Pope Francis comes out against LGBT indoctrination in schools. Printer bans book against Gay Marriage (1) Salon.com vs Pope Francis on Gender indoctrination in schools (2) "This is against nature:" Pope Francis reaffirms disagreement with teaching gender identity in schools (3) Francis’ LGBT failure: Vulnerable transgender community needs his active support - Salon (4) Pope Francis backs anti-Gay Marriage protests in Mexico (5) ‘Catholic’ LGBT Group Slams Pope Francis for Denouncing Gender Ideology (6) Printer bans book against Gay Marriage - Andrew Bolt (7) Commercial printer acts as censor; bans book against same-sex 'marriage' (8) Gays to infiltrate book launch, printer backs out (9) Two attempts to suppress pro-Marriage book, but successful launch in Sydney (10) Orthodox oppose Gay march in Jerusalem (11) Bearded Feminists; Abnormality is the New Norm - Lasha Darkmoon (12) Duterte calls US ambassador 'Gay' (13) ABC Keeps 'Modernizing' the Family Leftward (1) Salon.com vs Pope Francis on Gender indoctrination in schools http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/07/salon-pope-francis-not-cool-slamming-gender-ideology/ Salon: Pope Francis ‘Not So Cool After All’ After Slamming Gender Ideology by Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D. 7 Oct 2016 The liberal flagship Salon magazine has decided it doesn’t like Pope Francis anymore, ever since the pontiff came down hard against indoctrinating children in gender theory. In his article titled "Pope Francis’ LGBT failure," Salon writer Nico Lang compares the Pope’s "harsh words" against the gender ideology to those of "the right-wing extremists who have sought to prevent trans people from using bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity." The Cool Pope is "not so cool after all," Lang quipped, just before comparing the Catholic Church to the Republican Party—apparently the meanest slur he could come up with. The gender ideology claims that governments should require individuals to accept the "gender identity" of men or women who seek to live as members of the opposite sex. For example, new federal rules now urge punishment for K-12 students who refuse to use the female pronoun –‘her" — when referring a male classmate who dresses like a girl, or who do not want to share a bathroom with members of the opposite sex. Lang notes that this past weekend, Francis referred to teaching gender theory in schools as "ideological colonization." During his short trip to the Caucasus, Pope Francis also called gender theory a "great enemy" of marriage, adding that the ideology of gender is part of a global war of ideas out to destroy traditional marriage. Pope Francis Criticizes Trans People In Recent Conversation In an extended, off-the-cuff speech in Georgia, Francis said that today we are witnessing a "global war to destroy marriage" in which gender theory places a key role, fighting "not with weapons, but with ideas." But although the Pope’s stern opposition to gender theory may strike Nico Lang as a novelty, in point of fact, it is nothing new. For years the Pope has been an outspoken critic of LGBT agitators’ efforts to impose same-sex marriage on society along with theories of gender fluidity that divorce gender from biological sexual differences. In March, Francis published an extensive teaching letter on marriage and the family called The Joy of Love (Amoris Laetitia), in which he underscored the unique roles of motherhood and fatherhood, and called same-sex marriage legislation the "legal deconstruction of the family." In that same text, Francis slammed gender theory for its denial of "the difference and reciprocity in nature of a man and a woman," and for its dream of "a society without sexual differences." "An appreciation of our body as male or female," he said, is "necessary for our own self-awareness in an encounter with others different from ourselves." Efforts to erase sexual differences based in biology are a symptom of a sick society that "no longer knows how to deal with it," he wrote. In the past, Francis has used even stronger language to denounce gender theory. In early 2014, the Pope called modern gender ideology "demonic," and compared the teaching of gender theory to children with the educational policies of Hitler. In his Salon article, Lang declares that the pope’s message on transgender "boils down the old canard that the Catholic Church has been using against gays and lesbians for decades: ‘Love the sinner, hate the sin.’" The Pope’s ideas are "biblically inaccurate" and outdated, Lang insists. If loving sinners and hating sin is a "canard," at least the Pope has Jesus on his side—even if Salon is no longer a fan. Follow Thomas D. Williams on Twitter Follow @tdwilliamsrome (2) "This is against nature:" Pope Francis reaffirms disagreement with teaching gender identity in schools http://fox6now.com/2016/10/02/this-is-against-nature-pope-francis-reaffirms-disagreement-with-teaching-gender-identity-in-schools/ Posted 8:57 pm, October 2, 2016, by CNN Wire Service Pope Francis reaffirmed his disagreement with teaching gender identity in schools on Sunday, after earlier calling it a "war against marriage." On a return flight to Rome at the end of a three-day trip to Georgia and Azerbaijan, the Pope recounted a meeting with a French father whose young son wanted to be a girl after reading about it in a textbook. "This is against nature," he said. "It is one thing when someone has this tendency … and it is another matter to teach this in school." "To change the mentality — I call this ideological colonization," the Pope said. The Pope said he still spends time with transgender people, leading them closer to God. In August, the Pope called the teaching of gender identity theory "terrible." "Today, in schools they are teaching this to children — to children! — that everyone can choose their gender," Pope Francis said. New Ways Ministry, a Catholic LGBT advocacy group, criticized those remarks. "The pontiff’s remarks are further evidence that church officials need desperately to educate themselves about the lives and experiences of LGBT people," said Francis DeBernardo, executive director of New Ways Ministry. "Nobody chooses a gender identity. They discover it." As a new Pope in 2013, Francis made headlines around the world for his progressive stance on homosexuality. "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?" Francis asked. The position appeared to be a shift from the traditional Catholic stance on homosexuality as a sin. (3) Francis’ LGBT failure: Vulnerable transgender community needs his active support - Salon http://www.salon.com/2016/10/06/pope-francis-lgbt-failure-vulnerable-transgender-community-needs-his-active-support-now/ Friday, Oct 7, 2016 01:06 AM EST Francis’ LGBT failure: Vulnerable transgender community needs his active support now The Catholic Church has made great strides on gay and lesbian issues but still lags behind on trans understanding Nico Lang The Cool Pope may not be so cool after all. Pope Francis, who has been lauded as pushing the church toward a more accepting view of the LGBT community, appeared to back off from that stance during a Sunday interview with reporters. While aboard the papal plane, the Associated Press reported, Francis referred to teaching gender theory or trans acceptance in schools as "ideological colonization." "It’s one thing if a person has this tendency and also changes sex," the pope said. "It’s another thing to teach this in school to change mentalities." The previous day he claimed that transgender