(1) Doctors warn: Don't take the Pfizer vaccine(2) Association of American Physicians and Surgeons issues Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment(3) Trials of Pfizer vaccine used unreliable PCR diagnostic test(4) Professor Dr Pierre Kory tells Congress: Ivermectin is a "Miracle Drug" that Cures Covid!(5) Ivermectin  trial  in 14 Bangladesh hospitals: 99.3% of COVID-19 patients recovered in five days(6) Big Business Runs/Ruins the Healthcare Industry(7) Asymptomatic Transmission is very rare(8) Virologists file Stay of Action against Pfizer Civid vaccine(1) Doctors warn: Don't take the Pfizer vaccineFrom: cg <acmealethia@gmail.com>https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/doctors-around-the-world-issue-dire-warning-do-not-get-the-covid-vaccine/ December 8, 2020Doctors Around the World Issue Dire WARNING: DO NOT GET THE COVID VACCINE!!by Brian ShilhavyEditor, Health Impact NewsIn an effort to combat Big Pharma Corporate Media and Big Tech censorship, doctors around the world are frantically trying to warn the masses of the devastating effects of the experimental COVID vaccines about to be mass injected into the unsuspecting public assisted by military forces around the world.What could possibly motivate these doctors, nurses, scientists, and other health professionals to make such an impassioned plea? What do they have to gain by taking the time to educate the public on the hidden dangers of a new class of vaccine about to be inflicted upon the citizens of countries around the world?They have NOTHING TO GAIN, and much to lose, including their careers, and possibly even their lives.So why are they doing this? Why are these doctors and professionals being censored so much if the new COVID vaccines are in fact "safe and effective"? What is it that the media and the government are hiding that they don’t want the public to know?They are doing this because they are doctors and scientists who actually understand the REAL science here, and who know the devastating potential consequences of those who choose to get this very toxic and dangerous vaccine, and they are trying to save as many people as possible from the carnage this vaccine is going to cause, which will include DEATH, brain injuries, life-long autoimmune disease, infertility, and more.Please watch this video and their urgent pleas, and then share it with as many people as you can, because time is short! From our Bitchute Channel:https://www.bitchute.com/channel/HealthImpactNews/== Tip (Peter M.): bookmark this site & check it: https://healthimpactnews.com(2) Association of American Physicians and Surgeons issues Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatmenthttps://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment- PDF BookletAssociation of American Physicians and Surgeons – AAPS – is a non-partisan professional association of physicians in all types of practices and specialties across the country.https://aapsonline.org/CovidPatientTreatmentGuide.pdfCompanion videos:1) Video by Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjYKx-wqxJk2) Video by Dr. Peter McCullough, available at: https://rumble.com/vay2vx-dr.-mccullough-explains-treatment-protocol.htmlIf you would like to support ongoing and future efforts to protect patient rights, you can do so by contributing to the American Health Legal Foundation: http://americanhealthlegalfoundation.org/== Dr Peter Breggin discusses the AAPS Guide: https://breggin.com/covid-19-home-treatment/== extracts from the AAPS Guide:The chances of someone under 50 years old with symptoms dying from COVID-19 is 0.05%.The chances of someone under 18 years old dying from COVID is near 0%. Those that do are those with severe underlying medical conditions. There are roughly 7 times more children that die from the flu than COVID-19.To put it another way, approximately 99.9%+ of individuals who contract COVID will have mild to moderate symptoms and recover, just like with the flu. The majority of deaths are coming from the 0.62% of the population who are in nursing home facilities.The bottom line? This virus looks and acts very much like the flu, but with one CAVEAT: Unlike the usual seasonal influenza, COVID-19 illness can become profoundly serious in unpredictable ways.COVID-19 can very rapidly become critical illness for two primary reasons: this viruses triggers TWO responses in the body much worse than seasonal flu: an exaggerated inflammatory response causing damage to critical organs, and an exaggerated blood-clotting response leading to multiple blood clots in the lungs, brain and other organs.  Doctors have even found blood clots in large arteries like the aorta.Chapter 2I Have Flu-Like Symptoms: What Should I Do?{the Guide lists symptoms in detail}What should I do first?Consult your primary physician with the first onset of COVID-19 symptoms.If you are experiencing severe, life threatening symptoms call 911 or go to your nearest emergency department for evaluation.  Difficulty breathing or severe chest pain is a sign of serious illness and needs medical attention promptly.   The most important reason to contact your physician right away is that studies show early treatment is the KEY to success with COVID. Early treatment is especially critical for people at high-risk.Because rapid treatment is so crucial in COVID, many outpatient physicians elect to treat their patients based on clinical symptoms, risk factors, and other objective findings from a physical exam or blood work and do not lose the "window of opportunity" for early treatment by waiting several days for a COVID test report. That is a very reasonable option, since the tests have been at times hard to get and may take too many days for results. Also, reliability of the tests has been a serious problem. We have patients who tested negative but had the cardinal features of the COVID illness and needed treatment. If you have all the symptoms of COVID illness, but a negative test result, most physicians still recommend early treatment to help reduce the risk of requiring hospitalization.There are two basic types of tests:1. diagnostic tests: an "antigen" test and a "molecular" test.  