This newsletter is at http://mailstar.net/Christchurch-Big-Picture.doc (1) Christchurch Massacre: the Big Picture (2) NZ mosque chairman Ahmed Bhamji blames Christchurch shooting on Mossad (3) Jews outraged after mosque leader blames Mossad for Christchurch attack (4) NZ mosque chairman slammed for blaming Christchurch shooting on Mossad - Times of Israel (5) Wikipedia on Christchurch mosque shootings (6) Economist: Muslim & non-white 'invaders' imported by cosmopolitan elite to replace ethnic Europeans (7) Reaction in Australia: put Anti-Immigrant Parties last, in Preferential Voting (8) There was a police & military training course in Christchurch on the day of the attack (9) Vinny Eastwood & Barry Prince: when Sandy Hook happened, there was also a drill going on (10) Vinny Eastwood & Ole Dammegard: signs of a False Flag (11) Alan Sabrosky & Kevin Barrett say Christchurch Massacre was a 'False Flag' (12) Alan Sabrosky: Christchurch New Zealand - Tragedy or Travesty? (13) The New Zealand Shooting: What Happened And Why? - Scott Bennett, Ph.D (14) Brendon O'Connell: Mosque Shooter Was Professionally Trained (15) Why the New Zealand Mosque Attack Could Be a 'False-Flag' Mossad Operation (16) Gates of Vienna, far from supporting Breivik & Tarrant, calls them 'Nut Cases' (17) Port Arthur massacre: another False Flag, attested by Brigadier Ted Serong (18) Mossad's history of Deception, Assassination, Impersonation and Betrayal
(1) Christchurch Massacre: the Big Picture by Peter Myers, March 28, 2019 The information supplied here about the Christchurch massacre comes not from myself, but from dissident experts in New Zealand, the United States and elsewhere. My job has been to collate the material, to assemble it into a coherent story. Lest our dissident experts be dismissed as unqualified, they include Alan Sabrosky, who was Director of Studies at the US Army War College. And, on the Port Arthur Massacre, Brigadier Ted Serong, the leader of the Australian force in the Vietnam War (now deceased). I support Gun Control; in particular, curtailment of civilian ownership of military-style weapons (automatic & semi-automatic). But, in Australia, Gun Control was achieved via the Port Arthur massacre, which bears the marks of a False Flag operation. Brigadier Ted Serong said so (see item 17). In the 2 weeks or so since the Christchurch massacre, anti-immigration parties have been publicly blamed in a trial-by-media. Yet I have not found any so-called 'Far Right' persons or websites who praise Brenton Tarrant, who celebrate him or regard him as a leader. Even the 'Gates of Vienna' website repudiates him. So why are White Nationalists held to blame? Because he depicted himself as one. Please remember the Anthrax Letters of 2001. They purported to come from Moslems, proclaiming "Death to America ... Death to Israel ... Allah is Great". Subsequent analysis showed that the anthrax strain came from government laboratories, and was not sent by Moslems. Yet these letters may have influenced the decision to invade Iraq in 2004. Or consider the case of Jussie Smollet, recently exposed as a hoaxer. If the maxim "Believe the victim" were always followed, such hoaxes would not be exposed. Jewish activists have gone wild over Mosque chairman Ahmed Bhamji's claim that Mossad was behind the Christchurch massacre. As if it's unthinkable (see item 18, on Mossad's history of Deception). Yet White people, who have been accused of complicity in this atrocity for the last 2 weeks, stand defenceless before the media onslaught. Now for the big picture. 911 was a Mossad operation using Moslem patsies. The result was the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria - 18 years of war and still going on. Not for Oil, but for Israel. Costing American lives, American debt. The main aim of Zionism is the build the Third Temple - from which, they believe, the Messiah will rule us all (but for Christians, he will be the AntiChrist). However the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque stand in the way. To remove them means war with Islam. The war - between Judaism and Islam - must come either before or after the demolition. It's not a war between Christians and Islam, but Christians are being suckered into it. Just as Moslems were framed for 911, White Nationalists are being framed for the massacres of Breivik and Tarrant. The aim in both cases is to get them to fight each other. But NZ mosque chairman Ahmed Bhamji is right. Instead of fighting each other, Moslems and whites/Christians should work together to jointly expose the conspiratorial forces. (2) NZ mosque chairman Ahmed Bhamji blames Christchurch shooting on Mossad If you look this up in Google, you will be hard put to find it except at a Jewish website with Jewish commentary and Jewish Outrage. To see the Video WITHOUT any commentary: https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZHIOYKygOh0 Video with commentary by Melana Chasmata: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHIOYKygOh0 Ahmed Bhamji on Christchurch Shooter Melana Chasmata Published