people are launching a "world war against marriage." "What I was talking about was the nastiness that is present today in indoctrinating people in gender theory," Reuters reported Francis claimed when pressed to elaborate his position. These harsh words aren’t all that different than those of the right-wing extremists who have sought to prevent trans people from using bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Micah Clark of the American Family Association, the group that led a boycott against Target’s trans-inclusive bathroom policy, has referred to Gay-Straight Alliances and equal access for transgender students as "homosexual indoctrination programs." Sen. Ted Cruz, whom Clark endorsed in the Republican presidential primaries, added that trans people "don’t have a right to impose [their] lifestyle on others." Cruz advised trans people to use the bathroom at home. How can this be the same Pope Francis who was honored by the Advocate as the LGBT magazine’s "Person of the Year" in 2014? The one who — when asked about his stance on homosexuality — famously replied, "Who am I to judge?" In truth, the Roman Catholic Church finds itself in a strikingly similar position to the Republican Party, pushing traditional, conservative values during a time when social progress has made those beliefs increasingly unpopular with its membership. Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the ban on marriage equality in 2015, 55 percent of the U.S. public supports the rights of same-sex couples to wed. Intolerance, especially when the fight has already been lost, is bad optics. The public, however, has not yet caught up when it comes to transgender acceptance, meaning that trans and gender-nonconforming people remain vulnerable to being to singled out for ridicule. The church may have lost the culture war, but the battle over trans rights remains the last available hill to die on. *** Attacking the LGBT community used to be de rigueur for the Vatican, even as recently as a few years ago. In a 2003 letter titled "Considerations Regarding Proposals to Give Legal Recognition to Unions Between Homosexual Persons," the church stated its clear and emphatic opposition to same-sex marriage. "The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behaviour or to legal recognition of homosexual unions," read the letter, which was issued under the tenure of Pope John Paul II. "The common good requires that laws recognize, promote and protect marriage as the basis of the family, the primary unit of society." The letter continued, "Legal recognition of homosexual unions or placing them on the same level as marriage would mean not only the approval of deviant behaviour, with the consequence of making it a model in present-day society, but would also obscure basic values which belong to the common inheritance of humanity." The resolution also said that "homosexuality is a troubling moral and social phenomenon," adding that the legal recognition of same-sex unions poses a particular danger to the church because these couples may have "the possibility of adopting children." The Vatican would harden its stance toward the LGBT community under Pope Benedict, who co-wrote the letter during his time as a cardinal. Benedict (neé Joseph Ratzinger) would ascend to the papacy following John Paul’s death in 2005. While a prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the religious leader referred to LGBT people as "intrinsically disordered." "Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil," he claimed in a 1986 memorandum, "and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder." After Benedict stepped down in 2013, Francis’ papacy signaled an about-face for the church when it came to LGBT inclusion. Pope Francis struck a more tolerant, compassionate tone than his predecessors, repeatedly stressing compassion and forgiveness on both sides of the aisle. In a March letter, Francis wrote that the church should accept and welcome populations that the religion has historically shunned, including gays, lesbians and even divorcees. "A pastor cannot feel that it is enough simply to apply moral laws . . . as if they were stones to throw at people’s lives," he wrote, adding, "By thinking that everything is black and white, we sometimes close off the way of grace and growth." The Pope expounded upon that message in June, urging Catholics to "apologize" to marginalized groups, stating that they "must be respected and accompanied pastorally." By bringing the church into the 21st century, Francis was merely catching up to his parishioners. In a 2015 survey, the Pew Research Forum found that Catholics were among the most tolerant religious groups when it came to the support of same-sex marriage. Fifty-eight percent of Catholics believe that all couples should have the right to wed, as opposed to 27 percent of white evangelicals who stated the same. That’s also true globally: Many of the countries that are the most accepting of homosexuality are heavily Catholic. Whereas just 60 percent of the U.S. population said in a 2013 survey that relationships between people of the same sex are morally acceptable, homosexuality was OK with 88 percent of Spaniards. The Iberian country is estimated to be 70 percent to 75 percent Catholic. Argentina is 71 percent Catholic and an estimated 74 percent of its population believes there’s nothing immoral about homosexuality. The same was true for the Philippines (80 percent Catholic), France (77 percent) and Italy (74 percent), countries in which more than 70 percent of the public stated the same. Given the widespread support of gays and lesbians, the Catholic Church had no choice but to soften its rhetoric, even if none of its official policies have changed. The trans community, however, has not yet benefitted from that wave of social tolerance, despite some progress in recent years. Actress Laverne Cox was nominated for an Emmy in 2014 for her groundbreaking role in Netflix’s "Orange Is the New Black," while shows like "Transparent’ and "Strut" have brought trans issues to a national audience. Meanwhile, trans people remain at a high risk for harassment and abuse. The Center for American Progress reported in 2011 that 90 percent of trans people have been discriminated against in their place of employment, while 70 percent have experienced negative interactions when using a public restroom. In 2013, the vast majority (73 percent) of hate crime killings in the U.S. were of trans women. The pervasive bigotry that trans people face on a daily basis, as well as the community’s relatively small numbers, makes them extremely easy to demonize. The most recent estimate found that there were 1.2 million trans individuals living in the U.S., which means that many Americans simply don’t know (or know that they know) a trans person. A 2013 survey by the Public Religion Research Institute found that just 10 percent of respondents had a friend or close family member who is transgender. That number, however, appears to be growing. Republicans, following the gay marriage defeat, have exploited that vulnerability by making trans people into the wedge issue du jour, giving conservatives a common enemy to fight. The GOP has cast trans people as dangerous "bathroom predators," ones who will prey on women and young girls if allowed to use restrooms that are appropriate to their gender identity. This specter has been present in the nine states — including Illinois, South Carolina and Massachusetts — that have considered anti-trans bathroom legislation this year. North