DC Leaks reveals Soros' war on Putin & destruction of traditional values from above in the name of tolerance & equality (1) DC Leaks reveals Soros' war on Putin & destruction of traditional values from above in the name of tolerance & equality (2) Soros: we 'counter Russian support to movements defending traditional values' (3) DCLeaks publishes Soros OSI documents targeting Putin's 'defense of traditional family values' (4) Text of Soros OSI document targeting Putin's 'defense of traditional family values' (5) Hillary tie to Soros = Soros for president; 'national borders as the obstacle' (6) Establishment Panic: Ruling class fears the people won't accept its political legitimacy - Pat Buchanan (7) Sex Talk Eclipses Elites’ Push for World War III - Paul Craig Roberts (1) DC Leaks reveals Soros' war on Putin & destruction of traditional values from above in the name of tolerance & equality http://russia-insider.com/en/dc-leaks-reveal-5th-column-soros-plan-counter-russian-foreign-policy-and-subvert-russian-traditional DC Leaks Exposes Soros Plan to 'Counter Russian Foreign Policy and Subvert Traditional Russian Values' Remember this the next time someone tells you there is no plan to subvert Russia Richard Brandt Sun, Aug 14, 2016 | 9,833 The recent George Soros hacks show plans/conspiracy to subvert Russia's traditional values. George Soros' Open Society's Foundation is responsible for funding many "civil rights organization" that promote "Western values" in Russia. Soros is one of the 30 richest people in the world, known for supporting Cultural Marxist organizations around the world, using his billion dollar wealth to wield enormous influence in society. Here is a damning quote from the leaked files of Soros' Open Society Foundation: "Our inclination is to engage in activities that will ... counter Russian support to movements defending traditional values" The language in Soros' internal communication read as if his Foundation sees itself as a full-scale warrior in a global conflict, "the stakes are high", and "we should avoid entering directly into the geo-strategic warfare..." Enjoy these choice excerpts from the leaks" Full leaks here: http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/ (2) Soros: we 'counter Russian support to movements defending traditional values' http://yournewswire.com/vladimir-putin-george-soros-is-wanted-dead-or-alive/ Vladimir Putin: George Soros Is Wanted "Dead Or Alive" Posted on August 20, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in News, World // 11 Comments Putin says Soros is wanted Russia have officially declared that Billionaire George Soros is a wanted man in their country, citing him and his organizations as a "threat to Russian national security". Putin banned Soros from Russia last year due to the fact that Soros helped to nearly destroy the Russian economy in the early 1990’s. Veteranstoday.com reports: Matt Taibbi of the Rolling Stone said of Goldman Sachs six years ago: "The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. "In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry American empire, reads like a Who’s Who of Goldman Sachs graduates." Obviously Soros wants to be like Goldman Sachs. Phil Butler puts it well when he says: "George Soros has a finger in every political pie there is. If there is a crisis on our world, it’s a safe bet he’s had a hand in it." One can say that Soros and Goldman Sachs are ideologically part of the same brotherhood. Their strategy is a little different, but the end result is the destruction of lives via the economic system (be it capitalism or socialism) and political manipulation. That’s why Soros seems to think that he is invincible. He thinks he can move the political and economic planet in a few blinks of an eye and no one can tell him to stop. In fact, he writes books such as The Alchemy of Finance. Soros thinks he can kill political stability throughout Europe and indeed in America with no challenge. Soros is certainly old, but he doesn’t want to be obsolete. His organization has recently been caught conducting covert operations designed to destabilize Russia. Here is an interesting quote from the leaked files of Soros’ Open Society Foundation: "Our inclination is to engage in activities and with actors that will understand and counter Russian support to movements defending traditional values…Naming and shaming from us is problematic: we are also in the business of channeling money into other countries for political purposes." Now we’re talking! Now we’re seeing Soros’ true colors. All the talk about helping so-called Syrian refugees, about rescuing Ukrainians, about so-called "civil rights," about bringing "democracy" in Russia, was a smokescreen. According to Butler, this was all Soros’ own infection. Soros wanted to bring down Russia’s traditional families. He wanted to turn Russia into a zoo, but he had to use terms such as "democracy" to deceive the masses. So, when Soros wrote last February that "Putin is a bigger threat to Europe’s existence than Isis," he was marshalling his own diabolical plan, which arguably is consistent or congruent with what the Khazarian Mafia and their lackeys have been doing over the centuries. In fact, the Neoconservatives like Noah Rothman of Commentary continue to sing the ideological tune that "Russia is not your friend." Listen to