(1) Wynne government targets 'mother' and 'father' (2) Ontario to redefine the Family: 'Mother', 'Father' replaced by Up to 4 'Parents' (3) Ontario Gov't to erase the words "mother" and "father" from Ontario laws (4) Universities impose "Bias Free Language Guide" requiring "Inclusive Language" (5) University of New Hampshire "Bias Free Language Guide" (6) 'State Feminism' in Sweden - Leo Schmit (7) Gay Marriage Debate leads to Suicide, Australian Parliament should decide without Plebiscite (1) Wynne government targets 'mother' and 'father' http://www.torontosun.com/2016/10/16/wynne-government-targets-mother-and-father By Joe Warmington, Toronto Sun First posted: Sunday, October 16, 2016 03:27 PM EDT | Updated: Sunday, October 16, 2016 03:56 PM EDT "Mother" may soon be replaced in Ontario law by the term "birth parent." That’s what’s incorporated in amendments contained in the Liberal government’s proposed Bill 28 which is designed to change the "Children’s Law Reform Act, the Vital Statistics Act and various other acts respecting parentage." Premier Kathleen Wynne’s government says a new All Families Are Equal Act will modernize the definition of families. "People in Ontario value diversity and equality — that’s why all parents and their kids need to be treated equally under the law," said Wynne spokesperson Clare Graham. [...] Many religious and ethnic groups — also upset about "age inappropriate" introduction of sexual and gender identity teachings — are preparing for battle, too. "The premier is re-engineering the family," said Charles McVety, of Canada Christian College. "She removes ‘mother’ 17 times. Removes ‘father’ 23 times. The Act is amended by striking out the ‘mother’ and substituting it with ‘birth parent’ and ‘father’ with the word ‘parent.’" However Graham countered "there is no one way to start and raise a family" and offered assurances that the terms "mother and father" will remain on a child’s birth certificate. "We’re proposing to update Ontario’s parentage laws so that parents who have a baby with the help of a doctor don’t need to spend their money on a lawyer and go to court just so they can be their own kid’s parents," said Graham. "The best thing for a kid is that there is no uncertainty about who their parents are. At the end of the day, this is about ensuring that all kids are treated equally by recognizing the legal status of their parents no matter if their parents are LGBTQ2+ or straight, and no matter if they were conceived with the help of a doctor." Progressive Conservative MPP Randy Hillier last week argued there needs to be more time for study, insisting the bill was introduced with too much haste. And McVety agreed the government is rushing the bill through, calling it a "war on mothers" which could lead to the breakdown of the traditional family. "Mothers are the bedrock of society and their love gives life," said McVety. "A mother can take the place of all others but no one else can take the place of a mother." Yu added everything is moving so fast that the bill hasn’t been translated into Chinese languages, excluding some from the democratic process. "The government is trying to erase all trace of biological parents from these children for an ideological motive," she said. "It’s just unnatural." Meanwhile, with focus on the Blue Jays games, will public hearings at Queen’s Park Monday and Tuesday be noticed? McVety will speak to the committee at 5:40 p.m Monday. Yu is slated to speak at 5:40 p.m. Tuesday. There are 20 others on the agenda. Interesting debate. My feeling is modern family realities need to be accepted in law but it’s insulting to eliminate the words "mother and father." They need to restore that. But Wynne spokesperson Graham said the bill merely updates legal wording to comply with today’s norms. "The reality is, family structures are diverse, and there are many people who need a doctor’s help to have a baby," said Graham. "The definition of who is a parent in Ontario law hasn’t been updated since 1978 — a lot has changed since then. Right now, that definition is too narrow and excludes parents of modern families." Ironically, soon it could also exclude the words "mother" and "father." (2) Ontario to redefine the Family: 'Mother', 'Father' replaced by Up to 4 'Parents' http://www.christianpost.com/news/ontario-seeks-redefinition-of-family-mother-father-replaced-by-up-to-4-parents-171235/ Ontario Seeks Redefinition of Family; Mother, Father Replaced by Up to 4 'Parents' Fathers Can Absolve Themselves of Parental Responsibilities By Samuel Smith Christian Post November 1, 2016|12:09 pm The Legislative Assembly of Ontario is quickly pushing a bill that would make it so that children could have up to four legal parents and would also give biological fathers the right to absolve themselves from being listed on a child's birth certificate just by signing a waiver, critics are warning. Bill 28, the LGBT All Families Are Equal Act, was introduced on Sept. 29 and seeks to give non-biological parents the right to be listed on a child's birth records as a "parent" without having to spend thousands on adoption and legal fees to be legally recognized as legal guardians. As the bill is supported by Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and has quickly advanced to the Standing Committee on Social Policy, opponents argue that the legislation "turns on its head the former understanding of 'family,' which consisted of individuals united by