongoing Trump-Biden showdown, which will determine the political, cultural and economic trajectory of the United States long into the future.It is the opinion here that, judging by everything we know and don’t know about how the 2020 presidential election was organized, the only realistic option is to hold a nationwide recount. It is simply impossible to expect millions of American voters from either side of the political aisle to hold any doubts over an election of such tremendous consequence. Yes, a recount would be a massive undertaking, but the future peace and tranquility of the nation, already partisan to the breaking point, depends upon it. Once the recount is accomplished, the next task should be a congressional task force to examine ways of securing U.S. elections in the future, while holding the voting machine companies to severe government control and regulation. The days of monkey-wrenching U.S. elections must end.(4) CIA's Scorecard & Hammer hack voting machines to change votes during data transfer Voting Systems, Hammer And Scorecard, And The US General ElectionNovember 9, 2020 by Rose TaylorWhat is Dominion Voting Systems?Dominion voting systems is a Canadian based company that produces products intended to aid in elections. They have products for everything election-related including building the election, voting and tabulating, tallying and reporting, and auditing the election, according to their website. They boast to have "Comprehensive, non-alterable audit logs" as well as "Physical security seals and locks." This company, whose US headquarters are located in Denver, Colorado, is one of the major companies that provide election hardware and software to many jurisdictions in the United States.In 2010, Dominion Voting Software acquired Premier Election Solution, or PES, (formerly Diebold Election Systems) from Election Systems & Software (ES&S), which is another major player in the election hardware/software market in the United States. It is important to note that ES&S was required to sell off PES because of anti-trust concerns.Who Owns Dominion Voting Systems? It appears that a company called Staple Street Capital LLC owns Dominion Voting Systems according to Bloomberg. New Right Network is aware of claims that a company called Avid Technology is connected to Dominion Voting Systems but has been unable to verify that connection at this time. We are researching and will update this article accordingly if a verifiable connection is found.Staple Street Capital LLC is a privately owned company based in New York. It is not a publicly-traded company so there is no outside ownership reported. Bloomberg lists the Executives and board members. This information is now available, but it is important to note that NBC reported in 2019 that these big voting machine companies had come under scrutiny for secrecy involving their ownership, security, oversite, and finances.The name changing, secrecy, and selling of these companies that we use to have "secure elections" is alarming. New Right Network reported in 2018 on Diebold, the company whose name changed to Premier Election Solutions and is now owned by Dominion Voting Systems. Trying to trace the ownership and implementation of these voting systems can be a dire task, as the information is not uniformly available and leads to many dead ends.Historical Problems with Voting SystemsThere are several types of vote tallying that can be used in elections. Other than the traditional hand-counting method, digital voting machines offer a variety of options. According to Ballotpedia, these types of voting options are optical scan paper ballots, direct-recording electronic systems, and ballot-marking devices and systems. A list of the descriptions of these, along with what each state uses can be found here.As with any method, there is some error that occurs. When everything is happening as it is supposed to, that error is inconsequential.Contrary to what some might claim, software "glitches" do not result in widespread vote changes. Software is programmed to complete an action and in the event that something malfunctions, it would more likely present as a more obvious problem. When an issue occurs, like switching votes cast for one candidate to another it is more likely the result of programming.Following the 2016 Election when widespread claims of Russia "hacking the election" were being reported daily, our digital voting systems were brought to the forefront. We now know that the Russia claims were, in fact, disinformation. However, the Guardian reported in 2019 that "the Russians successfully breached at least one company [voting system] and installed malware on the company network." Moreover, they continued that "Intelligence agencies expect cyberattacks from Russia, China, and other nations against America’s democracy to continue in 2020."There has, historically, been much concern about the security and vulnerability of voting machines. The same Guardian article cited an example that came out of the 2017 Defcon hacking conference. Computer scientists released a report on how they hacked voting systems and the subpar computer programming found on them. Despite concerns, specifically raised just last year by the left, the use of these machines continued. Specifically, in Georgia, it was reported that they rushed to switch over to Dominion Voting Systems in all precincts ahead of the 2020 election despite critics saying that it will leave elections vulnerable.The AJC reported that Andrew Appel, an election security expert at Princeton University, said that "the touchscreen ballot-marking devices and optical scanners of the new system are easily hackable." This is the type of device that Dominion Voting Systems installed in Georgia. Moreover, there was an ongoing federal lawsuit asking a judge to order Georgia to hand-marked paper ballots. The lawsuit "argues that ballot-marking devices could be tampered with or fail to produce accurate results."Dominion Voting Systems and the 2020 General ElectionAll of this information is important in understanding what is happening