Soros very carefully here: "The leaders of the US and the EU are making a grievous error in thinking that president Vladimir Putin’s Russia is a potential ally in the fight against Islamic State. The evidence contradicts them. Putin’s aim is to foster the EU’s disintegration, and the best way to do so is to flood Europe with Syrian refugees. "Russian planes have been bombing the civilian population in southern Syria forcing them to flee to Jordan and Lebanon. There are now 20,000 Syrian refugees camped out in the desert awaiting admission to Jordan." What was the evidence that Russian planes were deliberately bombing the civilian population? Well, the evidence could be found in George Soros himself. Whatever comes out of his mouth is the truth. No further investigation is needed. No rigorous testing is required. Soros is the alpha and omega, the beginning and the end. And if evidence points to the other direction, then the evidence must be rejected, not Soros’ own words. If Russia is still obliterating ISIS in Syria, then the information is false because Soros did not approve it. Soros has obviously been making a fool of himself, and he seems to realize that he is more vulnerable than ever before because he is not acting according to the dictates of practical reason. In that sense, he is anti-reason. He aspires to fulfill ideological dogmas and disregard the truth at any cost. It is probably true that Soros has been against the Israeli regime, but what he gives on one hand he takes from the other. It says on paper that he is against the Israeli regime, but it has been reported that Soros supported organizations which sought to remove Assad from power. We have to keep in mind again that the Israeli regime wanted to kick Assad out since the beginning of the Syrian war. So, whether Soros liked it or not, he was indirectly supporting Israel’s crimes by supporting organizations which sought to oust Assad. If Soros really had aspired to do some good, he would have framed his political weltanschauung upon reason, not upon wicked ideologies which ended up ruining one country after another. As we have indicated elsewhere, George Soros proves himself to be an agent of the New World Order by going after Russia, the very country that has been obliterating ISIS in Syria. ISIS has been using chemical weapons in the region, and no one, not even Soros, has said a word about this. Russia obviously had enough of this man and eventually forbade him to enter the country. They eventually called him and his subversive organizations a "threat to Russian national security." Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said similar things. F. William Engdahl argued last January that "George Soros, the hedge fund speculator turned self-proclaimed philanthropist, and his tax-exempt foundations, are an integral part of that pre-emptive war machine." He is obviously right. Thank God Russia was more than willing to kick Soros out of the country. Thank God Putin was willing to act. Thank God for Russia, which is still shaking the very foundation of the New World Order and political Satanism: (3) DCLeaks publishes Soros OSI documents targeting Putin's 'defense of traditional family values' http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/ [...] Russia is investing heavily in increasing its influence in many aspects of Europe’s political life, very often supporting groups that are against open society values. There is evidence of Russian support for radical parties of the Left and Right, including Eurosceptic nationalists like France’s Front National and Austria’s FPÖ, and extreme xenophobic parties like Ataka in Bulgaria, Golden Dawn in Greece and Jobbik in Hungary. There is also evidence of support for individual political leaders, penetration in civil society, attempts to manipulate national debates (for instance, to defend Russia’s energy interests), propaganda to defend Russian international politics, and support for traditionalist movements. However, the evidence is still rather sketchy and based more on strong allegations, hence the need to first do a proper mapping. Putin’s neo-imperial model has also incorporated an ideological pillar: the defense of traditional family values. Putin has deemed what he called a destruction of traditional values from above in the name of so-called tolerance and equality inherently anti-democratic because it runs counter to the will of the majority of people. This ideology has been used to advance Russian influence beyond its borders in Europe and Central Asia, and in international organizations. Our inclination is to engage in activities and with actors that will understand and counter Russian influence and support to movements defending traditional values. (4) Text of Soros OSI document targeting Putin's 'defense of traditional family values' http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/ Open Society Foundations Documents describing financial reserves and plans of OSF. http://dcleaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/soros/reserves/russia-in-europe.docx Proposal Title Russia in Europe: the reactionary values agenda Reserve Fund Europe Reserve Amount Requested 500,000 USD Unforeseen Need (250 words) Ever since the start of the Ukraine crisis Russia has been able to attract a wide range of sympathizers across the political spectrum