An antigen test detects certain proteins on the surface of the virus. A molecular test, called RT-PCR or rRT-PCR detects fragments of the virus’ genetic material.2. Antibody tests: (after recovery from COVID): These tests check for antibodies made by your immune system in response to an infection, such as a viral illness. Antibodies help fight infections and antibodies "remember" what the infection-causing organism looks like to help our bodies fight similar infections in the future.Antibody tests are not used to diagnose an active infection.  These tests tell your doctor you had the illness and recovered and have developed immunity. Commonly used antibody tests are not specific to COVID. People may have similar antibody responses to other viral infections, such as the coronavirus that is responsible for the common cold and even the flu virus. The test can only say that you have had a viral infection, not the specific type of virus.Early Treatment Is the Key to SuccessSeek early treatment and be your own advocate. All of the physicians contributing to this booklet are on the frontlines treating outpatients at the first signs of COVID illness. Studies in the US and many other countries clearly show that patients who are treated within the first 5 days of symptoms have better outcomes using the combination of medications in the algorithm below.   Conversely the death rate is ~12% by the time oxygen is needed, and ~40% for those requiring the intensive care unit. These death rates are unacceptably high. We have found that death rates can be significantly lower with early, outpatient treatment for the high-risk patients over age 50, with one or more other medical conditions.Steps to Take:1. Be proactive.2. Print the treatment algorithm that we included in this chapter.3. Study this algorithm of medicines used and when they work the best. You will recognize many. They are in common use as anti-virals, anti-inflammatories, and anti-coagulants.4. Schedule a TeleMedicine appointment with your primary physician ahead of getting sick.5. Find out if your physician is willing to treat you according to this peer-reviewed published protocol, developed by experts from major U.S. and Italian medical centers.6. If your physician is not willing, or knowledgeable to treat you for COVID, start now to find one who is.  Look for a physician who is willing to treat your COVID with an aggressive plan as shown in this chapter. Resources for physicians across the United States are listed in Appendix IV. You need an advocate who will work to help you get well.7. A "wait and see" approach is not adequate for high-risk patients (those over age 50 with one or more other medical conditions). "Wait and see" is a factor contributing to the high death rate in the United States. Countries with the lowest death rates are treating early at home with the oral medicines listed in the algorithm that follows in this chapter.8. Our medical knowledge on how to treat COVID is changing and improving daily, so please do not be afraid to seek professional help promptly if you develop symptoms.{Various prescription medicines are listed for Doctors to Prescribe}IV. Vitamins, Supplements, and Oxygen.Zinc sulfate, gluconate or citrate. These forms are available in pharmacies, health food stores, and sold online. Zinc sulfate 220 mg provides 50 mg elemental zinc, the recommended anti-viral dose. Zinc in the form of zinc picolinate form is not recommended following reports of liver damage and tumors from studies about 20 years ago. Following these reports, the German Commission E that regulates supplements used in medical practice in Germany banned this form of zinc.Vitamin D3, preferable in oil in capsules for better absorption. Recommended doses for anti-viral benefit vary from 5000 IU or more for 5-30 daysVitamin C with bioflavonoids for antioxidant, anti-inflammatory effects. Dose recommendations from our contributors vary from 1000 mg (1 gram) once or twice a day up to 4 or more times a day.A word about quercetin. Some physicians are recommending this supplement to reduce viral illnesses because quercetin acts as a zinc ionophore to improve zinc uptake into cells. It is much less potent than HCQ as a zinc transporter, and it does not reach high concentrations in lung cells that HCQ does. Quercetin may help reduce risk of viral illness if you are basically healthy. But it is not potent enough to replace HCQ for treatment of COVID once you have symptoms, and it does not adequately get into lung tissue unless you take massive doses (3-5 grams a day), which cause significant GI side effects such as diarrhea.
(3) Trials of Pfizer vaccine used unreliable PCR diagnostic testhttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-petition-halt-pfizer-vaccine-efficacy/12/07/20Pathologist Petitions FDA to Halt Pfizer Emergency Use Authorization Until Vaccine Efficacy ConfirmedThe major reason for petitioning the FDA for a stay of action is that the Phase 2/3 clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine used a presumptive RT-qPCR diagnostic test.By Informed Consent Action Networkhttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-petition-halt-pfizer-vaccine-efficacy/Connecticut pathologist Dr. Sin Hang Lee and Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) have petitioned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to require accurate counts of COVID-19 cases in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial."Until an accurate count of COVID-19 cases in the vaccinated and placebo groups has been determined for vaccine efficacy evaluation, we are asking the FDA to stay its decision regarding the emergency use authorization for this vaccine," said Dr. Lee, director of Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory.The major reason for petitioning the FDA for a stay of action is that the Phase 2/3 clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine used a presumptive RT-qPCR diagnostic test. This test is acknowledged by the medical science community to generate high rates of false-positive results among qualified trial participants from the placebo group with minor symptoms such as a sore throat or a new cough. This is especially evident when a de facto unblinding among the trial participants has taken place, according to the petition.The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine trial primarily uses an RT-qPCR test that employs cycle thresholds possibly up to 44.9 to identify COVID-19 "cases." Samples deemed positive that require high levels of amplification (cycle thresholds greater than 30 to 35) are usually false positives, said Dr. Lee.A recent review of a COVID-19 PCR