Archives‎ > ‎

Peter Myers Digest: Conspiracy to cover up the Lab Origin of COVID

(1) Meryl Nass MD: conspiracy to cover up the Lab Origin of COVID(2) 5,165 Deaths Reported Following COVID Vaccines(3) Seven U.S. boys report chest pain, heart inflammation after 2nd dose of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine(4) YouTube censors President Bolsonaro and CNN Brazil over videos about HCQ(5) Fauci lifted ban on Gain-of-Function virus experiments in 2017 without Admin approval(6) Report on collapse of WTC7(7) COVID vaccines are experimental, not FDA approved; you have the right to decline, without fear of job loss(1) Meryl Nass MD: conspiracy to cover up the Lab Origin of COVIDbetween the five authors of the Nature paper and the heads of the NIH, NIAID and Wellcome Trust to cover up the lab origin of COVIDhttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fauci-emails-top-public-health-officials-lies-covid-origin-treatments/06/04/21Fauci Emails: How Top Public Health Officials Spun Tangled Web of Lies Around COVID Origin, TreatmentsCould four key public health officials have been intimately involved in the creation of the pandemic, as well as the prolongation and improper treatments used during the pandemic?By  Meryl Nass, MDIn early 2020, there was a lot of chatter about where the virus, later named SARS-CoV-2, actually came from.In an excellent, detailed article written earlier this month for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, former New York Times science writer Nicholas Wade described how two short pieces published in March 2020 — one in The Lancet and one in Nature Medicine — determined how this chatter would be channeled to the public.These two extraordinarily influential pieces, each published under the heading "correspondence," were parroted by mainstream media for a year. Both were plainly intended to shut down any discussion of the possibility that the virus originated in a lab.Listen here as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and I discuss these issues: <>As I read both the Lancet and Nature papers in March 2020, it became immediately apparent each was designed as a propaganda tool. Neither was based on science.I was so intrigued by these articles, I searched the web to better understand them. That's when I discovered Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), who had blogged on March 26, 2020, about the Nature article, suggesting the article should put an end to conspiracy theories about lab origin.Collins wrote:"Either way, this study leaves little room to refute a natural origin for COVID-19. And that's a good thing because it helps us keep focused on what really matters: observing good hygiene, practicing social distancing, and supporting the efforts of all the dedicated health-care professionals and researchers who are working so hard to address this major public health challenge."I wondered why five otherwise credible scientists would sign their names to the Nature article — and why Collins would endorse the article's conclusion — when the arguments made in the paper were nonsensical, in my opinion.I eventually concluded the authors had been put up to writing the paper by a "hidden hand."How had I reached that conclusion, even before Dr. Anthony Fauci's emails were uncovered Wednesday?Months ago, in another email drop obtained by U.S. Right to Know, we learned Peter Daszac, CEO of the nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, was the primary but hidden author of the Lancet article.Daszac was also the primary beneficiary of the article's conclusion — that the virus evolved in nature — as his organization had been used as the pass-through to send money from the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed by Fauci, to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in Wuhan, China. (Some might consider this method of giving out grants as a fancy way of money laundering.)Daszac, like Fauci, earned more than $400,000/year. He was also a member of the World Health Organization's (WHO) COVID origins investigative team, and had been selected as the head of the Lancet COVID origins investigative team, which appears now to be dead in the water.The WHO and the Lancet thus seem to be co-conspirators, choosing the fox (Daszac) to guard the henhouse (the theory that COVID evolved in nature).The release Wednesday of Fauci's emails, obtained by BuzzFeed News through the Freedom of Information Act, help to further clear up some of the mystery behind why five well-known scientists co-authored drivel — which the venerable Nature journal published, and which was then used as the foundation to support the natural origin theory.One of the emails strongly indicates Andersen, lead author of the Nature paper, knew he was participating in a con job. In a Feb. 1, 2020, email to fauci, Andersen expressed his own concerns about some of the "unusual features of the virus." Andersen appears to be worried these features suggest laboratory tampering.But Andersen then reassures Fauci these "unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered."Fauci emailIn another email to Fauci, Andersen thanks three incredibly important people — Fauci, Collins and Sir Jeremy Farrar — for their "advice and leadership" regarding the paper. All three are M.D. researchers who dole out more money for medical research than anyone else in the world, with the exception perhaps of Bill Gates.Fauci