(1) EcoHealth Alliance Hid Nearly $40 Million in Pentagon Funding on Biowar research(2) Bill Gates tattoo to store medical info beneath children’s skin(3) Gates funded MIT to develop Quantum Dot tattoo to store Vaccination info under the skin - Scientific American(4) WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives(5) WHO Information Notice (Dec 14) says specimens with high CT values might be False Positives(6) NYT & WaPo fail to quote the WHO Report(7) Pfizer vaccine could make women infertile - Wolfgang Wodarg & Michael Yeardon(8) Wolfgang Wodarg & Michael Yeardon - Petition for a stay of action(9) RFKjr: Pfizer & Moderna vaccines contain PEG (polyethylene glycol, similar to antifreeze)(10) Fetal Cell Lines (clones of aborted fetus) used in some Covid Vaccines(11) Great Reset - Don't Worry, Be Happy(1) EcoHealth Alliance Hid Nearly $40 Million in Pentagon Funding on Biowar researchhttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ecohealth-alliance-hid-pentagon-funding/12/18/20EcoHealth Alliance Hid Nearly $40 Million in Pentagon FundingInvestigation reveals $34.6 million of the just-under $39 million EcoHealth Alliance received in Pentagon funding from 2013 to 2020 came from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, a branch of the DOD tasked to "counter and deter weapons of mass destruction and improvised threat networks."By Sam Husseinihttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ecohealth-alliance-hid-pentagon-funding/"Pandemics are like terrorist attacks: We know roughly where they originate and what’s responsible for them, but we don’t know exactly when the next one will happen. They need to be handled the same way — by identifying all possible sources and dismantling those before the next pandemic strikes."This statement was written in the New York Times earlier this year by Peter Daszak. Daszak is the longtime president of the EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit whose claimed focus is pandemic prevention. But the EcoHealth Alliance, it turns out, is at the very center of the COVID-19 pandemic in many ways.To depict the pandemic in such militarized terms is, for Daszak, a commonplace. In an Oct. 7 online talk organized by Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs, Daszak presented a slide titled "Donald Rumsfeld’s Prescient Speech.":"There are known knowns; there are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns; that is to say, there are things that we know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns — there are things we don’t know we don’t know." (This Rumsfeld quote is in fact from a news conference)In the subsequent online discussion, Daszak emphasized the parallels between his own crusade and Rumsfeld’s, since, according to Daszak, the "potential for unknown attacks" is "the same for viruses".Daszak then proceeded with a not terribly subtle pitch for over a billion dollars. This money would support a fledgling virus hunting and surveillance project of his, the Global Virome Project — a "doable project" he assured watchers — given the cost of the pandemic to governments and various industries.Also on the video was Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs. Sachs is a former special advisor to the UN, the former head of the Millennium Villages Project, and was recently appointed Chair of the newly-formed EAT Lancet Commission on the pandemic. In September, Sachs’ commission named Daszak to head up its committee on the pandemic’s origins. Daszak is also on the WHO’s committee to investigate the pandemic’s origin. He is the only individual on both committees.These leadership positions are not the only reason why Peter Daszak is such a central figure in the COVID-19 pandemic, however. His appointment dismayed many of those who are aware that Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance funded bat coronavirus research, including virus collection, at the Wuhan Institute for Virology (WIV) and thus could themselves be directly implicated in the outbreak.For his part, Daszak has repeatedly dismissed the notion that the pandemic could have a lab origin. In fact, a recent FOIA by the transparency group U.S. Right To Know revealed that Peter Daszak drafted an influential multi-author letter published on Feb. 18 in the Lancet. That letter dismissed lab origin hypotheses as "conspiracy theory." Daszak was revealed to have orchestrated the letter such as to "avoid the appearance of a political statement."Sachs for his part seemed surprised by Daszak’s depiction of Rumsfeld but Daszak reassured him. "It’s an awesome quote! And yes, it’s Donald Rumsfeld, Jeff, and I know he’s a Republican, but — what a genius!"Following the EcoHealth Alliance’s money trail to the PentagonCollecting dangerous viruses is typically justified as a preventive and defensive activity, getting ahead of what "Nature" or "The Terrorists" might throw at us. But by its nature, this work is "dual use." "Biodefense" is often just as easily biowarfare since biodefense and the products of biowarfare are identical. It’s simply a matter of what the stated goals are.This is openly acknowledged [see below] by scientists associated with EcoHealth Alliance when talking about alleged programs in other countries — like Iraq.For much of this year, Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance garnered a great deal of sympathetic media coverage after its $3.7 million five-year NIH grant was prematurely cut when the Trump administration learned that EcoHealth Alliance