(1) India develops Ivermectin Home Treatment kit for US$3, has 25% of US death rate(2) Indian states ignore WHO recommendation on Ivermectin(3) Fierce campaign against Ivermectin - Juan Galindes in Brazil(4) Judge Saves Patient from Death by Ordering Hospital to Give Life-Saving Ivermectin(5) Professor Testifies to Congress: Ivermectin cures Covid(6) Mike Yeardon warns of "mass depopulation"(1) India develops Ivermectin Home Treatment kit for US$3, has 25% of US death ratehttps://www.lifesitenews.com/news/india-develops-covid-treatment-kit-for-less-than-3-per-person-with-miraculous-IvermectinIndia develops COVID treatment kit for less than $3 per person with 'miraculous' Ivermectin'Utilizing early treatment with hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, the densely populated India, which has four times the population of the U.S., has less than half of the coronavirus related deaths'Mon Jan 18, 2021 - 12:20 pm ESTINDIA, January 18, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — While the United States continues its aggressive military roll-out of novel, expensive and dangerous pharmaceutical vaccines, India has developed a "miraculously" effective and safe COVID-19 treatment kit which costs merely $2.65 per person and has helped put the nation's case and fatality rates in "steep decline."Last month, several medical experts testified before the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee in favor of authorizing Ivermectin for early treatment of the novel coronavirus. Among them, Dr. Pierre Kory, founding member of Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), explained that Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize–winning anti-parasitic agent, "basically obliterates transmission of this virus," with "miraculous effectiveness."Ivermectin has been the subject of dozens of studies and anecdotal success stories since it was found to reduce COVID-19 in a laboratory last June."I've been treating COVID pretty much every single day since the onset," Kory said. "When I say 'miracle' I do not use that term lightly…that is a scientific recommendation based on mountains of data that has emerged in the last three months."FLCCC has developed a treatment regimen incorporating Ivermectin, which the group claims has led to up to 83% lower-than-average COVID-19 death rates in hospitals that have applied it.However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has refused emergency authorization of Ivermectin to treat coronavirus, stating for months that "[m]ore testing is needed."In contrast, on the other side of the world, India has embraced the treatment protocol specified by Dr. Kory and his colleagues and is now manufacturing this product under the brand name "Ziverdo Kit" and it only costs approximately $2.65 per person.Though the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommends no treatment for those suffering from SARS-COV-2 "unless the patient is hospitalized and requires oxygen," in India, they began treating coronavirus patients early, including the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).Dr. Makarand Paranjpe and his wife, both 77 year-old Indian physicians, fully recovered from the COVID-19 virus using early treatment last November, TrialSiteNews (TSN) reports. She used hydroxychloroquine, and he took Ivermectin."Without any treatment, we know that the virus enters the cells and replicates there," Paranjpe said. "They can create disease that gets much more severe." Stopping such replication as early as possible is the simple function of these inexpensive and safe treatments.Last March, as debates raged in the U.S. over the merits of HCQ, following President Trump's endorsement of the drug, India had already recommended it in its national guidelines affirming it "should be used as early in the disease course as possible…and should be avoided in patients with severe disease."Following the June discovery of Ivermectin's efficacy in treating the virus, along with significant subsequent testing, the largest state in their nation, Uttar Pradesh (UP) (pop. 230 million), announced in August that it was replacing their HCQ protocol with Ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19."By the end of 2020, Uttar Pradesh — which distributed free Ivermectin for home care — had the second-lowest fatality rate in India at 0.26 per 100,000 residents in December. Only the state of Bihar, with 128 million residents, was lower, and it, too, recommends Ivermectin," writes Mary Beth Pfeiffer of TSN.By further comparison, utilizing early treatment with HCQ and Ivermectin, the densely populated India, which has four times the population of the U.S., has less than half of the coronavirus related deaths. "And India isn't just beating the poorly performing U.S. In all, 98 nations have higher death rates than India," Pfeiffer writes.Dr. Anil K. Chaurasia, a physician in UP, affirmed that starting in mid-September, "a clear decline in COVID cases and fatalities in India was noticeable … [and the] "steep decline in cases and fatalities is still continuing."The same results hold for neighboring Bangladesh, one of the most densely populated nations in the world, where doctors also utilize an Ivermectin home care therapy, and they have an even lower fatality rate, ranking 128thin the world.Kory cited similar results in Peru, Argentina, Brazil and several other South American countries demonstrating the effectiveness of Ivermectin.For example, in his written testimony to the senate committee, he related that in Peru, "the peak in deaths occurred at the time of distribution" of Ivermectin, which the country approved for COVID-19 treatment in late spring. Every Peruvian state witnessed "rapid and sustained reduction in both case counts and death rates in patients" as Ivermectin circulated, he wrote.In the face of such new and broad evidence, however, the FDA and NIH have nonetheless remained unwavering in their rejection of Ivermectin as a tool to combat coronavirus, and