Archives‎ > ‎

Rewriting History, by Larry Romanoff

I have seldom had much patience or sympathy with much of the historical
record that is popularly available and promulgated in the West. [...]

American historians are cut from the same cloth, with their children
being taught that America roamed the world only to spread freedom,
vanquish tyranny and make the world safe for democracy, with no
knowledge of the savage militarism that claimed tens of millions of
lives and rendered hundreds of millions to misery. Jewish children are
falsely taught that Israel was created and granted to them by the United
Nations and that they have been persecuted not for their crimes but from
prejudice. Almost none know the truths of their evictions from so many
nations. The only nation that has faced the brutal aspects of its
history is Germany, having for 70 years been bullied by the hypocritical
Americans and the Jews who have conveniently forgotten their own
atrocities by mercilessly using Germany as both poster boy and whipping
boy for what are mostly their own sins. So many American and other
informations sources engage in the most blatant and shameless re-writing
of historical fact to propagate mythology for the ignorant. Wikipedia
has proven itself virtually useless as a reference source due to its
Jewish roots and heavy ideological slant, heavy censorship and shameless
re-writing of historical accounts. [...]

It is particulary irritating that both the Americans and the Jews harp
on accusations of China not having self-immolated in repentance for its
historical mistakes while conveniently erasing their own squalid
histories from current memory. [...]

The American historian Howard Zinn shared this antipathy for revisionism
and made some good attempts to lay bare the fundamental truths of
historical events in contrast to most US historians who 'cherry-picked'
bits of American historical data and surrounded them with flowery
fabrications intended at best to deceive. His truths are impossible to
ignore, but the treatment of his work in universities serves mostly to
undermine and diminish the impact of his work. I will repeat here two
brief passages reporting on the same American historical event relating
to the arrival of Christopher Columbus in America. Both passages are
factually correct, but only the first appears in American history books.
It is a quote, but I do not recall the source.

The traditional American version begins this way: "When Columbus landed
in the New World in the 1490s, he found native people who were very
primitive with no written language, practiced pagan religious beliefs,
and lacked even the rudiments of civilization such as the wheel. They
were awed by the sight of the large Spanish ships with men in shining
armor and riding horses that had never before been seen in the Western
Hemisphere. These native people welcomed the Spaniards who brought
Christianity and civilization to their people."

Zinn's perspective is strikingly different. "Columbus and his men went
on a great slave raid, rounded up fifteen hundred Arawak men, women, and
children, put them in pens guarded by Spaniards and dogs, then picked
the five hundred best specimens to load onto ships. Of those five
hundred, two hundred died en route. The rest arrived alive in Spain and
were put up for sale (as slaves) by the archdeacon of the town, who
reported that, although the slaves were "naked as the day they were
born", they showed "no more embarrassment than animals."

Zinn should also have mentioned that one of Columbus' first activities
was the establishment of brothels in which he prostituted fairly large
numbers of of pre-pubescent native girls. From this, we wouldn't know we
were reading about the same history of the same country. But it is
actually worse than this because, although Zinn's books may appear in
university courses, American educators typically describe Zinn as a
"radical historian" which effectively consigns him to a place on the
edge of normality and perhaps even sanity. "Radical" is not a compliment
in the English language. One institution acknowledges that Zinn's
writing will "lead to very different conclusions about the same events",
but advises its students that "You do not have to believe (these
historical facts), only understand them". It then continues to degrade
the historical truth of its own nation by advising that the class will
compare "Zinn's view" with the "more traditional" view and with "other
interpretations" as well.

What can we conclude from this bit of educational treason? First, Zinn
is so extreme in his views that his judgment is in doubt and perhaps his
sanity as well. [...] To ensure continutation of this state of affairs,
after Zinn's death in 2013, many academics and politicians across the US
were busy photoshopping Zinn from the world of history and rendering the
pages once again blank. As one example of many, the governor of Indiana,
a man named Mitch Daniels, gleefully announced that "This terrible
anti-American academic [is dead]", publicly referred to Zinn's writing
as "crap", then embarked on a frantic attempt to remove Zinn's work from
libraries and classrooms everywhere. He said, "... how do we get rid of
[Zinn's writing] before more young people are force-fed a totally false
version of our history?" But of course Zinn's version wasn't false. It
was true. But it attacked Americans at their weakest point, undermining
the mythical Disney cartoon-like narrative that permeates the nation.
The reality is that Americans do not want to know the truths of their
nation. This false and pathetic mythology is the only adhesive that
holds the country together, which is why Zinn's books are now being
banned from schools and libraries in America.

When Harold Pinter accepted his Nobel prize in literature, he so
eloquently identified "a vast tapestry of lies, upon which we feed", and
asked why the crimes of nations like the Soviet Union were so apparently
well-known in the West while America's crimes were barely recorded, much
less properly documented or even acknowledged. The US has perhaps the
largest catalogue of crimes against humanity in the world's history,
involving genocides and massacres, exports of torture, predation and
misery, but all has been met with silence. As Pinter said, "... you
wouldn't know it happened. It never happened. Even while it was
happening it never happened". The history isn't really hidden, but it is
deliberately eradicated from the American consciousness - and from the
consciousness of the many victim societies that have suffered exposure
to this revisionist American mythology. The Americans are unique in that
they forcibly rewrite the history books of many other nations in
addition to their own. [...]

One typical case is the Sand Creek Massacre. Briefly, this was an event
where white Americans descended on a group of about 200 natives, mostly
women and children, and executed atrocities in the finest tradtion of
white colonialists anywhere. According to eyewitnesses, all natives were
killed and scalped, including suckling infants two or three months old.
The women and children all had their heads smashed in, while babies were
beaten with rifle butts until their brains were spattered everywhere.
Men used their knives to cut and rip open all the women, including
pregnant women, while they were still alive, then all the bodies were
mutilated. The Americans cut out and saved the fetuses from the pregnant
women, and removed not only the natives' scalps but cut out the genital
flesh and pubic hair of all the women, as well as all male genitalia,
especially the mens' testicles to be used as tobacco pouches. The dead
fetuses and other trophies were displayed later in many American towns
where delighted citizens were regaled with endless stories of these
atrocities. So it doesn't go unsaid, this was only one of thousands of
similar events. [...]