funded bat coronavirus research at the WIV.The temporary cut was widely depicted in major media as Trump undermining the EcoHealth Alliance’s noble fight against pandemics. The termination was reversed by NIH in late August, and even upped to $7.5 million. But entirely overlooked amid the claims and counter-claims was that far more funding for the EcoHealth Alliance comes from the Pentagon than the NIH.To be strictly fair to the media, Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance obscures its Pentagon funding. On its website EcoHealth Alliance states that "A copy of the EHA Grant Management Manual is available upon request to the EHA Chief Financial Officer at finance ( at ) ecohealthalliance.org". But an email to that address and numerous others, including Peter Daszak’s, requesting that Manual, as well as other financial information, was not returned. Neither were repeated voicemails.Only buried under their "Privacy Policy," under a section titled "EcoHealth Alliance Policy Regarding Conflict of Interest in Research," does the EcoHealth Alliance concede it is the "recipient of various grant awards from federal agencies including the National Institute of Health, the National Science Foundation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Department of Defense."Even this listing is deceptive. It obscures that its two largest funders are the Pentagon and the State Department (USAID); whereas the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which accounts for a minuscule $74,487, comes before either.Meticulous investigation of U.S. government databases reveals that Pentagon funding for the EcoHealth Alliance from 2013 to 2020, including contracts, grants and subcontracts, was just under $39 million. Most, $34.6 million, was from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), which is a branch of the DOD which states it is tasked to "counter and deter weapons of mass destruction and improvised threat networks."Most of the remaining money to EHA was from USAID, comprising at least $64,700,000*. These two sources thus total over $103 million. (See Fig).Summary of EHA Grants and Contracts. Note this figure doesn’t count subcontracts so it undercounts USAID’s contribution. Credit: James Baratta and Mariamne Everett*The figure for EHA’s USAID funding was obtained from the University of California at Davis, a major grantee of PREDICT funds, which EHA has been a major sub-grantee of Davis confirmed that EHA’s funding from PREDICT totaled $64,722,669 (PREDICT-1: 2009 to 2014: $19,943,214; PREDICT-2: 2014 to present (2020) $44,779,455)Another $20 million came from Health and Human Services ($13 million, which includes National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control), National Science Foundation ($2.6 million), Department of Homeland Security ($2.3 million), Department of Commerce ($1.2 million), Department of Agriculture ($0.6 million), and Department of Interior ($0.3 million). So, total U.S. government funding for EHA to-date stands at $123 million, approximately one third of which comes from the Pentagon directly. The full funding breakdown is available here and is summarized by year, source, and type, in a spreadsheet format.Pdf versions of this spreadsheet are available to download. The summary is here and all Federal grants and contracts are here.More military connectionsThe military links of the EcoHealth Alliance are not limited to money and mindset. One noteworthy ‘policy advisor’ to the EcoHealth Alliance is David Franz. Franz is former commander of Fort Detrick, which is the principal U.S. government biowarfare/biodefense facility.David Franz was part of UNSCOM which inspected Iraq for alleged bioweapons — what were constantly referred to as WMDs or Weapons of Mass Destruction by the U.S. government and the media. Franz has been one of those eager to state, at least when discussing alleged Iraqi programs, that "in biology … everything is dual use — the people, the facilities and the equipment." (NPR, May 14, 2003; link no longer available).Just this year Franz wrote a piece with former New York Times journalist Judith Miller, whose stories of Iraqi WMDs did much to misinform the U.S. public regarding the case for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Their joint article, "A Biosecurity Failure: America’s key lab for fighting infectious disease has become a Pentagon backwater," urges more funding for Fort Detrick.Miller and Franz are long-time associates. Miller co-wrote the book Germs, released amid the 2001 false flag anthrax attacks, which repeatedly quotes Franz. Miller at the time received a hoax letter with a harmless white powder, increasing her prominence.Franz continued hyping the existence of Iraqi WMDs even after the invasion of Iraq. While she was still with the Times, Miller quoted him in a story "U.S. Analysts Link Iraq Labs To Germ Arms" on May 21, 2003 pushing the theory that Iraq had mobile biological WMD units. (This theory was debunked by the British scientist Dr. David Kelly, who would die, apparently by suicide, soon thereafter.)Four significant insights emerge from all this. First, although it is called the EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Daszak and his non-profit work closely with the military. Second, the EcoHealth Alliance attempts to conceal these military connections. Third, through militaristic language and analogies Daszak and his colleagues promote what is often referred to as, and even then somewhat euphemistically, an ongoing agenda known as "securitization." In this case it is the securitization of infectious diseases and of global public health. That is, they argue that pandemics constitute a vast and existential threat. They minimize the very real risks associated with their work, and sell it as a billion dollar solution. The fourth insight is that Daszak himself, as the Godfather of the Global Virome Project, stands to benefit from the likely outlay of public funds.Originally posted by Independent Science News.