emailFauci runs the NIAID, Collins is the NIH director (nominally Fauci's boss) and Farrar is director of the Wellcome Trust. Farrar also signed the Lancet letter. And he is chair of the WHO's R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group, which put him in the driver's seat of the WHO's Solidarity trial, in which 1,000 unwitting subjects were overdosed with hydroxychloroquine in order to sink the use of that drug for COVID.Farrar had worked in Vietnam, where there was lots of malaria, and he had also been involved with SARS-1 there. He additionally was central in setting up the UK Recovery trial, where 1,600 subjects were overdosed with hydroxychloroquine.Even if Farrar didn't have some idea of the proper dose of chloroquine drugs from his experience in Vietnam, he, Fauci and Collins would have learned about such overdoses after Brazil told the world about how they mistakenly overdosed patients in a trial of chloroquine for COVID. The revelation was made in an article published in the JAMA in mid-April 2020. Thirty-nine percent of the subjects in Brazil who were given high doses of chloroquine died, average age 50.Yet the Solidarity and Recovery hydroxychloroquine trials continued into June, stopping only after their extreme doses were exposed.Fauci made sure to control the treatment guidelines for COVID that came out of the NIAID, advising against both chloroquine drugs and ivermectin. Fauci's NIAID also cancelled the first large-scale trial of hydroxychloroquine treatment in early disease, after only 20 of the expected 2,000 subjects were enrolled.What does all this mean?There was a conspiracy between the five authors of the Nature paper and the heads of the NIH, NIAID and Wellcome Trust to cover up the lab origin of COVID.There was a conspiracy involving Daszac, Fauci and others to push the natural origin theory. (See other emails in the recent drop.)There was a conspiracy involving Daszac to write the Lancet letter and hide its provenance, to push the natural origin theory and paint any other ideas as conspiracy theory. Collin's blog post is another piece of this story.Farrar was intimately involved in both large hydroxychloroquine overdose trials, in which about 500 subjects total died.Farrar, Fauci and Collins withheld research funds that could have supported quality trials of the use of chloroquine drugs and ivermectin and other repurposed drugs that might have turned around the pandemic.Are the four individuals named here — Fauci, Daszak, Collins and Farrar —  intimately involved in the creation of the pandemic, as well as the prolongation and improper treatments used during the pandemic?For more background, read by two earlier posts on this subject from March and April 2020. I don't want to take credit improperly for these discoveries — Dan Sirotkin noticed and wrote about the Nature article before I did, and wrote lucidly about it. I did not see his writing until much later.(2) 5,165 Deaths Reported Following COVID Vaccineshttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-data-deaths-reported-following-covid-vaccines/06/04/21Latest VAERS Data Show: 5,165 Deaths Reported Following COVID VaccinesVAERS data released today showed 294,801 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 5,165 deaths and 25,359 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and May 28, 2021.By Megan RedshawVAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It's free.This week's number of reported deaths among all age groups following COVID vaccines passed the 5,000 mark, up 759 from last week, according to data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Today's data show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and May 28, a total of 294,801 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 5,165 deaths — an increase of 759 over the previous week. There were 25,359 serious injuries reported, up 3,822 compared with last week.Among 12- to 17-year-olds, there were 40 reports of heart inflammation and 16 cases of blood clotting disorders.From the 5/28/21 release of VAERS data.In the U.S., 292.1 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of May 28. This includes 123 million doses of Moderna's vaccine, 158 million doses of Pfizer and 11 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.Of the 5,165 deaths reported as of May 28, 24% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 16% occurred within 24 hours and 38% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.This week's data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:4,740 total adverse events, including 117 rated as serious and four reported deaths among 12 to 17-year-olds. The youngest deaths reported include two 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918 and 1242573), a 16-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1225942) and one 17-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1199455). There were other reported deaths in children under 17 that could not be confirmed or contained obvious errors.635 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to17-year-olds with 97% of cases attributed to Pfizer's vaccine, 2% to Moderna and 0.31% (or two cases) to J&J.40 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) all attributed to Pfizer's COVID vaccine.16 reports of blood clotting disorders, all attributed to Pfizer.This week's total VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020, to