Carolina passed House Bill 2 in March, which blocks equal access in public accommodations for trans people across the state. That includes public restrooms. (4) Pope Francis backs anti-Gay Marriage protests in Mexico http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pope-francis-gay-marriage-mexico-protests-support-catholic-church-a7330181.html Pope Francis backs gay marriage protests in Mexico The Pontiff supports anti-LGBT campaigners in Mexico 'in favour of family and life' May Bulman Monday 26 September 201 The Pope has voiced his support for Mexicans campaigning against the government's push to legalise same-sex marriage. Speaking at his blessing on Sunday, Pope Francis said he supported their protest "in favour of family and life, which in these times require special pastoral and cultural attention around the world". The Pontiff's comments came as tens of thousands of demonstrators in Mexico took to the streets, led by far-right nationalist party Frente Nacional por la Familia (National Front for the Family), to protest against President Enrique Peña Nieto's proposal to legalise same-sex marriage and demanding parents’ right to control sex education in schools. It is not the first time Pope Francis has spoken out against gay marriage - despite apparently relaxing the church’s position towards the LGBT community in 2015 - but he has rarely intervened in national debates. In June, the Supreme Court in Mexico legalised same-sex marriage in a landmark legal ruling that concluded it was unconstitutional for Mexican states to bar gay marriages. No official legislation was brought forward in parliament to introduce marriage for gay and bisexual couples, instead requiring courts throughout the country to follow suit, but it meant same-sex marriage was effectively legalised throughout the country. Same-sex marriage is now legal in the capital Mexico City and nine of the 31 Mexican states. Mexican bishops have strongly opposed the measure, with one bishop announcing he was "willing to go to prison to defend the family". The issue over gay marriage appears to have divided Mexico. Earlier in September, a photograph went viral of a 12-year-old boy standing up to a protest march in the state of Guanajuato by thousands of anti-LGBT activists opposing the plans. (5) ‘Catholic’ LGBT Group Slams Pope Francis for Denouncing Gender Ideology http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/03/catholic-lgbt-group-slams-pope-francis-denouncing-gender-ideology/ by Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.3 Oct 2016756 A nominally Catholic LGBT advocacy group is blasting Pope Francis for his ongoing criticisms of gender ideology, which he calls a "global war against the family." During his weekend trip to the Caucasus, the Pope twice decried the evils of indoctrinating children with the idea that gender is a fluid concept, disconnected from biological sexual differences. While drawing a distinction between individuals who struggle with their sexual identity and those who push a radical agenda, Francis forcefully denounced the latter, saying that gender theory is "against the nature of things." The director of New Ways Ministry, Francis DeBernardo, published a statement attacking the Pope for his comments, accusing him of being out of touch with reality for his "reliance upon so-called ‘gender theory’ and ‘ideological colonization.’" While praising the Francis’s pastoral sensitivity, DeBernardo said that the Pope’s remarks "reveal that he thinks children are being encouraged to choose their genders in a frivolous way. That simply is not the case." "Throwing about terms such as ‘gender theory’ and ‘ideological colonization’ is a red herring," he said. "It deflects from examining the deeper causes of marital strife and deterioration." Autoplay: On | Off New Ways Ministry was founded in 1977 Sr. Jeannine Gramick and Father Robert Nugent, who were later reprimanded by the Vatican for promoting "ambiguous positions on homosexuality," while also noting that their pastoral activities were "incompatible with the fullness of Christian morality." In the end, the Vatican "permanently prohibited" the pair from any pastoral work involving homosexual persons, citing their unwillingness to teach in accordance with Catholic doctrine and the confusion they were spreading among the faithful. Later, the president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Cardinal Francis George, further clarified that "New Ways Ministry has no approval or recognition from the Catholic Church and they cannot speak on behalf of the Catholic faithful in the United States." (6) Printer bans book against Gay Marriage - Andrew Bolt http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/printer-bans-book-against-gay-marriage/news-story/bb6fe0c10a440aba4b51e6e9dc41532f Printer bans book against gay marriage Andrew Bolt Herald Sun September 23, 2016 11:36am First we saw two commercial TV stations ban an ad backing traditional marriage. So did SBS. Then we saw a Catholic Archbishop taken to the Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Commission for defending traditional marriage. Next, we saw a meeting of Christian opponents of same-sex marriage bombarded with abuse and threats, forcing its cancellation. And now a printer has refused to print a book arguing against same-sex marriage: The Australian Marriage Forum announces: Yesterday, the publisher, Connor Court, was notified by the printer, McPherson's, in writing: "Due to the subject matter and content of your book, unfortunately I have been instructed by senior management not to proceed with printing this title." McPherson's is a printing company in Maryborough, Victoria, and is now owned by OpusGroup, headquartered in Sydney. McPherson's has had a ten year relationship with Connor Court, publishing many volumes including controversial books such as Ian Plimer's best-seller, Heaven and Earth, and Cory Bernardi's Conservative Revolution. Never before has the publisher known a printer to refuse to print a book on political grounds.... "This was a shock, because you don't expect a printing firm to act as a political censor for the gay lobby", [author] Dr van Gend said today. "It is also a shock because it comes just days after the Mercure International Hotel in Sydney cancelled the venue for our big gathering of groups opposing same-sex 'marriage', after gay activists threatened hotel staff if they let us meet there.... "I defy anyone to find a single word in my book that should not be printed. I can understand the gay lobby being worried about a book that so clearly exposes the harms of genderless 'marriage' and of the whole genderless package deal that comes with it, but they should not try to shut down our side of the debate by banning a book!" (7) Commercial printer acts as censor; bans book against same-sex 'marriage' http://australianmarriage.org/media-release-censored-opusgroup-refuses-print-dr-van-gends-book/ OpusGroup refuses to print Dr van Gend’s book: Commercial printer acts as censor; bans book against same-sex 'marriage' Today is the release date for a much-anticipated book by Dr David van Gend, President of the Australian Marriage Forum. The book is titled, Stealing from a Child: the Injustice of 'Marriage Equality', and has sold over two thousand copies prior to its release. It is described as "a manifesto in defense of society's inviolable foundation: Father, Mother, Child". The first in a series of launches in all state capitals begins tonight in Brisbane. Yesterday, the publisher, Connor Court, was notified by