Beginning in the late 1940s and continuing to the present day, the US
has been engaged in an ideological war against socialism, a war driven
primarily by a fear stoked in an ignorant and naive American public.
This is perhaps best personified by Joseph McCarthy, an influential US
Senator who used his power to instil fear into the both the government
and the general population, and to implement one of the most widespread
programs of Human Rights violations that has ever existed in any country.

The McCarthy era, which persisted in some ways until the 1970s, was
driven by a genuine and irrational fear of socialism and communism, with
disastrous results both inside the US and outside in terms of its
effects on US foreign policy. By the time Russia blockaded Berlin, the
US was almost hysterical with anti-communism, resulting in witch-hunts,
censorship, and widespread human-rights abuses. [...]

Christopher Columbus is today venerated throughout the US with a
Columbus Day holiday and even Washington's 'District of Columbia' is
named after him. To support their narrative, the Americans created the
myth of Queen Isabella of Spain pawning her crown jewels to finance his
voyages of exploration, but none of that is true. Columbus, whose real
name was Cristobol Colon, was a Jewish slave trader financed by wealthy
Jewish businessmen, whose discovery of the new world set in motion a
program of genocide that covered all the Americas, exterminating more
than 125 million people including the entire Maya, Inca and Aztec
civilisations, as well as the Carib Indians and 98% of American
aboriginal peoples. To celebrate a national holiday in his name is an
unparalleled obscenity, but not for the Americans. To them, Columbus
created "freedom". [...]

Davy Crockett, an American frontiersman beloved by generations of small
boys, was built into the epitome of a moral role model for emulation,
the kids being taught he died fighting "an enemy of freedom" at the
Alamo. The hell he did. Crockett was little more than a murderous goon
expanding the American empire, and died trying to kill thousands of
Mexicans, just as he had previously done with the natives. There were
many of these so-called American heroes, mostly created from the corpses
of resurrected non-descript gangsters infused with a sudden excess of
Christian morality, becoming part Christian soldier and part typical
American. [...]

Another current example is Steven Spielberg's unforgivably distorted
portrayal of Lincoln and slavery and the American civil war. It was the
Rothschild's Barings Bank that financed the slave trade, and a great
many if not most of the slave traders were Jewish. Furthermore, we have
adequate documentation that it was European Jewish bankers who
stimulated the slavery-related rift in American society to instigate the
civil war. In this context, Spielberg's movie is an especially offensive
false and mythical portrayal of the true facts. As one columnist noted,
Spielberg's movie "had too many negroes and too few Jews".  [...]

A great many Americans "know" - because their narrative has told them -
that China stole all their jobs, that China cheats on trade, that the
Chinese have no "freedom" and, of course, that "all Chinese are
brainwashed". Likewise, historical myths about Tibet and Xinjiang have
been impressed onto gullible minds with an inflammatory emotional
narrative and are now unlikely to change. [...] ==

History and Propaganda, Bernays and Propaganda

Many years ago, the Jewish-American political commentator Walter
Lippmann realised that political ideology could be completely
fabricated, using the media to control both presentation and
conceptualisation, not only to create deeply-ingrained false beliefs in
a population, but also to entirely erase undesirable political ideas
from the public mind. [...] An Austrian Jew named Edward Louis Bernays
who was the nephew of psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, was one of Lippman's
most precocious students and it was he who put Lippman's theories into
practice. Bernays is widely known in America as the father of Public
Relations, but he would be much more accurately described as the father
of American war marketing as well as the father of mass manipulation of
the public mind. [...]

In his main work titled 'Propaganda', which he wrote in 1928, Bernays
argued that the manipulation of public opinion was a necessary part of
democracy in which individuals were inherently dangerous (to the
rapacity of the elites) but could be harnessed and channeled by these
same elites for their economic benefit. He wrote further that "No
serious sociologist any longer believes that the voice of the people
expresses any ... wise idea. The voice of the people expresses the mind
of the people, and that mind is made up for it by ... those persons who
understand the manipulation of public opinion. It is composed of
inherited prejudices and symbols and cliches and verbal formulas
supplied to them by the leaders. Fortunately, the ... politician is
able, by the instrument of propaganda, to mold and form the will of the
people." He clearly believed that virtually total control of a
population was possible, and perhaps easy to accomplish: "So vast are
the numbers of minds which can be regimented, and so tenacious are they
when regimented, that (they produce) an irresistible pressure before
which legislators, editors, and teachers are helpless." [...]

Bernays carries the blame for more than American entry into the two
world wars, having been instrumental in paving the way for the US
cannibalisation and military colonisation of much of the world, and for
the US installing and supporting the dozens of brutal military
dictatorships around the world. [...]

In the discovery of propaganda as a tool of public mind control and in
its use for war marketing, it is worthwhile to take a quick look at the
historical background of Bernays' war effort. At the time, the European
Zionist Jews had made an agreement with England to bring the US into the
war against Germany, on the side of England, a favor for which England
would grant the Jews the possession of Palestine as a location for a new
homeland. Palestine did not 'belong' to England, it was not England's to
give, and England had no legal or moral right to make such an agreement,
but it was made nevertheless. The Jews had created in US President
Wilson an intense desire to enter the war, but the American population
had no interest in the European war and public sentiment was entirely
against participating.

To facilitate the desired result, Wilson created a body named the
Committee on Public Information (CPI), to propagandise the war by the
mass brainwashing of America. The group was led by a
publicist/advertising man named George Creel, and consisted of
individually-selected men from advertising and the movie industry, the
academic world, the media and music industry, as well as specialists in
psychology. Two of the most important members were Lippman, whom we have
already met, and whom Wilson described as "the most brilliant man of his
age", and Bernays who was the group's top mind-control expert, both Jews
and both aware of the stakes in this game. Bernays planned to combine
his uncle Freud's psychiatric insights with mass psychology blended with
modern advertising techniques, and apply them to the task of mass mind
control.  [...]