on 27 Mar 2019 New Zealand's Jewish community is outraged and revolted after a prominent mosque leader blamed Mossad for being behind the Christchurch terror attack. On Saturday, a group called Love Aotearoa Hate Racism organised a rally for the victims in Auckland's Aotea Square. Ahmed Bhamji, chairman of the Mt Roskill Masjid E Umar, gave a speech questioning where the gunman got his funding from. He said he suspected it came from "Mossad" and "Zionist business". Mossad is the foreign intelligence agency of Israel responsible for covert operations, intelligence gathering and counterterrorism. "I really want to say one thing today. Do you think this guy was alone… I want to ask you - where did he get the funding from?" he can be heard saying in video footage. "I stand here and I say I have a very very strong suspicion that there's some group behind him and I am not afraid to say I feel Mossad is behind this." One person can be heard shouting in support: "It's the truth. Israel is behind this. That's right!" A video of the speech was posted to Twitter, where it's caused outrage in the Jewish community. "These conspiracy theories are dangerous lies. They put the Jewish community at risk, at a time of heightened security concerns," New Zealand Jewish Council spokesperson Juliet Moses told Newshub. "Conspiracy theories - particularly the idea that Jews (whether through the Jewish state or otherwise) are a malevolent controlling force in the world - are at the very core of anti-Semitism." Several attendees at the event have already called out the event, saying they were "disappointed by some of the hate rhetoric". "The speaker talking about Mossad conspiracy theories already left me speechless," one person wrote on the event's Facebook page. "Mentioning Mossad was deeply, deeply disappointing. And pretty racist," another person said. Newshub spoke to Love Aotearoa Hate Racism co-founder Joe Carolan, who said Bhamji was one speaker out of 30 and there were many
(3) Jews outraged after mosque leader blames Mossad for Christchurch attack 26/03/2019 Scott Palmer New Zealand's Jewish community is outraged and revolted after a prominent mosque leader blamed Mossad for being behind the Christchurch terror attack. On Saturday, a group called Love Aotearoa Hate Racism organised a rally for the victims in Auckland's Aotea Square. Ahmed Bhamji, chairman of the Mt Roskill Masjid E Umar, gave a speech questioning where the gunman got his funding from. He said he suspected it came from "Mossad" and "Zionist business". Mossad is the foreign intelligence agency of Israel responsible for covert operations, intelligence gathering and counterterrorism. "I really want to say one thing today. Do you think this guy was alone... I want to ask you - where did he get the funding from?" he can be heard saying in video footage. "I stand here and I say I have a very very strong suspicion that there's some group behind him and I am not afraid to say I feel Mossad is behind this." One person can be heard shouting in support: "It's the truth. Israel is behind this. That's right!" A video of the speech was posted to Twitter, where it's caused outrage in the Jewish community. "These conspiracy theories are dangerous lies. They put the Jewish community at risk, at a time of heightened security concerns," New Zealand Jewish Council spokesperson Juliet Moses told Newshub. "Conspiracy theories - particularly the idea that Jews (whether through the Jewish state or otherwise) are a malevolent controlling force in the world - are at the very core of anti-Semitism." Several attendees at the event have already called out the event, saying they were "disappointed by some of the hate rhetoric". "The speaker talking about Mossad conspiracy theories already left me speechless," one person wrote on the event's Facebook page. "Mentioning Mossad was deeply, deeply disappointing. And pretty racist," another person said. Newshub spoke to Love Aotearoa Hate Racism co-founder Joe Carolan, who said Bhamji was one speaker out of 30 and there were many different points of view at the event. When asked whether he agreed with or believed the theory that Mossad were behind the attack, Carolan told Newshub "absolutely not". But Moses says the event organisers should have publicly disagreed with Bhamji. "It is unfortunate that they did not appear to put its anti-racism message into practice, by challenging or condemning the racism in their midst," she told Newshub. "We must call out hateful dehumanising language, whatever the source, target and circumstances, and even when it is not politically expedient to do so." Newshub contacted Bhamji, who accused Newshub of singling him out. "I made a statement, a lot of other people made statements," he said. Bhamji defended his speech, saying an inquiry is needed into where the alleged gunman got his money from. He didn't offer any proof to his speculation Mossad had funded the alleged gunman. "Mossad is up to all these things," he said. "When I talk about Mossad, why should the Jews be upset about it? Give me an answer?" Newshub.