instead have maintained a central focus on vaccines.And while HCQ and Ivermectin have been around for many decades, and are known to be quite safe, serious concerns remain regarding these COVID-19 vaccines which have been rushed through the process of development, testing, approval, and now distribution, with a new "messenger RNA" technology, no industry-standard animal trials, nor any sufficient studies on long-term effects.These concerns include "allergic" and "potentially fatal reactions," as well as concerns about the potential impact on fertility.The FDA even drew up a document this fall listing the possible side-effects from a COVID-19 vaccine, including strokes, encephalitis, auto-immune disease, birth defects, Kawasaki disease, and death.Present reports reveal that hundreds of individuals injected with these vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and at least two have died.Though these U.S. regulatory agencies maintain "[m]ore testing is needed," before approving Ivermectin, Pfeiffer observes, "[m]ore information is always better. But at what point, in a pandemic, is there enough?"Kory forcefully asserted to the senate, "the amount of evidence that I have presented far exceed[s] the level required for a compassionate use authorization as defined by the FDA."Ivermectin "needs to be immediately adopted systematically nationally and globally, period," he insisted."You can use this medication in just about any condition," he said. "It is safe, inexpensive, [and] widely available."LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. ?View it here.(2) Indian states ignore WHO recommendation on Ivermectinhttps://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/health/covid-19-states-ignore-who-recommendation-on-Ivermectin-heres-what-doctor-who-wrote-white-paper-on-the-drug-has-to-say/2231596/Financial Express - Business News, Stock Market NewsCOVID-19: States ignore WHO recommendation on Ivermectin, here's what doctor who wrote white paper on the drug has to sayBy: Raghwendra Shuklahttps://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/health/covid-19-states-ignore-who-recommendation-on-Ivermectin-heres-what-doctor-who-wrote-white-paper-on-the-drug-has-to-say/2231596/COVID-19: States ignore WHO recommendation on Ivermectin, here's what doctor who wrote white paper on the drug has to sayBy: Raghwendra ShuklaFinancial Express - Business News, Stock Market NewsUpdated: Apr 14, 2021 11:59 AMThe World Health Organisation (WHO) recently recommended that antiparasitic drug Ivermectin must be used to treat COVID-19 patients within the clinical trials only. The WHO sighted lack of conclusive data behind this recommendation, which is applicable to "patients with COVID-19 of any disease severity." Despite this, some states – including Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra – are using the drug off-label for not only the treatment of coronavirus patients but also as prophylaxis against COVID-19. Ivermectin, also referred to as a 'wonder drug' by many, is usually used to treat parasitic infections like onchocerciasis (river blindness), trichuriasis, scabies, strongyloidiasis, and other diseases caused by soil-transmitted helminthiasis. But, Uttar Pradesh has prescribed it as part of a protocol to treat mild and moderate cases of COVID-19.Moreover, rapid response teams in the state have been ordered to distribute Ivermectin to people under home isolation. The teams of doctors who assess asymptomatic patients are even asking primary and secondary contacts of confirmed cases to take this drug in order to prevent any possible infection. When asked about the decision to continue the usage of the drug for the treatment of COVID-19, Dr Surya Kant Tripathi – Head, Respiratory Medicine Department, King George Medical University, Lucknow – told Financial Express Online that Ivermectin is being used both for the treatment of coronavirus patients and as prophylaxis for COVID-19 for more than nine months without any major side effects being reported."The drug is being majorly used for the treatment of COVID-19 when patients are under home isolation and also in all mild cases of the disease. It is true that we have not used the drug in severe cases. But this is also a fact that even healthcare workers shifted from the prophylaxis of hydroxychloroquine to Ivermectin. This is because we observed that 17 per cent of healthcare workers using hydroxychloroquine developed one or another kind of side effects," Dr Surya Kant – who is also national vice chairman of IMA-AMS – said.It must be noted that Dr Surya Kant, along with some other health experts of India, wrote a white paper on Ivermectin last year and it was displayed on the website of the World Health Organization. Dr Surya Kant also emphasized that this drug reduces the replication rate of the infection by several thousand times. It was only after this white paper when Uttar Pradesh government started using the drug. UP was the first state to use Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 and it has been extensively used since then, the doctor of KGMU said."Not only Uttar Pradesh, governments of West Bengal, Maharashtra, and Assam too included Ivermectin in their protocol for the treatment of COVID-19," he added.When asked about the lack of clinical trial data on Ivermectin, Dr Surya Kant said that over 40 such trials are underway, and not one has reported any major side effects yet. "More than 40 clinical trials are underway, including eight in India. This includes the most prestigious institute in India i.e. AIIMS Delhi. The trial underway at AIIMS is also on five different types of doses of Ivermectin, which is a very important issue. So, all kinds of trials are underway. My whitepaper was published in the month of July 2020. In the whitepaper, 19 Indian experts have contributed. They collected and compiled all data available on Ivermectin since 1981, when the drug was introduced to the world. Both researchers (William C. Campbell of US and