They created a similar Division for cinema that resulted in the
production of dozens of outrageous and virulently anti-German movies,
hate films containing completely fictional tales of atrocities and
bestialities committed by the Germans. Bernays was the source of all the
movie scenes where the "dirty" Germans (and later the dirtier Japanese)
machine-gunned brave American pilots while parachuting to the ground.
None of these tales were ever true; these and many more were total
fabrications. Then, as now, the motion picture industry in the US was
entirely controlled by Jews who were eager to assist. One Jewish
editorial stated that "every individual at work in this industry wants
to do his share" and that "through slides, film leaders and trailers,
posters and newspaper publicity they will spread that propaganda so
necessary to the immediate mobilization of the country's great
resources".  [...]

While Bernays was "making the world safe for democracy", that safety was
not meant for Americans. Under the coaching of Col. E. M. House who was
Wilson's Jewish handler, Wilson passed oppressive legislation including
the Espionage Act and Sedition Act that were entirely fascist in content
and which made illegal anything that might hinder American entry into
the war. Freedom of speech and assembly, and press freedom virtually
disappeared from America during this time, it eventually becoming
illegal to say or write anything critical of the US government, its
officials and even its "symbols". Any expression of objection to
American entrance into the war would result in a fine of $10,000 (ten
years' average wages at the time) or 20 years in prison, with much of
the policing power given to what were in effect private vigilante groups
like the infamous American Protective League that operated virtually
without oversight. The suppression of public opinion and of dissent, and
the control exercised on anti-war communication was universal. The
Espionage Act stated "Every letter, writing, circular, postal card,
picture, print, engraving, photograph, newspaper, pamphlet, book, or
other publication, matter or thing of any kind containing any matter
which is intended to obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of
the United States is hereby declared to be non-mailable." Nothing was
permitted that might prevent the successful recruitment of American
soldiers for a war that only the Jews wanted.

With all of this and much more, Bernays and Lippman turned America into
a hotbed of hatred for the entire German population, accomplishing the
goal of the Zionist Jews to use the US military as a tool, their own
private army, in the European war to fulfil their ambition for
Palestine, and thus these two men changed the course of history. It is
worth noting that not long after the Second World War the Jews widely
accused Goebbels, the German minister of propaganda, of using
'propaganda' against the Jews in Germany. In this context, are we
ourselves so indoctrinated and blind as to tell ourselves that Bernays'
massive and unspeakably evil storm of Jewish hate propaganda against
Germans was moral, righteous and just, while German propaganda against
Jews was reprehensible? [...]

This wouldn't be the last time Lippman and Bernays would use these
techniques against Germany. This massive attack was repeated little more
than ten years later to destroy Germany and push it into yet another war
the Germans didn't want. In the 1930s, the same Jewish European bankers
with largely the same agenda wanted the US to join another war they
planned to initiate against Germany. In 1933 they embarked on an
extensive worldwide commercial war intended to destroy Germany
financially, with newspaper headlines reading "Judea Declares War on
Germany". They had already induced in Roosevelt "an intense desire for
war", but were having the same problem again with the unwilling American
public. Needing firm provocation to justify entering the war, Roosevelt
used a wide array of tactics to bait Germany into attacking US shipping,
and even sent unescorted US passenger liners into the submarine lanes,
but without result. Until this time, the US was quite disinterested in
Japan's activities in Asia, but since Germany had signed a mutual
defense pact with Japan, an attack from that country would serve to put
the US into war with both nations, so Bernays and his handlers directed
their provocative tactics toward Japan. They produced a document
containing a series of eight "insults" that was deemed sufficient to
provoke an attack on the US, which program Roosevelt immediately put
into action. In addition to the insults, the US launched a full military
blockade of petroleum supplies which threatened to bring Japan's
military to its knees very quickly, leaving the Japanese no alternative
but to attack.

Most Americans won't want to hear this, but the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor was not a surprise. Sufficient documentation has now been
discovered to leave no doubt that Roosevelt knew the precise location of
the Japanese fleet and the time and hour the attack would take place.
Many cables and other diplomatic documents have proven he received
detailed information and warnings, yet refused to inform Pearl Harbor of
the impending attack. The bald truth is that Roosevelt deliberately
sacrificed the American lives at Pearl Harbor for the sake of justifying
an entry into World War II, all for the purpose of fighting someone
else's battle for them. Once again, the US was just a tool. It should be
noted that the US military lost nothing of value in that attack, the
aircraft carriers and valuable military assets having been pulled out to
a safe distance, the remaining ships also sacrificed since they were old
World War I vintage and would have been largely useless in combat
against the modernised Japanese fleet.

In all of this, Lippman and Bernays were not working independently or
without guidance. Prior to their massive 'war effort' in the US, they
had operated a successful pilot test case in the UK, using British
newspapers owned by their controllers, to determine the efficacy of
their methods. The plan to mass-engineer public opinion began in a
propaganda factory at Wellington House in London in the early 1900s,
with Lords Northcliffe and Rothmere, Arnold Toynbee, and of course our
two war-marketing geniuses Lippman and Bernays. It was from this source
that the scheme was hatched to force the Rothschild's privately-owned
Federal Reserve banks onto the US Congress, and that trained and coached
Lippman and Bernays on the methods of molding American public opinion to
push the US into the First World War for the promotion of Zionism.
Bernays' book 'Propaganda' offers a clear vision of his training, not
only for war marketing but for the pathology of American consumption,
automobiles, the hysteria of patriotism and much more.

Wellington House eventually morphed into the Tavistock Institute, which
was created at Oxford University in London by the founders of the Royal
Institute of International Affairs and the Round Table, and was
essentially a kind of mass brainwashing facility beginning as a
psychological warfare bureau. It was the Tavistock Institute's studies
in psychological programming that were used to create and then exploit a
grand mass hysteria during the cold war, evoking fearful delusions of a
nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union that even led to millions of
Americans building bomb shelters in their back yards.  [...]

Everything we have read above about the marketing of war during
preparation for the two World Wars, is from a template created by
Lippman and Bernays exclusively to support the creation of a Jewish
state in Palestine and to promote the agenda of Zionism.  [...]

Among the many results of the work of Lippman and Bernays was the
subsumption, of initially the Executive Branch and eventually the
Legislative Branch as well, of the US government, into a global plan of
the European and American bankers and their US corporate and political
interests. We speak openly today of the White House and US Congress
being overwhelmingly controlled by the Jewish lobby and their
multinational corporations, but this forest was planted 100 years ago.
By the early 1900s we already had an American government firmly under
the powerful influence of, and effectively controlled by, what Bernays
termed the "secret government", and which was controlled in virtually
the same manner as the bewildered public herd.  [...]