marriage, blood and adoption." In order to accommodate for same-sex couples and the changing definition of marriage, the bill lists a number of circumstances when the terms "mother" and "father" should be replaced with terms like "birth parent" and "parent." Charles McVety, the president of Canada Christian College, said in an interview with the Toronto Sun that the bill removes the word "mother" 17 times, while removing the word "father" 23 times. "The premier is re-engineering the family," McVety said. "The Act is amended by striking out the 'mother' and substituting it with 'birth parent' and 'father' with the word 'parent.'" "Mothers are the bedrock of society and their love gives life," McVety added. "A mother can take the place of all others but no one else can take the place of a mother." Additionally, the legislation allows for a birth parent to "enter into a pre-conception parentage agreement with one or more persons in which they agree to be, together, parents of a child yet to be conceived." "Subject to the meeting of specified conditions, including that there be no more than four parties to the agreement, on the birth of a child contemplated by the agreement, any party to the agreement who is not otherwise a parent of the child also becomes a parent of the child," the legislation explains. The social conservative nonprofit Real Women of Canada has spoken out strongly against the bill. Additionally, nearly 20,000 concerned individuals have signed an online petition condemning the legislation. "Bill 28 provides among its provisions that a child may have four parents, allowing a partner of the same-sex couple who has no blood ties with the child to become the parent of the child automatically, without adoption," a statement from Real Women of Canada notes. "[S]perm donors (fathers) are no longer deemed to be a parent of the child conceived; apart from a surrogacy agreement, there is no reference to the relationship of an ovum donor (the mother) to the child; and 'mother,' 'father,' are no longer mentioned on birth certificates." Clare Graham, a spokesperson for Premier Wynne, told the Sun that the bill merely updates legal wording to comply with the changes over the last decade since gay marriage was legalized in 2003. "The reality is, family structures are diverse, and there are many people who need a doctor's help to have a baby," Graham said. "The definition of who is a parent in Ontario law hasn't been updated since 1978 — a lot has changed since then. Right now, that definition is too narrow and excludes parents of modern families." Another aspect of this bill is that it could allow for a man to have sex with a woman, impregnate her and be able absolve himself from being listed as the father if he just signs a simple agreement with the mother, Toronto Sun columnist Joe Warmington wrote. The bill states: "This section is deemed not to apply to a person who provides his own sperm for use in conceiving a child without the use of assisted reproduction if, before the child is conceived, the person and the intended birth parent agree in writing that the person providing the sperm does not intend to be a parent of any child conceived as a result." Warmington argues that such a provision allows for "an agreement where a man is nothing more than a sperm donor — with no financial or emotional commitments." "A friend of mine told me as a homosexual man, he has been 'assisting some of my lesbian friends' in having children by 'donating my sperm to them' without any middle player or corporation involved that 'allows them to conceive a child' without having to go through a sperm bank or with dealing with registering a father," Warmington wrote. "In this scenario, prior to the Bill 28, this arrangement could technically force my friend to be a legal father," he explained. "But the new rules allow both the male and the female to agree to sign away his responsibility. It means he can help many female friends have children without repercussions." Warmington adds that the legislation does not require the written notice to be notarized. "Just write it on a post-it note before going to bed and you can sign away your responsibility as a father," McVety told Warmington. "It is sad that Bill 28 will allow a man to write an agreement before sex that absolves himself of paternal responsibility." (3) Ontario Gov't to erase the words "mother" and "father" from Ontario laws http://www.therebel.media/wynne_liberals_move_to_erase_words_mother_and_father_from_ontario_laws Wynne Liberals move to erase words "mother" and "father" from Ontario laws Brian Lilley The Rebel October 18, 2016 Ontario’s Liberal government is getting ready to scrap the words "mother" and "father" from our laws because they say family composition is different now but really, this is about social engineering. I’ve read through Bill 28, otherwise known as the "All Families Are Equal Act" and will show you how truly bizarre it is. Wynne and the Ontario Liberals have taken a Newspeak mentality to the next level with this legislation that erases human terms like ‘mother’ and ‘father’ in what amounts to an attack against the nuclear family. If you agree, sign Faith Goldy’s petition at SaveMomAndDad.ca, and remember to share this video and petition with your friends, family and neighbours to make sure this legislation isn’t rushed through without any opposition or debate. (4) Universities impose "Bias Free Language Guide" requiring "Inclusive