Satoshi O¯mura from Japan) who discovered this drug won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for discovering this drug. It has got more than four properties – anti-viral, anti-parasitic, anti-cancer, and even anti-HIV. This is a wonderful drug, low cost, widely available and used for last 40 years throughout the world."He went on to say that anti-viral drug remdesivir has failed drastically. "All trials are saying that this drug is not effective in the treatment of COVID-19, rather it is complicating and resulting in mortality of patients. At so many centers, remdesivir trails were stopped. Also, remdesivir is costing minimum of Rs 5,000 per vial. [...]Updated: Apr 14, 2021 11:59 AMThe World Health Organisation (WHO) recently recommended that antiparasitic drug Ivermectin must be used to treat COVID-19 patients within the clinical trials only. The WHO sighted lack of conclusive data behind this recommendation, which is applicable to "patients with COVID-19 of any disease severity." Despite this, some states – including Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra – are using the drug off-label for not only the treatment of coronavirus patients but also as prophylaxis against COVID-19. Ivermectin, also referred to as a 'wonder drug' by many, is usually used to treat parasitic infections like onchocerciasis (river blindness), trichuriasis, scabies, strongyloidiasis, and other diseases caused by soil-transmitted helminthiasis. But, Uttar Pradesh has prescribed it as part of a protocol to treat mild and moderate cases of COVID-19.Moreover, rapid response teams in the state have been ordered to distribute Ivermectin to people under home isolation. The teams of doctors who assess asymptomatic patients are even asking primary and secondary contacts of confirmed cases to take this drug in order to prevent any possible infection. When asked about the decision to continue the usage of the drug for the treatment of COVID-19, Dr Surya Kant Tripathi – Head, Respiratory Medicine Department, King George Medical University, Lucknow – told Financial Express Online that Ivermectin is being used both for the treatment of coronavirus patients and as prophylaxis for COVID-19 for more than nine months without any major side effects being reported."The drug is being majorly used for the treatment of COVID-19 when patients are under home isolation and also in all mild cases of the disease. It is true that we have not used the drug in severe cases. But this is also a fact that even healthcare workers shifted from the prophylaxis of hydroxychloroquine to Ivermectin. This is because we observed that 17 per cent of healthcare workers using hydroxychloroquine developed one or another kind of side effects," Dr Surya Kant – who is also national vice chairman of IMA-AMS – said.It must be noted that Dr Surya Kant, along with some other health experts of India, wrote a white paper on Ivermectin last year and it was displayed on the website of the World Health Organization. Dr Surya Kant also emphasized that this drug reduces the replication rate of the infection by several thousand times. It was only after this white paper when Uttar Pradesh government started using the drug. UP was the first state to use Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 and it has been extensively used since then, the doctor of KGMU said."Not only Uttar Pradesh, governments of West Bengal, Maharashtra, and Assam too included Ivermectin in their protocol for the treatment of COVID-19," he added.When asked about the lack of clinical trial data on Ivermectin, Dr Surya Kant said that over 40 such trials are underway, and not one has reported any major side effects yet. "More than 40 clinical trials are underway, including eight in India. This includes the most prestigious institute in India i.e. AIIMS Delhi. The trial underway at AIIMS is also on five different types of doses of Ivermectin, which is a very important issue. So, all kinds of trials are underway. My whitepaper was published in the month of July 2020. In the whitepaper, 19 Indian experts have contributed. They collected and compiled all data available on Ivermectin since 1981, when the drug was introduced to the world. Both researchers (William C. Campbell of US and Satoshi O¯mura from Japan) who discovered this drug won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for discovering this drug. It has got more than four properties – anti-viral, anti-parasitic, anti-cancer, and even anti-HIV. This is a wonderful drug, low cost, widely available and used for last 40 years throughout the world."He went on to say that anti-viral drug remdesivir has failed drastically. "All trials are saying that this drug is not effective in the treatment of COVID-19, rather it is complicating and resulting in mortality of patients. At so many centers, remdesivir trails were stopped. Also, remdesivir is costing minimum of Rs 5,000 per vial. [...](3) Fierce campaign against Ivermectin - Juan Galindes in BrazilFrom: juan galindes <jgalindes@gmail.com>Dear Peter, hope you are well. I fully appreciate your efforts to clarify, teach and save lives during the current "pandemy" of COVID 19. I live in Brazil and several members of my extended family recovered from the malady using Ivermectin. There is a fierce campaign against this product. I'm sending attached a sample of a "fake news check" promoted by one of the largest and most important newspapers in the country. <https://tinyurl.com/e3fb4r2m>I look forward to hearing from you and if possible render more scientific proof in order to combat these criminals.https://tinyurl.com/e3fb4r2mWith regards, Juan(4) Judge Saves 80-Year-Old Patient from Death by Ordering Hospital to Give Life-Saving Ivermectinhttps://vaccineimpact.com/2021/new-york-supreme-court-judge-saves-80-year-old-patient-from-death-by-ordering-hospital-to-give-life-saving-Ivermectin/January 15, 2021New York Supreme Court Judge Saves 80-Year-Old Patient from Death by Ordering Hospital to Give Life-Saving