within the EU, and proved adept at nudging them in the required direction. The request to explore the work around Russia’s influence in Europe has come from the OSF Chairman after our work-plans and budget for 2015 had already been submitted. The focus in the first year of this work at OSIFE will be to gauge the influence of Russia in diverting basic democratic values on EU proper. It will be about exposing Russia’s many messages that are increasingly well addressed to particular national discourses, especially building on the erosion of trust in national and EU-level politics. Background (Optional) Russia is investing heavily in increasing its influence in many aspects of Europe’s political life, very often supporting groups that are against open society values. There is evidence of Russian support for radical parties of the Left and Right, including Eurosceptic nationalists like France’s Front National and Austria’s FPÖ, and extreme xenophobic parties like Ataka in Bulgaria, Golden Dawn in Greece and Jobbik in Hungary. There is also evidence of support for individual political leaders, penetration in civil society, attempts to manipulate national debates (for instance, to defend Russia’s energy interests), propaganda to defend Russian international politics, and support for traditionalist movements. However, the evidence is still rather sketchy and based more on strong allegations, hence the need to first do a proper mapping. Putin’s neo-imperial model has also incorporated an ideological pillar: the defense of traditional family values. Putin has deemed what he called a destruction of traditional values from above in the name of so-called tolerance and equality inherently anti-democratic because it runs counter to the will of the majority of people. This ideology has been used to advance Russian influence beyond its borders in Europe and Central Asia, and in international organizations. Our inclination is to engage in activities and with actors that will understand and counter Russian influence and support to movements defending traditional values. Activities Proposed (500 words) We will seek to understand in detail some of the activities by official and unofficial Russian institutions to promote a traditional values agenda as a means to extend its influence into EU member countries. Once these activities are mapped and understood, we will support the creation of tools for organizations that defend individual rights under attack (LGBTIQ, gender equality, reproductive rights) to understand and develop a strategy to counter the tactics that are being used in their countries with Russian support. The three main objectives for this work are: 1) To have a clearer picture with concrete examples and, where possible, hard data on Russian attempts to promote a socially regressive agenda in at least 5 countries of the European Union. The mapping will include tracking at least two different issues: a) both the actors that our outright supported and those who flirt with Russian support without actually receiving it; b) discourses that these actors engage in. 2) To equip organizations in these 5 countries defending liberal values with the information and tools to detect, understand, and counter Russian support for reactionary attacks on individual rights and freedoms. 3) To generate awareness and understanding in the LGBTIQ, gender equality and reproductive rights movements across Europe about this new threat to individual rights and freedoms. The proposed activities would entail the following: . 2 mapping consultancies (one for Western Europe, including at least Austria, France and Italy; one in Central and Eastern Europe, including at least all three Baltic Republics); . 6 in-depth country reports (countries will be selected after the mapping exercise); . 1 in-depth report about key players in Russia and their strategies; . Communications, dissemination and training consultancies to process and disseminate the results; . 1 seminar/workshop to share the lessons of the research and generate a tool kit for organizations; . 10 half-day presentations of conclusions, lessons and tool kit (6 in each target country, one in Brussels, one with donors, one in Central Europe, one in Southeast Europe) to activists, politicians and journalists. We are building this work on existing links OSF has with groups in the above referenced movements and their indications of the disruptive role the Russian insistence on traditional family values is playing, particularly in the Baltics. Elsewhere there is so far limited but growing awareness of the funding streams reaching the actors in Western Europe, particularly the people behind the Manif pour tous in France and other defenders of reactionary values. Summary for Board Reports (100 words) Russia is investing heavily in increasing its influence in many aspects of Europe’s political life, very often supporting groups that are against open society values. Putin’s neo-imperial model has also incorporated an ideological pillar: the defense of traditional family values. Putin claims the West is hell-bent on destroying traditional values from above in the name of so-called tolerance and equality, which is inherently anti-democratic because it runs counter to the will of the majority. The focus of this work in 2015 at OSIFE will be to gauge the influence of Russia