test, which was signed by 22 international scientists, emphatically stated:"To determine whether the amplified products are indeed SARS-CoV-2 genes, biomolecular validation of amplified PCR products is essential. For a diagnostic test, this validation is an absolute must. Validation of PCR products should be performed by either running the PCR product in a 1% agarose-EtBr gel together with a size indicator (DNA ruler or DNA ladder) so that the size of the product can be estimated. The size must correspond to the calculated size of the amplification product. But it is even better to sequence the amplification product. The latter will give 100% certainty about the identity of the amplification product. Without molecular validation one cannot be sure about the identity of the amplified PCR products…"A recent petition to the European Medicines Agency to stay their COVID-19 vaccine trials used similar arguments regarding the inaccuracy of the PCR tests being used and the need for confirmatory sequencing.On Dec. 1, Switzerland’s medical regulator, Swissmedic, said it lacks the necessary information to approve three different coronavirus vaccines ordered by the government, including the Pfizer vaccine. ...(4) Professor Dr Pierre Kory tells Congress: Ivermectin is a "Miracle Drug" that Cures Covid!https://www.bitchute.com/video/5aIXPVYuDzJ3/MEDICAL PROFESSOR TELLS CONGRESS THAT EXISTING DRUG IVERMECTIN IS A "MIRACLE DRUG" THAT CURES COVID!DR Pierre Kory MDRepurposed drugs (already registered)https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/i-cant-keep-watching-patients-die-needlessly-medical-professor-testifies-to-congress-that-covid-cure-already-exists-with-ivermectin/December 9, 2020"I Can’t Keep Watching Patients Die Needlessly!" Medical Professor Testifies to Congress that COVID Cure Already Exists with Ivermectinby Brian ShilhavyEditor, Health Impact NewsDr. Pierre Kory M.D., a pulmonary and critical care specialist who is also an Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, pleaded with members of Congress to have the NIH, CDC, and FDA look at the "mountains" of data that he and his colleagues have gathered on the drug Ivermectin, which is already approved by the FDA as an anti-parasitic drug, and their success in treating COVID patients.He states: "If you take it, you will not get sick."Dr. Kory is president of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), and their success in treating patients with COVID has been so dramatic, that he referred to it as a "miracle drug." From the organization’s website:Appearing as a witness Tuesday morning before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs—which held a hearing on "Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution"— Dr. Pierre Kory, President of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), called for the government to swiftly review the already expansive and still rapidly emerging medical evidence on Ivermectin.The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a "miracle drug" against COVID-19 and called upon the government’s medical authorities—the NIH, CDC, and FDA—to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19.The Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) is comprised of some of the most highly published scientists in the world, with over 2000 peer-reviewed publications among them. Dr. Kory states:I am severely troubled that the NIH, FDA, and CDC – I do not know of any task force that was assigned or compiled to review repurposed drugs in an attempt to treat this disease.Everything has been about novel, and or expensive pharmaceutically engineered drugs (like remdesivir and vaccines.)We have a hundred years of medicine development. We are experts in all of the medicines we use, and I do not know of a task force that has focused on repurposed drugs.We have filled that void. That is all we have done, focus on the things we know and the things we do.We have a solution to this crisis. There is a drug that is proving to be of miraculous impact.And when I say "miracle," I do not use that term lightly. And I don’t want to be sensationalized when I say that. That is a scientific recommendation based on MOUNTAINS of data that has emerged in the last 3 months.Dr. Kory explains that the NIH recommendation NOT to use Ivermectin for COVID outside of clinical trials, was from August 27th, and that 3-4 months later, "mountains" of data have emerged from countries around the world showing the "miraculous" effectiveness of Ivermectin.It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. If you take it, you will not get sick.The most emotional part of Dr. Kory’s testimony was when he described what he was seeing in patients in the ICU.I’m a lung specialist. I’m an ICU specialist.I’ve cared for more dying COVID patients than anyone can imagine. They’re dying because they cannot breathe.I watch them every day. They die. By the time they get to me in the ICU, they are already dying. They’re almost impossible to recover.Early treatment is key. We need to offload the hospitals.We are tired. I can’t keep doing this.If you look at my manuscript, and if I have to go back to work next week, any further deaths are going to be needless deaths.And I cannot be traumatized by that. I cannot keep caring for patients when I know that they could have been saved with earlier treatment.And that drug that will treat them and prevent the hospitalization is Ivermectin.Watch the full testimony. This is on YouTube, but if it disappears, we have a copy on our Bitchute channel as well.The U.S. Government and Big Pharma Are Guilty of Mass Murder!This is now the second group of physicians who treat COVID patients that have presented their evidence and experience in treating and healing COVID patients with a near 100% success rate with older drugs that have already been approved by the FDA to the politicians sitting in Washington D.C.The first group was the group called "Frontline Doctors" who presented their evidence for hydroxychloroquine, and their nearly 100% success rate in treating patients and not having to send them to the hospitals.Learn more about the Frontline Doctors and the hydroxychloroquine scandal here.The U.S. Government is clearly guilty of mass murder! The two main bureaucrat doctors responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of American lives are FDA Director Stephen Hahn and NIAID Director Anthony Fauci.These two men and others who serve with them have pushed to get new drugs to market instead, and now are poised to unleash a dangerous, fast-tracked COVID vaccine never before seen in the human population.And the ONLY way they could approve these new drugs and vaccines, was to LIE about effective cures that already exist, which means all of these new drugs and vaccines developed for COVID are ILLEGAL!Let’s not beat around the bush and let’s call this what it really is: Crimes Against Humanity!Both of these men, and many others, need to be arrested for mass murder, tried in a court of law with a jury of their peers, and then executed by sentence of DEATH!And for those of you still supporting President Donald Trump, who not only is allowing this to happen but encouraging it by rushing dangerous vaccines to market at "Warp Speed" when nobody needs these vaccines, how can you keep looking the other way when thousands of people are dying needlessly??