Ivermectinby Brian ShilhavyEditor, Health Impact NewsThe genocide against the elderly is in full swing right now in the U.S. and around the world.As we have recently reported, assisted living centers who are now injecting their residents with the experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID injections are killing off many of them, particularly the oldest residents above the age of 80. [...]We have reported on these drugs extensively, such as Hydroxychloroquine, and the medical scandal behind censoring this drug for use in hospitals. See our Hydroxychloroquine page in our COVID Information Center to learn more.Another older drug that is already approved by the FDA that many doctors have had such success in treating COVID patients, to the point where they testified before Congress and called it a "miracle drug" because it was so effective, is Ivermectin.Dr. Pierre Kory M.D., a pulmonary and critical care specialist who is also an Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke's Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, pleaded with members of Congress to have the NIH, CDC, and FDA look at the "mountains" of data that he and his colleagues have gathered on the drug Ivermectin, which is already approved by the FDA as an anti-parasitic drug, and their success in treating COVID patients.He stated: "If you take it, you will not get sick." See:The Buffalo News is reporting a story out of New York State where family members of an 80-year-old woman, Judith Smentkiewicz, did their own research after their mother was diagnosed with COVID and put on a ventilator, where she was only given a 20% chance to live.They read about Ivermectin and convinced one of the doctors in the ICU of Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital to let her try it."We did a lot of our own research, we read about Ivermectin … The results sounded very promising, and we decided we had to try something different," Michael Smentkiewicz said. "We pressured the doctor in the ICU to give it to her. He finally agreed."On Jan. 2, Smentkiewicz was given her first dose of Ivermectin, and according to court papers filed by her family, she made "a complete turnaround.""In less than 48 hours, my mother was taken off the ventilator, transferred out of the Intensive Care Unit, sitting up on her own and communicating," Kulbacki said in a court affidavit.However, she was soon transferred to a different section of the hospital away from the ICU, and the doctors there refused to allow her to continue taking Ivermectin.But after her mother was transferred to another hospital wing away from the ICU, doctors in that unit refused to give her any more doses of the drug, and her condition quickly declined, the family said in court papers."We were astounded when they refused to give her any more doses," Michael Smentkiewicz said. "That's why I called Ralph Lorigo and we took the hospital to court."Amazingly, the hospital did not back down even when faced with a fight in court. They defended their right to deny this woman life-saving medication so they could effectively kill her!Kaleida Health, which operates the hospital, opposed the family's request in court. Lorigo said Kaleida attorney Michael J. Roach argued to Judge Nowak that doctors – and not the courts – should be making decisions about medical care.What about the patient and family members?? I am sure Ms. Smentkiewicz was in favor of the treatment her children had found for her which got her off of the ventilator and out of the ICU.But this is how the Medical Industrial Complex works. They don't think anyone should dare to question their alleged "authority."Fortunately, the Judge wasn't persuaded, and basically saved this woman's life.On Jan. 8, Nowak ordered the hospital to "immediately administer the drug Ivermectin" to Smentkiewicz, court papers show."But the judge also told us verbally that Judith's family doctor would have to write a prescription for Ivermectin, which he did," Lorigo said. "In 46 years as an attorney, I've never seen another case where a family had to get a court order to continue a treatment that had already been started by a hospital.""This lady was on a ventilator, literally on her deathbed, before she was given this drug," Lorigo told The Buffalo News about Smentkiewicz, a Cheektowaga resident. "As far as we're concerned, the judge's order saved this woman's life." (Source.)The key here for everyone to note when advocating for a loved one to receive treatment from these older drugs, is what the Judge allegedly told the family verbally: get a prescription from your family doctor.Then it is 100% legal, and the hospital cannot do anything about it, at least not legally, because medical physicians are allowed to prescribe drugs for "off-label" use.The doctors in the hospital that decided to withhold this drug from Ms. Smentkiewicz are not named. They should be arrested and charged with attempted murder.The reporter for The Buffalo News, Dan Herbeck, interviewed another doctor who gave his "reasoning" for withholding this treatment:Dr. Thomas A. Russo, one of the region's leading experts on infectious diseases, said he was glad to hear that Smentkiewicz is doing better, but he said people should never jump to conclusions about Ivermectin or any other drug based on one patient's outcome."There are some indications that this drug may have some merit in treating Covid-19 … Yes, it is possible that it helped this woman," Russo said. "But the trials and testing are ongoing. We don't have definitive data yet to show it does help. Presently, it is not recommended as a treatment for Covid-19."Russo is the chief of infectious diseases at the University at Buffalo's Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. He has no involvement in the Smentkiewicz case.This is the "official position" of the medical bureaucrats, which is obviously crafted to protect the FDA who has given emergency use authorization (EUA) to new experimental drugs, including the new mRNA