Among many substantial pieces of evidence of this 'secret government'
control, we have not only the foreign-programmed US entry into two world
wars, but the European Jewish bankers forcing onto the US government the
creation of the US Federal Reserve as a private central bank that would
control the nation's currency and largely control its economy as well. [...]

The success of Lippman and Bernays did not go unnoticed in many segments
of American society. The universities and educators, the intellectuals,
realised the potential of these new propaganda techniques to form,
manipulate and control social perceptions. Schools and Universities in
the US had never been viewed as an educational system but more as tools
of a public disciplinary system, a method not only of social control but
as a means to inculcate attitudes and beliefs most useful to the
industrialists and bankers in the elite top 1%. [...]

The elite 1%, the same group Lippman and Bernays had served so well, and
in whose company they travelled, founded not only universities but the
family Foundations that exist to this day, and for the same purposes of
social control. Institutions like the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie
Foundations were primarily created "to perpetuate predatory wealth
through the control of information and the sources of information", and
quickly assumed missions of direct influence and control of the mindsets
of many of the world's leaders, or at least influential individuals. The
Rockefeller Foundation has been pre-eminent in an astonishing array of
social control initiatives that included population control in the real
sense through sterilisation and war. And it was both the Rockefeller and
Carnegie institutes that funded and promoted the practice of eugenics we
read about earlier, with the Carnegies recommending a national chain of
gas chambers to eliminate the socially (and ideologically) unfit. All of
this twisted ideology stemmed from the same sources.

The Rockefeller Foundation attempted to advance their ideologies by
drawing cooperation from major industrial leaders and bankers, in one
advertised instance holding a major conference with "representatives of
some of the largest financial interests" in the US, i.e. the Jewish
European bankers who controlled the US FED.  [...]

Referring to the business of values again, Neal Gabler, Author of An
Empire of Their Own: How the Jews invented Hollywood, wrote "What is
amazing is the extent to which they succeeded in promulgating this
fiction throughout the world. By making a 'shadow' America, one which
idealized every old glorifying bromide about the country, the Hollywood
Jews created a powerful cluster of images and ideas so powerful that, in
a sense, they colonized the American imagination. Ultimately, American
values came to be defined largely by the movies the Jews made."  [...] ==

The Power Behind the Throne

Under the guidance of the invisible people, many members of the
establishment's think-tanks are increasingly, and openly, arguing that
US democracy today is "incapable of meeting the challenges facing the
country", concluding that the US needs a new "top down" solution that
would be exercised by executive power independent of the elected
Congress. Several people including NYT columnist Thomas Friedman have
argued that "power should shift from contentious, ideologically diverse
elected bodies subject to pressure from the 'lower orders', toward
credentialed "experts" operating in Washington, Brussels or the United
Nations." [...]

In similar vein, we can recall State Department employee Victoria Nuland
boasting of the $5 billion spent on destabilising Ukraine and
overthrowing its government during this same time of empty bank
accounts. We also have her conversation on Ukraine that was posted
online for the world, where she famously dismissed Europe's objections
to the forcible and violent overthrow of Ukraine's government by saying,
"Fuck the EU", and continued to decide the new puppet rulers of that
country. Note that it wasn't the White House deciding who would be
acceptable as new leaders of the Ukraine, nor was it the US Congress,
and certainly not the Ukrainian people whose so-called 'democracy'
doesn't even qualify as farce. Nuland's husband is Robert Kagan, who is
active in the Brookings Institute and the Carnegie Endowment for
Perpetual War, both of whom are neocon Zionist Jews playing Monopoly
with real countries, and it was Nuland making those decisions, one sign
of where the real power lies. [...]

Some years back, Paul Findley wrote a book titled They Dare to Speak
Out, detailing the Jewish influence and control of the US government. In
his book, Findley quoted US Senator William Fulbright, then the Chairman
of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who had conducted
investigations into foreign control of his nation's government, and who
wrote in 1973,

"Israel controls the Senate ... around 80% (of US Senators) are
completely in support of Israel, and Jewish influence in the House of
Representatives is even greater. Anything Israel wants (Israel will
get). ...[Israel] is able to stifle free speech, control our Congress,
and even dictate our foreign policy". In a CBS TV interview, Fulbright
stated further, "The Israelis control the policy in the Congress and the
Senate. I am aware how almost impossible it is in this country to carry
out a foreign policy [in the Middle East] not approved by the Jews ...
terrific control the Jews have over the news media and the barrage the
Jews have built up on congressmen ... I am very much concerned over the
fact that the Jewish influence here is completely dominating the scene
and making it almost impossible to get Congress to do anything they
don't approve of. The Israeli embassy is practically dictating to the
congress through influential Jewish people in the country."

Fulbright stated repeatedly that the US Senate was "subservient" to
Israel and the Jews, which prevented the government from applying any
pressure on Israel in its atrocities toward the Palestinian people. He
claimed the US possessed sufficient leverage on Israel because "we
supply all the wherewithal - or a major part of the wherewithal - to
finance or to pay for everything Israel does", but he added that the
leverage couldn't be applied because "Israel controls the Senate". He
also stated "The Senate is subservient to Israel, in my opinion much too
much. We should be more concerned about the United States interest
rather than doing the bidding of Israel This is a most unusual
development. The great majority of the Senate of the United States -
somewhere around 80 percent - are completely in support of Israel. This
has been demonstrated time and again and this has made it difficult for
our government."

Rabbi Cohen stated in his now-famous lecture,

"(US President) Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act and gave us total
financial power over the United States. As the sole proprietors of the
FED, we control all of American commerce and pull the strings of
government. Although we Jews make up only four percent of the U.S.
population, over sixty percent of the Clinton political appointments
have gone to Jews. As Supreme court judges, foreign ambassadors, FBI and
CIA positions and Democratic Party officers, we as a tiny minority now
have 80 percent control of the US Government." How can it be more clear
than this? Ominously, Cohen also added this statement: "And so we shall
have our revenge ... every man, woman and child of the goyim (non-Jews)
must be destroyed without mercy."