(4) NZ mosque chairman slammed for blaming Christchurch shooting on Mossad - Times of Israel New Zealand mosque chairman slammed for blaming Christchurch shooting on Mossad Ahmed Bhamji filmed during Auckland rally suggesting Israeli spy agency and ‘Zionist business houses’ funded Australian gunman who massacred 50 Muslim worshipers By MICHAEL BACHNER 27 March 2019, 4:32 pm The chairman of New Zealand’s biggest mosque has come under fire for suggesting Israel’s Mossad spy agency and “Zionist business houses” were behind the Christchurch massacre that killed 50 Muslim worshipers. The country’s Jewish community and national human rights institution both condemned the remarks, made on Saturday at a rally in Auckland organized by a group called Love Aotearoa Hate Racism and streamed live on local broadcaster Apna TV’s Facebook page. One of the speakers at the rally was Fiji Indian businessman Ahmed Bhamji, who is the chairman of Masjid E Umar in the Auckland suburb of Mount Roskill — which describes itself on its Facebook page as the “busiest and biggest” mosque in New Zealand. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern had visited that mosque on the same day as the rally, mourning the victims of the massacre committed by Australian white supremacist Brenton Tarrant. ... The Human Rights Commission, New Zealand’s national human rights institution, said: “Prejudice against Jewish people has no place in New Zealand. We must condemn racism, hate and anti-semitism whenever we see it.” ...
(5) Wikipedia on Christchurch mosque shootings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchurch_mosque_shootings The Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive terrorist attacks at mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, during Friday Prayer on 15 March 2019.[9] The attacks began at the Al Noor Mosque in the suburb of Riccarton a 1:40 pm, and continued at the Linwood Islamic Centre[10][11][12] at about 1:55 pm.[13] The gunman live-streamed the first attack on Facebook Live.[14] Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive terrorist attacks at mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, during Friday Prayer on 15 March 2019.[9] The attacks began at the Al Noor Mos The attacks killed 50 people and injured 50 others.[15][16] A 28-year-old Australian man, described in media reports as a white supremacist and part of the alt-right, was arrested and charged with murder.[17][18][19] The attacks have been linked to an increase in white supremacism and alt-right extremism globally[20][21] observed since the mid-2010s.[22][23] Politicians and world leaders condemned the attacks,[24] and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern described the attacks as "one of New Zealand's darkest days". It is the deadliest mass shooting in modern New Zealand history.[25] The gunman began shooting worshippers at the Al Noor Mosque, Riccarton, at around 1:40 pm. Police received the first emergency call at 1:41 pm.[36] Between three hundred and five hundred people may have been inside the mosque attending Friday Prayer at the time of the shooting.[37] A neighbour of the mosque told reporters he saw the gunman flee and drop what appeared to be a firearm in the driveway.[38] The witness said the gunman appeared to be wearing military-style clothing.[39] The gunman live-streamed the first 17 minutes of this attack on Facebook Live, starting with the drive to the mosque and ending with the drive away.[40] Moments before the shooting, the gunman played several songs including a traditional marching song of the British military called "The British Grenadiers", and "Serbia Strong", a Serb nationalist song from the Bosnian War (1992–1995) celebrating Radovan Karadzˇic´, who was found guilty of genocide against Bosnian Muslims.[41][42][43][44] One witness said the gunman continued to play "military music" from a portable speaker inside the mosque.[45] Just before the shooting, the gunman appeared to be greeted by one of the worshippers, who said "Hello, brother" and who was amongst the first people to be killed.[39][46][47] The gunman spent several minutes inside the mosque, shooting attendees indiscriminately. He killed three people near the entrance, and many others inside a larger room. During the attack, a worshipper, Naeem Rashid, charged at the gunman and was shot; he later died from his injuries.[48][49][50][51] The gunman approached wounded victims, firing at them multiple times. He then left the mosque and fired at people outside. He retrieved another weapon from his vehicle before returning to the mosque to murder more victims, many of whom were already wounded and unable to escape. The gunman then exited the mosque for a second time and killed a woman near the footpath as she pleaded for help. He left the scene shortly thereafter, in his car,[39][52] to the music of "Fire" by The Crazy World of Arthur Brown,[53][54][55] where the singer proclaims: "I am the god of hellfire!"