COVID injections, which has resulted in literally $TRILLIONS in federal funding being awarded to them to develop these new COVID drugs and vaccines. Older drugs already approved by the FDA with decades of proven safety, and whose patents have long since ran out, are a threat to this new market that COVID is creating.They also summarily dismiss all of the clinical experience and data that Professor Dr. Pierre Kory from Milwaukee, along with his group the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) have discovered.Thanks to Dr. Meryl Nass and her blog which tipped me off to this story. If her blog is not part of your newsfeed, it should be!If your doctor is afraid to prescribe Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine due to political pressure, Dr. Meryl Nass has a list of resources where you can find someone who can:How you can receive early effective treatment for CovidSome of the Frontline Doctors have also published their protocols that they have had success with:(5) "I Can't Keep Watching Patients Die Needlessly!" Professor Testifies to Congress: Ivermectin cures Covidhttps://healthimpactnews.com/2020/i-cant-keep-watching-patients-die-needlessly-medical-professor-testifies-to-congress-that-covid-cure-already-exists-with-Ivermectin/December 9, 2020"I Can't Keep Watching Patients Die Needlessly!" Medical Professor Testifies to Congress that COVID Cure Already Exists with Ivermectinby Brian Shilhavy, Editor, Health Impact NewsDr. Pierre Kory M.D., a pulmonary and critical care specialist who is also an Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke's Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, pleaded with members of Congress to have the NIH, CDC, and FDA look at the "mountains" of data that he and his colleagues have gathered on the drug Ivermectin, which is already approved by the FDA as an anti-parasitic drug, and their success in treating COVID patients.He states: "If you take it, you will not get sick."Dr. Kory is president of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), and their success in treating patients with COVID has been so dramatic, that he referred to it as a "miracle drug." From the organization's website:Appearing as a witness Tuesday morning before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs—which held a hearing on "Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution"— Dr. Pierre Kory, President of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), called for the government to swiftly review the already expansive and still rapidly emerging medical evidence on Ivermectin.The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a "miracle drug" against COVID-19 and called upon the government's medical authorities—the NIH, CDC, and FDA—to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19.The Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) is comprised of some of the most highly published scientists in the world, with over 2000 peer-reviewed publications among them. Dr. Kory states:I am severely troubled that the NIH, FDA, and CDC – I do not know of any task force that was assigned or compiled to review repurposed drugs in an attempt to treat this disease.Everything has been about novel, and or expensive pharmaceutically engineered drugs (like remdesivir and vaccines.)We have a hundred years of medicine development. We are experts in all of the medicines we use, and I do not know of a task force that has focused on repurposed drugs.We have filled that void. That is all we have done, focus on the things we know and the things we do.We have a solution to this crisis. There is a drug that is proving to be of miraculous impact.And when I say "miracle," I do not use that term lightly. And I don't want to be sensationalized when I say that. That is a scientific recommendation based on MOUNTAINS of data that has emerged in the last 3 months.Dr. Kory explains that the NIH recommendation NOT to use Ivermectin for COVID outside of clinical trials, was from August 27th, and that 3-4 months later, "mountains" of data have emerged from countries around the world showing the "miraculous" effectiveness of Ivermectin.It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. If you take it, you will not get sick.The most emotional part of Dr. Kory's testimony was when he described what he was seeing in patients in the ICU.I'm a lung specialist. I'm an ICU specialist.I've cared for more dying COVID patients than anyone can imagine. They're dying because they cannot breathe.I watch them every day. They die. By the time they get to me in the ICU, they are already dying. They're almost impossible to recover.Early treatment is key. We need to offload the hospitals.We are tired. I can't keep doing this.If you look at my manuscript, and if I have to go back to work next week, any further deaths are going to be needless deaths.And I cannot be traumatized by that. I cannot keep caring for patients when I know that they could have been saved with earlier treatment.And that drug that will treat them and prevent the hospitalization is Ivermectin.Watch the full testimony. We have a copy on our Bitchute channel as well.(6) Mike Yeardon warns of "mass depopulation"https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-former-pfizer-vp-your-government-is-lying-to-you-in-a-way-that-could-lead-to-your-deathEXCLUSIVE - Former Pfizer VP: 'Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.''Look out the window, and think, "why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?" Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They're going to kill you and your family.'       Wed Apr 7, 2021 - 8:47 am ESTApril 7, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with "the most senior research position" in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews in a telephone interview.He addressed the "demonstrably false" propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the "lie" of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for "vaccine passports," and the strong possibility we are dealing with a "conspiracy" which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.His main points included:There is "no possibility" current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is "just a lie."Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just "convergent opportunism," but a "conspiracy." Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded "top-up" ("booster") vaccines for the "variants." The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 "vaccine" campaign.Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these "top-up" vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to "perform any clinical safety studies."Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines "go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification."Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a "banking reset" could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, "mass depopulation" remains a logical outcome.The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must "fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms."Dr. Yeadon began identifying himself as merely a "boring guy" who went "to work for a big drug company … listening to the main national broadcast and reading the broad sheet newspapers."Continuing, he said: "But in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything. It's a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don't have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in."Or, by the way, on top of the current list of gene-based vaccines that we have miraculously made, there will be some 'top-up' vaccines to cope with the immune escape variants."Everything I have told you, every single one of those things is demonstrably false. But our entire national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but they are all wrong."'Conspiracy' and not just 'convergent opportunism'"But what I would like to do is talk about immune escape because I think that's probably going to be the end game for this whole event, which I think is probably a conspiracy. Last year I thought it was what I called 'convergent opportunism,' that is a bunch of different stakeholder groups have managed to pounce on a world in chaos to push us in a particular direction. So it looked like it was kind of linked, but I was prepared to say it was just convergence.""I [now] think that's naïve. There is no question in my mind that very significant powerbrokers around the world have either planned to take advantage of the next pandemic or created the pandemic. One of those two things is true because the reason it must be true is that dozens and dozens of governments are all saying the same lies and doing the same inefficacious things that demonstrably cost lives."And they are talking the same sort of future script which is, 'We don't want you to move around because of these pesky varmints, these "variants"'— which I call 'samiants' by the way, because they are pretty much the same — but they're all saying this and they are all saying 'don't worry, there will be "top-up" vaccines that will cope with the potential escapees.' They're all saying this when it is obviously nonsense."Possible end game: vaccine 'passports' tied to spending allowances, thorough control"I think the end game is going to be, 'everyone receives a vaccine'… Everyone on the planet is going to find themselves persuaded, cajoled, not quite mandated, hemmed-in to take a jab."When they do that every single individual on the planet will have a name, or unique digital ID and a health status flag which will be 'vaccinated,' or not … and whoever possesses that, sort of single database, operable centrally, applicable everywhere to control, to provide as it were, a privilege, you can either cross this particular threshold or conduct this particular transaction or not depending on [what] the controllers of that one human population database decide. And I think that's what this is all about because once you've got that, we become playthings and the world can be as the controllers of that database want it."For example, you might find that after a banking reset that you can only spend through using an app that actually feeds off this [database], your ID, your name, [and] your health status flag.""And, yes, certainly crossing an international border is the most obvious use for these vaccine passports, as they are called, but I've heard talk of them already that they could be necessary for you to get into public spaces, enclosed public spaces. I expect that if they wanted to, you would not be able to leave your house in the future without the appropriate privilege on your app."But even if that's not [the] true [intent of the vaccine campaign], it doesn't matter, the fact that it could be true means everyone [reading] this should fight like crazy to make sure that [vaccine passport] system never forms.""[With such a system], here is an example of what they could make you do, and I think this is what they're going to make [people] do."You could invent a story that is about a virus and its variations, its mutations over time. You could invent the story and make sure you embed it through the captive media, make sure that no one can counter it by censoring alternative sources, then people are now familiar with this idea that this virus mutates, which it does, and that it produces variants, which is true [as well], which could escape your immune system, and that's a lie."But, nevertheless, we're going to tell you it's true, and then when we tell you that it's true and we say 'but we've got the cure, here's a top-up vaccine,' you'll get a message, based on this one global, this one ID system: 'Bing!' it will come up and say 'Dr. Yeadon, time for your top-up vaccine. And, by the way,' it will say 'your existing immune privileges remain valid for four weeks. But if you don't get your top-up vaccine in that time, you will unfortunately detrimentally be an "out person," and you don't