May 28, 2021, for all age groups show:17% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.52% of those who died were male, 45% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.The average age of death was 74.4.As of May 28, 1,831 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 596 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.Of the 2,876 cases of Bell's Palsy reported, 52% were reported after Pfizer vaccinations, 41% following vaccination with the Moderna vaccine and 253 cases, or 9%, of Bell's Palsy cases were reported in conjunction with J&J.280 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome with 46% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 40% to Moderna and 20% to J&J.83,684 reports of anaphylaxis with 40% of cases attributed to Pfizer's vaccine, 51% to Moderna and 9% to J&J.5,159 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 2,213 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 1,617 reports to Moderna and 1,289 reports to J&J.Seven cases of heart inflammation reported in teen boys, new study showsOn June 4, The Defender reported seven boys between the ages of 14 and 19 in the U.S. reportedly developed chest pain and heart inflammation within four days of receiving a second dose of the Pfizer vaccine, according to a study published today in Pediatrics.Heart imaging tests detected a rare type of heart muscle inflammation called myocarditis and pericarditis. None of the teens were critically ill but all were hospitalized.Only one of the seven boys in the Pediatrics report displayed evidence of a possible previous COVID infection, and doctors determined none of them had a rare inflammatory condition linked with COVID or pre-existing conditions. It is possible myocarditis or pericarditis may be an additional rare adverse event related to systemic reactogenicity, but currently no causal association has been established between this vaccine and myopericarditis, the authors concluded.A search in VAERS revealed 628 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, among all age groups reported in the U.S following COVID vaccination between Dec.14, 2020 and May 28. Of the 628 cases reported, 392 cases were attributed to Pfizer, 206 cases to Moderna and 27 cases to J&J's COVID vaccine.Of the 628 total cases of heart inflammation, 40 cases occurred in children ages 12 to 17, all attributed to Pfizer's COVID vaccine.CHD Calls on FDA to Take COVID Vaccines Off the Market - Submit a CommentIsraeli health officials find probable link between Pfizer vaccine and heart inflammationAs The Defender reported June 2, Israeli health officials found a probable link between Pfizer's COVID vaccine — which the country has relied on almost exclusively in its vaccination drive — and dozens of cases of heart inflammation in young men following the second dose.A study by Israeli health officials identified 275 cases of myocarditis in Israel between December 2020 and May 2021, including 148 cases that occurred within a month after vaccination. Of those 148 cases, 27 occurred after the first dose and 121 after the second dose. About half of the cases involved people with previous medical conditions.Many of the cases were reported among men 16 to 30 years old, and most often in 16- to 19-year-olds. Most of the patients were discharged from the hospital in less than four days, and 95% of the cases were considered mild.New research shows COVID vaccine spike protein travels from injection siteOn June 3, The Defender reported on research obtained by a group of scientists showing the COVID vaccine spike protein can travel from the injection site and accumulate in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and in "quite high concentrations" in the ovaries.COVID vaccine researchers had previously assumed mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like traditional vaccines. The vaccine's spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the injection site at the shoulder muscle or local lymph nodes.The new research for the first time provided scientists the opportunity to see  where messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination."Woman who almost died after J&J vaccine stuck with $1 million in medical billsAs The Defender reported June 2, a 38-year-old woman who suffered multiple organ failure from J&J's COVID vaccine said victims should be compensated by the government for taking the risk.Kendra Lippy was diagnosed with severe blood clots resulting in 33 days of hospitalization. She suffered organ failure, and was left without most of her small intestine — and with crippling medical bills.Lippy's case was one of the six that led federal agencies to temporarily pause the J&J shot in mid-April.Because the government shielded vaccine makers from liability, Lippy can't sue J&J. She also doesn't have a legitimate legal route to sue the government. The only current option for people who have suffered COVID vaccine injuries is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which turns down most applicants. Fewer than one in 10 people receive compensation after applying.According to data from CICP, more than 701 claim filings since 2010 have been received from individuals requesting compensation for injuries. Of the 701 claims, only 29 claims were compensated totaling $6 million. Another 452 claims were deemed ineligible. There are 210 cases pending. As of May 26, CICP had received 152 