[56][57][58] He had spent about six minutes at the Al Noor Mosque.[59] The gunman shot other civilians in the area and drove away at high speed, heading in the direction of the Linwood Islamic Centre.[59][60][61] A second attack began at about 1:55 pm[62] at the Linwood Islamic Centre,[63][64] a mosque 5 kilometres (3 mi) east of the Al Noor Mosque.[39] According to a survivor, the gunman initially did not find the door, and shot people outside and through a window, which alerted those inside.[65] The mosque's acting imam credited a worshipper named Abdul Aziz Wahabzadah with stopping the attack.[66][67][68] Wahabzadah told reporters he had taken a credit-card reader and ran at the gunman, hoping to distract him. When the gunman retreated, Wahabzadah threw the credit-card reader at him. The gunman took a firearm from his car and fired at Wahabzadah, who took cover among nearby cars and retrieved an empty shotgun the gunman had dropped. The gunman continued firing at the mosque. When the gunman returned to his car again, Wahabzadah threw the shotgun at the car, which shattered one of its windows or its windscreen. The gunman then drove away.[67][68][69][70] Early reports indicated "multiple, simultaneous attack[s]",[71] but later only a single suspect was implicated.[72][73] He was arrested on Brougham Street in Sydenham, 21 minutes after the first emergency call.[74][75] Video footage showed his car had been rammed against the kerb by a police car before his arrest at gunpoint.[76][77] Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the suspect had been planning to continue the attacks at a third location,[78] possibly the mosque in Ashburton or the An-Nur Child Care Centre in Hornby;[75] Police Commissioner Mike Bush corroborated this, saying police had stopped the suspect on his way to a third location.[79] A total of 50 people (46 of them male, and 4 female) were killed in the attacks: 42 at the Al Noor Mosque; 7 at the Linwood Islamic Centre,[11] and one who died later in Christchurch Hospital.[60][80] The victims were aged between 3 and 77 years old.[81] Greg Robertson, Chief of Surgery at the hospital, stated on 16 March that four of the victims had died in ambulances en route to the hospital.[82] On 17 March, Commissioner Bush said 50 other people had been injured in the attacks, 36 of whom were being treated for gunshot wounds in hospital.[15][16] Two were in a serious condition, and a 4-year-old girl was transferred to Starship Hospital in a critical condition.[83] In the days following the attacks, dozens of people remained missing[84] and several diplomatic offices and foreign ministries released statements regarding the number of victims from their respective nations.[85][86][87] Police requested that those listed as missing who were in fact not missing register themselves as safe on the Restoring Family Links website.[88] The New Zealand Red Cross published a list of missing people which included nationals of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Jordan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Indonesia.[89] New Zealand Police media releases list among the dead citizens of Bangladesh, Egypt, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, Malaysia, Mauritius, New Zealand, Pakistan and Palestine.[90][91][92][93] Atta Elayyan, an IT entrepreneur and player in the national futsal team, was among those killed.[94][95] Police have charged Brenton Harrison Tarrant, a 28-year-old Australian man, with murder in relation to the attacks.[96] At the time of his arrest, he lived in Andersons Bay in Dunedin. He was a member of a South Otago gun club and practised shooting at its range.[97] He grew up in Grafton, New South Wales, attended Grafton High School,[98] and worked as a personal trainer in his hometown from 2009 to 2011.[99] Around 2012, he started visiting a number of countries in Asia and Europe. Police in Bulgaria and Turkey are investigating his visits to their nations.[100][101] He became obsessed with terrorist attacks committed by Islamic extremists in 2016 and 2017, started planning an attack about two years prior to the shootings, and chose his targets three months in advance.[102] Security officials suspect he had come into contact with far-right organisations about two years before the shooting, while visiting European nations.[103] Captivated with sites of battle between Christians and the Ottoman Empire, he went on another series of visits to the Balkans in 2016–2018, with Croatia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Turkey and Bosnia-Herzegovina confirming his presence there in these years.[104] He posted a slew of Balkan nationalist material on social-media platforms,[105] and called for the United States to be weakened in order to prevent events such as the NATO intervention in Kosovo in response to a Serbian ethnic-cleansing campaign against Kosovar Albanians.