want that, do you?' So, that's how it'll work, and people will just walk up and they'll get their top-up vaccine."Gov't lies, Big Pharma moves forward, medicine regulators get out of the way, and possible 'mass-depopulation'"But I will take you through this, Patrick, because I am qualified to comment. I don't know what Vanden Bossche is about. There was no possibility at all, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous]."Nevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are saying that they are. They're lying. Well, why would you do that?"Here's the other thing, in parallel, pharmaceutical companies have said, several of them, it will be quite easy for us to adjust our gene-based vaccines, and we can hasten them through development, and we can help you."And here's the real scary part, global medicines regulators like [the U.S. Food and Drug Administration] FDA, the Japanese medicines agency, the European Medicines Agency, have gotten together and announced … since top-up vaccines will be considered so similar to the ones that we have already approved for emergency use authorization, we are not going to require the drug companies to perform any clinical safety studies."So, you've got on the one hand, governments and their advisers that are lying to you that variants are different enough from the current virus that, even if you're immune from natural exposure or vaccination, you're a risk and you need to come and get this top-up vaccine. So, I think neither of those are true. So why is the drug company making the top-up vaccines? And [with] the regulators having got out of the way — and if Yeadon is right, and I'm sure I am or I wouldn't be telling you this — you go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification."And if you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say 'let's put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,' or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible]. Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people."And since I can't think of a benign explanation for any of the steps: variants, top-up vaccines, no regulatory studies… it's not only that I cannot think of a benign explanation, the steps described, and the scenario described, and the necessary sort of resolution to this false problem is going to allow what I just described: unknown, and unnecessary gene sequences injected into the arms of potentially billions of people for no reason."I'm very worried … that pathway will be used for mass depopulation, because I can't think of any benign explanation."'Absurdly impossible' variants will escape immunity, 'just a lie'"If I can show you that one major thing that governments around the world are telling the people is a lie, you should take my 32 years of experienced opinion that says, most of it, if not all of it, is a lie.""The most different variant is only 0.3% different from the original sequence as emailed out of Wuhan in … January 2020. 0.3% [is] the one [variant] that is the most different on the planet so far. And now another way of saying it is, 'all of the variants are not less than 99.7% identical to each other.'"Now, you might be thinking, 'hmm, .3%, is that enough [to escape immunity and become more dangerous]?' The answer is no. Get away, ya know, get out of here …"The human immune system is a thing of wonder. What it does is when it faces a new pathogen like this, you've got professional cells, they're called professional antigen-presenting cells —they're kind of rough tough things that tend not to succumb to viruses. And their job is to grab foreign things in the near environment and tear them limb from limb [inside the cell]. They really cut them up into hundreds of pieces. And then they present these pieces on the surfaces of their cell to other bits of your immune system, and amazingly, because of the variability that God and nature gave you, huge variability to recognize foreign things, and your body ends up using 15 to 20 different specific motifs that it spots about this virus. They're called epitopes, basically they're just like little photographs of the details about this virus. That's what they do. And that is what is called your repertoire, your immune repertoire is like 20 different accurate photographs, close-ups, of different bits of this virus.wcea facebook"Now, if a tiny piece of the virus changes, like the .3% I've just described, if you are reinfected by that variant, your professional cells tear into that virus and cut it into pieces, present them again, and lo and behold, most of the pieces that you have already seen and recognized, are still there in the variants."There is absolutely no chance that all of them will fail to be recognized and that is what is required for immune escape, to escape your immunity. It must present to you as a new pathogen. It must be sufficiently different that, when it is cut up by your professional checker cells, it won't find mostly the same thing it has seen before. And that is just absurdly impossible when you have only varied .3%, so it is 99.7% (similar)."You can go and check that by looking at papers by a person called Alison Tarke. There is also Shane Crotty, and all of the other co-authors."And before them, coming from my theoretical understanding of multi-locus immunity, which is what I just badly tried to describe, to what actually happens … If your [immune system] is presented with something that contains even half of those similar pieces, there is no way your body will say, 'that's a new pathogen.'"And, so, the idea that 0.3% could even have a chance of getting around immunity is just a lie. It's not [even] like an opinion difference."I don't think 3% would be enough. That's 10 times more variation than has occurred in 16 months [with this virus]. I don't even think 30% difference would be enough. So, I'm saying that 100 times more variation than has actually happened, would still leave me putting a big bet on the human immune system not being fooled that these are