in diverting basic democratic values on EU proper. Collaborating Programs within OSF and essential partners or grantees None foreseen in financial terms for now but we will build on the experience of Eurasia program, OSEPI and TTF both with Russia and with researchers and investigative journalists in the selected countries. Statement of who within OSF would guide the work The Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE) will create a separate portfolio that will host this work and be led by Peter Matjas?ic?, a Barcelona-based program officer. Allocator (See list on Reserve Funds KARL) Name Jordi Vaquer Date Approved 5th April 2015 Allocator Notes / Comments (To be completed by allocator only) (Notes/Comments - Optional field) The origin of this request is a direct demand by George Soros for OSIFE to become active in this field, which came in November 2014, too late to incorporate this in the budget. This work will continue in the next years, but it will need to be part of OSIFE’s regular budget. (5) Hillary tie to Soros = Soros for president; 'national borders as the obstacle' http://www.worldtribune.com/hillary-clintons-deep-ideological-ties-with-george-soros-called-serious-cause-for-alarm/ Hillary Clinton’s deep ideological ties with George Soros called ‘serious cause for alarm’ by WorldTribune Staff, October 21, 2016 The close relationship between Hillary Clinton and billionaire globalist George Soros came into clear focus when WikiLeaks released emails from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. Clinton rarely mentions Soros’s name publicly, but the emails released thus far show the billionaire’s deep influence on the Democratic nominee. His name comes up nearly 60 times in the email exchanges. On the same page: George Soros and Hillary Clinton. /Getty Images Sugar daddy: George Soros and Hillary Clinton. /Getty Images Soros has donated nearly $11 million to Clinton’s Democratic presidential campaign and three main super PACS — USA Action, American Bridge 21st Century and Hillary for America, according to an analysis by Rowan Scarborough for The Washington Times. The new revelations show Clinton "has aligned herself closely with a vision for America laid out by Soros, who talks of ‘international governance,’ more open borders, increased Muslim immigration and diminished U.S. global power." Soros, in 1998, wrote that "the sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions. We need some global system of political decision-making. In short, we need a global society to support our global economy." Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican and co-chair of Donald Trump’s congressional leadership caucus, said a vote for Clinton is a vote for the Soros agenda. "The fact that Hillary Clinton and her campaign are so closely aligned with George Soros and his radical agenda is serious cause for alarm," Hunter told The Washington Times. "Publicly, it’s a relationship she’s never really talked up, but communications at least now reveal how closely aligned they are, and Americans deserve to know that a Clinton presidency means even more direct influence from George Soros. And as for an agenda, there probably won’t be much daylight between the two, and Americans should be concerned that a vote for Clinton is no different than a vote for George Soros for president." His foundation has given up to $6 million to the Clinton Foundation. "A review of Mrs. Clinton’s private and public comments shows she has very much absorbed Mr. Soros‘ grand plan for the world, a blueprint that hangs under the title ‘open societies.’ His New York-based Open Societies Foundation is at the center of his philanthropy and politics," Scarborough wrote. "My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders," Clinton told a closed-door audience at Brazilian bank Banco Tau in May 2013. Soros told Bloomberg News: "Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle." Clinton said on CBS’ "Face the Nation" that she wants to boost President Barack Obama’s mark of 10,000 Syrian refugees resettled in the U.S. in one year to 65,000 — a 500 percent increase. In a rare public acknowledgment, Clinton said in 2004 that "we need people like George Soros, who is fearless and willing to step up when it counts." (6) Establishment Panic: Ruling class fears the people won't accept its political legitimacy - Pat Buchanan http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/an-establishment-in-panic-2/ http://thedailytrump.org/an-establishment-in-panic/ http://americanfreepress.net/the-establishment-is-in-a-panic/ An establishment in panic: Ruling class fears the people won't accept its political legitimacy October 26, 2016 By Patrick Buchanan Pressed by moderator Chris Wallace as to whether he would accept defeat should Hillary Clinton win the election, Donald Trump replied, "I will tell you at the time. I’ll keep you in suspense." "That’s horrifying," said Clinton, setting off a chain reaction on the post-debate panels with talking heads falling all over one another in purple-faced anger, outrage and disbelief. "Disqualifying!" was the cry on Clinton cable. "Trump Won’t Say If He Will Accept Election Results," wailed The New York Times. "Trump Won’t Vow to Honor Results," ran the banner in The Washington Post. But what do these chattering classes and establishment bulletin