(5) Ivermectin  trial  in 14 Bangladesh hospitals: 99.3% of COVID-19 patients recovered in five dayshttps://www.newsmax.com/health/health-news/australia-ivermectin-coronavirus-covid/2020/08/08/id/981220/Monday December 07, 2020Australian Professor: Ivermectin 'Amazingly Successful' in Killing CoronavirusBy Tauren Dyson    |   Saturday, 08 August 2020 10:27 AMAn Australian drug known as Ivermectin, which is already in use throughout the world to treat parasitic conditions, is showing great results in killing coronavirus in studies involving patients, according to Sky News."Because I'm involved in developing these in the U.S. where all the patients are, there are a number of studies that are amazingly successful. We're talking close to 100%. In fact, we haven't seen a result yet under 100%. It looks like corona is very simple to kill," Professor Thomas Borody, medical director of Australia's Center for Digestive Disease. "It's available as a prescription medication. You wouldn't use it alone ... but you add two other things to it such as doxycycline and zinc."Ivermectin is already approved by the FDA and is on the World Health Organization's list of model list of essential medicines."We had a 14-hospital trial in Bangladesh. We got [cured] 100 out of 100. In China, they tried to reproduce it. They got 60 out of 60 cured ... So I am behind the Ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc treatment because it has very few side effects and is a real killer of coronavirus," Borody said.Borody said the Ivermectin tablet could cost as little as $2, which is likely why drugmakers haven't promoted the drug's usage. He also suggested that have a cure for the disease easily would do away with the need for people to be hospitalized, which would make doctors less money."There's no huge pharmaceutical company behind it to spend millions of dollars and put people in places to treat," Borody said.https://dominicantoday.com/dr/local/2020/11/30/doctor-explains-99-3-of-covid-19-patients-treated-with-ivermectin-recovered-in-five-days/Doctor explains 99.3% of COVID-19 patients treated with Ivermectin recovered in five daysAfter eight months of active clinical observation and attending about 7 thousand patients of Covid-19 in three medical centers located in Puerto Plata, La Romana, and Punta Cana, Dr. José Natalio Redondo revealed that 99.3% of the symptomatic patients who received care in his emergency services, including the use of Ivermectin, managed to recover in the first five days of recorded symptoms.The renowned cardiologist and health manager affirmed that Ivermectin’s use against the symptoms of Covid-19 is practically generalized in the country and attributed to this factor, among others, the fact that the risk of dying from this disease in the Dominican Republic is significantly lower than in the United States.The also tourist businessman and founder of the National Network of Medical Services RESCUE GROUP said he had found that the most significant impact and the real intervention to vary the results were in VIROSIS’s early management.He added that "in a therapeutic format duly tested over the years, infections have always been cured faster and leave fewer sequelae if antimicrobial treatment is applied as early as possible since this allows the use of lower doses of the selected drugs. This has been one of the dogmas that remain in our daily medical practice."The key is early treatment.After pointing out that early treatment should be the goal, Dr. Redondo maintained that Ivermectin could be the effective instrument to prevent that bridge of progression from being installed, with very harmful results, even if the patient does not die.The physician with more than 40 years of practice of medicine presented a report on the experience registered in the clinical management of Coronavirus in the health establishments ascribed to the RESCUE GROUP, integrated by the Bournigal Medical Center, of Puerto Plata; Clinica Canela, of La Romana; and Punta Cana Medical Center, in the province of Altagracia, where about seven thousand patients diagnosed with the virus have been attended since last March 2020."From the beginning, our team of medical specialists, who were at the forefront of the battle, led by our emergency physicians, intensivists and internists, raised the need to see this disease in a different way than that proposed by international health organizations, says Dr. Redondo in his report.And he adds that the Group’s experts proposed the urgency of reorienting the management protocols towards earlier and more timely stages. "We realized that the war was being lost because of the obsession of large groups, agencies, and companies linked to research and production of drugs, to focus their interest almost exclusively on the management of critical patients."Our results were immediate; the use of Ivermectin, together with Azithromycin and Zinc (plus the usual vitamins that tend to increase the immune response of individuals) produced an impressive variation in the course of the disease; it was demonstrated that 99. 