(2) Bill Gates tattoo to store medical info beneath children’s skinhttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/yes-bill-gates-said-that/12/11/20Yes, Bill Gates Said That. Here’s the Proof.Gates and his minions insist the billionaire never said we’d need digital vaccine passports. But in a June 2020 TED Talk, Gates said exactly that. Someone edited out the statement, but CHD tracked down the original.By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/yes-bill-gates-said-that/Some chiseler altered Bill Gates’ June 2020 TED Talk to edit out his revealing prediction that we will all soon need digital vaccine passports (slide 1). But after considerable effort, we tracked down the original video (slide 2).  <https://www.instagram.com/p/CIj3F0Rlsqs/>Gates’ minions on cable and network news, his public broadcasting, social media and fact-checker toadies all now insist that Gates never said such things. They say he never intended to track and trace us with subdermal chips or injected tattoos.They dismiss such talk as "conspiracy theories."Well, here it is from the horse’s mouth.In 2019, according to a not-yet-purged Scientific American article, Gates commissioned the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to build an injectable quantum dot dye system to tattoo stored medical info beneath children’s skin. The tattoo was designed to be readable by an iPhone app.Gates’ company, Microsoft, has patented a sinister technology that uses implanted chips with sensors that will monitor body and brain activity. It promises to reward compliant humans with crypto currency payments when they perform assigned activities.Gates also invested approximately $20 million in MicroCHIPS, a company that makes chip-based devices, including birth-control implant chips with wireless on/off switches for remote-controlled drug-delivery by medical authorities.In July 2019, months before the COVID pandemic, Gates bought 3.7M shares of Serco, a military contractor with U.S. and UK government contracts to track and trace pandemic infections and vaccine compliance.To facilitate our transition to his surveillance society, Gates invested $1 billion in EarthNow, which promises to blanket the globe in 5G video surveillance satellites. EarthNow will launch 500 satellites allowing governments and large enterprises to live-stream monitor almost every "corner" of the Earth, providing instantaneous video feedback with one-second delay.The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also acquired 5.3 million shares of Crown Castle, which owns 5G spy antennas including more than 40,000 cell towers and 65,000 small cells.Please make your own copy of these clips — as Gates’ power to disappear inconvenient facts is expanding every digital day.Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.https://www.instagram.com/p/CIj3F0Rlsqs/"so eventually there will be this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global reopening up".https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606Abstract(IN)Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified. ...(3) Bill Gates funded MIT to develop Quantum Dot tattoo to store Vaccination info under the skin - Scientific American{save this article to your computer, in case it is deleted}https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/invisible-ink-could-reveal-whether-kids-have-been-vaccinated/Invisible Ink Could Reveal whether Kids Have Been VaccinatedThe technology embeds immunization records into a child’s skinBy Karen WeintraubScientific AmericanDecember 18, 2019M.I.T. engineers have developed a way to store medical information under the skin, using a quantum dot dye that is delivered, along with a vaccine, by a microneedle patch. The dye, which is invisible to the naked eye, can be read later using a specially adapted smartphone. Credit: Second Bay StudiosKeeping track of vaccinations remains a major challenge in the developing world, and even in many developed countries, paperwork gets lost, and parents forget whether their child is up to date. Now a group of Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers has developed a novel way to address this problem: embedding the record directly into the skin.Along with the vaccine, a child would be injected with a bit of dye that is invisible to the naked eye but easily seen with a special cell-phone filter, combined with an app that shines near-infrared light onto the skin. The dye would be expected to last up to five years, according to tests on pig and rat skin and human skin in a dish.The system—which has not yet been tested in children—would provide quick and easy access to vaccination history, avoid the risk of clerical errors, and add little to the cost or risk of the procedure, according to the study, published Wednesday in Science Translational Medicine."Especially in developing countries where medical records may not be as complete or as accessible, there can be value in having medical information directly associated with a person," says