claims involving COVID vaccines, and 293 involving other treatments.Moderna applies for full FDA approval of its COVID vaccineOn June 1, CNBC reported Moderna asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for full U.S. approval of its COVID vaccine — the second drugmaker in the U.S. to seek a biologics license that will allow it to market the shots directly to consumers. The mRNA vaccine is currently only approved under an Emergency Use Authorization, which was granted by the FDA in December. The FDA approval process is likely to take months.On May 10, the FDA amended the Emergency Use Authorization for Pfizer's COVID vaccine to include 12- to 15-year-olds. On May 7, the vaccine maker also applied for full approval of its vaccine. Currently, only Pfizer's vaccine is approved for emergency use in the 12 to 15 age group.88 days and counting, CDC ignores The Defender's inquiriesAccording to the CDC website, "the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated."On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. After repeated attempts, by phone and email, to obtain a response to our questions, a health communications specialist from the CDC's Vaccine Task Force contacted us on March 29 — three weeks after our initial inquiry.The individual received our request for information from VAERS, but said she had never received our list of questions, even though employees we talked to several times said CDC press officers were working through the questions and confirmed the representative had received them. We provided the list of questions again along with a new deadline, but never received a response.On May 19, a CDC employee said our questions had been reviewed and our inquiry was pending in their system, but would not provide us with a copy of the response. We were told we would be contacted by phone or email with the response.On June 4, the CDC employee we contacted said our request was pending in the system, but nobody had responded to our inquiries. We were advised to submit our questions again, which we have done numerous times.It has been 88 days since we sent our first email inquiring into VAERS data and reports.(3) Seven U.S. boys report chest pain, heart inflammation after 2nd dose of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccinehttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/teens-heart-inflammation-second-pfizer-vaccine/06/04/217 U.S. Teens Developed Heart Inflammation After Second Pfizer Vaccine, New Study ShowsA study published today in Pediatrics reported seven boys between the ages of 14 and 19 were hospitalized for heart inflammation and chest pain within four days of receiving the second dose of Pfizer's COVID vaccine.By Megan RedshawSeven U.S. boys reportedly developed chest pain, heart inflammation after second dose of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine.Seven boys between the ages of 14 and 19 in the U.S. reportedly developed chest pain and heart inflammation within four days of receiving a second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine, according to a new study published today in Pediatrics.Heart imaging tests detected a rare type of heart muscle inflammation called myocarditis and pericarditis. None of the teens were critically ill but all were hospitalized.All were healthy enough to be sent home after two to six days in the hospital and are ‘'doing pretty well,'' said Dr. Preeti Jaggi, an Emory University infectious disease specialist who co-authored the report.Jaggi said more follow-up is needed to determine how the seven fare, but it's likely the heart changes were temporary.Only one of the seven boys in the Pediatrics report displayed evidence of a possible previous COVID infection, and doctors determined none of them had a rare inflammatory condition linked with COVID or pre-existing conditions."I think we're in the waiting period where we need to see whether this is cause-and-effect or not," said John Grabenstein of the Immunization Action Coalition, a former director of the U.S. Department of Defense's immunization program.It is possible myocarditis or pericarditis may be an additional rare adverse event related to systemic reactogenicity, but currently no causal association has been established between this vaccine and myopericarditis, the authors concluded.Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to cardiac arrhythmia and death. According to researchers at the National Organization for Rare Disorders, myocarditis can result from infections, but "more commonly the myocarditis is a result of the body's immune reaction to the initial heart damage."Pericarditis is often used interchangeably with myocarditis and refers to inflammation of the pericardium, the thin sac surrounding the heart.A search in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) revealed 628 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, among all age groups reported in the U.S following COVID vaccination between Dec.14, 2020 and May 28, 2021. Of the 628 cases reported, 392 cases were attributed to Pfizer, 206 cases to Moderna and 27 cases to J&J's COVID vaccine.Of the 628 total cases of heart inflammation reported to VAERS, 40 cases occurred in children ages 12 to 17, all were attributed to Pfizer's vaccine.The U.S., Europe and Israel have all announced they are investigating a possible link between heart inflammation and mRNA vaccines, like Pfizer and Moderna.On June 