[42][104][106] He said he was against intervention by NATO because he saw the Serbian military as "Christian Europeans attempting to remove these Islamic occupiers from Europe".[42][106] Three years prior to the attacks, he praised Blair Cottrell as a leader of the far-right movements in Australia. He made more than 30 comments on the now-deleted "United Patriots Front" and "True Blue Crew" Facebook pages, one calling the election of US President Donald Trump in 2016 "[s]imply one of the most important events in modern history." An Australian Broadcasting Corporation team who studied the comments called them "fragments and digital impressions of a well-travelled young man who frequented hate-filled anonymous messaging boards and was deeply engaged in a global alt-right culture."[107] According to Commissioner Bush, the gunman held a firearms licence with an "A" endorsement.[108] Police recovered five guns at the scene: two semi-automatic weapons, two shotguns and a lever-action firearm.[109] According to a city gun store, the gunman bought them online.[110] Additionally, he illegally replaced the semi-automatic rifles' small, legal magazines with 30-round magazines, also legally purchased online.[111][112] The guns and magazines used were covered in white writing naming historical events, people, and motifs related to historical conflicts, wars, and battles between Muslims and European Christians, as well as the names of recent Islamic-terrorist-attack victims and the names of far-right attackers such as Josué Estébanez and Luca Traini.[113][note 1] Police also found two improvised explosive devices attached to a car; these were defused by the New Zealand Defence Force.[119] No explosives were found on the gunman.[120] Tarrant is allegedly the author of a 73-page manifesto titled "The Great Replacement", a reference to the "Great Replacement" and "white genocide" conspiracy theories.[121] It said the attacks were planned two years prior, and that the location was selected three months prior.[122] Nine minutes before the attacks, the manifesto was emailed to more than 30 recipients, including the Prime Minister's office and several media outlets.[123] Links to the manifesto were also shared on Twitter and 8chan immediately before the attacks.[124][125] In the manifesto several anti-immigrant sentiments are expressed, including hate speech against migrants, white supremacist rhetoric, and calls for all non-European immigrants in Europe who are claimed to be "invading his land" to be removed.[126] The author also describes himself as an ethno-nationalist.[106][127][128] In the manifesto, the author names dozens of people from around the world, ranging from politicians whose ideas he supports[129][130][131][132] to terrorists and murderers whose actions he applauds.[133] In particular, the author cites Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik as an inspiration, and claims he had had been in "brief contact" with Breivik.[134][135] He also calls for the assassination of several politicians with whom he disagrees.[1][136][note 2] He says he supports President Trump as "a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose", but not as a leader or policy-maker.[126] The manifesto displays neo-Nazi symbols such as the Black Sun and Odin's cross.[137] However, the author denies being a Nazi, and professes instead to be an "eco-fascist"[138][139][140] and a "kebab removalist", in reference to a meme exalting the genocide of Bosnian Muslims by the Bosnian Serb army.[141] The manifesto states that the alleged shooter targeted Muslims as a form of "revenge against Islam for 1,300 years of war and devastation that it has brought upon the people of the West and other peoples of the world".[4][5][142] The manifesto mentions Pope Urban II regarding a crusade against "the impious race of the Saracens [Muslims]", and also calls for the Christian reconquest of Constantinople (Turkey's Istanbul).[143] The manifesto contained many explicit references to the Ottoman Empire and Turkey[144] and expressed a desire to "drive a wedge between the nations of NATO that are European and the Turks that also make a part of the NATO".[145] The manifesto says that the main goal of the attacks was to accelerate anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant sentiment across majority-white nations in order to fight growing numbers of "invaders", and ignite an eventual "race war".[146] The manifesto was described by some media outlets as "shitposting"—trolling designed to engender conflict between certain groups and people.[129][130][147] On 23 March 2019, the manifesto was deemed "objectionable" by the Chief Censor of New Zealand, making it unlawful to possess or distribute it in New Zealand.[148] Police in Hamilton, Ontario are investigating a white nationalist, Paul Fromm, for posting the manifesto on his website.[149] ... This page was last edited on 26 March 2019, at 21:15 (UTC).