Several authors have written that the Congress' constant display of
allegiance to the Jews and Israel instead of to the US was both
embarrassing and unpatriotic, especially considering that Israel is
almost totally dependent on American frinancial and military aid. Many
have further noted that the Jewish-controlled media present such a
"biased and sympathetic portrayal" of Israel, and further prevent any
opposing views or truths of the Palestinians' bitter suffering, that
apparently only 4% of Americans are at all aware of the Jews' 70-year
long brutal military occupation of the Palestinian people. The long
history of US Congressional support for Israel led former Secretary of
State James Baker to call the Congress "The Little Knesset" after
Israel's Knesset (parliament) in Jerusalem. One US Senator lamented that
he had the right to criticise his own government, but no such right to
criticise the government of Israel even if its actions were against the
US national interest. Paul Craig Roberts wrote "When the world looks at
America, what it sees is an Israeli colony", and former Presidential
candidate Pat Buchanan described Capitol Hill as "Israeli-occupied

In this context, and in a stunning combination of utopian pathology,
propaganda, boldness, and irony, the US media produced a small flurry of
noise in the person of Jewish-American Senator Barbara Boxer who
obediently proclaimed she had been warned by the FBI that "Chinese
citizens or government officials might try to contact her office 'in an
effort to influence U.S. foreign policy'". 'Chinese officials' might try
to influence US foreign policy? And what of the Jews' efforts to
influence US foreign policy? Not a peep from her. As one writer pointed
out, "That such double standard material can be published without ironic
intent is a blazing indictment of the American mass media and current
political system." No kidding.

Admiral Thomas Moorer, who was Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff,
said in 1983 "I’ve never seen a President stand up to the Jews. They
always get what they want. If the American people understood what a grip
those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms." It
was the same Admiral Moorer, America’s highest ranking military officer,
who could not get an honest investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on
the USS Liberty. For background, the Jewish military attacked an unarmed
US espionage vessel in international waters, hoping to destroy it and
lay the blame on Iran. The Liberty was attacked repeatedly over a span
of several hours by jet aircraft and torpedo boats, killing 34 Americans
and wounding another 174, but failed to sink the vessel. The Israelis
attributed the failed attack to accidental mis-identification, but all
the survivors claimed that US flags were clearly flying on the ship
during the attack and that in radio contact the Israelis had identified
the Liberty as a US vessel. This was clearly another false-flag
operation that failed in its mission by leaving survivors to testify to
the truth. But the White House, on the demand of its Jewish handlers,
swept the affair under the carpet to the extent that all survivors were
forbidden to ever discuss the matter under pain of criminal sanction,
and most were too afraid to talk even after they had retired from the US
military. At the time, a White House spokesman stated that "(President)
Johnson isn't going to start a war over a few dead sailors".

Walt and Mearsheimer wrote a definitive paper on the Iraq war,
documenting that it was, in their words, "the Jewish lobby" that wanted
- and got - the war. Libya was the same, and it is only the Jews who
want the invasion and destruction of Syria and Iran, and most likely
supplied the chemical weapons to the so-called Syrian rebels and
provided the photo shoots as proof. [...]

In 2001, an Israeli cabinet meeting was broadcast on Israel Radio,
during which a disagreement arose between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres. Peres was warning Sharon
that Israel should heed American demands in their dealings with the
Palestinians and that Sharon's obstinacy would endanger Israeli
interests and "turn the US against us." Sharon replied to Peres, "Every
time we do something you tell me Americans will do this and will do
that. I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about
American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and
the Americans know it." Also in 2001, the Jewish Prime Minister
Netanyahu openly mocked the US on Israeli television, saying "I know
what America is. America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in
the right direction. They won't get in the way." And we have Netanyahu
again when he was visiting Jonathan Pollard, the American Jew who was
convicted as a traitor and spy for leaking volumes of US military
secrets to Israel. On leaving Pollard's prison cell, Netanyahu was
quoted as having said, "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United
States, it can dry up and blow away".

In July and August of 2014, when Israel was conducting yet another
savage offensive against the Palestinians, the Wall Street Journal
reported that White House and State Department officials were taken by
surprise to learn that the Israeli military had been securing large
supplies of weapons and ammunition directly from their friends in the
Pentagon, without the knowledge or approval of the White House. Both
Jewish and American officials said this was yet one more indication of
how little influence the White House and State Department had in terms
of extractions the Jews can make from the US, the President and his
White House staff essentially finding themselves on the outside looking
in. The Journal reported that Israeli officials considered Obama to be
weak and naive, and were just bypassing him to deal directly with the
Pentagon and Congress to satisfy their wishes. They apparently said they
weren't concerned about tensions with the White House or a failure to
obtain Obama's approval for anything because he would soon be gone
anyway, and they could just outwait him. There have been other incidents
of this kind, one where the Jewish lobby managed to get possession of
the only squadron of American's most highly developed aircraft which had
been obtained for the US military at great expense and internal
lobbying. A Defense Department official apparently told the Israelis
that to ship those aircraft to Israel would be politically impossible,
given the very difficult circumstances of their purchase. He claimed the
Israeli response was to say, "Just get the aircraft ready. We'll take
care of Congress." And they did. The aircraft were shipped to Israel,
and the Americans did without.

On November 25, 1977 the Jewish Press ran an article titled 'US foreign
policy is now based on how foreign countries treat their native Jews'.
For background, a Russian Jew named Anatoly Sharansky had become
seditious and troublesome to the Russian government and had been
imprisoned. The Jews were crying for his release. The article noted that
US Senators Moynihan and Javits of New York, two ardent Zionists,
notified the Soviet Government that grain shipments from the US would be
cancelled if the Russians failed to release Sharansky. He was released
and deported to Israel. Consider for a moment the depth of the Jewish
influence that would result in two Senators taking upon themselves the
authority to decide and dictate a serious US foreign policy mandate to
another nation on a trivial matter, and without legislative or executive

US Journalist Helen Thomas, who covered the White House for more than
six decades, was forced to resign from her position at Hearst News after
saying in an interview that Jews should "get the hell out of Palestine".
In a published interview, Thomas said that Jews have "total control"
over the White House and US Congress, that "it's not a secret. It's very
open ... Everybody is in the pocket of the Israeli lobbies, which are
funded by wealthy supporters, including those from Hollywood. Same thing
with the financial markets. There's total control. We are owned by the
propagandists against the Arabs. There’s no question about that.
Congress, the White House and Hollywood, Wall Street, are owned by the
Zionists. We’re being pushed into a wrong direction in every way." [...]