2, Israeli health officials announced they had found a "probable" link between Pfizer's vaccine — which the country has relied on almost exclusively in its vaccination drive — and dozens of cases of heart inflammation in young men following the second dose.According to a study by Israeli health officials, there were 275 cases of myocarditis identified in Israel between December 2020 and May 2021, including 148 cases that occurred within a month after vaccination. Of those 148 cases, 27 occurred after the first dose and 121 after the second dose. About half of the cases involved people with previous medical conditions.Many of the cases were reported among men 16 to 30, and most often in 16- to 19-year-olds. Most of the patients were discharged from the hospital in less than four days, and 95% of the cases were considered mild."There is a likelihood of a connection between receiving a second dose of vaccine and the onset of myocarditis in young men aged 16-30," the group of experts concluded. "The connection is stronger in young people aged 16-19 compared to other ages and it decreases as age increases."As The Defender reported May 10, EU regulators called on Pfizer and Moderna to provide additional data related to the companies' COVID vaccines and a potential link to heart inflammation after the agency completed a safety review of all four COVID vaccines authorized for emergency use in the EU.In a report issued May 7, the European Medicines Agency's safety committee, (PRAC), disclosed its members were aware of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following Pfizer vaccination.As a prevention, PRAC requested Pfizer provide further data, including an analysis of events according to age and gender, in its next pandemic summary safety report before regulators could determine if any other regulatory action is needed.On May 24, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced it was investigating reports that some teenagers and young adults vaccinated against COVID may have experienced heart problems.The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in a May 17 statement said reports of myocarditis to date seemed to occur predominantly in adolescents and young adults, more often in males than females, more often following the second dose and typically within four days after vaccination. Most cases appeared to be "mild" and follow-up is ongoing.On April 27, Reuters reported the U.S. Department of Defense was investigating 14 cases of heart inflammation among people who were vaccinated through the military's health services.(4) YouTube censors President Bolsonaro and CNN Brazil over videos about HCQhttps://reclaimthenet.org/youtube-censors-president-bolsonaro-cnn-brasil/May 27, 2021YouTube censors President Bolsonaro and CNN Brazil over videos about hydroxychloroquineEven the President and mainstream media are being impacted by Big Tech's COVID censorship rules.By Tom ParkerPosted 6:55 pmYouTube Brazil has purged 22 videos about the coronavirus that were posted by several high profile channels with more than 10 million collective subscribers.The affected channels include those of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro (3.39 million subscribers), his son Eduardo Bolsonaro (854,000 subscribers), CNN Brasil (1.72 million subscribers), Brazilian radio station Jovem Pan News (3.45 million subscribers), and Brazilian media outlet Folha Politica (2.42 million subscribers).11 videos discussing coronavirus treatment were removed from President Bolsonaro’s channel and 10 of these videos mentioned the drug chloroquine and its derivative hydroxychloroquine in the title.CNN Brasil also had three of its videos featuring Brazilian doctor Nise Yamaguchi removed. In these videos, she discussed coronavirus treatment and advocated for the drug hydroxychloroquine.And Eduardo Bolsonaro’s interview with the Brazilian doctor Nise Yamaguchi, which discussed drugs for treating COVID, was removed from his channel.Additionally, a COVID debate that was recorded in April 2020 was removed from Jovem Pan and an interview with Brazilian doctor Raíssa Soares where she discussed COVID treatments was removed from Folha Politica.According to Guilherme Felitti, founder of the São Paulo-based data analytics studio Novelo Data, this is the biggest COVID censorship purge since his company started monitoring YouTube.Numerous doctors have advocated for hydroxychloroquine and claimed that it’s a safe and effective coronavirus treatment.Regardless, YouTube and other Big Tech platforms have decided to silence the opinions of these doctors and state health authorities and have been purging praise for the drug since the start of the pandemic and instead going only with their chosen sources.As is evidenced by this latest round of YouTube censorship, even world leaders and large media outlets aren’t immune to these far-reaching censorship rules that stamp out almost any COVID recommendations that are counter to the Big Tech approved talking points of wearing a mask and getting the vaccine.