Archives‎ > ‎

Peter Myers Digest: Controversal statements on Covid

(1) Professor Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. David E Martin - controversial statements on Covid(2) Professor Sucharit Bhakdi says our immune systems recognise Covid, and can kill it; vaccines are dangerous(3) Wikipedia censors Professor Sucharit Bhakdi(4) Dr David E Martin examined patents on Coronaviruses - they began in 1999 with Ralph Baric at UNC(5) The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier, by David E. Martin(1) Professor Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. David E Martin - controversial statements on Covid- by Peter Myers, July 14, 2021Professor Sucharit Bhakdi was  head of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygieneat the University of Mainz. He speaks as a medical expert.He says that the Coronavirus is not as "novel" as was announced, in that we have had exposure to coronaviruses for over 20 years, and, as a result of that exposure, our immune systems recognise coronaviruses, and thus (in 99% of us) can fight them. Vaccines are not needed, and can cause the immune system to mistakenly attack our bodies. He recommends Ivermectin.Dr David E Martin is an expert in Finance. His particular interest is Patents - and he has examined ALL the patents for Coronaviruses  filed in the US since the first, in 1999. Ralph Baric holds most of these patents; but the CDC holds some.Dr Martin mentions Shi Zhengli only once, but she and others at Wuhan Institute of Virology also hold patents on Coronaviruses: connect science and business; Big Pharma needs patents to keep prices high.Dr Martin quotes Peter Daszak on the connection between media hype and the profits Big Pharma can reap:"Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated."David E Martin implies that the US created Sars-Cov2.However, Daszak acknowledged that the manipulation of the virus was done not by himself, but by "my colleagues in China".In a 2016 c-span video, Daszak describes "insert[ing] spike proteins" into viruses to see if they can "bind to human cells".Watch a clip of that part at admits that Gain of Function experiments are being conducted by "my colleagues in China" - with his collaboration: National Pulse.EXCLUSIVE WATCH: Explosive, Unearthed Video Shows Peter Daszak Describing 'Chinese Colleagues' Developing 'Killer' Coronaviruses.JUNE 8, 2021NATALIE WINTERS{ at 1:17:06 - 37}"Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we ... Well I didn't do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people."You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers," he adds.The comments follow growing evidence that Fauci's NIAID has deep financial and personnel ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology – and that Daszak's EcoHealth alliance was one of the primary proxies funneling the money to the Chinese Communist Party lab. ==Comment (Peter M):Could US specialists such as Baric and Daszak have deliberately helped China develop a bioweapon? Whether that was their intention we do not know, but Event 201 rehearsed the responses that have transformed our lives, as if the whole thing were planned.(2) Professor Sucharit Bhakdi says our immune systems recognise Covid, and can kill it; vaccines are dangerous"Proof that puts an end to the Sars-CoV-2 Narrative" - Professor Sucharit BhakdiHealth Ranger ReportPublished Yesterday |Some good news and some troubling news, from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D.SCIENTIFIC PROOF: NO VACCINES NEEDED (July 2021)Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi shows how the SARS CoV2 virus is not a stranger to our immune system. It recognizes the virus and removes it in 99% of us. This means we already have herd immunity. Sucharit also shows how coronaviruses can't mutate as much as a flu virus. This means we are already immune to all current and future variants. This also means that NO VACCINES ARE NEEDED and that THE PANDEMIC IS OVER! (Wohoo!) Now, what needs to be done is to inform the public about the DANGERS of these experimental COVID-19 gene therapy "vaccines" and end the mass vaccinations immediately. These new studies as of June/July of 2021 effectively ends the COVID-19 pandemic for good. The question is: Will we follow the science and recreate an amazing world of freedom and opportunity? Or will we bow to dictators and tyrants scaring us using psychological torture tactics, lying about variants and vaccines and requiring passports to leave our own home... Your choice humanity. Your choice.Video - watch at above link Sucharit Bhakti – Proof That Puts an End to the SARS-CoV-2 NarrativeCOVID TRUTHS  JULY 10, 2021All of the vaccinated are in grave danger of their own immune system destroying itself, which scientists have been warning for months, and have been censored off the main social media channels like YouTube, Twitter, Facebook. You cannot trust your Governments or mainstream media any more. They are lying to you. Now they want to vaccinate children. These are psychopaths with no empathy for humankind. All they have is money to buy people, influence, celebrities who are showing proof that the love of money is the root of all evil. Money in itself is not evil, but the love of it leads to evil acts.For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows – 1  Timothy 6:10They are promoting evil through the promise of a lie – that the vaccine is the way to normal again. Please open your eyes and at least if you have been vaccinated, try to eliminate these spike proteins as best you can with the solutions found in this post entitled: Possible Ways to Neutralise Spike Protein Damage from COVID VaccinesSPEAKERSProf Sucharit BhakdiProf Sucharit Bhakdi  00:00The good news today is that scientific publications have just appeared that put an end to the whole narrative. What one has been made to believe up to now is that the SARS- CoV-2 virus is so new, that our immune system will not recognise it. And