Language" http://www.therebel.media/university_s_bias_free_language University's "Bias Free Language Guide" bans "American," "diabetic" and the phrase "Dogs smell funny" Ezra Levant The Rebel August 03, 2015 The University of New Hampshire is a pretty pricey, fancy college, but I wouldn't go there if you paid me. That's because of their "Bias Free Language Guide." It covers "microagressions" -- including "micro-insults" -- plus offenses against "ageism, sexism, racism" and other "-isms." The guide gets off to a bad start with its dubious definition of "democracy" and goes downhill from there. It's Orwell's 1984 except it isn't fiction. Here's an actual example from the guide: You shouldn't say "Dogs smell funny" in front of a blind person with a seeing eye dog. Another "problematic" word? "American." A major contributor to the guide is Melissa Harris-Perry, a pundit on far left MSNBC who, among other things, wore tampon earrings on the air and mocked interracial adoption. Is this the intellectual and moral role mode a university needs? Anyway, after this 5000 word guide showed up on their website, something interesting happened... Here's a copy of the guide so you can see how crazy it is yourself: https://www.girardatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Bias-Free-Language-Guide-Inclusive-Excellence-073015.pdf Uni Wisconsin Madison: https://academicaffairs.ucsd.edu/_files/aps/adeo/Article_Guide_to_Bias-Free_Communications.pdf (5) University of New Hampshire "Bias Free Language Guide" https://www.girardatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Bias-Free-Language-Guide-Inclusive-Excellence-073015.pdf What is "Inclusive Language"? Inclusive Language is communication that does not stereotype or demean people based on personal characteristics including gender, gender expression, race, ethnicity, economic background, ability/disability status, religion, sexual orientation, etc. Identities Matter and Words Matter Identities are personal. It is important to realize that each person will define their own identity. Identity terms are meant for individuals to use to identify themselves and not for us to identify them. You will find various definitions depending on culture, places of origin, generation, etc. When appropriate, ask how a person wishes to be identified, and please remember that identity terms are meant for individuals to use to identify themselves and not for us to identify them. Use inclusive language to emphasize or focus the reader’s attention on similarities, equality and respect. Conversely, avoid using language that detracts from the sense of value of the whole person and avoid terms that exclude, marginalize, diminish or lower the status of any individual or group (e.g., "us and them" constructions). If you don’t know what to say, just ask the individual how they prefer to be identified. In addition, avoid stereotypes and words that are derived from negative assumptions e.g., using the expression "going Dutch" for "splitting the bill". MICRO-AGGRESSIONS A micro-aggression is a subtle, often automatic, stereotypical, and insensitive behavior or comment or assumption about a person’s identity, background, ethnicity, or disability. Micro-aggressions may be intentional or non-intentional. They may be experienced daily by some people. The messages may be delivered in verbal, behavioral, and environmental forms (residing in the "climate" of an institution or in the broader society). For example, when women in the workplace enter a conference room where portraits of past CEOs or boards of directors are honorifically displayed, and they are all men. The implicit message is that women are less competent and/or that women may not be selected for leadership in that organization. Mico-aggressions are delivered in many forms - politely or negatively. "I don't think your daughter is capable of doing that because of her disability", a school principal may say to a parent in front of the student - ignoring her presence completely. Forms of Aggression Micro-assault, verbal attack Example: "Why do you need a wheelchair? I saw you walk... You can walk, right?" to a person who is using a mobile chair for long-distance travel. Example: "Dogs smell funny" to a blind person using a guide dog. Micro-insult, a form of verbal or silent demeaning through insensitive comments or behavior Example: A person exhibits a stubborn, begrudging attitude, that they will accommodate an accessibility request. The verbalization is appropriate but the tone seems insulting. Micro-invalidation, degrading a person’s wholeness through making false assumptions about the other’s ability, causing a sense of invalidation. Example: "You have a learning disability? How can you be a lawyer?" to a person with a learning disability. Example: "The new international student is having language challenges." (More appropriately, we would say that the new international student is concentrating on learning a new language.) Watch the Metaphors "Bipolar," "autistic," "schizo," and "ADD" are words that should not be thrown around in conversation. These words are descriptors of real psychiatric disabilities that people actually possess. They are not metaphors for everyday behaviors that happen to bug us. When used to describe people you hate, you imply that the disabilities themselves are something to be hated. Note: Most disabilities are not diseases. Do not refer to a person with a disability as a patient unless that