(6) Economist: Muslim & non-white 'invaders' imported by cosmopolitan elite to replace ethnic Europeans Far right and very wrong Why white nationalist terrorism is a global threat The Christchurch killer acted alone but followed a terrifying trend Print edition | International Mar 21st 2019 CHRISTCHURCH, ISTANBUL, MOSCOW AND WASHINGTON, DC He seems to have been a classic “lone wolf”. As far as police can tell, the man who murdered 50 worshippers, and critically wounded nine more, at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on March 15th was not part of any organisation. The 28-year-old Australian, Brenton Tarrant, claimed to have developed his violent beliefs on his own, surfing the internet and visiting Europe. He bought his weapons himself. He honed his skills at a suburban shooting-range. No one there suspected that he was preparing a massacre. Yet he was part of something much bigger. The names and slogans scrawled on his weapons were familiar to extreme white nationalists all around the world—but hardly anyone else. His ranting internet manifesto, “The Great Replacement”, repeated a staple far-right conspiracy theory: that non-white and Muslim immigrants in Western countries are invaders, ushered in by scheming elites to replace ethnic-European populations. Variants of that once-fringe idea are now common, not just in social-media posts by anonymous wackos but in the speeches of elected politicians from Hungary to Iowa. ... Islamic State tries to provoke the West into persecuting Muslims and thus driving sympathisers from the “grey zone” towards radical participation. Right-wing extremists may also hope to provoke an Islamist backlash. Police are investigating a possible terrorist motive behind the murder of three people on a tram in Utrecht in the Netherlands, three days after the massacre in Christchurch. A Turkish-born suspect has been arrested. In Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has seized on the attack in Christchurch as evidence of a broad conspiracy against Turkey and Islam. He has quoted from the killer’s manifesto, which includes calls to expel Turks from Europe and to kill Mr Erdogan. The president’s not-so-subtle message is that only he can protect Turks from rampant white nationalism. The Christchurch killer also hoped to provoke stricter gun laws, so that gun-owners would rise up in revolt. There is not much chance of more gun control in America, Mr Tarrant’s primary target. However, Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand’s prime minister, is moving to tighten her country’s lax gun laws. This will not start a civil war. New Zealand prides itself on multiculturalism (see article). Its politics are more moderate than Australia’s. That, along with its easy gun laws, may have been why Mr Tarrant picked New Zealand. He wrote that he wanted to prove that nowhere was safe. Muslims in Christchurch have lost all sense of security. Tofazzal Alam, who survived the attack, says he is now afraid “to go to mosque, afraid of any crowd, afraid even to open the door”. Yet the killer’s manifesto was inspired by events far away in Europe. He claimed he was converted to radical-right ideology on a trip to France in 2017, when he saw how much of the population was Muslim. He decorated his flak jacket with a “black sun”, a symbol traced to a floor motif used in his castle by Heinrich Himmler, a Nazi leader. He decorated his weapons with the names of victims of jihadist attacks in Stockholm and Paris. Before the shootings, he listened in his car to “God is a Serb”, a song written in 1993 in support of Radovan Karadzic—a Bosnian Serb leader convicted of genocide for his role in the massacre of 8,000 Muslims at Srebrenica in 1995. The idea that Muslims and non-whites are “invaders” imported by a cosmopolitan elite to replace ethnic Europeans has its roots in thinkers of the French “new right” of the 1970s, such as Alain de Benoist and Renaud Camus. It is often linked to the belief that multicultural societies, far from promoting diversity, extinguish it by mixing distinct cultures and races together. The nuttiest apostles of such notions equate immigration with genocide. These ideas attracted the anti-Muslim populist politicians who sprung up across Europe around the turn of the millennium, especially after the September 11th attacks in America. They inspired the far-right youth network Generation Identity. But the big impetus came in 2015-16, when some 2m asylum-seekers, mostly from the Middle East, poured into Europe. [...] This article appeared in the International section of the print edition under the headline "No safe places"
(7) Reaction in Australia: put Anti-Immigrant Parties last, in Preferential Voting CHRISTCHURCH SHOOTING putting One Nation and Senator Anning last Political forces unite to reject far right and deny One Nation preferences By David Crowe March 18, 2019 — 11.45pm A series of powerful political campaigns will seek to defeat far-right candidates at the federal election as major parties and activist groups warn against the rise of extremism in the wake of the Christchurch terror attacks. Australians will be urged to reject Pauline Hanson’s One Nation and controversial Queensland senator Fraser Anning amid accusations they have inflamed racial hatred. The fortunes of the far-right have depended in the past on preference deals with the major parties, but similar arrangements are now off the agenda ahead of the election. Labor has vowed to put One Nation and Senator Anning last on its how-to-vote cards at the election in May, while the union movement and activist group GetUp! are also preparing to mobilise against right-wing candidates. A Liberal Party spokesman said the party "will not be doing any preference deals" with One Nation and would urge voters to reject Senator Anning. ... == Scott Morrison confirms Liberals will preference One Nation lower than Labor at federal election Scott Morrison confirms Liberals will preference One Nation lower than Labor at federal election By political reporter Brett Worthington Prime Minister Scott Morrison has announced the Liberals will preference One Nation below the Labor Party at the federal election. The commitment comes after an Al Jazeera investigation revealed One Nation tried to solicit millions of dollars in donations from a US gun lobby last year. That same investigation has obtained footage of the party's leader Pauline Hanson appearing to suggest the Port Arthur massacre was part of a conspiracy. Mr Morrison has faced repeated calls for the Coalition to preference One Nation last at the election. His comments today relate to candidates running under the Liberal banner and it will be for the Nationals, the junior Coalition partner, to decide its own preferences for its candidates. ...