In early 2014 Jeff Blankfort wrote an article titled 'Rendering Unto
AIPAC', in which he included this paragraph:

"Early in their campaigns, every viable candidate on the Democratic or
Republican ticket will receive a visit from an AIPAC staff member
requesting a statement describing his or her current position on the
US-Israel relationship. For those who are short on words, AIPAC will
gladly provide assistance. These statements are then made available to
pro-Israel donors in the candidate’s district as well as to a long list
of donors throughout the country. In exchange for what is invariably a
pledge of loyalty to Israel, AIPAC will see that the candidate will have
no shortage of volunteers and funds, although these will not come
directly from AIPAC. It was, however, the spectacle of watching Obama,
Hillary Clinton, and McCain, the three individuals who were vying to
become the leader of the world’s only superpower, joined by House and
Senate leaders of both parties, humbling themselves before the AIPAC
audience, that led veteran journalist, Arnaud de Borchgrave, to reveal
to readers an elemental truth about the US political process and the
decision making parameters available to the next American president."

de Borchrave's "truth" in the Times article, was this: "Once a year, the
Israel lobby in Washington known as AIPAC holds its annual convention
where anyone who is anyone in the political world comes to render
fealty, rather than homage. (For those who don't know, 'fealty' is
subservient obedience and loyalty of a peasant to his feudal lord and
master: Ed) It has become a political rite of passage, like a medieval
contract … Anyone who doesn’t pass the litmus test can forget about
becoming president of the United States, or senator or even congressman."

Blankfort also detailed how, in another flashy display of Jewish
political power and control of American politics, the Jewish
billionnaire casino owner Sheldon Adelson "summoned" the several most
likely candidates for the next Presidential election, in order to
"choose" one of them. Blankfort noted that all obeyed the summons and
groveled before their lord, "doing their best to to sell themselves like
applicants at a job interview". Adelson apparently interrogated each
ambitious candidate and demanded from each "First of all and above
everything else, blind and unconditional obedience to the government of
another state: Israel". [...]

The Jews boast openly about their political influence and power, Jewish
publications bragging that they made Obama what he is, and one Jewish
Zionist famously claiming "Barack Obama is the first Jewish President".
James Petras wrote a useful article in which he quoted a Chicago Jewish
News article claiming Obama had been "discovered" by a Jewish Zionist
professor at Harvard when he was still studying law there, and decided
he was "recruitable". She recounted how she enlisted the aid of family,
friends, financiers, and helped obtain prestigious employment for him,
followed by introductions to a wide array of Jewish Zionists, including
financial supporters, all of whom worked to ensure Obama would be
permanently "embedded" in their network. Petras also noted that as a
senator, Obama shared an office with a fanatical Jewish Zionist named
Ira Silverstein, who later boasted of his role in 'educating' Obama
about Jews and Israel. Obama did not appear out of the blue sky as a
breath of fresh air for America; he had been specifically selected,
assiduously cultivated and carefully groomed by the Jews for two decades
before he was presented as a 'choice' to the country, and by that time
it was already much too late for the people.

It is to these people that Obama owes his allegiance, and his first acts
in office were to fill the White House and many important agencies with
radical Zionists, most of whom were Jewish, and also to purge these
agencies of any who failed to please AIPAC. The process is very broad
and deep, and includes most visible politicians and government
officials. In referring to Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Petras noted they are so deeply infused
with Israel-First ideology that they were "Zionized Zombies". I would
concur. Truly, few people realise the depth of Jewish influence and
control in Washington, especially on US foreign policy. Israel not only
badly wants to destroy Iran militarily so as to eliminate a threat to
its military supremacy, but it wants the US to destroy its enemies for
it and, through its US lobbying power, is in fact dictating the terms
under which the US military will do so. It was the radical Jewish
Zionist Mark Dubowitz, who is neither an elected nor appointed
government official, who wrote much of the legislation relating to
sanctions on Iran.

It is not the elected Congress and not the White House, but the secret
government mostly represented by its friends in AIPAC, that determines
and dictates US policy for Israel and the Middle East, and for much of
the world, certainly toward Eastern Europe and especially Russia and the
Ukraine. AIPAC is not the power behind the throne; rather it is the
public face of that power, doing the bidding of names that will never be
mentioned. In this sense, it is not different from what is loosely
called 'the Jewish lobby', being only one arrow in a quiver that
includes the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission,
the Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford Foundations, the US FED and the Bank
of England along with other bankers, financiers like George Soros, the
Hollywood studio and mass media owners, sundry other so-called NGOs, and
many multi-national corporations. They are all members of the same choir
and are all singing the same song, with both lyrics and melody written
by the international Jewish financiers in Europe.

An important part of this political landscape consists of organisations
like the already-mentioned Trilateral Commission, which is an offshoot
of the also US-based 'Council on Foreign Relations' (CFR) that the
European Rothschilds created as the American version of their UK-based
'Round Table'. [...] One US Congressman stated,

"The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power
in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to
apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and
groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions
for converting the US from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a
servile member of New World Order dictatorship."

This so-called council is still a subsidiary of the European
Rothschild's Round Table, which was originally created by Cecil Rhodes
as a mechanism for world domination, and given to Rothschild to
continue, and is still controlled by the same Zionist European bankers
with their "pernicious and pervasive" influence on Europe as much as on
the US.

According to an official statement, "The Trilateral Commission was
formed in 1973 by private citizens of Western Europe, Japan and North
America to foster closer cooperation among these three regions on common
problems. It seeks to improve public understanding of such problems, to
support proposals for handling them jointly, and to nurture habits and
practices of working together among these regions." That sounds good,
but the 'private citizens' were a secret group of seventeen very
powerful people that included David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski,
McGeorge Bundy and others from the New World Order Bilderberg Group who
met at Rockefeller's New York estate to plan this monster. The
Commission wasn't created in any sense to 'solve problems' but to do
heavy social and political engineering, dealing with the 'crisis of
democracy' and preparing a move to authoritarian fascism. The US media,
again almost entirely Jewish-owned, are silent on the CFR and the
Trilateral Commission and their influence and power in the nation.