Mark Prausnitz, a bioengineering professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology, who was not involved in the new study. Such a system of recording medical information must be extremely discreet and acceptable to the person whose health information is being recorded and his or her family, he says. "This, I think, is a pretty interesting way to accomplish those goals."The research, conducted by M.I.T. bioengineers Robert Langer and Ana Jaklenec and their colleagues, uses a patch of tiny needles called microneedles to provide an effective vaccination without a teeth-clenching jab. Microneedles are embedded in a Band-Aid-like device that is placed on the skin; a skilled nurse or technician is not required. Vaccines delivered with microneedles also may not need to be refrigerated, reducing both the cost and difficulty of delivery, Langer and Jaklenec say.Delivering the dye required the researchers to find something that was safe and would last long enough to be useful. "That’s really the biggest challenge that we overcame in the project," Jaklenec says, adding that the team tested a number of off-the-shelf dyes that could be used in the body but could not find any that endured when exposed to sunlight. The team ended up using a technology called quantum dots, tiny semiconducting crystals that reflect light and were originally developed to label cells during research. The dye has been shown to be safe in humans.  A close-up microscope image of the microneedle array, which could deliver quantum dots into skin. Credit: K.J. McHugh et al. Science Translational Medicine (2019)The approach raises some privacy concerns, says Prausnitz, who helped invent microneedle technology and directs Georgia Tech’s Center for Drug Design, Development and Delivery. "There may be other concerns that patients have about being ‘tattooed,’ carrying around personal medical information on their bodies or other aspects of this unfamiliar approach to storing medical records," he says. "Different people and different cultures will probably feel differently about having an invisible medical tattoo."When people were still getting vaccinated for smallpox, which has since been eradicated worldwide, they got a visible scar on their arm from the shot that made it easy to identify who had been vaccinated and who had not, Jaklenec says. "But obviously, we didn’t want to give people a scar," she says, noting that her team was looking for an identifier that would be invisible to the naked eye. The researchers also wanted to avoid technologies that would raise even more privacy concerns, such as iris scans and databases with names and identifiable data, she says.The work was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and came about because of a direct request from Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates himself, who has been supporting efforts to wipe out diseases such as polio and measles across the world, Jaklenec says. "If we don’t have good data, it’s really difficult to eradicate disease," she says.The researchers hope to add more detailed information to the dots, such as the date of vaccination. Along with them, the team eventually wants to inject sensors that could also potentially be used to track aspects of health such as insulin levels in diabetics, Jaklenec says.This approach is likely to be one of many trying to solve the problem of storing individuals’ medical information, says Ruchit Nagar, a fourth-year student at Harvard Medical School, who also was not involved in the new study. He runs a company, called Khushi Baby, that is also trying to create a system for tracking such information, including vaccination history, in the developing world.Working in the northern Indian state of Rajasthan, Nagar and his team have devised a necklace, resembling one worn locally, which compresses, encrypts and password protects medical information. The necklace uses the same technology as radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips—such as those employed in retail clothing or athletes’ race bibs—and provides health care workers access to a mother’s pregnancy history, her child’s growth chart and vaccination history, and suggestions on what vaccinations and other treatments may be needed, he says. But Nagar acknowledges the possible concerns all such technology poses. "Messaging and cultural appropriateness need to be considered," he says.(4) WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positiveshttps://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives/WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positivesWarnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now? The potential explanation is shockingly cynical.Kit KnightlyThe World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?The "gold standard" Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the "cycle threshold" or "CT value". The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.To quote their own words [our emphasis]:Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.They go on to explain [again, our emphasis]:The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the CT value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high CT value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention. That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the "pandemic" narrative, and the policies it’s being used to sell.Many articles have been written about it, by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. It’s been commonly available knowledge, for months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless.Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying:with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody."And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said:If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR."The MIQE guidelines for PCR use state:Cq values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported,"This has all been public knowledge since the beginning of the lockdown. The Australian government’s own website admitted the tests were flawed, and a court in Portugal ruled they were not fit for purpose.Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting "dead nucleotides", not a living virus.Despite all this, it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with CT values over 35, even into the low 40s.So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognise this simple reality?The answer to that is potentially shockingly cynical: We have a vaccine now. We don’t need false positives anymore.Notionally, the system has produced its miracle cure. So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done "under the new WHO guidelines", and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+.Lo and behold, the number of "positive cases" will plummet, and we’ll have confirmation that our miracle vaccine works.After months of flooding the data pool with false positives, miscounting deaths "by accident", adding "Covid19 related death" to every other death certificate…they can stop. The create-a-pandemic machine can be turned down to zero again.…as long as we all do as we’re told. Any signs of dissent – masses of people refusing the vaccine, for example – and the CT value can start to climb again, and they bring back their magical disease.(5) WHO Information Notice (Dec 14) says specimens with high CT values might be False Positiveshttps://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2020-who-information-notice-for-ivd-usersWHO Information Notice for IVD UsersNucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-214 December 2020 Medical product alert Geneva Reading time: 2 min (554 words)Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2Date: 7 December 2020 WHO-identifier: 2020/5, version 1Purpose of this notice: To ensure users of certain nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies are aware of certain aspects of the instructions for use (IFU) for all products.Description of the problem: WHO has received user feedback on an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results when testing specimens using RT-PCR reagents on open systems.As with any diagnostic procedure, the positive and negative predictive values for the product in a given testing population are important to note. As the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 decreases, the positive predictive value also decreases. This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as positivity rate decreases, irrespective of the assay specificity. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts, etc.Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.  The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the CT value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high CT value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain. Thus, the IFU will state how to interpret specimens at or near the limit for PCR positivity. In some cases, the IFU will state that the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high CT values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise.Manufacturers regularly review the design of their product, including labelling and IFU based on customer feedback. In the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) were rapidly developed, validated and verified, and then rolled out. Therefore, it is not unexpected that IVDs may require refinement based on user feedback after their introduction at scale. Users should verify the version of the IFU with each consignment they receive to see if any changes have been made to the IFU.Advice on action to be taken by users:Please read carefully the IFU in its entirety.Contact your local representative if there is any aspect of the IFU that is unclear to you.Check the IFU for each incoming consignment to detect any changes to the IFU.Consider any positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) or negative results (SARS-CoV-2 not detected) in combination with specimen type, clinical observations, patient history, and epidemiological information.Provide the CT value in the report to the requesting healthcare provider.Transmission of this WHO Information Notice for Users:Please disseminate this notice to all those who need to be aware within your organization or to any organization where the potentially affected product has been deployed and used.Contact person for further information:Anita SANDS, Regulation and Prequalification, World Health Organization, e-mail: sandsa@who.int(6) NYT & WaPo fail to quote the WHO ReportGoogle Search Dec 21 2.22pm AESTI selected a key phrase from the WHO Report and checked whether NYT & WaPo used that phrase, i.e. quoted that key sentence.They did not. And yet, Australia has just cancelled the Sydney-Hobart Yacht Race - for the first time ever.site:nytimes.com "value result being interpreted as a positive result"No results foundsite:washingtonpost.com  "value result being interpreted as a positive result"No results found(7) Pfizer vaccine could make