(8) There was a police & military training course in Christchurch on the day of the attack The New Zealand training force included the Armed Offenders Squad (AOS) NB: At 9/11 and 7/7, drills simulating the REAL even were under way on the same day. - PGM. Global sharpshooters trained in Christchurch as mosque shooting unfolded Katie Kenny 21:03, Mar 19 2019 MORNING REPORT/RNZ A veteran ambulance officer who worked through the Canterbury earthquakes says the mosque terror attack was the worst scene he's ever attended. Thanks to a police training course the same day as the Christchurch terrorist attack, specialist staff from overseas, as well as New Zealand's Defence Force, were on hand to help. Personnel taking part in the course in the city centre were already wearing their gear when the first 111 call was received at 1.41pm on Friday, March 15. Fifty people were killed and dozens more injured in the massacre, which had been timed to coincide with Jumu'ah, a congregational prayer that has Muslims shoulder-to-shoulder in mosques not long after noon each Friday. Fortunately, it also happened to coincide with a gathering of some of the world's best sharpshooters. Individuals from the police special tactics group (STG), NZDF, Australian and Hong Kong police, were involved in the response, a New Zealand Police spokesperson said.
(9) Vinny Eastwood & Barry Prince: when Sandy Hook happened, there was also a drill going on Vinny Eastwood is a local New Zealander who insists that this was a False Flag attack https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaYOUkTCdzI Christchurch Mosque Massacre EXPOSED, Vinny Eastwood, The Big Puzzle With Barry Prince Barry Prince: "When Sandy Hook happened, there was a drill going on, four miles away from the school; and when 911 happened, there was a drill going on." False Flag: a Drill goes L:ive. It does not mean that people did not die. Vinny Eastwood: the perpetrator wore police-issue Body Armour; and the weapons he used were police-issue weapons.
(10) Vinny Eastwood & Ole Dammegard: signs of a False Flag https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GoyYbgzL9o From Day 1, Christchurch Mosque Massacre Ole Dammegard & Vinny Eastwood How many out of Kurt Ritchard Haskell's 41 signs of a a false flag did this incident display? 18 so far! (below)
(11) Alan Sabrosky & Kevin Barrett say Christchurch Massacre was a 'False Flag' Alan Sabrosky is a US Marine Corps Veteran who completed two tours in Vietnam. He was later Director of Studies at the US Army War College. Kevin Barrett hosts False Flag Weekly News. Alan Sabrosky watched the video, twice, and observed No screaming, no blood, no holes in walls. This does not mean that there were no deaths; the deaths are real. But he assesses the video as Fake. Says a 2nd shooter much more likely. He also read the Manifesto, and pronounced it a pastiche of bits cobbled together from various sources, to make it look White Nationalist. But he said it's just as fake as the Anthrax Letters sent after 911. Those Anthrax Letters were intended to frame Muslims; just as 911 was blamed on Muslims. Sabrosky assessed Mossad as the real culprits behind 911. Barrett says that the agenda is the Clash of Civilizations. Mossad stages attacks to provoke the West to destroy Israel's enemies (Islam in particular). But it also stages attacks such as the Christchurch Massacre, to weaken the anti-Globalist forces (White Nationalists) and to provoke a further round of Islamic retaliation. See the discussion between Sabrosky & Barrett at https://vimeo.com/325778913 Also see the No Lies archive on the Christchurch Mosque shooting http://noliesradio.org/archives/163398
(12) Alan Sabrosky: Christchurch New Zealand - Tragedy or Travesty? Dr. Alan Ned Sabrosky Most people were shocked to hear that a shooter had invaded mosques in Christchurch New Zealand last week, killing 49 people and wounding others. Word that he was a white nationalist (the Left’s favorite villain these days) spread rapidly, as did the determination by New Zealand’s prime minister to undertake a major reappraisal of the country’s gun laws. Rather less publicity was given some oddly dissonant details that gradually seeped out. There were claims that the shooter had some Jewish heritage, although that was hotly disputed by others, and that Communist China was his favorite country – not exactly a favorite of real white nationalists anywhere, I believe. Israel took up the cause of the victims with Netanyahu condemning the attack, itself a bit strange as he and the Israeli government have never cared overmuch about what happened to Muslims anywhere, and occurred while Israeli warplanes were busily savaging Gaza in one of their periodic onslaughts against the Palestinians cringing in their fish-barrel