Not long ago, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu attempted to increase the
pressure on Obama to deal harshly with Iran by bypassing the White House
and the US government altogether, and appearing on a Sunday TV talk show
to appeal directly to the American public. Inserting himself directly
into US politics while claiming he didn't want to insert himself into US
politics, Netanyahu insisted the Americans must act quickly and forcibly
to eliminate all threats to Jewish military supremacy in the Middle
East. Iran, of course, is one of those threats, with Israel having been
claiming for ten years that Iran was two days away from having nuclear
weapons. The Jewish-controlled US media are of course silent on the one
essential point which is to ask why it is okay for Israel to have
nuclear weapons and be an existential threat to Iran, but it is not okay
for Iran to possess the only suitable deterrent of its own weapons.
Netanyahu spoke eloquently about the security of Israel but ignored the
fact that Israel's military presence and extreme belligerence threaten
the security of every other nation in the Middle East. The Jewish lobby
has sufficient influence that Netanyahu has on occasion demanded, and
received, permission to bypass the White House and address the US
Congress directly, to make more clear his expectations of them. This was
neither the first nor last time an Israeli prime minister had gone over
a president’s head and appealed directly to Congress or the American people.

None of this is new. Jewish influence on American politicians and in
particular on the White House has existed for at least most of the last
century. There is no shortage of documentation of various US presidents
confiding to their staff that their Jewish handlers would shortly be
informing them of the appropriate decisions and courses of action to be
taken. Another quote from Findley's book:

"When I lived in America, I learned that Jewish personalities, most of
them rich donors for the parties, had easy access to the President. They
used to contact him over the head of the Foreign Secretary and the
representative at the United Nations and other officials. They were
often in a position to alter the entire political line by a single
telephone conversation..."

Given all of this, it is long past time for everyone to stop pretending
that the Jews do not control the US government, notwithstanding the
inevitable condemnation as an anti-Semite for doing so. Any examination
of the American political scene is obliged to recognise that the US is
closer to being a Jewish state than an American one, especially
considering, but by no means limited to, the treasonous allegiance by
the US congress sworn to Israel and the Jews. A dog doesn't serve two
masters. Since we have already reached the stage where prominent former
government officials are openly referring to Washington as
"Israeli-Occupied Territory", it is long past time that someone told
Americans, bluntly and to their face, that their great United States of
America today is little more than a pimple on Israel's ass.

Financial power is crucial to the success of this influence. A recent
article noted that in the 2012 election about 30% - nearly one-third of
all 'disclosed' political contributions came from only 31,000 donors, or
0.0001 of the population, less than one ten-thousandth. It further noted
that not a single member of the House or Senate was elected without
financial assistance from this group, and about 85% of these politicians
received more money from this tiny group than from all their small
donors combined. This tiny, but rich and powerful minority of people are
"the political gatekeepers of American politics". They decide which
candidates are acceptable to them, which hold the 'correct' opinions and
ideologies, and which will vote the way the elite want them to vote. It
is not the American public who are selecting candidates to represent
their interests, but this small clique buying politicians who can be
trusted to carry out their agenda. The American people can do no better
than vote for one of two pre-selected clones, with their choices being
both inconsequential and irrelevant. By any definition of the word,
democracy in America is a myth.

This influence has for long extended to appointments to a vast selection
of important executive posts within many departments of government and,
more often than we want to know or admit, involves elements of extortion
or blackmail. Few Americans, and even fewer others, are familiar with
the appointment of Louis Brandeis to the US Supreme Court, an event
privately hailed by the Jews as 'their' first Supreme Court judge.
President Wilson was approached by a Jewish lawyer, Samuel Untermeyer,
who claimed to have a female client who badly needed $40,000 and who
possessed a collection of passionate and indiscreet love letters sent to
her by Wilson when they were illicit lovers, and was threatening to make
the letters public. Untermeyer, knowing Wilson had no access to a sum
that large, offered to pay the $40,000 out of his own pocket in return
for a favor: Wilson would agree to recommend a person of Untermeyer's
choosing to the next opening on the Supreme Court. That person was
Brandeis and, above strenuous public objection, Wilson pushed forcefully
until the appointment was confirmed. Untermeyer kept the Wilson love
letters "to ensure they would never fall into the wrong hands", but also
to ensure his future control over Wilson. It is probably true that the
appointment of many Jews to government posts have been made willingly or
on merit alone, but it is also true there have been many of the other kind.

Mike Lofgren was a high-level US congressional staff member who spent 28
years on Capitol Hill, serving on both the House and Senate budget
committees, and who wrote in early 2014 a brief paper titled 'Anatomy of
the Deep State', revealing his accumulated observations about the power
behind the throne of the US government. There are many names for this
secret entity that has existed for at least the past 100 years. I have
followed Bernays' lead in calling it the 'Secret Government'; Lofgren
uses the term 'Deep State'; they are the same. He began by stating, "I
use the term to mean a hybrid association of elements of government and
parts of top-level finance and industry that is effectively able to
govern the United States without reference to the consent of the
governed as expressed through the formal political process". I include
below a few of Lofgren's comments, edited for brevity. His intent and
content are unchanged.

"There is the visible government in Washington, and then there is
another, more shadowy, more indefinable government that is not explained
in Civics 101 or observable to tourists at the Capitol. The former is
traditional Washington partisan politics: the tip of the iceberg which
is theoretically controllable via elections. The subsurface part of the
iceberg I call the Deep State, which operates according to its own
compass heading. (It) is another government concealed behind the one
that is visible, a hybrid entity of public and private institutions
ruling the country, connected to, but only intermittently controlled by,
the visible state whose leaders we choose. My analysis of this
phenomenon is not an exposé of a secret, conspiratorial cabal; the state
within a state is hiding mostly in plain sight, and its operators mainly
act in the light of day. In terms of its scope, financial resources and
sheer global reach, the American hybrid state, the Deep State, is in a
class by itself, (and its) protectiveness towards its higher-ranking
personnel allows them to escape the consequences (of their actions)."