(5) Fauci lifted ban on Gain-of-Function virus experiments in 2017 without Admin approvalThe Australian is Rupert Murdoch's lead newspaper.https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/anthony-fauci-backed-virus-experiments-despite-pandemic-risk/news-story/3c604681cfcbfeda88bac25e372a1b8aFauci backed virus experiments 'despite pandemic risk'The Australian, May 29, 2021America's top medical adviser for the coronavirus, Anthony Fauci, argued that the benefits of experimenting on contagious viruses – manipulating and heightening their infectious potency – was worth the risk of a laboratory accident sparking a pandemic.In previously unreported remarks, Dr Fauci supported the contentious gain-of--function experiments that some now fear might have led to an escape from a Wuhan laboratory causing the Covid-19 pandemic, calling them "important work".An investigation by The Weekend Australian has also confirmed Dr Fauci, the director of the Nat-ional Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, did not alert senior White House officials before lifting the ban on gain-of-function research in 2017.Writing in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012, Dr Fauci acknowledged the controversial scientific research could spark a pandemic."In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?" he wrote. "Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?"Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks."It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky."In the paper, Dr Fauci also writes: "Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, might attempt to replicate these experiments sloppily. This is a valid concern."Dr Fauci has led the US response to the outbreak but is now facing serious questions about his role in funding the radical experiments being conducted inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology.A forthcoming book, What -Really Happened in Wuhan, documents increasing concerns that a leak from the Wuhan lab – and not natural spread via an animal in a wet market – could have sparked the Covid-19 crisis that has up-ended every nation in the world and killed 3.4 million people.Dr Fauci on May 11 reversed his position on whether Covid-19 had leaked from the WIV, and said he was now "not convinced" the virus had developed naturally and authorities needed to find out "exactly what happened".Gain-of-function experiments – often with bat-derived coronaviruses – centre on manipulating, splicing and recombining viruses potentially into strands of highly infectious and little understood diseases.This type of research carries such a risk of causing a pandemic that the Obama administration paused funding for gain-of--function experiments in 22 fields in 2014, including those involving SARS, influenza and MERS.US President Joe Biden this week ordered a fresh US intelligence inquiry into whether the virus had originated at the laboratory, while WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said his team's inquiry into the origins did not sufficiently examine an accidental laboratory leak.The NIH has come under significant criticism in recent weeks over funding WIV research relating to change-of-function, which Dr Fauci denies. Earlier this month, he told a US Senate hearing that the NIH "has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the WIV".Yet papers published as late as last year in American peer--reviewed academic journals that include WIV researchers – including its prominent virologist Shi Zhengli – disclose that work on coronaviruses had been funded by at least three NIH grants.At the time of Dr Fauci's paper, there was a voluntary ban on gain-of-function research related to highly infectious influenza -viruses.... In December 2017, the National Institute of Health, of which the NIAID is a part, announced it would resume funding the gain-of-function research.Multiple Trump administration officials told The Weekend Australian Dr Fauci had not raised the issue of restarting the research funding with senior figures in the White House."It kind of just got rammed through," one official said."I think there's truth in the narrative that the (National Security Council) staff, the president, the White House chief-of-staff, those people were in the dark that he was switching back on the research."The Weekend Australian has also confirmed that neither Mike Pompeo, the then director of the Central Intelligence Agency, nor National Security Council member Matthew Pottinger, was briefed.The experiments are also opposed by prominent scientists, including the Cambridge Working Group of 200 researchers which issued a public warning in 2014."Accident risks with newly created "potential pandemic pathogens" raise grave new concerns," the group's letter read. "Laboratory creation of highly transmissible, novel strains of dangerous viruses, especially but not limited to influenza, poses substantially increased risks."An accidental infection in such a setting could trigger outbreaks that would be difficult or impossible to control. Historically, new strains of influenza, once they establish transmission in the human population, have infected a quarter or more of the world's population within two years."And Steven Salzberg, of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, in 2015 said the benefits of gain-of-function research were "minimal at best" and they could "far more safely be obtained through other avenues of research"."I am very concerned that the continuing gain-of-function research on influenza viruses, and more recently on other viruses, presents extremely serious risks to the public health," he wrote.Dr Fauci did not respond to queries.