person is in a hospital or care facility. In the context of occupational or physical therapy, the term client is preferable. Potential Issues Although the majority of disability advocacy groups and members of the disability community generally accept the term "disability," there are some who believe that even the term "disability" itself is pejorative. Some people may often prefer to use terms such as "differently abled" and/or may characterize a disability as simply a difference rather than any sort of impediment, for example, members of Deaf Culture. Again, it is advisable to ask people how they would they like to be addressed whenever it is relevant to the situation. Remember, most of us will possibly face being disabled at some point in our lives; whether it comes sooner or later depends on our circumstances. Glossary of Language Focus: It’s important to remember that we come from diverse backgrounds and experiences that foster our full identities. We are not just what appears on the surface to be our singular or perceived dominant identity. Preferred: "non-disabled" is the preferred term for people without disabilities. problematic: normal, able-bodied, healthy or whole Preferred: person who is blind/visually impaired Problematic: blind person, "dumb" Preferred: person who is deaf or hard-of-hearing Problematic: deaf person, Deaf-and-Dumb, Deaf-Mute Preferred: person with a speech/communication impairment Problematic: dumb, speech impediment Preferred: person who is learning disabled, person who has a cognitive disability, person with a learning or cognitive disability, persons with intellectual and developmental disability Problematic: retarded, slow, brain-damaged, special education student Preferred: person with a psychiatric disability; person with a mental health condition Problematic: mentally ill, hyper-sensitive, psycho, crazy, insane, wacko, nuts Preferred: wheelchair user, person who is - wheelchair mobile, physically disabled, quadriplegic, paraplegic Problematic: handicapped, physically challenged, invalid, "special", deformed, cripple, gimp, spaz, wheelchair-bound, confined to a wheelchair, lame Preferred: seeking help for emotional mental health, person who identifies as having an emotional disability Problematic: emotionally disturbed Preferred: cognitively/developmentally delayed/disabled, person with a cognitive/developmental delay or disability, person with an intellectual disability Problematic: retard, mentally retarded, special ed student Preferred: someone of short stature, little person Problematic: dwarf, midget Preferred: person "living with" a specific disability, (i.e. "someone living with cancer or AIDS") Problematic: victim, someone "stricken with" a disability (i.e. "someone stricken with cancer" or "an AIDS victim") "Afflicted with", "stricken with", "suffers from", "victim of", and "confined to" are terms that are based on the assumption that a person with a disability is suffering or living a reduced quality of life. Instead, use neutral language when describing a person who has a disability. Not every person with a disability 'suffers,' is a 'victim' or is 'stricken.' Instead simply state the facts about the nature of the person's disability, preferably in the way that they have told you they want to be identified. RACE, ETHNICITY, CULTURE AND IMMIGRANT STATUS The following is a list of terms that arise when referring to race, ethnicity and culture. Glossary of Language Preferred: Black or African American Problematic: negro, negroid, colored person, dark Preferred: U.S. citizen or Resident of the U.S. Problematic: American Note: North Americans often use "American" which usually, depending on the context, fails to recognize South America Preferred: North American or South American Problematic: American: assumes the U.S. is the only country inside these two continents. Preferred: People of Color Problematic: Colored, Non-White Note: In the U.S. context, "People of Color" usually refers to Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American, Latino/a, Hispanic, African American and biracial/multiracial people and should not be used synonymously with "Black" or "African American." Preferred: use the specific name of the country on the continent; Africa; e.g., Egypt, Ethiopia Problematic: Africa, which is a continent of many countries Note: "African" is a broad term. Even though we know Africa as one of the seven continents, citizens prefer to identify with their country of origin, such as Ethiopian or Nigerian. Preferred: Western Asian, Northern African people Problematic: Arabs Note: The people of these regions of the world identify according to their genealogical, linguistic, or cultural backgrounds. When applicable, tribal affiliations and intra-tribal relationships play an important role in their identity. Preferred: White people, European-American individuals Problematic: Caucasian people Preferred: international people Problematic: foreigners Preferred: Undocumented* immigrant or worker; person seeking asylum, refugee Problematic: illegal alien *Although preferable to illegal (when we call a person illegal, we imply that they are an object), this term lacks recognition of the person’s humanity first. Preferred: bi-racial people, multi-racial individuals when it is relevant to state this in a communication Problematic: mixed race people, mulatto [...] SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY You will find various definitions of