the printer, McPherson's, in writing: "Due to the subject matter and content of your book, unfortunately I have been instructed by senior management not to proceed with printing this title." McPherson's is a printer in regional Victoria now owned by OpusGroup, headquartered in Sydney. McPherson's has had a ten year relationship with Connor Court, publishing controversial books such as Ian Plimer's best-seller, Heaven and Earth, and Cory Bernardi's Conservative Revolution. Never before has the publisher known a printer to refuse to print a book on political grounds. REACTION FROM DR VAN GEND "This was a shock, because you don't expect a printing firm to act as a political censor for the gay lobby. "It is also a shock because it comes just days after the Mercure International Hotel in Sydney cancelled the venue for our big gathering of groups opposing same-sex 'marriage', after gay activists threatened hotel staff if they let us meet there. "We had to find a different venue in Sydney at short notice, and we will have to find a different printer at short notice - but we will not be silenced. "I defy anyone to find a single word in my book that should not be printed. I can understand the gay lobby being worried about a book that so clearly exposes the harms of genderless 'marriage' and of the whole genderless package deal that comes with it, but they should not try to shut down our side of the debate by banning a book! "We have been through this censorship already, with our TV Ad last year for the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras banned at the last minute by SBS - but that led to widespread condemnation of SBS, and I hope this act of political censorship by a corporation gets the condemnation it deserves. "We are meant to be an open society where great issues are debated freely. What's the difference between burning books and banning them being printed? "The printing company, OpusGroup, has had my book with them for two weeks - why did they wait until the day before the launch to pull the plug? If they were trying to make it impossible for me to supply books for the national tour, they have failed, because the heavy early demand for books meant we had to run off a few thousand interim copies digitally at a different company and we will be able to supply demand for at least the next week, until we find a new offset-printer. "I can only say to people, read the book and try to find anything that could justify this printing company acting as a branch of the Thought Police. Only today a Member of Parliament messaged me and said, "I couldn't put the book down. It's a clarion call to the complacent - a wonderfully kind but persuasive read." The national book tour starts in Brisbane today, and goes to all state capitals before ending in Canberra on Monday 10th October, the day Parliament is expected to resume debate on the marriage plebiscite. (8) Gays to infiltrate book launch, printer backs out http://www.chinchillanews.com.au/news/far-left-and-union-militants-protest-van-gend-book/3092592/ Andrew Backhouse | 22nd Sep 2016 4:00 PM Updated: 23rd Sep 2016 10:19 AM UPDATE: A printer has reportedly pulled out from publishing a book on same sex marriage written by a Toowoomba doctor because of its controversial subject matter. Television host Andrew Bolt, speaking on Sky News, said the printer had previously agreed to print the book, which argues against same sex marriage. The book, named "Stealing From a Child: The Injustice of Marriage Equality" was written by Dr David van Gend and is due to be officially launched at a function in Brisbane tonight. Gay and lesbian groups are planning to protest the book, arguing it is inflammatory and denigrates gay people. The book has the support of the Australian Marriage Forum, of which Dr van Gend is president, and former Toowoomba councillor Lyle Shelton from the Australian Christian Lobby. Mr Bolt said the book had been pulled by the printer just as the press was about to start rolling. He quoted senior management as saying the book's "subject matter and content" were behind the decision. "This closing down of debate is getting really too much," Mr Bolt said. The book is still available online. Gay rights proponent Gary Dodkins is planning to picket the official launch of the book tonight at Maylon College in Gaythorne. The launch starts at 6pm and will feature George Christensen as a special guest. Mr Dodkins slated the protest as a "peaceful vigil" but added "far left" groups and "militant unions" would be in attendance. He said gays were becoming so frustrated about the debate over marriage equality they were "willing to be arrested" and would likely infiltrate the event. Mr Dodkins is expecting hundreds of people to attend the rally. "People have said to me: 'Most of us have been bashed at some point in time, and I'm willing to be bashed again this time if something will come of it', which shows the level of sentiment that is out there," Mr Dodkins said. "The fuse has been lit and things will get ugly in the next couple of months." The Chronicle understands that as yet no permit has been issued for the rally, which will take place on private property. EARLIER: The gay and lesbian community in Brisbane is preparing to rally against the launch of a new book by Toowoomba doctor David van Gend. The book, named "Stealing >From a Child: The Injustice of Marriage Equality" will be launched with special guest George Christensen at Maylon College in Gaythorne from 6pm tomorrow. Former Toowoomba councillor Lyle Shelton from the Australian Christian Lobby wrote: "If you think same-sex 'marriage' won't affect your family or freedom you haven't read this book." Gary Dodkins is organising what he called a "peaceful vigil style protest" outside the event and is urging protesters to bring candles, rainbow flags and banners supporting marriage equality. He said the gay community was becoming increasingly frustrated with the debate around same-sex marriage. Mr Dodkins said members of the far left and militant unionists were expected to attend the protest, which is being held in the context of the government's push to hold a plebiscite on same-sex marriage. It comes after an Australian Christian Lobby event was cancelled after a satirist Simon Hunt, sometimes known as Pauline Pantsdown, led a social media campaign against it. The Queensland Government also recently lowered the age of consensual anal sex to 16. Dr van Gend was contacted for comment. (9) Two attempts to suppress pro-Marriage book, but successful launch in Sydney http://australianmarriage.org/marriage-book-banned-printer-melbourne-launch-thursday-night/ Marriage Book Banned By Printer: Melbourne Launch Thursday Night Follow us Facebooktwitterrssyoutube After a sold-out launch in Sydney last night, the national book tour for Dr David van Gend's manifesto against same-sex 'marriage' goes to Melbourne Thursday night. A capacity crowd at Sydney's Hellenic Club on Hyde Park listened to State Labor MP the Hon. Greg Donnelly introduce STEALING FROM A CHILD: THE INJUSTICE OF 'MARRIAGE EQUALITY'. Dr van Gend, a family doctor and president of the Australian Marriage Forum, then spoke about the "genderless agenda that comes with genderless 'marriage'" and this was followed by a lively Q&A. Book sales are averaging over 200 per night, with the total now around three thousand just a few days into the release. Last week saw two attempts to suppress the pro-traditional marriage voice - the cancelling of a marriage meeting at the Mercure Hotel on Tuesday, and the cancelling of