(6) Report on collapse of WTC7by J. Leroy Hulsey, Professor of Structural Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2020concludes that (1) Fire did not cause the collapse; (2) Every column, internal & external, failed, almost simultaneously.This amounts to Controlled Demolition.Full Report:https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdfAbstract:https://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/Abstract-A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7.pdfThe Abstract says,"The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."Hulsey, J.L., Quan, Z., and Xiao, F., 2020. A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 – Final Report. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Mines, Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, INE Report 18.17, 112 pp.(7) COVID vaccines are experimental, not FDA approved; you have the right to decline, without fear of job loss, discrimination or segregationhttps://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/06/05/organic-consumers-associations-covid-19-tribunal.aspxOrganic Consumers Association’s COVID-19 Tribunalby Dr. Joseph MercolaFact CheckedJune 05, 2021The video above features the first of several tribunals1 on COVID-19, in which we expose the willful misconduct that runs like a red thread through the entire pandemic narrative. This first one is sponsored by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a 501c3 nonprofit organization chartered to educate and empower you with information that promotes health and happiness for you and your family.The panel, consisting of a number of experts from different fields, including scientists, doctors, authors, activists and attorneys, is hosted by Alexis Baden-Mayor. The topic, of course, is COVID-19, which has risen as the most important topic of our lifetime. [...]Shocking Statistics Are Being IgnoredAnyone who has looked at the U.S. federal vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) will be struck by the shockingly high number of serious injuries and deaths occurring after receiving the COVID-19 "vaccine."Many of these occur within the first 24 to 48 hours after taking the vaccine, which ought to raise automatic questions. Yet the timing of these injuries and deaths are ignored, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration insists that none of them has any relation to the vaccines,19 which simply isn't believable. As noted by Baden-Mayor:"As of April 16 [2021], the following information is confirmed: At least 3,186 Americans have died after receiving experimental COVID injections. At least 1,015 of those deaths have occurred within 24 hours. According to the various medical records, at least 115 expecting mothers have spontaneously aborted their babies or given birth to stillborn babies after receiving experimental COVID injections.At least 86,080 Americans have reported some form of injury post-injection, including at least 6,282 people who have required hospitalization due to the severity of their injuries.We support everyone's right to access experimental COVID injections, but it is important to note that they are not FDA approved. Currently the clinical trials are ongoing until October 27, 2022, for Moderna, the NIH study until January 2, 2023, for Johnson & Johnson, and April 6, 2023, for the Pfizer-BioNTech.Under current informed consent laws, you have the right to decline the use of any experimental product without fear of job loss, discrimination or segregation from the society that you paid taxes to support. It is your body. It is your choice."Side Effect Reports Are SkyrocketingThese numbers are skyrocketing by the day. As of April 23, 2021, the total number of adverse reports had jumped to 118,902, 12,618 of which were serious and 3,544 of which died.20 While shocking as is, the real numbers are undoubtedly even higher, as VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on voluntary reporting. [...]Illogical COVID Rules Have Created a Statistical MessFritz goes on to review what happened the last time the National Center for Health Statistics had a governing committee make recommendations regarding contagious or vaccine-preventable disease. On page 139 of the 2003 report from this panel, the committee asked how to address questions such as "Was a contagious disease present at time of death, or did the death result from a vaccine preventable disease?""The committee subgroup on death certificates decided against the death certificate being updated to include those risk factors," Fritz says. The committee stated that "the death certificate is not a medical record and is not intended to include prevalence data.""This is a very important part of what the precedence was, before this pandemic, about contagious and vaccine-preventable diseases on death certificates," Fritz says."They intentionally, in 2020, changed this with the COVID guidance. They created this lopsided reporting system — and they didn't make it for all contagious diseases — they just made it for COVID. So, it's naturally going to create a ballooning of reporting for this one contagious disease.Then, if you look at the context, these are experts at our statistical regulatory bodies. They know about the statistics on death certificates and [the importance of] accuracy. These guys know that — according to peer-reviewed medical literature, across the board, in every continent in the world — 20% to 60% of our death certificates have the wrong or an inaccurate cause of death listed. [...]- Sources and References {visit the link}