therefore, when the need arises, the immune system will not respond in time with the production of antibodies, that they could save our lives. And that's why we need to be vaccinated. That's why the whole world needs to be vaccinated. Now, scientific publications that have appeared in the last weeks, as I said, put an end to this narrative because it turns out that the Corona, SARS-CoV-2 virus and its descendants are not so different from the old normal coronaviruses that it would not be recognised by the immune system.Prof Sucharit Bhakdi  00:58Now, I'll try to explain this with this chart here. This is the immune system, and the immune system can make many components, one of them are the antibodies that the immune system will make, when it meets a new opponent – a virus. Now, depending on whether the immune system recalls that it has seen this virus before or not, the response will be slow. The first response is always slow, takes about four weeks for the antibodies to be made, and these antibodies are called IgM Immunoglobulin M. If, however, the immune system has seen this virus before, and remembers it because the immune system has a memory, then it quickly makes other antibodies, which are called IgG and IgA, these are recall antibodies. Now these antibodies serve principally two functions. One function is that if it's a virus that the antibodies are supposed to combat, the antibodies can try to prevent the entry of the virus into your cell. This is what the antibodies to Corona are supposed to do. They are called protective antibodies because they protect the cell from getting infected by the virus. If, however, the cell does get infected, then lymphocytes are there behind the scenes that will come out and recognise that the cell is infected. And these killer lymphocytes have the duty to kill the cell. So once the cell is killed, the virus factory is destroyed, the virus can't be produced anymore, and you get up and go back to work.Prof Sucharit Bhakdi  02:58The other function of antibodies, a major function, is that if the antibodies are directed against a bacterium, or a fungal, then these antibodies will bind to the bacteria, and that will cause another arm of the immune system to be activated. This is so called complement because it complements that the action of the antibodies and leukocytes. Leukocytes are the cells that eat. These are cells that are in your blood and they're circulating all the time, and they're waiting for these bacteria to come into your blood, be coated with the antibodies, and then they will come and eat them. And thus, are you protected by your antibodies against bacteria? So, we have aptly two major arms of the immune system, one, the lymphocytes that are directed against viruses and virus infected cells, and the others are leukocytes that are directed against bacteria. It's like the Navy and the Air Force, Air Force, Navy, and both are really deadly. They take care of all the viruses that you are confronted with and all the bacteria normally. So, the question is now is our immune system really blind to the new so called new SARS-CoV-2 virus question. Now this can be answered very simply. And for that, what one has to do is one has to inject this virus or the virus gene into the body and see how long the immune system takes to make the antibodies against this gene. And this was done by three independent American research groups in the last weeks and published, so everyone can go and have a look at these papers, and everyone should look at the papers because two questions arise. First, was the antibody response fast or slow? This would be fast, and this would be slow. 30 days, 10 days or five days? And if it were fast did the antibodies carry the correct label IgG IgA are there only.Prof Sucharit Bhakdi  05:30So, what do you think, I'm going to ask you? the Americans measured in the blood the appearance of the antibodies every day. The people [who] are telling you that you should get vaccinated are going to say, of course, they were IgM antibodies because this was blind to them. But the fact is the opposite. All groups found out that everyone who had been vaccinated responded with IgG and IgA antibodies within days after the vaccination, which is absolute proof that it is a recall response to something that the immune system has recognised. You may ask me how can this be? The answer is very simple. Look, this is the hand, the grasping hand of the virus, this is the spike. And the spike is that to grasp the handle of the door to yourself to get in. The antibody comes and forces itself into the jaw like the crocodile, the mouth is open, it stops the crocodile from closing its mouth. Of course, this is not completely correct. But it will do as a picture for you, all right. Now, this key that enters into the mouth, of course it's not a perfect fit, so you could change a finger or two and it will still go in. And this is the difference between coronaviruses and influenza virus, influenza flu viruses, the real flu, alright, which has really caused pandemics because flu viruses can completely change the whole hand so that the hand looks like this suddenly. Okay. And then your antibodies don't fit into that. But this is something that the Coronaviruses can never do. They can't. And so, they can only change the shape of the fingers. And that's not enough to fool the immune system. It's that simple. And this applies to all the variants. So, forget it if someone tells you that you are not immune against the variants. The fact is, of course, that the immune system doesn't splurge. It keeps its antibodies in a locker, just like you have money in the bank, you don't go around throwing your money out of your pockets, you get the money out of the bank when you need it. And that's what happens to the immune system. And wonderfully enough, another publication coming from Denmark, another one, showed that true infections with the SARS-CoV-2 do exactly the same, meaning that everyone who has had an