3% of the patients recovered quickly when the treatment was started in the first five days of proven symptoms, with an average of 3.5 days, and a fall of more than 50% in the rate and duration of hospitalizations, and reducing from 9 to 1 the mortality rate, when the treatment was started on time."Integral management of Covid-19Dr. José Natalio Redondo explained that "once the presence of the virus was demonstrated in our areas of influence, three of our hospitals were adapted to a process of physical re-engineering and management to turn them into Health Centers authorized for the integral management of COVID-19 patients."He indicated that at that time, an expanded committee was also created to design, supervise and evaluate an Institutional Management Guide for patients with COVID-19, "following the guidelines established by the Ministry of Health of our country, the Dominican Republic, and the management protocols imposed on us by the international accreditation held by our hospital Centro Médico Punta Cana with Canadian accreditation.""This committee consists of more than 20 medical professionals, specialized in Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, internists, infectious pneumologists and epidemiological researchers from several countries, among others, who have met every Thursday of each week, since mid-April, to update and modify the Management Guide so that it can serve as a binding instrument for the professional practice of our associated physicians, and especially our residents of the specialties of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care or Intensivists."High rate of hospitalization and mortalityHe emphasized that this committee was the promoter of the use of Ivermectin in the management of the disease associated with Covid-19; "first of all, because of the evident inefficiency shown by the management schemes initially proposed by national and international organizations, which were filling our hospitals with seriously ill patients and a very high mortality rate.And later, because of the impressive information published by the group of researchers led by Caly and his collaborators, about the almost miraculous effect of the old and very well known antiparasitic and antiviral drug "Ivermectin," in the elimination of the burden of the coronavirus 2, cultivated in laboratory Vero Slam cells, in Monash University, Australia," points out Dr. Redondo.He specifies that Dominican patients were dying mainly because of the loss of time in seeking rapid medical assistance, or because of the inconsistent policy of sending them home, without antiviral treatment, with paracetamol and hydration, until their evolution led them to get worse so that they returned to the emergency service."Those who get complicated have a common denominator that we see repeated and repeated, always, they arrive when the inflammatory phase has already begun; at a time when the immune response can be so intense that it attacks our cells, or when the damage caused by the virus at the intracellular level is already almost irreversible," Dr. Redondo emphasizes.(6) Big Business Runs/Ruins the Healthcare IndustryHow Big Business Runs/Ruins the Healthcare Industry – Part TwoBy Gary G. Kohls, MD – November 8, 2018In this two-part series, Dr. Kohls explores how the intersection of big business and the pharmaceutical, vaccine and medical device corporations have come to rule the healthcare industry. Part one of the series appeared in the October 2018 issue of Westview News.http://westviewnews.org/2018/11/08/duty-to-warn-part-ii-how-big-business-runs-the-healthcare-industry/hmariey/The Big Pharma propaganda campaigns are much more potent today in 2018 than in the days before my retirement from my medical practice a decade ago. At least back then there were no drugs (oral or injectable) that cost tens of thousands of dollars per year. Now there are dozens and dozens of drugs that can cost $60,000 to $120,000 per year! Even wealthy patients would refuse to pay out of pocket for such drugs, so insurance companies raise the premiums that patients pay in order for everything to be profitable. And the sociopaths in Big Pharma and Big Vaccine feel no guilt. It is just the way business is done in all aspects of corporate America.What pains me the most is witnessing the huge influence that the massive propaganda campaigns have over both the prescribers of the risky drugs and vaccines and the patients of those prescribers, despite the vast and valid scientific information that is never advertised or even written about in the mainstream media, which relies on ad dollars from Big Pharma and Big Vaccine.Ignoring the Principle of Informed Consent is normal - and legal nowadays, for there is another principle called the "Community Standard of Care," which is a quasi-legal principle that has nothing to do with medical ethics. We students weren't taught about it when we went to med school. Below is one definition of "standard of care" as cited by Canada's Center for Research on Globalization:"In legal terms, (Standard of Care is) the level at which the average, prudent medical provider in a given community would practice. It is how similarly qualified practitioners would have managed the patient's care under the same or similar circumstances. The medical malpractice plaintiff must establish the appropriate standard of care and demonstrate that the standard of care has been breached."In other words, the standard of care in one community could be considered malpractice in another community depending on what is considered normal or average. So, an injured patient-victim of malpractice in one community couldn't sue for malpractice if the "guilty" physician was practicing in a way that was considered normal or average in that community. In other words, gross breaches of medical ethics can be considered normal.Corrupt capitalist principles—including the need for the individual physician to be highly "efficient" and "profitable" and "quick"—have gradually taken over the once honorable practice of medicine. Exercising the Principle of Fully Informed Consent is ALWAYS too time-consuming because there are dozens of potential adverse effects from every drug or vaccine that truly needs to be explained in detail to the patient. Those adverse effects often include unrecognizable delayed reactions (which are often not recognized, and even illogically and diabolically denied by the physician); permanent disability; and even death.Physicians employed by large healthcare corporations are rarely allowed the valuable time to explain to the patient about the many potential adverse events, so physicians and nurses have been told by their corporate rulers to just mention a handful of the problems. Giving short shrift to fully informing patients of side effects and then obtaining informed consent (signed or unsigned) from the patient has now evolved into what is a new standard of care in most communities.Essentially all Big Healthcare, Big Pharmaceutical and Big Vaccine Corporations are now managed by non-physician, Wall Street insider CEOs who have Masters of Business Administration (MBA) degrees and guiltlessly manage gambling casinos, for-profit penitentiaries, hedge funds or any other ethically-questionable corporations such as pharmaceutical and vaccine companies, for all MBAs know how to milk the system in favor of the corporate bottom line and the economics of their investors, ethics be damned.Following are a number of quotes that refer to the ethical problems and even the criminal activities of medical-related corporations that have taken control over what once were ethical endeavors.Let the prescriber and the patients of the prescribers beware.