sexual orientation among people of varying cultures, places of origin, generations, etc. Gender Pronoun Guide (Click Here ? ? ? ) Some people may not feel comfortable using traditional gender pronouns (she/her, he/him) to fit their gender identities. Transgender, genderqueer, and gender-variant people may choose different pronouns for themselves. The attached guide is a starting point for using pronouns respectfully. Glossary of Language Preferred: Sexual Orientation, Sexual Identity Problematic: Sexual Preference The scientifically accurate term for an individual’s enduring physical, romantic and/or emotional attraction to members of the same and/or other sex, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and heterosexual (straight) orientations. Avoid the offensive term "sexual preference", which is used to suggest that being gay or lesbian is voluntary and therefore "curable." Preferred: Gay, Lesbian, Same Gender Loving (SGL) Problematic: "Homosexual" "Homosexual" is an outdated clinical term considered derogatory and offensive by many gay and lesbian people. Gay and/or lesbian accurately describe those who are attracted to people of the same sex or gender. Same Gender Loving is sometimes used among African American sexual minority individuals. Preferred: Sexual Minorities, Queer, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) Problematic: People of an alternative "lifestyle" (when referring to sexuality) "Lifestyle" is an inaccurate term used by anti-gay extremists to denigrate lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lives. As there is not one straight lifestyle, there is not one lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender lifestyle. Queer, historically a derogatory term, has been reclaimed by many sexual minorities and their allies. Queer is often used as an umbrella term to describe lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, transgender, and questioning (of sexuality and/or gender identity). Preferred: People with intersex characteristics, individuals with ambiguous sexual organs Problematic/Outdated: Hermaphrodites Intersex can be used when describing a person whose biological sex is ambiguous. There are many genetic, hormonal or anatomical variations that make a person’s sexual organs ambiguous (e.g., Klinefelter Syndrome). Parents and medical professionals usually assign intersex infants a sex and perform surgical procedures to conform the infant’s body to the chosen assignment. Note: the intersex community speaks out against non-consensual, premature and unsound practices. The term intersex is not interchangeable with or a synonym for transgender. Preferred: Sexual Reassignment Surgery (SRS), Gender Reaffirming Surgery, Gender Confirming Surgery Problematic/Outdated: Sex Change Refers to surgical alteration, and is only one small part of transition (see transition directly above on intersex characteristics). Not all transgender people choose to, or can afford to have Sexual Reassignment Surgery. Journalists and researchers should avoid overemphasizing the role of SRS in the transition process. Glossary of Terms Biphobia The fear, hatred and/or dislike of people who are or are perceived to be bisexual. Note: This includes prejudice, discrimination, harassment and acts of violence. It can often manifest as discrediting or doubting the existence of bisexuality. [...] Gender Identity A person's internal definition of self as man, woman, or transgendered. One's gender identity may or may not be conguent with one's biological sex or traits typically associated with one's biological sex. Not to be confused with sexual orientation, which determines one's primary attraction to another gender. Hetero-normativity The presumption that heterosexuality is universal and/or superior to other sexual orientations Example of perpetuation of hetero-normativity - seeing a ring on a woman’s finger and saying "congratulations, what’s his name?" This illustrates the assumption that the woman is heterosexual or that she is in a relationship with a person of male gender. Note: Even though it may seem this way in some relationships where one person is more masculine and/or feminine than the other, the idea of someone being "the man" and the other being "the woman" is a reflection of a hetero-normative society. Heterosexism Prejudice, bias, or discriminations based on the presumption that heterosexuality is universal and/or superior to other sexual orientations. Homophobia The fear, hatred and/or dislike of people who are attracted - or are perceived to be attracted to a person of the same sex or gender. Note: Homophobia may result in acts of prejudice, discrimination, harassment and violence. It is possible for someone who is attracted to people of the same gender to be homophobic. This is called "internalized homophobia", which means having negative feelings toward oneself because we live in a homophobic society – or something like that. [...] Sexual Orientation A person’s innate, enduring physical, emotional and/or spiritual attraction toward others Note: This attraction is typically, but not always, specific to a particular gender (or to multiple genders). For example, some people are attracted only to men or women; other people are attracted to both men and women, and some others’ attractions transcend gender (e.g., they are attracted to specific traits or characteristics, regardless of their gender). Sexual behavior is an action that a person chooses, but that action does not necessarily define a person’s orientation as gay, straight, bisexual, pansexual or asexual. Transphobia The fear, hatred, and/or dislike of people who are/or are perceived to be outside of the socially constructed systems of sex and/or gender. Note: Transphobia may result in acts of prejudice, discrimination, harassment and violence. WOMEN AND GENDER [...] Gender Pronoun Guide (Click Here ) Some people may not feel comfortable using traditional gender pronouns (she/her, he/him) to fit their gender identities. Transgender, genderqueer, and gender-variant people may choose different pronouns for themselves. The attached guide is a starting point for using pronouns respectfully. [...] 