boards think the Donald is going to do if he falls short of 270 electoral votes? Lead a Coxey’s Army on Washington and burn it down as British General Robert Ross did in August 1814, while "Little Jemmy" Madison fled on horseback out the Brookville What explains the hysteria of the establishment? In a word, fear. The establishment is horrified at the Donald’s defiance because, deep within its soul, it fears that the people for whom Trump speaks no longer accept its political legitimacy or moral authority. It may rule and run the country, and may rig the system through mass immigration and a mammoth welfare state so that Middle America is never again able to elect one of its own. But that establishment, disconnected from the people it rules, senses, rightly, that it is unloved and even detested. Having fixed the future, the establishment finds half of the country looking upon it with the same sullen contempt that our Founding Fathers came to look upon the overlords Parliament sent to rule them. Establishment panic is traceable to another fear: Its ideology, its political religion, is seen by growing millions as a golden calf, a 20th-century god that has failed. Trump is "talking down our democracy," said a shocked Clinton. After having expunged Christianity from our public life and public square, our establishment installed "democracy" as the new deity, at whose altars we should all worship. And so our schools began to teach. Half a millennia ago, missionaries and explorers set sail from Spain, England and France to bring Christianity to the New World. Today, Clintons, Obamas and Bushes send soldiers and secularist tutors to "establish democracy" among the "lesser breeds without the Law." Unfortunately, the natives, once democratized, return to their roots and vote for Hezbollah, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, using democratic processes and procedures to re-establish their true God. And Allah is no democrat. By suggesting he might not accept the results of a "rigged election" Trump is committing an unpardonable sin. But this new cult, this devotion to a new holy trinity of diversity, democracy and equality, is of recent vintage and has shallow roots. For none of the three — diversity, equality, democracy — is to be found in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Federalist Papers or the Pledge of Allegiance. In the pledge, we are a republic. When Ben Franklin, emerging from the Philadelphia convention, was asked by a woman what kind of government they had created, he answered, "A republic, if you can keep it." Among many in the silent majority, Clintonian democracy is not an improvement upon the old republic; it is the corruption of it. Consider: Six months ago, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, the Clinton bundler, announced that by executive action he would convert 200,000 convicted felons into eligible voters by November. If that is democracy, many will say, to hell with it. And if felons decide the electoral votes of Virginia, and Virginia decides who is our next U.S. president, are we obligated to honor that election? In 1824, Gen. Andrew Jackson ran first in popular and electoral votes. But, short of a majority, the matter went to the House. There, Speaker Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams delivered the presidency to Adams — and Adams made Clay secretary of state, putting him on the path to the presidency that had been taken by Jefferson, Madison, Monroe and Adams himself. Were Jackson’s people wrong to regard as a "corrupt bargain" the deal that robbed the general of the presidency? The establishment also recoiled in horror from Milwaukee Sheriff Dave Clarke’s declaration that it is now "torches and pitchforks time." Yet, some of us recall another time, when Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas wrote in "Points of Rebellion": "We must realize that today’s Establishment is the new George III. Whether it will continue to adhere to his tactics, we do not know. If it does, the redress, honored in tradition, is also revolution." Baby-boomer radicals loved it, raising their fists in defiance of Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew. But now that it is the populist-nationalist right that is moving beyond the niceties of liberal democracy to save the America that they love, elitist enthusiasm for "revolution" seems more constrained. What goes around comes around. http://americanfreepress.net/sex-talk-eclipses-potential-for-world-war-iii-outbreak/ http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/10/11/engage-in-sex-not-war-paul-craig-roberts/ (7) Sex Talk Eclipses Elites’ Push for World War III - Paul Craig Roberts Sex Talk Eclipses Elites’ Push for World War III October 12, 2016 By Paul Craig Roberts During the sexual scandals of former President Bill Clinton—the "bimbo eruptions" as Hillary Clinton called them—the Democrats and progressive opinion ruled out a person’s sex life as a political factor. Now, suddenly, nothing more than juvenile locker room banter without the actual sex has become the determinant of political unfitness. The following questions must asked: Where did the 11-year old recording of locker room talk between Donald Trump and Billy Bush come from? Who recorded it and kept it for 11 years for what purpose? Why was it released the day prior to