(7) Asymptomatic Transmission is very rareMaria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization's technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that asymptomatic transmission is very rarehttps://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/04/do-asymptomatic-people-spread-coronavirus.aspxAsymptomatic People Do Not Spread COVID-19by Dr. Joseph MercolaDecember 04, 2020According to media reports, COVID-19 "cases," meaning positive PCR test results, are soaring across the U.S. and around the world, leading to the implementation of measures that in some cases are stricter than what we endured during the initial wave.However, as detailed in several recent articles, including "Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste," PCR tests are being used incorrectly, resulting in the false appearance of widespread transmission.In reality, the vast majority of people who end up with a positive test will not develop symptoms and aren't infectious. Needless to say, if you're not infectious, you pose no health risk to anyone, and being placed under what amounts to house arrest is nothing but cruel and unusual punishment for no reason whatsoever.Positive Test Rates Have No Bearing on Mortality RatesIn The Highwire report above, Del Bigtree breaks down how excessively high test sensitivity leads to falsely elevated "case" numbers that in reality tell us nothing about the situation at hand. As noted by Bigtree, what's missing from the COVID-19 conversation is the actual death rate."If COVID is a deadly virus, what should we see when cases increase?" he asks. The answer, of course, is an increase in deaths. However, that's not what's happening.Aside from a small bump at the beginning, when doctors were unsure of the appropriate treatment and some states recklessly and irresponsibly sent infected patients into ill equipped nursing homes, the death rate has remained relatively flat while positive test rates have dramatically risen and fallen in intervals.In the video, Bigtree features a November 4, 2020, tweet1 by White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas showing the number of positive tests (aka "cases") in blue and COVID-19 related deaths in red, since the start of the pandemic up until the end of October 2020. As you can see, there's no correlation between the positive test rate and subsequent deaths.One of the explanations for why positive test rates and mortality do not go hand in hand is the simple fact that a vast majority of those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic. They simply aren't sick. The PCR test is merely picking up inactive (noninfectious) viral particles.In one study,2 which looked at pregnant women admitted for delivery, 87.9% of the women who tested positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms. Another study3 looked at a large homeless shelter in Boston. After a cluster of COVID-19 cases was observed there, researchers conducted symptoms assessments and testing among all guests residing at the shelter over a two-day period.Of 408 people tested, 147, or 36%, were positive, yet symptoms were conspicuously absent. Cough occurred in only 7.5% of cases, shortness of breath in 1.4% and fever in 0.7%. All symptoms were "uncommon among COVID-positive individuals," the researchers noted.Asymptomatic Transmission Is Very RareDuring a June 8, 2020, press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization's technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that asymptomatic transmission is very rare, meaning an individual who tests positive but does not exhibit symptoms is highly unlikely to transmit live virus to others."We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They're following asymptomatic cases, they're following contacts, and they're not finding secondary transmission … it's very rare, and much of that is not published in the literature," Van Kerkhove said.Just one day later, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO's emergencies program, backpedaled Van Kerkhove's statement, saying the remarks were "misinterpreted."4 Needless to say, when you're trying to justify the implementation of a vast surveillance network, it's no good to admit a vast majority of people are having their privacy infringed upon for no good reason whatsoever.Asymptomatic People Pose No Risk to OthersMost recently, a study5 in Nature Communications assessed the risk posed by asymptomatic people by looking at the data from a mass screening program in Wuhan, China.The city had been under strict lockdown between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Between May 14 and June 1, 2020, 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan city over the age of 6 underwent PCR testing. In all, 92.9% of the entire city population participated in the testing. Of these, 9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19 and 34,424 were recovered COVID-19 patients.Not a single one of the 1,174 people who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive.In all, there were zero symptomatic cases and only 300 asymptomatic cases detected. (The overall detection rate was 0.3 per 10,000.) Importantly, not a single one of the 1,174 people who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive.Additionally, of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 individuals (0.310%) tested positive again, but none were symptomatic. As noted by the authors:6"Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases, indicating no 'viable