new pathogens."I've chatted this over with several professors of immunology and they agreed with me, it's like, 'why are you asking me this?'"So, I think that what I've just said is that governments and their advisors in multiple countries are lying about variants. That's a massive thing! You should check it out. Your readers should check it out. If it's true, don't you think it's terrifying?! It was when I realized it."So, they're lying about variants, and then, of course, since [the variants] are not really different, you do not need a 'top-up' vaccine. Now you should be getting the hairs on the back of your neck up, because they are making them right now!""They are making billions of vials of it. And they will be available by the end of the year."And I think they'll require people to first, be on the vaccine passport one-world database, and then it will roll up into the top-ups, and if it takes a bit longer it will take a bit longer."But this is not going away. It won't go away until enough people, if they ever do, say 'you're a bunch of frauds and we are taking our freedoms back, so you can just stop doing this.'"Because one person shouting into the wilderness and all of the other academics looking the other way, will have us just going down this pipe maybe a week later than if I hadn't said anything, but we're still going down to hell."So, that's why I'm frightened."The variants aren't different. I call them 'samiants'… they're pretty much the same. They're not different. Therefore, you don't need a top-up vaccine, so don't go near any of them."'Why is my government lying to me?' Because 'they are going to kill you.'"[And if you recognize that our governments are involved in a major verifiable lie], don't just turn your computer off and go to supper. Stop. Look out the window, and think, 'why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?' Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They're going to kill you and your family."The eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you. I have no idea what it will actually be, but it won't be a vaccine because you don't need one. And it won't kill you on the end of the needle because you would spot that."It could be something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at various times between vaccination and the event, it will be plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on in the world at that time, in the context of which your demise, or that of your children will look normal."That's what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world's population. And I think that's what they're doing.""Now I don't know [for certain] that they're going to use that [system] to kill you, but I can't think of a benign reason, and with that power they certainly could harm you, or control you, so you should object [and strenuously oppose it]."People can't deal with this level of evil, but Soviets, Hitler, Mao show its possibility"It's become absolutely clear to me, even when I talk to intelligent people, friends, acquaintances … and they can tell I'm telling them something important, but they get to the point [where I say] 'your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death and that of your children,' and they can't begin to engage with it. And I think maybe 10% of them understand what I said, and 90% of those blank their understanding of it because it is too difficult. And my concern is, we are going to lose this, because people will not deal with the possibility that anyone is so evil…"But I remind you of what happened in Russia in the 20th Century, what happened in 1933 to 1945, what happened in, you know, Southeast Asia in some of the most awful times in the post-war era. And, what happened in China with Mao and so on."We've only got to look back two or three generations. All around us there are people who are as bad as the people doing this. They're all around us. So, I say to folks, the only thing that really marks this one out, is its scale."But actually, this is probably less bloody, it's less personal, isn't it? The people who are steering this … it's going to be much easier for them. They don't have to shoot anyone in the face. They don't have to beat someone to death with a baseball bat, or freeze them, starve them, make them work until they die. All of those things did happen two or three generations back and our grandparents or great grandparents were either victims of this, or they were actually members of it, or at least they witnessed it from overseas. That's how close we are."And all I'm saying is, some shifts like that are happening again, but now they are using molecular biology."And the people going along with it, I think they would probably say, 'I was only following orders,' which we have heard before."But I know, because I have talked to lots of people, and some of them have said 'I don't want to believe that you are right, so I'm going to just put it away because if it is true, I can't handle it.' And I think … all you need to do is find a good reason to tell people, 'Don't take the vaccine unless you're a medical risk of dying from the virus!' That seems to me a pretty good line!"Towards a solution – 'We need God'"I'm a scientist, and I can tell you, talking to non-scientists, using science as a tool, will not work. It will fail."So, we need philosophers, people who understand logic, religion, something like that, [they have] got to wrestle with this, and start talking in a language people will understand. Because if we leave it with scientists, people like me, even though I'm well-intentioned, I'm a gabbling alien as far as most people in the street are concerned. They won't believe the government will lie to them, they don't believe the government would ever do anything that will harm them, but they are [doing such things]."Finally, in an email correspondence, Dr. Yeadon concluded, "I have latest taken to signing off with 'May God save us', because I think we need God now more than at any time since WW2."