the second debate between Trump and Hillary? Was the recording an illegal violation of privacy? What became of the woman who recorded Monica Lewinsky’s confession to her of sex with Bill Clinton? Wasn’t she prosecuted for wiretaping or some such offense? Why was Billy Bush, the relative of two US presidents, suspended from his TV show because of a private conversation with Trump? You have to take men’s sexual banter with a grain of salt, just as you do their fish stories. President or candidate Bill Clinton himself publicly engaged in sexual banter. If memory serves, in a speech to blue collar workers, Bill said that the bed of his pickup truck was covered in artificial turf and "you know what that was for." In the Clinton White House according to reports there were a number of female interns seeking Bill’s sexual attention. The scantily clad young women came to work sans underwear until Hillary put her foot down. One wonders if the Secret Service was told to inspect compliance with the dress code. The One Percent masquerading as prudes want to remove Trump as the Republican candidate. Just how the people’s choice of presidential candidate is removed in a democracy prior to election, the prudes do not say. No one wanted to remove Clinton from the presidency despite the sexual use of the Oval Office, called at the time the "Oral Orifice." The House Republicans wanted to remove Clinton not for sex but for lying about it, but the Senate would not go along with it. As senators all lied about their sexual liaisons, they saw no harm in it. Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . . What disturbs me about the importance attributed to Trump’s sexual banter is that we have in front of us the dangerous situation of the neoconservatives pushing for Washington to attack Syrian and Russian forces in Syria and the chief Washington propagandist, neocon Carl Gershman, calling publicly for the US to "summon the will" to bring regime change to Russia. The tensions between the two nuclear powers are currently at all time highs, and this dangerous situation is not a factor in the US presidential election! And some people wonder why I call Americans insouciant. The U.S. media, 90% owned by the One Percent, have teamed up with their owners against the American people—the 995. As Trump observed during the second presidential "debate," ABC’s Martha Raddatz and CNN’s Anderson Cooper teamed up with Hillary against him: "Nice, three on one," Trump said. Do the 99% understand that the anti-Trump hysteria fanned by the presstitutes is intended to keep the people in economic bondage and at war? We all know that the hysteria over the Trump-Billy Bush locker room banter is orchestrated for political purposes. But consider the absurdity of it all. Trump’s private expression of sexual interest in an attractive member of the opposite sex has been declared by the presstitutes to be "extremely lewd comments about women." Is what is going on here the criminalization of heterosexual sex?  >Feminist say that women do not want to be regarded as sex objects, but much of womankind disagrees, judging by the provocative way some of them dress. Clothes designers, assuming they are good judges of the apparal market for women, also disagree. At the latest Paris fashion show (October 1) Vivienne Westwood displayed a dress on which the female sexual organs are displayed on the dress. Vivienne Westwood is a woman, a British fashion designer. She has twice earned the award for British Designer of the Year. The Queen of England awarded her the aristocratic title of Dame Commander of the British Empire (DBE) "for services to fashion." At a ceremony honoring her at Buckingham Palace, Westwood appeared without panties and twirled her skirt in the courtyard of the palace. Photographers caught the event, and in Vivienne’s words, "the result was more glamourous than I expected." As recently as 2012, Vivienne was chosen by a panel of academics, historians, and journalists as one of The New Elizabethans who have had a major impact on the UK and given this age its character. In 18th century England, if historians are correct, young women would appear at evening social functions in wet gowns that clung to their bodies the better to indicate their charms. Some of them died of pneumonia as a consequence. They did this on their own accord to attract the attention of the opposite sex. According to reports, robotic sexual partners are being created for men and women that are superior to the real thing. Other news reports are that young Japanese men go on vacation with their sex apps, not with girlfriends. There are indications that as the advancement in social approval of homosexual, lesbian, and transgendered sex progresses, heterosexual sex is acquiring the designation of queer. If Trump had expressed sexual interest in a male or a transgendered person, it would be politically incorrect to mention it. Only heterosexual sexual impulses are a political target. We have reached that point in which women can appear in high heels with skirts that barely cover their nether parts and their braless breasts exposed, and men are lewd if they notice. Do women really want it this way? Is Hillary really going to win the election because Trump is sexually interested in women? -- Peter Myers website: http://mailstar.net/index.html |
Archives‎ > ‎