infection, even if he's asymptomatic, you know no symptoms, the virus just gets into your throat, multiplies a bit and gets thrown out again. But even then, the immune system responds by making IgG and IgA antibodies, meaning that you have the money in the bank. This means dear fellow citizens, that the herd immunity is already present, but kept under lock and key like a treasure. But it can be mobilised at any time you want. This is like a dog and his master. The dog is the immune system. The master, in this case, would be the virus. All right. So the moment the virus comes near to the house, it gets back [and] the dog senses that the virus is coming, begins wagging his tail, begins barking, throwing out the antibodies to say hello to the master.Prof Sucharit Bhakdi  09:35So you see, this virus always first enters through the front door, goes into your throat and it takes days to multiply, it takes days to multiply, and if it multiplies in your throat, it doesn't matter. It only kills you if it gets to your lungs. But now we know that this is enough time for you and me or anyone because the Danes showed that over 99 percent of all people running around have this treasure in that role, they have the treasure, and they could mobilise the IgG and IgA antibodies even when the virus was only in the throat. Now, isn't this a piece of wonderful news, I think it causes us to realise, it causes us to realise that we can cast the dread of this pandemic away and return to a wonderful world, return to our friends, our beloved ones, join hands with them, and rejoice. The pandemic is not existent as a modally dangerous new disease.Prof Sucharit Bhakdi  10:59Now, the second piece of news I have for you is that this will not only cause vaccination to be unnecessary, but also says if the vaccination carries any danger whatsoever, it must be stopped because there is no benefit, and if it only contains danger then it is the duty of the doctors and the authorities not to undertake vaccination. Now, let me tell you something very, very alarming. So alarming that this piece of news is just as important as the good piece of news. And this comes also from the publications that have just appeared. So we'll go back to this chart here. And I told you, the vaccinated, they found that the IgG and IgA antibodies came immediately. Then they waited for another two weeks or three weeks, and then they gave the people a second shot. What did they see, they saw that the IgG and IgA levels immediately continued to rise, which is what a booster is supposed to do.Prof Sucharit Bhakdi  12:25However, now, listen very carefully, look at this. This is a vessel wall; this is your blood. It is now known that the genes that are injected into your body will enter the bloodstream and it is absolutely certain now that these genes are going to enter the cells that line the vessel wall. Because these are the cells that they contact. Now what happens when the cells that line the vessel walls begin to produce these spikes, the spikes will then be produced by the cell and protrude from the cell surface into the bloodstream. Alright, now, these cells are going to be recognised by your lymphocytes that are born or given to you by the Dear Lord, to kill those cells that are making the virus or the virus protein, any virus protein. So, these lymphocytes are going to mount the attack on your vessel walls. This is the first way towards clot formation that as we know is happening all over the place all over the world. Now at the beginning after the first vaccination, this danger is bad and is already terrible in itself if your killer lymphocytes start trying to kill you. But at that time, during the first seven to ten days, there are still no antibodies. They are not yet any antibodies. However, after three or four weeks, there are masses of antibodies all over the place in your blood. And if you dare to repeat this performance and start to put those spikes out into your blood, God help you because now not only the killer lymphocytes are going to attack antibodies and complement, and leukocytes are also going to attack thinking that your cells that are producing these spikes are bacteria, and they are going to try to eat your vessel wall cells.Prof Sucharit Bhakdi  14:55Now, this attack of the Air Force and the Navy on a single cell target has never been seen before. There is no situation because either you're combating a virus, or you're combating a bacteria, mixed infections that go through the body are actually virtually unknown. So, we have the unique situation that has been created by the vaccination. That is, in a way, extremely interesting because no one knows what the outcome will be.Prof Sucharit Bhakdi  15:35However, the vision is so horrible, and so awful and terrifying, that I, myself, don't really want to know the answer. And I don't want this answer to become known. I want you to decide to not take the second shot, not only the second shot, but any shot thereafter is going to place your life in danger. That is what I am convinced of now, especially because of the publications that have just appeared. So I think that was the most important thing I have to say today. And I hope people will sit down, look at these papers, talk about them. And I hope that my colleagues, physicians and scientists will do the same and get together to see whether this may have a grain of truth. Because if it does, the consequences are absolutely endless or the consequences are very simple, we just have to stop everything now.Please share with your friends and loved ones. If they call you names or persecute you, at least you told the truth and your conscience is clear if they refuse to even watch the video or read the transcript. As Dr Mike Yeadon says in one of his recent interviews with Lifesite News, he said:I am telling you about this, because all that governments, their scientific advisers, Big Pharma (here's Merck, who originally developed & marketed it) and regulatory