virus' in positive cases detected in this study … The 300 asymptomatic positive persons aged from 10 to 89 years …The asymptomatic positive rate was the lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below (0.124/10,000), and the highest among the elderly aged 60 years and above (0.442/10,000). The asymptomatic positive rate in females (0.355/10,000) was higher than that in males (0.256/10,000)."Asymptomatic People Have Low Viral LoadInterestingly, when they further tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a "hot" or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies. Still, none of their contacts had been infected.In other words, even though asymptomatics were (or had been) carriers of apparently live virus, they still did not transmit it to others. As noted by the authors, "there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts." They further added:7"Compared with symptomatic patients, asymptomatic infected persons generally have low quantity of viral loads and a short duration of viral shedding, which decrease the transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2.In the present study, virus culture was carried out on samples from asymptomatic positive cases, and found no viable SARS-CoV-2 virus. All close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases tested negative, indicating that the asymptomatic positive cases detected in this study were unlikely to be infectious."Reinfected Individuals Are Not Infectious EitherThe same held true for people who tested positive a second time after having recovered from an active infection."Results of virus culturing and contract [sic] tracing found no evidence that repositive cases in recovered COVID-19 patients were infectious, which is consistent with evidence from other sources," the authors said.8The researchers also pointed out that virus cultures and genetic studies have shown the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be weakening over time, and that newly infected individuals are more likely to be asymptomatic and have a lower viral load than the cases seen earlier in the outbreak.What does all of this tell us? It tells us there's no reason to panic simply because the number of positive tests are on the rise. Remember, the more people you test using a PCR test that is set to an excessive cycle threshold, the more false positives you'll get.As explained in "Asymptomatic 'Casedemic' Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear," by using an excessive cycle threshold that amplifies the viral RNA to the point that it detects inactive (noninfectious) particles is at the heart of this so-called pandemic. It's what keeps the pandemic narrative going, when in fact it's long since over.CDC Uses Questionable Sources to Counter China StudyInterestingly, the same day the China study came out, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance9,10 on mask wearing, claiming asymptomatic people account for more than half of all transmissions. Where did they get that from?The two references listed as support for that claim include a study11 from July 2020, and CDC data that haven't even been published yet.12 It just says it was "submitted" for publication sometime in 2020, therefore, we are unable to provide any source link. The CDC makes no mention of the China study, which included nearly 10 million individuals.CNN, which reported the CDC's update, parroting the idea that asymptomatic spread is why it's so important to wear a mask, also made no mention of the landmark study from China. Curious, don't you think? It's almost as though the CDC doesn't want us to know we have nothing to fear from healthy people.German Lawyers Sue Fact Checkers Over CensorshipMany doctors, scientists and lawyers have now become wise to the fact that it is these flawed tests, and their fraudulent use, that is keeping the fear narrative alive — and they're taking action.In the video above, Ben Swann talks to Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,13 a consumer protection trial lawyer14 and founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss15),16,17 which is seeking to expose how fraudulent testing has been and continues to be used to engineer the appearance of a dangerous pandemic when in fact there is none.The committee is now filing the first of many lawsuits to come, this one against so-called fact checkers on social media. They opted to file a defamation lawsuit on behalf of Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former member of the German Congress and the Council of Europe who has been an outspoken critic of PCR testing, as it cannot be used to diagnose infection.Social media companies have labeled Wodarg's statements as "false," and by filing a defamation suit, the burden of proof now falls on the fact checkers to prove that they are correct. In other words, to win, the fact checkers must prove that PCR tests diagnose active infection. The scientific evidence proves they don't, so this case could turn out to be pivotal in the fight against the big tech censorship that keeps the fearmongering alive.COVID-19 Pandemic — The Greatest Psyop in History?While Fuellmich and his team make no claims about WHY the pandemic is being kept alive using fraudulent science, they are unequivocal in their assertion that it is in fact a fake pandemic and that it has had devastating health and economic consequences around the world.For the why, we have to turn to the geopolitical scene to see what narratives have rolled out in tandem with the pandemic. What we find is that leaders across the world are now calling for a "reset" of the global economy in the wake of the destruction brought by the pandemic. In reality, of course, it is the global response to the pandemic that created the economic devastation, not the virus itself.Either way, the call to "build back better" is being heard around the world, and such plans include the elimination of conventional capitalism, free enterprise and private ownership, replacing them with a technocratic resource-based economic system in which energy and social engineering run the economy rather than pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand.Leaders are also calling for invasive health surveillance, and there appear to be plans in place to use biometric surveillance via vaccines, all of which feed into the technocratic system in which this kind of mass surveillance is