now. Post-2020 General Election there have been many claims of voting irregularities and "glitches." In Michigan, a clerk reported a "glitch" that caused 6000 votes cast for President Trump to be tabulated for Candidate Joe Biden. Once this was discovered and manually fixed, it changed the outcome of the county in favor of President Trump. Another reported "glitch" in Georgia caused voting software to be down for several hours on Election Day after an "overnight upload."Learning what we have about these systems and their programs and statically what is true about software glitches, it is increasingly unlikely that a glitch occurred. We know that concerns about these voting machines, specifically the Dominion Voting System machines, were raised prior to this election by the Democrats. The vulnerabilities of hacking these machines have already been exposed and well documented.The president has been warning of the possibility of voter fraud in the 2020 election for months. More impressively, the Democrats have talked about a ‘rigged election’ since 2016. They have highlighted the vulnerabilities of our system, demanded transparency, and heavily warned of a ‘stolen election.’ Even going so far as to advising Candidate Joe Biden to "not concede under any circumstances." Given all that we know, it would be prudent to investigate any and all claims of voting irregularities, including ones that defy statistics like Benford’s Law, to ensure a free and fair election – no matter the outcome.Hammer and Scorecard ConnectionIt is important to note the Dominion Voting Systems software’s presence in our voting system. It has been called out previously for being "easily hacked." This software is used all over the country, including every single key swing state. If a computer scientist at a "hacking convention" can successfully hack a voting machine, then it can be deduced that someone with a great deal of knowledge would be able to do the same.For those that do not know, Hammer is a software developed for the CIA designed to penetrate secure systems (like voting systems) without detection. While this was originally designed to be used only against foreign countries, whistleblower, and the person who designed the software, Dennis Montgomery revealed that under the Obama administration this software was used to surveille domestically.This software designed for the CIA could have easily been used to access the already vulnerable voting systems. Used along with the app "Scorecard" this could have led to a premeditated attempt to switch votes. Scorecard works in conjunction with Hammer to change votes at a rate of just 3% during the data transfer portion of voter tabulation. The results would have been slight enough that poll workers may not have noticed the discrepancy.Dominion Voting System claims that their voting systems have "Comprehensive, non-alterable audit logs." Could that mean that a footprint was left that could be the "forensic evidence" that Sydney Powell, attorney to General Flynn, spoke about? As more and more evidence is revealed of irregularities in voting tabulation, it is a reasonable move to request that all irregularities are examined and an audit of all votes tallied through these machines be completed.Concerning Connections with Dominion Voting SystemsHidden in plain sight is the fact the Dominion Voting Systems is connected to the infamous Clinton Foundation. On the Clinton Foundation website, there is a "commitment to action" on the DELIAN project with none other than – Dominion Voting Systems. The Clinton Foundation has been under fire for numerous scandals in the past not to mention that former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton herself has a stake in the present election.Clinton has stated on numerous occasions that President Trump is an ‘illegitimate president’ and alleged that the 2016 election was ‘stolen from her.’ Moreover, she was the person who advised candidate Joe Biden to "not concede under any circumstances." At the very least, this connection is odd.Media Blackout on Hammer and ScorecardWith valid questions being asked about the transparency of this election, the media continues to assert that "widespread voter fraud does not exist." This is after four years of almost non-stop reporting on "Russia Collusion" where the main talking point was "Russia hacking our voting systems." Not only that, Fox News, who recently iced out their voter base by joining the left-leaning media, reported in 2019 that someone was able to buy a "key" of the internet that gave them access to our voting machines!More evidence is being brought to light almost daily. Most recently Gateway Pundit reports that another "glitch" was uncovered, this time in Wisconsin that will result in a 19,500-vote gain for President Trump. This change will make the race in Wisconsin a toss-up although it was previously called for candidate Joe Biden by most major News Networks.The mainstream media seems intent on refusing to acknowledge the voter fraud that they warned of is potentially happening. They have even went as far as calling candidate Joe Biden "President-Elect." Projected calls by the media do not decide elections. When an election is this highly contested, the media should refrain from making calls. In the event that the alleged voter fraud is not only proven but swings the election, there could be major ramifications of this early call.New Right Network is actively researching Dominion Voting Systems as well as Hammer and Scorecard. As we are able to verify information, it will be added to this article. Please check back for more information. If you have any tips on these topics, you can send them to info@newrightnetwork.comRose Taylor(5) Whistleblower: election software was designed to "rig elections," "he saw it happen in other countries" Lawyer Sidney Powell: "We're Getting Ready To Overturn Election Results In Multiple States"Mon, 11/16/2020 - 06:12Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities."We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states," Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation."I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up," she added, saying that elections software switched "millions of votes" from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to "rig elections," saying that "he saw it happen in other countries," referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines."We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose," Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has."They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even," she said, adding that operations "can watch votes in real-time" and "can shift votes in real-time," or alleged bad actors can "remote access anything.""We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning" that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems."(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process," wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago."These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack."Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has "detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable" in states where officials believe they have valid systems.During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.Companies RespondThe Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity agency issued a statement on Thursday calling the 2020 general election the "most secure in American history," despite multiple legal challenges alleging a variety of alleged voting irregularities across a number of battleground states."The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result," read the statement released by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).Smartmatic, in a statement on Saturday, said that it has no ties with Dominion Voting Systems. Powell suggested that Smartmatic is operated by Dominion in the interview.Dominion, over the past several weeks, has repeatedly denied its systems were compromised in some way."In the aftermath of the 2020 general election, there has been a great deal of misinformation being circulated about Smartmatic and other companies that provide election technology to voting jurisdictions in the US. We would like to dispel these incorrect statements with facts," the firm wrote, adding that it "has never owned any shares or had any financial stake in Dominion Voting Systems."Dominion also refuted allegations that its machines changed votes from Trump to Biden on Election Day and beyond."Dominion Voting Systems categorically denies any claims about any vote switching or alleged software issues with our voting systems," a company spokesperson said in a statement to The Denver Post. "Our systems continue to reliably and accurately count ballots, and state and local election authorities have publicly confirmed the integrity of the process."(6) Dominion Voting used in EVERY SWING STATE! In Michigan a manual recount found it switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden Mike Adams, <> Natural News:Five days ago, we published a breaking story that was originally uncovered by Dave Janda (<>, detailing the use of CIA-developed software to steal votes by intercepting voting machines and switching Trump votes to Biden votes. That story is entitled, "<>RED ALERT: Dems collude with CIA to launch intelligence operation that ALTERS voting machine results in Pennsylvania and other swing states." (See full video interview below, which was banned by YouTube.)Earlier today it was discovered that a software "glitch" in Michigan had switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden. The glitch was discovered when an effort was made to manually review the ballots, revealing that thousands of votes were switched by the software. This was announced by state GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox, who stated:In Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said ‘tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the vote.’ Since then, we have now discovered the 47 counties used the same software in the same capacity… Antrim County had to hand count all of the ballots, and these counties that used the software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies.So 47 other counties in Michigan were using the same software. This means the Michigan vote was stolen from Trump, and we are actually being subjected to a cyber warfare assault on America.The same vote rigging software is used in every swing stateNow, we are <>learning from The Gateway Pundit that this same software was used in all swing states, including PA, GA, NV, MI, WI, AZ and MN.The software is ominously named "Dominion." The project to deploy this software is called both "Project Hammer" and "Operation Scorecard."As TGP reports:Dominion Software is used in 47 US states including ALL OF THE BATTLEGROUND STATES.The Dominion software "glitch" ONLY took votes from President Trump and Republicans.Dominion is used in 30 different states.Dominion is used in EVERY SWING STATE!NevadaArizonaMinnesotaMichiganWisconsinGeorgiaPennsylvaniaAnd NUMEROUS COUNTIES in Georgia also used the software!!This is turning into a MASSIVE scandal!Democrats thought this "glitch" would be enough to beat Donald Trump.They had no idea he would have the greatest landslide and vote totals in US history!So then they had to dump Hundreds of Thousands of ballots in to the swing states they lost!Watch the original interview with Dave Janda that YouTube censoredThe original interview that broke this story was published by Dave Janda. It was an interview with Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney. As I wrote several days ago:Dave Janda of Operation Freedom (<> has unleashed a bombshell story with huge implications for Tuesday’s elections. Janda’s guest in his latest broadcast is a former high-level intelligence official (Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney) who warns that the Dems and the CIA have put in place a mechanism which can alter the voting results of electronic voting machines in key swing states (like Pennsylvania) that will determine the outcome of the election.