women infertile - Wolfgang Wodarg & Michael Yeardonhttps://healthimpactnews.com/2020/breaking-uk-first-to-approve-pfizer-covid-vaccine-as-former-head-of-pfizer-research-says-vaccine-can-make-females-infertile/In their STAY OF ACTION filed yesterday, one day BEFORE the U.K. issued emergency use authorization, Dr. Yeadon stated that this vaccine can make females infertile.He writes that the Pfizer COVID vaccine as well as other COVID vaccines currently in Phase III trials are:expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., "Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses" – http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019-against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed. (Source. https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf)As we have previously reported, Pfizer is one of the largest criminal organizations in the world, having repeatedly paid out BILLIONS of dollars in settlements for fraud. See:Criminal Pfizer Inc. Wins COVID Vaccine Race? Hundreds of Millions of Doses Expected to be Ready Within WeeksWill The U.S. Public Wake Up in Time to Understand the Globalist Eugenic Agenda Standing at Our Door??The COVID vaccine has been the plan all along with the COVID Plandemic. They are not even hiding this fact. ==(8) Wolfgang Wodarg & Michael Yeardon - Petition for a stay of actionWolfgang Wodarg & Michael Yeardon petitionhttps://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdfPETITIONER: December 1, 2020Dr. med. Wolfgang WodargGermanyCO-PETITIONER:Dr. Michael YeadonEngland, CT3 1RTTO:European Medicines Agency Committee for human medicinal products (CHMP) COVID-19 EMA pandemic Task Force (COVID-ETF) Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 1083 HS Amsterdam The Netherlandsinfo@ema.europa.eu press@ema.europa.eu... This petition for a stay of action is submitted by the undersigned ("Petitioner" or "Lead Petitioner") to request the EMA a) stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b (EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42) in the EU (current protocol country: Germany) until study design is amended to conform with the requests in the "Action Requested" section (B.) below; and b) stay all other clinical trials of vaccine candidates designed to stop transmission of the virus from thevaccine recipient to others and/or prevent or mitigate symptoms of COVID-19 for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection. ...Before an Emergency Authorization/Conditional Approval and/or Unrestricted Authorization is issued for vaccine designed to stop transmission of the virus from the vaccine recipient to others and/or to prevent or mitigate symptoms of COVID-19, all "endpoints" or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy should have their infection status confirmed by appropriate Sanger sequencing (as described in section B. III. below), given a) the high cycle thresholds used in some trials; and b) design flaws of certain RT-qPCR tests identical to or modeled after what is sometimes called the "Drosten-Test".III. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives. Also, a group of scientists and researchers have recently called for a retraction of the paper that describes the so called "Drosten-Test" (sometimes also being referred to as the "Corman-Drosten protocol" -a specific RT-qPCR assay described by Corman,Victor M., Drosten, Christian and others in "Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR." Euro Surveillance 2020;25(3):pii=2000045. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045).All RT-qPCR-positive test results used to categorize patient as "COVID-19 cases" in the trials and used to qualify the trial’s endpoints should be verified by Sanger sequencing to confirm that the tested samples in fact contain a unique SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA. Congruent with FDA and EMA requirements for a confirmed diagnosis of human papillomavirus (HPV) using PCR, the sequencing electropherogram must show a minimum of 100 contiguous bases matching the reference sequence with an Expected Value (E Value) <10-30 for the specific SARS-CoV-2 gene sequence based on a BLAST search of the GenBank database (aka NCBI Nucleotide database). ...XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., "Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses" -http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies.However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed.  ...(9) RFKjr: Pfizer & Moderna vaccines contain PEG (polyethylene glycol, similar to antifreeze)https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-reaction-fda-peg/12/11/20RFK, Jr. Warned FDA Three Months Ago About Ingredient in Pfizer COVID Vaccine That Likely Caused Life-Threatening Reaction in Two UK Healthcare WorkersAn investigation this week identified polyethylene glycol (PEG) as the likely reason two people in the UK suffered anaphylaxis after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. In September, CHD Chairman RFK, Jr. warned the FDA that PEG in COVID vaccines could lead to severe allergic reactions.By Lyn Redwood, RN, MSNOn Dec. 2, Britain’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) became the first in the world to approve a COVID-19 vaccine developed by Germany’s BioNTech and Pfizer.A mass vaccination campaign that targeted frontline workers to receive the vaccine began on Dec. 8. Within 24 hours of launching the campaign, MHRA acknowledged two reports of anaphylaxis and one report of a