the book's main print run on Thursday - and Dr van Gend commented on the significance of launching this book at such a time: "Part of this book tour is going to be a gigantic defiance of those forces that would silence public discussion on matters of great importance. That is a value of this book launch at a time like this... It is an exercise in asserting civil discussion in a free society - and I could really feel that animated in a meeting like we had tonight." Media are welcome at the launch in Melbourne which will be held at the Community Hall, Maronite Centre, 230 Normanby Ave, Thornbury at 7pm Thursday. All attendees including media need to register at Eventbrite for security purposes, with a $6 ticket cost towards expenses. (10) Orthodox oppose Gay march in Jerusalem http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/07/gilad-erdan-gay-pride-parade-jerusalem-yair-lapid.html The triumph of Jerusalem's Gay Pride Parade The large participation of politicians and of figures from the Orthodox-Zionist stream at the Jerusalem Gay Pride Parade was a victory for liberalism over incitement against the LGBTQ community. Author Mazal Mualem Posted July 22, 2016 Translator Danny Wool Some 25,000 Israelis, including dozens of Knesset members, marched in Jerusalem’s Gay Pride Parade on July 21. They were taking part in much more than a heart-warming show of strength by the LGBTQ community. More than ever, it was a demonstration of enlightened liberalism. At the largest gay pride parade that Jerusalem has ever seen, it was a comforting final note after a very harsh week for the LGBTQ community. It all began with a July 13 speech by Rabbi Yigal Levenstein, the head of the pre-military service yeshiva in the settlement of Eli, in which he called gays and lesbians "perverts." These disparaging and insulting remarks, made by the head of an influential educational institution, were surprising not only in their crassness, but also because they were made openly, at a public conference. Then came a letter in support of Levenstein signed by 300 prominent rabbis. It was suddenly obvious that despite the enormous progress that Israel’s gay community has made over the past few years in the struggle for equal rights, there is still a long way to go. One positive surprise was the response by politicians from across the political spectrum denouncing Levenstein’s comments. They included the chairman of the right-wing Orthodox HaBayit HaYehudi, Education Minister Naftali Bennett. His rejection of Levenstein's remarks was especially important, because it gave voice to a tense debate within the religious Zionist community. Bennett had most probably chosen his words carefully when saying, "You cannot call an entire community derogatory names and hide behind [Jewish law]. … What was said is unacceptable to me. … That is not our way." In addition to Bennett, several Orthodox-Zionist rabbis joined the pushback against Levenstein's statement, vehemently condemning it. Rabbi Benny Lau, a leading Orthodox-Zionist figure, harshly criticized Levenstein, warning that his words could have dangerous repercussions for some young boys. He said that a young gay yeshiva student had tried to commit suicide following similar comments Levenstein made in the past. Over the past few years, some politicians, particularly from the mainstream secular parties, have "discovered" the gay community and have sought ways to reach out to it, not least for basic political and electoral reasons. Tel Aviv’s Gay Pride Parade has become a mecca for politicians ranging from Culture Minister Miri Regev to Yesh Atid Chairman Yair Lapid. The parties have courted the LGBTQ community and electorate, and many of them have established gay groups within their organizations. Regardless, this embrace has not always found expression in the struggle for equal rights legislation, and in many cases, the LGBTQ community has come out against these very politicians when they abandoned them and their fight at the moment of truth. Even Amir Ohana, Likud's only openly gay Knesset member, disappointed his community by voting against such legislation because of his overriding commitment to coalition discipline. Yet, even if the community failed to obtain legislation it sought, when it comes to mood and attitude, politicians have embraced the gay community, and this is important. By standing beside the LGBTQ community after Levenstein's remarks, and especially by participating in the parade, politicians have shown a level of solidarity that extends beyond calculations of political benefit. Recalling the benighted comments that former Shas Chairman Eli Yishai made just a decade ago, it is quite apparent that times have changed. Yishai didn't have a second thought, and he certainly didn’t apologize, when in 2006 he said in an interview to the Knesset Channel, "Gays and lesbians are sick people who, until just a few years ago, were exempted from military service because of it. It’s a sickness, literally. I didn’t decide that. Medicine decided that. It’s an illness. The Torah speaks about how serious it is." At the time, only a handful of politicians openly challenged him and condemned his comments. After all, he was industry and commerce minister, an important portfolio, and an influential political figure who could determine political fates. Instead of speaking out against Yishai's remarks, most politicians simply decided to ignore them. The shocking murder of two young people at Bar Noar, a gay youth club in Tel Aviv, in 2009 was a transformative moment in terms of public attitudes toward the gay community, especially among the political classes. Immediately after the murders, ultra-Orthodox politicians were accused of incitement because of their attitudes and statements about gays and lesbians. Yishai’s comments were cited again and again, and the ultra-Orthodox political leadership was forced to defend itself. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and several of his ministers visited the site of the murder and publicly embraced the community. For several years now, it seemed as if unenlightened comments about gays and lesbians by public figures had just about disappeared from public life. Then along came Levenstein, a man who seemed rather enlightened and liberal. By saying what he did, he delivered a harsh blow to the community and set the country at least a generation backward. He did this in the shadow of the one-year anniversary of the murder of Shira Banki, who was stabbed to death at last year’s event by an ultra-Orthodox homophobe named Zvi Schlissel. Banki was only 16 when she died. The dark mood hovering over the event was exacerbated by the letter from the rabbis supporting Levenstein and by ultra-Orthodox demands that the parade be canceled, amid threats that they would cause a disturbance. To make matters worse, Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat announced that he would not be participating in the parade. In an interview with Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, Barkat, who is secular, explained that he did not want to offend the ultra-Orthodox community. Instead of showing his support just a year after Banki was murdered, in his own town, in an attack against the gay community, he chose instead to ingratiate himself to his city’s ultra-Orthodox community solely for political considerations. If there is any other reason to consider this year's huge Gay Pride Parade in Jerusalem a stunning victory, it is that it offered a resounding rebuttal to Barkat’s infuriating comments at a time when he should have been standing at the forefront of the marchers. That dozens of politicians — including Home Security Minister Gilad Erdan, opposition leader Isaac Herzog from the Zionist Camp, Yesh Atid's Lapid and many other Knesset members — turned out in Jerusalem to show support for the LGBTQ community makes Barkat look ridiculous for putting politics above all else. In a city as divided as Jerusalem, Barkat had a chance to be a uniter, but he chose instead to join the dividers. In an interview during the parade, Erdan commented on the incitement against the LGBTQ community preceding the event. "What I saw over the last few days was very, very painful," he said. "We live in a Jewish and democratic state. I grew up in a religious home and attended a yeshiva high school. The most important rule that we are taught is that ‘"You shall love your neighbor as yourself" is a central principle in the Torah [Jerusalem Talmud, Nedarim 9:4].’ It is what preserved the Jewish people throughout the generations." (11) Bearded Feminists; Abnormality is the New Norm - Lasha Darkmoon https://www.darkmoon.me/2016/when-abnormality-is-the-new-norm/ When Abnormality is the New Norm Lasha Darkmoon July 24, 2016  When the abnormal has been normalized, it becomes a crime to be normal. CONCHITA WURST, the bearded drag queen, winner of the Eurovision song contest in 2014 and promoter of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights Can you imagine a world in which heterosexuality has been criminalized and straight people are hunted down and killed? I can. It’s on its way. You may have to go underground if you are perverted enough to prefer the opposite sex to your own, but don’t worry, they won’t compare you to a pedophile — because by that time pedophilia will be all the rage and incest the ‘in’ thing. Brave New World, stop! — I want to get off! Pretty soon it will be a crime even to think like that, let alone say it. We are moving into uncharted waters where the old certainties no longer apply. This is what has been planned for us. It didn’t just happen. This is Nietzsche’s Umwertung der Werte—"the revaluation of all values"—in which the traditional verities our ancestors took for granted are kicked into the long grass. Moral anarchy is the result. Mass immiseration. Universal despair, planned in advance. And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born…? — § — I was shocked to read an article in the Daily Mail the other day which began by revealing that scores of schools throughout Britain had decided to adopt a ‘gender-neutral’ uniform policy that would allow boys to wear skirts to school in future—and girls, presumably, to cultivate beards if they wished. Around 40 state secondary and 40 state primary schools have recently changed their dress rules in a drive to be more sensitive to transgender pupils. Schools have been ordered to stop referring to "girls" and "boys" because to do so, allegedly, can give rise to serious misunderstandings and cause considerable psychological trauma. Henceforth, everyone in school undergoing education must be referred to by the neutral term "pupil", without specifying biological gender. This is because gender is "fluid" and the person you are referring to presumptuously as a "boy" or "girl" may have very different views to you on that subject. A boy today may feel like a girl tomorrow, and vice versa. The result is that pupils are now being encouraged "to dress in the uniform in which they feel most comfortable. It will mean children as young as five will be able to ‘come out’ as trans without breaking uniform rules." According to the Daily Mail:     "Diversity campaigners have warned schools that current policies risk discriminating against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender pupils. However, Christian groups fear that introducing a choice of uniform could confuse youngsters.     Allens Croft School in Birmingham is believed to be the first state primary school in Britain to declare it has a ‘gender neutral’ uniform.     Its rules state that boys can wear a grey or black skirt or pinafore while girls can wear grey or black trousers. It says it aims ‘to promote each child’s right to express their gender and personality in whichever way feels right for them’. " (See here) Logically, this means that girls with a surplus of male hormones can come to school sporting beards if they want. Bearded females, like the 40-year-old housewife pictured below, will be encouraged as future role models for schoolgirls who are not sure of their gender identity. article-2239177-163C0317000005DC-170_1024x615_large SIOBHAN FLETCHER, feisty role model for the bearded feminists of the future A feminist colleague of mine has a thing about beards. "If men can have beards" she told me indignantly, "why can’t women? I was given the sack at my last job for growing a goatee beard." "Beard luck!" I quipped. She wasn’t too pleased. ?? — § — Head teacher Paula Weaver told The Sunday Times: "Everybody has the right to be themselves. We do lots of work through literature and drama and we talk to children about the fact we have someone who was assigned male at birth who is saying ‘I’m a girl’. It’s about being open with them and about everyone feeling OK." Elly Barnes, founder of Educate and Celebrate, echoed Ms Weaver’s politically correct views:     "In some schools, when I have the initial staff meeting and talk about gender-neutral uniforms, the reaction is ‘We can’t do it, parents won’t like it’. But as soon as they do it, they find out there is absolutely no difference.     You don’t get boys coming in to schools suddenly wearing skirts. But it just gives that space for it not to be an issue if there are trans kids." I can see some kids getting a bit confused, like the little mite below: Andrea Williams of Christian Concern, however, takes a more traditional attitude. She argues that gender-neutral uniforms could mean schools were pushing an agenda on impressionable minds. "We are increasingly seeing boundaries being overstepped," she said, "and it is concerning." You bet it’s concerning. It’s more than concerning. It’s creepy. Take the issue of unisex toilets. If you’re a woman, how would you like a miniskirted serial killer barging into your "safe space" and beating you to the only available cubicle? That is soooo unacceptable! COMPULSORY UNISEX TOILET HE : Your first time doing it standing up, is it? SHE : Yep, I’m still a learner. HE : Careful you don’t splash your shoes! New York City has just launched a $265,000 tax-funded ad campaign to push transgender bathrooms on the city’s residents. There’s nothing now to stop a serial killer—and 99.9 percent of serial killers are males—from freely entering female bathrooms and going berserk. Disturbingly, it’s now a criminal offense in Washington State to ask a man in a woman’s bathroom if he thinks he is male or female. — § — The Daily Mail goes on to report the case of 34-year-old Emma Symonds from Gloucester. She has a 4-year-old son called Logan who insists on dressing up as a girl. Logan’s (non-identical) twin brother Alfie is quite happy to dress up as a boy, but Logan prefers wearing pretty pinafore dresses and playing with dolls. If Emma dresses Logan in male clothes, he throws a tantrum. Result: Logan goes to nursery school kitted out in pinafore dresses and "the head of his school has been most supportive." The only problem is that Logan runs the risk of the other little boys in his class calling him a "sissy". The government takes a stern view of this sort of "antisocial" behavior and is pouring vast sums of money into training staff to deal with "transphobic bullying." All very interesting, but the paragraph that made my eyes pop came right at the end of the Daily Mail article:     "Transgender criminals will be able to choose between male and female prisons under official guidance drawn up by ministers. The policy would mean convicts would be allowed to serve their sentences alongside those of the gender they ‘identify with’, The Sunday Times reported." That takes the biscuit. We are living in Absurdistan. If criminals are going to be free to choose between male and female prisons, depending on which gender they identify with at the time of their conviction, it doesn’t require much imagination to figure out what kind of prison the average heterosexual male convict is going to end up in—provided he is willing to trade in his trousers for a skirt. What if the Jack the Rippers of tomorrow should claim, "Hey, I now feel like Jill the Ripper!" — § — A few words now on the difference between "transgenders" and "transsexuals". If a boy likes dressing up as a girl, like the 4-year-old Logan mentioned above, there’s no need for alarm. He could be going through a phase. He could grow out of it. If he doesn’t, then he becomes a "transgender", i.e., someone suffering from gender dysphoria, a term introduced officially by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 2012. This means: a profound dissatisfaction with the sex assigned to you at birth. If you’re a boy, you want to be a girl; and if you’re a girl, you want to be a boy. Many people are confused between "transgender" and "transsexual" and often assume these two terms are synonymous. Let me explain the difference. Consider the tomboy: the little girl with short hair who wants to be a boy. First of all, she could grow out of it. If she does, no problem. She is behaving like most women do: happy to wear female attire, showing a healthy interest in men, and not particularly anxious to acquire a beard or moustache. If, however, she continues to be dissatisfied with her female sex and would prefer to have a penis and grow a beard, then she has a problem. She is now a "transgender", suffering from gender dysphoria. She continues to be a "transgender" as long as she holds on to her breasts and refrains from drastic surgical treatment. She can dress up as a man if she wishes, but at least she retains her breasts and can, if she wants, make an effort to pass as a woman again by growing her hair long, wearing skirts and heels, and generally trying to look feminine. It’s the same with a man. No matter how dissatisfied he is with his male sex and would prefer to be a woman, he remains a man—a transgendered man—as long as he keeps his penis. As soon as he has his penis removed, it’s a different ballgame. He is now a "transsexual." With the help of female hormones, he will grow breasts and even get himself an artificially constructed vagina. To all intents and purposes, he is now a woman. And he can be pretty hot, too, with lots of men lusting after him like crazy—as long as they don’t know he was once a man. When they find out the gorgeous female they’ve been wining and dining all evening was a guy with a Charles Darwin beard only a couple of years ago, passion tends to die the death. However, not always. Sometimes love triumphs. Amor vincit omnia. What counts is attitude. If your attitude is the politically correct one, you will be perfectly happy living with a transsexual in marital bliss. But you will never be able to have children. The man with the artificial vagina, now officially a "woman", will always remain a man biologically. She/He will never be able to conceive. In 2014 Facebook created a stir when it added over 50 gender options for its billions of users. With 50 different genders on the menu, figuring out what gender you are can be quite a problem for the average dimwit. You have a choice between several bewildering, exotic and overlapping genders. I will list only a few: agender, androgynous, bigender, cisgender female, cisgender male, female to male (FTM), male to female (MTF), gender fluid, gender nonconforming, gender questioning, gender variant, gender queer, intersex, neutrois, non-binary, Other, pangender, polygender, transgender, transsexual, trans-masculine, trans-feminine, "two spirit". (To find out what these impressive terms are supposed to mean, see here). In my humble opinion, the people inventing these terms are all bluffing. They cannot even agree on the number of genders in existence: some of them pontificate that there are 71 genders, others 56, or 58, or 51, or 63. Quite simply, they are making it all up. (Check out these pretentious figures here). If the astronomers all differed about the number of planets in the solar system, and if the geographers weren’t sure how many continents there were, I think we would be right to take everything they said with a pinch of salt. So it is with these pseudo-scholars of sexual gender. Their inability to make up their minds how many genders there are makes it unnecessary, I think, to believe a word they say. They look like Frankfurt School charlatans to me. For the various species to increase and multiply, only two sexes have hitherto been necessary. So far the grammarians have contented themselves with three genders: masculine, feminine and neuter. The idea of 50-plus fluid and overlapping sexual genders is almost certainly a violation of Occam’s razor. E.B. White says it for me: "Trust me, Wilbur. People are very gullible. They’ll believe anything they see in print." — § — The latest trendy term for normal people, by the way, is "cisgender." If you want to sound really cool, you can shorten this to "cis", as in: "Are you cis or trans?" (The prefix "cis" in Latin means "this side of"; which is the opposite of "trans", meaning "across from" or "the other side of".) With any luck, you will find the terms "male" and "female" buried away in small print among the voluminous footnotes. The case of Caitlyn Jenner (pictured here on the cover of Vanity Fair) will serve as a useful illustration of the difference between "transgender" and "transsexual". Caitlyn Jenner was born William Bruce Jenner in 1949 and is biologically a man, though he insists he is a woman. Though he retains his penis, he dresses as a woman and looks like a woman after receiving hormone replacement therapy and cosmetic surgery. "For all intents and purposes," he maintains, "I’m a woman." He says this in spite of that fact that he has never been attracted to men, always preferring women. He has never had "gender reassignment surgery"—which would involve the removal of his penis, turning him into a full-fledged "transsexual". This is an option, however, he is prepared to consider. (See here) To clarify and summarize: if you’re a man who prefers to be a woman, you can do this by taking three steps: (a) hormone replacement therapy which will give you breasts and feminize your voice, (b) cosmetic surgery, which will alter your face and make you look more like a woman, (c) by dressing like a woman. However, you can still hang on to your penis in case you change your mind and wish to revert back to being a man. The final step is the removal of your penis: gender reassignment surgery. There’s no going back after this. You are now a "transsexual." A "cross-dresser" or transvestite is simply a man who dresses up as a woman or a woman who dresses up as a man. You can be a cross-dresser without cosmetic surgery, hormone replacement therapy, or gender reassignment surgery. These three steps come later, if you are really determined to switch over. One fact remains indisputable: you can change your sex only in appearance, but you can never change your underlying biological gender. MARITAL BLISS, 2020 (How long will it last?) "Would you like to see a picture of me before the operation?"     Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;    Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,    The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere    The ceremony of innocence is drowned;    The best lack all conviction, while the worst    Are full of passionate intensity.     — WB Yeats, The Second Coming (12) Duterte calls US ambassador 'Gay' http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-10/philippines-president-rodrigo-duterte-calls-us-envoy-gay/7717106 Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte calls US envoy Philip Goldberg 'gay', prompting summons Updated yesterday at 5:31pm Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has sparked a fresh diplomatic row after calling the US ambassador "gay", in comments that prompted Washington to summon Manila's envoy. Mr Duterte used a local Tagalog language homophobic slur to express his displeasure with US Ambassador Philip Goldberg in televised comments.     "As you know, I'm fighting with [US Secretary of State John Kerry's] ambassador. His gay ambassador, the son of a whore. He pissed me off," Mr Duterte said. Mr Duterte surged to power with a landslide victory in May following an incendiary campaign in which he gleefully used foul language to disrespect authority figures, from his local political rivals to the Pope. He first came into conflict with the US envoy during the campaign, after he said he wanted to rape Australian missionary Jacqueline Hamill, who was sexually assaulted and murdered in a 1989 prison riot in Davao, the city Mr Duterte ran for two decades. Mr Goldberg and Australia's ambassador Amanda Gorely both strongly criticised the comments.     "[Mr Goldberg] meddled during the elections, giving statements here and there. He was not supposed to do that," Mr Duterte said. The US State Department said the Filipino charge d'affaires Patrick Chuasoto had been summoned to discuss the President's comments. "We had that conversation," department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau said. "I think what we were seeking is perhaps a better understanding of why that statement was made," she added. Philippine foreign affairs spokesman Charles Jose confirmed the meeting but said Manila's envoy had been "invited to the State Department to discuss the entire breadth of Philippines-US relations". "Philippine-US relations remain strong," he said. AFP (13) ABC Keeps 'Modernizing' the Family Leftward http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/l-brent-bozell-iii/abc-keeps-modernizing-family-leftward By L. Brent Bozell III and Tim Graham | September 30, 2016 | 8:16 AM EDT The cast and crew of " Modern Family" pose backstage after winning the award for outstanding comedy series at the 63rd Primetime Emmy Awards. (AP Photo/Matt Sayles) ABC debuted the sitcom "Modern Family" in 2009 in part to push a broader acceptance of same-sex couples. But the cultural deconstructionists cannot rest until the mission is complete, so then they pushed it even further, agitating for a broader acceptance of same-sex marriage as just as sacred as traditional marriage. Now, the deconstructionists are doing it again, this time pushing transgender acceptance ... with a transgender child actor. This new initiative came just a few weeks after transgender actors became the latest social justice cause pushed at the Emmy Awards. When he accepted a highly politicized Emmy award for the second year in a row, Jeffrey Tambor of "Transparent" pleaded that he should be the last "cisgender" actor — an actor who "identifies" with his or her biological sex — to play a transgender on television. He said: "Please give transgender talent a chance. Give them auditions. Give them their story." This trend was already underway. One CNN writer gushed that "'Modern Family' is truly living up to its name." It hired Jackson Millarker, an 8 year old from Atlanta, Georgia, to play a transgender boy who pressures the gay characters, Cam and Mitchell, to explore whether they are tolerant enough. Cam and Mitchell are upset when their adopted daughter, Lily, calls her new playmate Tom (formerly Tina) a "weirdo." You read that correctly. The child is 8 years old. When the episode aired on Sept. 28, Millarker was on screen for just seconds, and the transgender plot was a mere fraction of the half-hour. Cam and Mitchell first imagine themselves winning parenting awards for their daughter's commitment to tolerance. When the "weirdo" moment arrives, they're upset, of course. One says to the other, "One little spat, and her instinct is to go all baby bigot on him?" Then, Mitchell's father asks how they would react if their Lily decided to become "Lou." They want to approve but struggle with the thought. In horror, Cam says, "Are we not being as tolerant as we think?" Mitchell replies, "But that's our thing, lording our tolerance over others." That's a fitting slogan for "Modern Family" and the Emmy-awarding elite. Gay actor Jesse Tyler Ferguson, who plays Mitchell, tweeted that he was "super proud of this weeks episode." The director of the episode, Ryan Case, took to Instagram to post a photo of herself with Millarker with the caption: "This is Jackson Millarker. He's 8 years old, from Atlanta, and just happens to be transgender. He plays Lily's friend Tom in this week's Modern Family and he's wonderful. One of the many reasons I love being a part of this show." People magazine touted Stacey and Jen, the two lesbian parents of Jackson, who say that he "transitioned at 6 years old." They boasted: "We followed Jackson's lead from a very early age and supported him in every aspect of his transition. ... He was always a very gender-neutral child, but at the age of 4 he started experiencing intense anxiety in his daily life." They insisted that they gave the child "the freedom to express himself however he felt comfortable." You read that correctly, as well. Four years old. In today's oh-so-tolerant culture, it seems no one ever opposed this child's denial of actual biology. Millarker insisted on being referred to with male pronouns at age 6, and his parents said: "He entered second grade as his true self, a boy. His family, friends, and school have been very supportive from the beginning. He is now a confident, happy, healthy young man." They loved ABC's invitation, saying, "Jackson has been a young activist in our community and he knew that 'Modern Family' would portray the role of a transgender child in a positive light." Apparently, America's culture is unanimous. If millions of you disagree, then you're prehistoric, stuck in the dark days of ... 2009. Question: Have you ever known a 6 year old who questioned (without any prompting) his or her own gender? We pose that question to the entire national readership of this column. Disney-owned ABC runs a Mickey Mouse "news" operation. L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org -- Peter Myers 381 Goodwood Rd Childers Qld 4660 Australia ph. in Australia: 07 41170125 from overseas: +61 7 41170125 website: http://mailstar.net/index.html Skype video: petermyersaus . By prior arrangement only, after discussions by email. To unsubscribe, reply with "Unsubscribe" in the Subject line. Allow one day. |
Archives‎ > ‎