not only paramount but also foundational.The reason surveillance is so crucial is because the functioning of this system hinges on artificial intelligence-driven social engineering and manipulation of the masses. Unless people are locked into what could be described as a digital prison, they won't comply with what's coming.Hook everyone up to a digital centralized banking system, a digital ID and a social credit score, however, and few will have the fortitude to object or speak out against the unelected rulers. Your entire life could easily be upended with the push of a button.We've already seen how many people have not only been deplatformed for speaking out against one thing or another this past year, they've also had their digital payment accounts closed down, effectively destroying their ability to earn a living. Imagine if there were nothing but a centralized digital currency system and your accounts got shut down. How would you live?Fear Is a Highly Effective Manipulation ToolNo person in their right mind would agree to this Great Reset plan if they were aware of all the details and its ultimate implications for humanity as a whole. So, to roll it out, they had to use psychological manipulation, and fear is the most effective tool there is.As explained by psychiatrist Dr. Peter Breggin, there's an entire school of public health research that focuses on identifying the most effective ways to frighten people into accepting desired public health measures.By adding confusion and uncertainty to the mix, you can bring an individual from fear to anxiety — a state of confusion in which you can no longer think logically — and in this state, you are more easily manipulated. The following graphic illustrates the central role of fearmongering for the successful rollout of the Great Reset.technocracy and the great resetIn closing, testing asymptomatic people and isolating people who test positive even when they have no symptoms is a key strategy that keeps the fear level high. There simply aren't enough hospitalized COVID-19 patients to keep the ruse going, and far too few actually die to make the narrative work. That's why we hear nothing about those statistics anymore.Instead, all we hear about are the "cases" — the positive tests which have no bearing on mortality rates. Fear of asymptomatics also drive the narrative that we must all wear face masks everywhere we go, because you don't know who might be infected and not know it. It instills fear of others, as even seemingly healthy people might make you deathly ill.The featured study from Wuhan demonstrates the fallacy of such fears. People who test positive but have no symptoms are not infectious and pose no risk to others. They don't need to wear masks and they don't need to be isolated. In short, we don't need to fear each other.- Sources and References1 Twitter Scott Atlas2 The New England Journal of Medicine April 13, 2020; 382:2163-21643 medRxiv April 15, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.12.200596184 Yahoo June 9, 20205, 6, 8 Nature Communications November 20, 2020; 11 Article number 59177 Nature Communications November 20, 2020; 11 Article number 5917,   Discussion9 CDC.gov10 CNN November 20, 202011 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(30):17513-17515.10.1073/pnas.2008373117.12 Johansson MA, Quandelacy TM, Kada S, et al. Controlling COVID-19 requires preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission from people without symptoms. submitted.13 Fuellmich.com, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Bio (German)14 Fuellmich.com15 Acu2020.org Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss16 Acu2020.org Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, English17 Algora October 4, 2020(8) Virologists file Stay of Action against Pfizer Civid vaccinehttps://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2020/12/breaking-uk-first-to-approve-pfizer-covid-vaccine-as-former-head-of-pfizer-research-says-vaccine-can-make-females-infertile-2664804.htmlUK First to Approve Pfizer COVID Vaccine as Former Head of Pfizer Research Says Vaccine Can Make Females InfertileThursday, December 3, 2020 5:57by Brian ShilhavyEditor, Health Impact NewsIn breaking news today, the U.K. became the first country to issue emergency authorization for Pfizer's new COVID vaccine, with the first doses being delivered "immediately" and injections expected to begin in the U.K. next week.Pfizer and BioNTech have made history.The two companies' BNT162b2 has become the first COVID-19 vaccine allowed in the Western world as drug regulators in the U.K. doled out an emergency use authorization on Wednesday, ahead of decisions by the U.S. and Europe, which are expected soon.For the broader vaccine world, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's decision means the world now has the first mRNA shot authorized for widespread use, opening up a brand-new chapter for vaccine development. (Source.)This announcement today comes one day AFTER an emergency STAY OF ACTION was filed with the European Medicines Agency by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research.This STAY OF ACTION is very similar to the one filed last week with the FDA in the U.S. by Dr. Sin Hang Lee, and demands that clinical trials be STOPPED until there is an accurate testing mechanism in place to correctly identify SARS-CoV-2, since the PCR test is very inaccurate. See:"Stay of Action" Filed Against FDA to STOP Approval of COVID Vaccine for Using Faulty PCR Tests in TrialsDr. Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research, also went public recently in a viral video recording where he states that the COVID Pandemic is over, and that it is being kept alive by false narratives using the faulty PCR tests. See:"Pandemic is Over" – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says "Second Wave" Faked On False-Positive COVID TestsIn their STAY OF ACTION filed yesterday, one day BEFORE the U.K. issued emergency use authorization, Dr. Yeadon stated that this vaccine can make females infertile.He writes that the Pfizer COVID vaccine as well as other COVID vaccines currently in Phase III trials are:expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., "Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses" – http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019-against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed. (Source.) ...