1. Include all people in general references by substituting gender-neutral words and phrases for gender-biases words. Example Recommended mankind people, humanity, human beings man-to-man defense one-to-one defense man the operation staff the operation manpower labor, human resources layman’s terms ordinary terms man hours staff hours, hours manmade manufactured, synthetic, artificial [...] 3. Avoid gender-biased pronouns by: a) Dropping pronouns that signify gender and restructur- ing the statement. (6) 'State Feminism' in Sweden - Leo Schmit Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 04:39:33 +0000 (UTC) From: leo schmit <leoschmit@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Compulsory Gay indoctrination of schoolchildren under the misnomer "Safe Schools" Good morning Peter, I am always very pleased to receive your postings. This morning I thought about checking my blog-bookmarks (on relevance) and found the professorsblog from Sweden, quite interesting on 'state feminism' in Sweden. According to Swedish state feminism 'men are animals, a machine, a mobile dildo, an emotional parasite' I am sure the subject will come back, since Assange has not yet been freed and his prosecutors in Sweden are still well resourced with state funds to promote 'state feminism' in the courts. Let me copy the relevant links: http://professorsblogg.com/2016/03/10/the-psychiatric-origins-of-swedish-state-feminism-an-analysis-of-the-satanism-theses-of-eva-lundgren/ http://professorsblogg.com/2016/03/10/swedish-state-feminism-men-are-animals/ http://professorsblogg.com/2016/03/09/on-the-swedish-origins-of-state-feminism/ http://professorsblogg.com/2016/03/10/the-anti-scientifc-method-of-state-feminism/ (7) Gay Marriage Debate leads to Suicide, Australian Parliament should decide without Plebiscite http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2016/04/03/lgbti-mental-health-marriage_n_9587570.html?utm_hp_ref=australia Marriage Equality Debate Harming LGBTI People's Mental Health Posted: 03/04/2016 07:08 AEST Updated: 03/04/2016 07:08 AEST The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists has raised concerns over alarming statistics around the mental health of LGBTI people, throwing its weight behind the push for marriage equality on health grounds. The RANZCP published a position statement this week, 'Recognising and addressing the mental health needs of the LGBTI population.' The paper outlines that the college is "concerned that a disproportionate number of Australia and New Zealand’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) population experience mental illness and psychological distress." "Evidence shows that discrimination and marginalisation experienced by the LGBTI population increases the risk of developing mental health issues, and also creates barriers to accessing supportive services." As we outlined in February, in the wake of the Safe Schools Coalition debate, LGBTI people are between three and fourteen times more likely to commit suicide than heterosexual Australians, one in six young LGBTI people have attempted suicide, and one in three have self harmed. "LGBTI identity has historically been criminalised, pathologised or invisibilised by the legal and medical institutions of Australia and New Zealand," the RANZCP wrote in its position statement. "Legal and medical institutions are becoming increasingly inclusive. Same-sex marriage was legalised in New Zealand in 2013 but is not currently legal in Australia. The RANZCP supports marriage equality based on the evidence that legislative inequality has a significant and deleterious impact on mental health and conversely, that there is a strong link between improved health outcomes and legislation change of this sort." The college said it supported marriage equality being legislated in Australia, for the positive mental health effects it would have on LGBTI people. "The RANZCP emphasises the importance of ongoing, respectful dialogue with those on both sides of the marriage equality debate in Australia, and the need for any discussion around the plebiscite to keep the mental health of vulnerable young people as a priority" said RANZCP President Professor Malcolm Hopwood in a statement. "Research shows intersex individuals exhibit levels of psychological distress comparable to people who have experienced several physical or sexual abuse. "These statistics show that for many individuals sadly expressing their sexuality can still be a distressing or traumatic experience due to discrimination they experience from their community, and our society at large. This can increase the likelihood of people experiencing mental health disorders." -- Peter Myers website: http://mailstar.net/index.html |
Archives‎ > ‎