possible allergic reaction.Reuters reported late yesterday afternoon that an investigation into the anaphylactic reactions by MHRA has identified polyethylene glycol, or PEG, as the likely culprit.Imperial College London’s Paul Turner, an expert in allergy and immunology who has been advising the MHRA on its revised guidance, told Reuters: "The ingredients like PEG which we think might be responsible for the reactions are not related to things which can cause food allergy. Likewise, people with a known allergy to just one medicine should not be at risk."It was also reported that PEG, which helps to stabilize the shot, is not in other types of vaccines.The statements by Turner that "PEG is not in other types of vaccines" and that people with allergies to "just one medicine should not be at risk" are a failed attempt to provide false assurances and are patently untrue.Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech and Arcturus Therapeutics COVID vaccines all utilize a never-before-approved messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, an experimental approach designed to turn the body’s cells into viral protein-making factories. This technology involves the use of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that encapsulate the mRNA to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake.The LNP formulations in the three COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are "PEGylated," meaning that the vaccine nanoparticles are coated with a synthetic, non-degradable and increasingly controversial PEG.COVID mRNA vaccines are not the only vehicle for PEG involvement in COVID-19 vaccine production. Researchers at Germany’s Max Planck Institute report developing a process for COVID-19 vaccine production to purify virus particles at "high yield." The process involves adding PEG to a virus-containing liquid and passing the liquid through membranes.On Sept. 25, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), notified the Steven Hahn, director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Dr. Peter Marks director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, of the serious and possibly life-threatening anaphylactic potential of PEG. ...(10) Fetal Cell Lines (clones of aborted fetus) used in some Covid Vaccineshttps://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/15/aborted-fetal-cells-in-coronavirus-vaccines.aspxSeveral COVID-19 Vaccines Are Made Using Aborted Fetal Cellsby Dr. Joseph MercolaDecember 15, 2020aborted fetal cells in coronavirus vaccinesThe claim made by some citizen journalists is that certain COVID-19 vaccines "contain cells from an aborted fetus." One video headline stated: "CONFIRMED — aborted fetus in COVID-19 vaccine"Fact checkers have "debunked" these claims and labeled them false, in one instance because the name of the fetal cell line was incorrect and in others because the vaccines do not literally "contain" these cells; rather, the fetal cell lines were used as a growth medium for the virus during the production phaseFact checkers’ claim that fetal cells are not used in vaccine development because they are clones of the original is perhaps the most ludicrous. There’s no difference between cells growing and multiplying indefinitely in a petri dish and cells growing and multiplying in your body during your lifetime. If the cells in your body are still you, then the cells in the petri dish are still that of the original fetus that was abortedAside from ethical concerns, some may also object to vaccines manufactured through the use of fetal cell lines on the basis that there may be health risks involved, due to potential DNA contamination. Human fetal cell lines in vaccine production have been linked to both autism and autoimmune diseasesVaccine makers using a fetal cell line in the development of their COVID-19 vaccines include AstraZeneca, Jansen Research and Development/Johnson & Johnson, CanSino Biologics, University of Pittsburgh, ImmunityBio and AltimmuneIn addition to standard concerns over the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is the moral dilemma of taking vaccines made with aborted fetal cells. For many, this alone is a cause for objection. Several of the vaccine candidates, including AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine, are made using aborted fetal cell lines.1,2Several fact checkers — including Politifact,3 The Associated Press4 and Snopes5 — have labeled the claim as "false," but is it? As it turns out, fact checkers are relying on semantics to "debunk" this claim. In reality, most thinking individuals are able to determine the truth of the matter once the details are explained.Semantics and Technicalities Used to 'Debunk' the TruthA common mistake by less experienced citizen journalists is to use rather general terms, assuming people will "get the gist" without having to be overly specific, and this is precisely what self-declared fact checkers home in on when rating something false or misleading.Fact checkers routinely rely on semantics and technicalities to break apart a given claim, and unless you carefully read their explanation, you're likely to miss this and simply write it off based on the headline claiming something to be false. The case of COVID-19 vaccines containing aborted fetal cells is a perfect example of this, so let's go through some of what you need to know before discounting this claim off-hand.Commonly Used Fetal Cell LinesThere are several cell lines commonly used in vaccine development that