"The Deep State does not consist of the entire government. It is a
hybrid of national security and law enforcement agencies: the Department
of Defense, the Department of State, Homeland Security, the CIA, the
Justice Department, certain key areas of the judiciary and a kind of
rump Congress consisting of the congressional leadership and some of the
defense and intelligence committees. All these agencies are coordinated
by the Executive Office of the President via the National Security
Council. The Deep State does not consist only of government agencies.
What is euphemistically called "private enterprise" is an integral part
of its operations. Invisible threads of money and ambition connect
(Washington) to other nodes. One is Wall Street, which supplies the cash
that keeps the political machine quiescent and operating as a
diversionary marionette theater. Should the politicians forget their
lines and threaten the status quo, Wall Street floods the town with cash
and lawyers to help the hired hands remember their own best interests."

Lofgren included the Treasury Department in the Deep State because of
its jurisdiction over financial flows, its enforcement of international
sanctions and its organic symbiosis with Wall Street. He went on to
write, "It is not too much to say that Wall Street may be the ultimate
owner of the Deep State and its strategies." And here, of course, he had
it absolutely right; it is the domestic and foreign bankers who are
indeed the "ultimate owners" of the Deep State, but in this he failed to
include the US FED and its European owners who determine and dictate
both financial and political policy to the rest.

Chinese journalist Lee Fang produced some stunning facts for a research
report in which he documented that individuals often receive
multi-million dollar bonuses when they leave secretive Wall Street to
enter the active, visible government. According to Fang, many large
corporations who want to influence public policy give executives huge
bonuses if they take jobs within the government. Among them are Goldman
Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan Chase, the Blackstone Group, Fannie
Mae, Northern Trust. Citigroup even awards additional retirement pay
upon leaving to take a "full time high level position with the US
government or regulatory body". The Bank of America gave Stefan Seelig
more than $9 million in bonus pay when he was nominated to become the
Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade, and Michael Froman
received over $4 million when he left Citigroup to become the current US
trade representative. "The fox is groomed for the chicken coop, and the
Deep State grows fat on its prey."

Lofgren was correct in claiming the Deep State is an ideology that is a
kind of corporatism, but in categorising it as nameless, he didn't quite
connect all the dots. It does indeed have a name - the New World Order.
The Deep State is extremely Right-Wing, primarily Jewish, and fervently
Zionist. Many people have described portions of it, but approach from
too many points of view: corporate domination, human rights, banking,
surveillance, politics. It is all of these, and none of them. It is as
much about the Bush's enormous landholdings in Brazil or the Rothschilds
setting up a new bank to hold lands extorted from developing countries
as it is about health care or the housing crisis or the NSA and DHS.
This is about a small group of powerful individuals working steadily to
build a farm where the people of the world are the cattle. The Deep
State, the Secret Government, the New World Order, are all names and
faces of the same entity which is at its core an international fascist
dictatorship, with the security state and its internment camps forming
an increasingly integral part. [...]

Lofgren went on to say that the Deep State's physical expansion and
consolidation of power "would seem to make a mockery of the frequent
pronouncement that governance in Washington is dysfunctional and
broken". While the US government was laying off staff, forcing unpaid
vacations, closing all tourist facilities for lack of funds, there was
no shortage of cash to destroy Libya or attempt the destruction of
Syria, nor the $2 billion to build the NSA data storage center. He wrote
"That the secret and unaccountable Deep State floats freely above the
gridlock ... is the paradox of American government in the 21st century:
drone strikes, data mining, secret prisons and Panopticon-like control
on the one hand; and on the other, the visible parliamentary
institutions of self-government declining to the status of a banana
republic amid the gradual collapse of public infrastructure." He said it
is true that US government is dysfunctional and broken, that it no
longer works, "but somehow Obama can go into Libya. He can assassinate
US citizens. He can collect all our phone records. He can even bring
down a jet carrying a president of a sovereign country without asking
anyone's permission. And no one seems to connect the two, the failure of
our visible constitutional state and this other government that operates
according to no constitutional rules or any constraint by the governed."

But these people are not interested in either government or governing,
in the traditional sense of meaning of these words. They are instead
arranging the parasitic extraction of wealth from the population, and
want the people to remain under control. Beyond that, they have little
interest. These people are vampires. They are parasites. They are venal
and extractive. Lofgren again:

"The Deep State has been extracting value from the American people in
vampire-like fashion. While it seems to float above the constitutional
state, its essentially parasitic, extractive nature means that it is
still tethered to the formal proceedings of governance. They are
extracting revenue from the American people everywhere they can find a
revenue stream: public schools, housing, prisons, infrastructure,
pipelines, fracking, oil and gas exploration, Social Security,
privatization of health insurance and health care."

We should not proceed further without noting here that this Deep State
or Secret Government is the source of the destruction of the social
contract that governed the US after the Second World War. It is these
people who are responsible for the gutting of the American economy, for
outsourcing, deindustrialisation, the destruction of labor, the
evisceration of the middle class, and so much more. It is they who have
launched the class war on all but the elites in the US, Canada and all
of Western Europe. It is they who arranged the US$5 billion investment
in overthrowing successive governments in Ukraine, and it is they who
want yet again the destruction of Russia. They are also responsible for
virtually all the interference in China's internal affairs and the
efforts to derail China's progress. There are dangers lurking here so
great as to be almost impossible to overestimate, and to ingore or
dismiss them would be foolhardy in the extreme.

Supporting The Deep State

When writing of Jewish influence and control of a society's segments,
most especially those in the US like Hollywood or the media or the
ownership of the FED, there is always a flurry of denial even though the
Jews like to boast in private of their control of these same segments.
Anticipating this same response (as well as the usual charges of
anti-Semitism) to claims of the Jews controlling Washington, we can
expect the multitude of Jewish defense organisations to emerge with
strident denials saying "No, we don't. No, we don't." Well, guys, much
as I dislike contradicting you: "Yes, you do. Yes, you do." Here is a
bit of accumulated evidence garnered from various publicly-available
sources. It is by no means complete; a full list would contain many
hundreds if not thousands of names, and I didn't have the patience to
pursue this research to the end. Nevertheless, Jews do hold an enormous,
and enormously disproportionate number of government positions in the US
at all levels from Secretary of State to a lowly communications clerk or
Bill Clinton's interns. A large number of these people have dual
Israeli-US citizenship with clearly concomitant loyalties, almost all
being Zionists as well.