agencies will tell you is that Ivermectin doesn't work in COVID-19. They are lying. I am inviting any of them to sue me, but they won't, for I would win easily.The only reason why the Governments do not sue these scientists who tell the truth about already available treatments for COVID-19, or speak anything against the mainstream narrative, is because they ARE lying. They have a bought media who deceive and lie to the public. The proof is here in this excellent UK Column post by Iain Davis entitled: Buying a Single Version of the Truth.They have only their conflicts of interest SAGE pseudoscientists who spin their version of the truth. They do evil because they love money more than human life. ==These are the scientific papers that Prof Sucharit Bhakti refers to in this presentation: _Scientific Journals recently publishedSARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity.EBioMedicine Volume 68. June 2021, 103410Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccinesAdam V. Wisnewski ,Julian Campillo Luna ,Carrie A. RedlichPublished: June 16, 2021Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine RecipientsAlana F Ogata, Chi-An Cheng, Michaël Desjardins, Yasmeen Senussi, Amy C Sherman, Megan Powell, Lewis Novack, Salena Von, Xiaofang Li, Lindsey R Baden … Show moreAuthor NotesClinical Infectious Diseases, ciab465, 20 May 2021SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces functionally diverse antibodies to NTD, RBD, and S2. Cell. Elsevier.Fatima Amanat, Mahima Thapa, Tinting Lei, Viviana Simon, Ali H. Ellebedy, Florian KrammerPublished: June 08, 2021DOI: Wikipedia censors Professor Sucharit Bhakdi Bhakdi (born Sucharit Punyaratabandhu, 1 November 1946, in Washington, D.C.) is a retired Thai-German microbiologist.[1] In 2020 and 2021 Bhakdi became a prominent exponent of false ideas about the coronavirus pandemic, claiming that the pandemic was "fake" and that COVID-19 vaccines were going to decimate the world's population.[3][2]He was a professor at the University of Mainz, where from 1991 to 2012 he was head of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene.[4] The university subsequently disassociated itself from Bhakdi's views on the Coronavirus pandemic.[5]This page was last edited on 3 July 2021, at 12:21 (UTC).(4) Dr David E Martin examined patents on Coronaviruses - they began in 1999 with Ralph Baric at UNCFrom: Ionut Dobrinescu <> Knowledge TVContributed by Alexandra BruceJune 5, 2021{video: watch Dr David E Martin at the above link}I can't say enough about how much I admire Dr David E Martin and his impressive erudition and his ability to articulate what is happening. He does not mince words when he calls Anthony Fauci a "mass-murdering psychopath… who is actively killing human beings."The world is only just now beginning to catch up with him and everything he told us a year ago in Plandemic II.From 2003 to 2018, Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, the CDC, Bill Gates and others controlled 100% of the cash flow that built the empire around the industrial complex of coronavirus.The manipulation of the coronavirus began in 1999 with University of North Carolina Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Ralph Baric. In 2002, there was a recognition that the coronavirus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill. On April 25th, 2003, the CDC filed Patent #US7776521B1 on the coronavirus transmitted to humans.Under 35 USC §101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either SARS coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal – or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either outcome, both are illegal.In the spring of 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the Patent Office to keep their application confidential and private. They actually filed patents not only on the virus, they also filed patents on its detection and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent, they had the ability to control who was authorized and who was not authorized to make independent inquiries into coronavirus.You cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it, you cannot develop a test kit for it. By owning these patents, they had the means, they had the motive and most of all, they had the monetary gain from turning coronavirus from a pathogen to profit.In 2013, Federal funding for research at places like Harvard, Emory, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill suddenly became impaired when the NIH decided that gain-of-function research on coronavirus should be suspended.In 2014 and 2015, this research was off-shored via a US non-profit organization called the EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Peter Daszak, which reportedly received $123 million from US Federal Government agencies and $39 million from the Pentagon, alone and then subcontracted with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.As we learned earlier this week, Daszak thanked Fauci in an email in 2020 for insisting the coronavirus was naturally-occurring when both men knew it was a product of their research funding.In 2020, Daszak was cited as a COVID-19 Factchecker by Facebook – and incredibly, Daszak has now been put in charge by The Lancet of their task force to investigate the origins of COVID-19!CommentsJustinJune 20, 2021 at 1:06 pmThe transcript of this video raises several more questions, like this one."In the spring of 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the Patent Office to keep their application confidential and private. They actually filed patents not only on the virus, they also filed patents on its detection and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent, they had the ability to control who was authorized and who was not authorized to make independent inquiries into coronavirus." ... ==Dr. David Martin Releases 'The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier" David Martin Releases 'The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier" (Video + Dossier)Posted on February 17, 2021 by State of the NationDr. David Martin Releases 'The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier" | 205 Pages, 22 Years of ResearchButterfly of the Week, 18 January 2021: The Fauci/Covid-19 Dossierby Dr. David MartinJanuary 19, 2021Download PDFThe Fauci/COVID-19 DossierPrepared for humanity by Dr. David E. MartinIn the video below, Dr. David Martin reads this excerpt from the report:By March 2015, both the virulence of the S1 spike protein and the ACE II receptor was known to present a considerable risk to human health. NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and numerous researchers lamented the fact that the public was not sufficiently concerned about coronavirus to adequately fund their desired research.Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance offered the following assessment:"Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated."Original video available at David Martin World YouTube channel.[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.](5) The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier, by David E. Martin 13, 2021The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier- investigation into possible illegal patent claims resulting in millions of $ in commercial benefitsBy David E. Martin, PhDFebruary 22, 2021Dr. David Martin is the founding CEO of M?CAM Inc. M?CAM is the international leader in intellectual property-based financial risk management. From auditing patent quality for governments and patent offices, to providing state-of-the-art actuarial risk management systems and solutions to the largest banks and insurance companies, M?CAM has established a global standard in patent quality and commercial validity assessment and management.A spokesperson for global intellectual property accountability and quality reform, Dr. Martin has worked closely with the United States Congress, numerous trade and finance regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe and Asia, in advocating and deploying infrastructure to support growing reliance on proprietary rights in business transactions. M?CAM has supported the modernization of intellectual property, tax, and accounting laws through its work with oversight agencies and policy makers.Dr. Martin has founded several for-profit and non-profit companies and organizations and serves of several boards. He was the founding CEO of Mosaic Technologies Inc., a company that developed and commercialized advanced computational linguistics technologies, dynamic data compression and encryption technologies, electrical field transmission technology, medical diagnostics, and stealth/anechoic technology. He was a founding member of Japan's Institute for Interface Science & Technology. He founded and served as Executive Director of the Charlottesville Venture Group. He has served as a board member for the Research Institute for Small and Emerging Business (WaShington D.C.), the Academy for Augmenting Grassroots Technological Innovations (India), the IST (Japan) the Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce (Virginia), and the Charlottesville Industrial Development Agency (Virginia).As former Assistant Professor at the University of Virginia?s School of Medicine, Dr. Martin founded the University?s first wholly-owned, for-profit, research and development and technology transfer corporation. Engaged in domestic and international technology transfer, clinical research, and financing, this company pioneered new techniques innovation management that have become industry standards. In 1999, Dr. Martin was appointed by the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia to serve on the Joint Commission on Technology and Science and has served the General Assembly and Virginia?s Center for Innovative Technology on numerous occasions.Dr. Martin's work with the Batten Institute at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia and his related work at the Indian Institute for Management in Ahmedabad India has brought unprecedented curricular focus to areas of intangible asset risk management, finance, and accounting standards. In addition to his academic work, Dr. Martin has closely advised intellectual property based finance and investment programs in India, China, Denmark, the European Union, the United Kingdom, South Africa, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the United States, and the United Arab Emirates.Dr. Martin has publications in law, medicine, engineering, finance and education. He maintains active research in the fields of linguistic genomics, fractal financial risk modeling, as well as continuing his over 15 years of research in cellular membrane ionic signaling.ENDThis document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.This work was supported, in part, by a fund-raising effort in which approximately 330 persons contributed funds in support of the New Earth technology team and Urban Global Health Alliance. It is released under a Creative Commons license CC- BY-NC-SA. Any derivative use of this dossier must be made public for the benefit of others. All documents, references and disclosures contained herein are subject to an AS-IS representation. The author does not bear responsibility for errors in the public record or references therein. Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.Background:Over the past two decades, my company – M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China's growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations.The National Institute of Health's grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci's NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.1 In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments."Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV)that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones."On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, "an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus." This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.1 2 Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier CC-BY-NC-SA Dr. David E. Martinp. 2Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.In short, with Baric's U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC's '852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement.We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization's International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining "novelty" of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration. Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of interests constituted what we would suggest are "interlocking directorates" under U.S. anti-trust laws.These entities also were affiliated with the WHO's Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic "desk-top" exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us to anticipate an "epidemic" scenario. We expected to see such a scenario emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric's work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas.This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism. All source materials are referenced herein. An additional detailed breakdown of all the of individuals, research institutions, foundations, funding sources, and commercial enterprises can be accessed upon request.From Justice ClarenceThomas' opinion for the majority Section 101 of the Patent Act provides: "Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful … composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title." 35 U.S.C. § 101.We have "long held that this provision contains an important implicit exception[:] Laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas are not patentable." Mayo, 566 U.S., at _, 132 S.Ct., at 1293 (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). Rather, "they are the basic tools of scientific and technological work'" that lie beyond the domain of patent protection. Id., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1293. As the Court has explained, without this exception, there would be considerable danger that the grant of patents would "tie up" the use of such tools and thereby "inhibit future innovation premised upon them." Id., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1301. This would be at odds with the very point of patents, which exist to promote creation. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 309, 100 S.Ct. 2204, 65 L.Ed.2d 144 (1980) (Products of nature are not created, and "manifestations… of nature [are] free to all men and reservedexclusively to none'").3In their majority opinion in 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made it abundantly clear that the Court had "long held" that nature was not patentable. Merely isolating DNA does not constitute patentable subject matter. In their patent, the CDC made false and misleading claims to the United States Patent & Trademark Office by stating that, "A newly isolated human coronavirus has been identified as the causative agent of SARS, and is termed SARS-CoV."4 No "causal" data was provided for this statement.When they filed their patent application on April 25, 2003 their first claim (and the only one that survived to ultimate issuance over the objection of the patent examiner in 2006 and 2007) was the genome for SARS CoV.While this patent is clearly illegal under 35 U.S.C. §101, not only did the CDC insist on its granting over non-final and final rejections, but they also continued to pay maintenance fees on the patent after the 2013 Supreme Court decision confirmed that it was illegal.In addition, the CDC patented the detection of SARS CoV using a number of methods including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). With this patent, they precluded anyone outside of their licensed or conspiring interest from legally engaging in independent verification of their claim that they had isolated a virus, that it was a causative agent for SARS, or that any therapy could be effective against the reported pathogen.It is important to note that the CDC's patent applications were also rejected in non-final and final rejections for ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for being publicly disclosed prior to their own filing. In the first non-final rejection, the USPTO stated that the CDC's genome was published in four Genbank accession entries on April 14, 18, and 21, 2003 with identity ranging from 96.8% to 99.9% identical sequences.5 Dr. Fauci knew, and failed to disclose evidence that the CDC patent was illegal, based on work he had funded in the years leading up to the SARS outbreak.After seeking an illegal patent, petitioning to override the decision of an examiner to reject it, and ultimately prevailing with the patent's grant, the CDC lied to the public by stating they were controlling the patent so that it would be "publicly available".6 Tragically, this public statement is falsified by the simple fact that their own publication in Genbank had, in fact, made it public domain and thereby unpatentable. This fact, confirmed by patent examiners, was overridden by CDC in a paid solicitation to override the law.While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Dr. Fauci's abuse of the patent law is detailed below. Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term "vaccine" in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public.In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:"This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that 'persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state…"The Moderna and Pfizer "alleged vaccine" trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. Therefore, the basis for the Massachusetts statute and the Supreme Court's determination is moot in this case.Further, the USPTO, in its REJECTION of Anthony Fauci's HIV vaccine made the following statement supporting their rejection of his bogus "invention"