originate from aborted fetuses, including:6HEK2937,8,9,10,11 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from kidney tissue obtained from a female fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1972MRC512 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 14-week-old male fetusaborted in 1966PER.C613 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the retina of an 18-week-old male fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1985WI3814 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 12-week-old female fetus aborted in 1961Vaccine makers using at least one of these fetal cell lines in the development of their COVID-19 vaccines include:15,16,17AstraZeneca (HEK293)Jansen Research and Development (owned by Johnson & Johnson), (PER.C6)CanSino Biologics (HEK293)University of Pittsburgh (HEK293)ImmunityBio (HEK293)Altimmune (PER.C6)Vaccine makers using either "ethically derived" cell lines, meaning cell lines that do not originate from aborted human fetuses, or no cell lines at all, include Moderna, Merck, Novavax, Sanofi Pasteur, Pfizer, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline and Sinovac.18 ...(11) Great Reset - Don't Worry, Be Happyhttps://www.globalresearch.ca/world-economic-forum-step-two-resetting-future-work-agenda-after-great-reset/5729175The Post Covid World, The WEF’s Diabolical Project: "Resetting the Future of Work Agenda" – After "The Great Reset". A Horrifying FutureBy Peter KoenigGlobal Research, December 16, 2020The World Economic Forum (WEF) has just published (October 2020) a so-called White Paper, entitled "Resetting the Future of Work Agenda – in a Post-Covid World".This 31-page document reads like a blueprint on how to "execute" – because an execution (or implementation) would be – "Covid-19 – The Great Reset" (July 2020), by Klaus Schwab, founder and CEO (since the foundation of the WEF in 1974) and his associate Thierry Malleret.They call "Resetting the Future" a White Paper, meaning it’s not quite a final version. It is a draft of sorts, a trial balloon, to measure people’s reactions. It reads indeed like an executioner’s tale. Many people may not read it – have no awareness of its existence. If they did, they would go up in arms and fight this latest totalitarian blueprint, offered to the world by the WEF.It promises a horrifying future to some 80%-plus of the (surviving) population. George Orwell’s "1984" reads like a benign fantasy, as compared to what the WEF has in mind for humanity.The time frame is ten years – by 2030 – the UN agenda 2021 – 2030 should be implemented.Planned business measures in response to COVID-19:An acceleration of digitized work processes, leading to 84% of all work processes as digital, or virtual / video conferences.Some 83% of people are planned to work remotely – i.e. no more interaction between colleagues – absolute social distancing, separation of humanity from the human contact.About 50% of all tasks are planned to be automated – in other words, human input will be drastically diminished, even while remote working.Accelerate the digitization of upskilling / reskilling (e.g. education technology providers) – 42% of skill upgrading or training for new skills will be digitized, in other words, no human contact – all on computer, Artificial Intelligence (AI), algorithms.Accelerate the implementation of upskilling / reskilling programs – 35% of skills are planned to be "re-tooled" – i.e. existing skills are planned to be abandoned – declared defunct.Accelerate ongoing organizational transformations (e.g. restructuring) – 34% of current organizational set-ups are planned to be "restructured’ – or, in other words, existing organizational structures will be declared obsolete – to make space for new sets of organizational frameworks, digital structures that provide utmost control over all activities.Temporarily reassign workers to different tasks – this is expected to touch 30% of the work force. That also means completely different pay-scales – most probably unlivable wages, which would make the also planned "universal basic salary" or "basic income" – a wage that allows you barely to survive, an obvious need. – But it would make you totally dependent on the system – a digital system, where you have no control whatsoever.Temporarily reduce workforce – this is projected as affecting 28% of the population. It is an additional unemployment figure, in disguise, as the "temporarily" will never come back to full-time.Permanently reduce workforce – 13% permanently reduced workforce.Temporarily increase workforce – 5% – there is no reference to what type of workforce – probably unskilled labor that sooner or later will also be replaced by automation, by AI and robotization of the workplace.No specific measures implemented – 4% – does that mean, a mere 4% will remain untouched? From the algorithm and AI-directed new work places? – as small and insignificant as the figure is, it sounds like "wishful thinking", never to be accomplished.Permanently increase workforce – a mere 1% is projected as "permanently increased workforce". This is of course not even cosmetics. It is a joke.This is the what is being put forth, namely the concrete process of implementing The Great Reset.The Great Reset also foresees, a credit scheme, whereby all personal debt would be "forgiven" – against handing over all personal assets to an administrative body or agency – could possibly be the IMF.So, you would own nothing – and be happy. Because all your necessities will be provided for.