there. A VIDEO TOO MANY? But the oddest thing was the appearance of a video supposedly recorded by the shooter as his attack unfolded – I saw the short version on YouTube twice before it was pulled, with some sources claiming that the New Zealand government threatened severe criminal penalties for re-posting it. (ER: links to the longer version of the video can be found below) Now I am not in New Zealand so I cannot independently verify what did or did not happen. But I can tell you that I had the oddest reaction to the video of the actual shootings, apparently looking down the length of the rifle (presumably a variant of an AR-15) as the shooter fired while walking forward, then paused briefly to change magazines, then continued to shoot. My impression was that I was watching a sanitized version of one of those “soldier in combat” action games, and not an actual shooting. Why? My ten years in the US Marine Corps, including two tours in Vietnam with the 1st Marine Division, had me watching the video with a growing sense of disbelief. First, for all of the shooting going on, there were no screams – not from the wounded or the dying, and not from others present in the mosque, when there should have been a cacophony of screams – people generally do that when they are shot or in fear of being shot, yet not here. All one could hear was murmuring or chanting from somewhere in the near distance. Second, in the short video, as the shooter walked down halls firing as he went, there was no blood or other offal anywhere – yet .223 rounds make nasty wounds so there ought to have been blood – LOTS of blood – on the floors and walls everywhere. Nor was there any evidence of the outpouring of vomit, urine and feces that accompanies violent death, especially in those numbers. And third, there was no visible evidence along the shooter’s walkway of physical damage to walls, windows or doors from errant rounds or rounds that passed through victims and went on to hit something else. Yet from the amount of shooting going on, there ought to have been lots of physical damage visible to even the casual observer. There surely was no reason for anyone to feel the need to conceal it, so where was it? I cannot say. AND IN ANOTHER TIME AND PLACE The whole thing reminded me of other tragedies in other places that had different inconsistencies standing in stark contrast to the preferred official narrative of “whodunit” and why. One was the massacre in a gay night club in Florida, where a lone gunman stacked up scores of victims. Yet to be able to do that, he would have had to walk down the street and through the club with 20 or more magazines for his rifle, shooting & reloading as he went. It isn’t obvious to me how anyone even in prime condition (which the person named as the Florida shooter was not) could pull that off. Another was the San Bernadino CA incident, which I first heard about on the BBC (I prefer to get my news there rather than from the gossip gangs passing for newscasters in the U.S.). They described the shooters – based on a woman eye-witness in the building where the attacks were occurring – as three tall white men in black military fatigues with rifles (ER: see two eyewitness videos here). Yet they somehow morphed into a diminutive South Asian couple (conveniently dead), which took some serious magic. There were doubtless real tragedies in any or all of these and other incidents. But the devil is in the details, as the saying goes, and way too many of the details in way too many assassinations and mass shootings simply do not add up and are contrary to reason. Do I hear the phrase “false flag” anywhere?_______________________________________________________________________ *Dr. Alan Ned Sabrosky (PhD, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran. He served two tours in Vietnam with the 1st Marine Division and is a graduate of the US Army War College. He can be contacted at docbrosk@comcast.net ******** ER: The full-length version of the video (around 17 minutes) and the manifesto of Tarrant can be found at the Charles Carroll Society website. Scroll down through this article to obtain links to both.
(13) The New Zealand Shooting: What Happened And Why? - Scott Bennett, Ph.D The New Zealand Shooting: What Happened And Why? By Scott Bennett, Ph.D. (abd) Former U.S. Army Psychological Operations Officer and State Department Counterterrorism Contractor OVERVIEW There may be more to the New Zealand shooting event which just occurred than meets the eye. In fact, there is a very real possibility that it may have been the “Pearl Harbor” attack in a long campaign against President Trump, designed ultimately to neutralize the conservative republican base, weaken President Trump, and take-over America in a blitzkrieg of political turmoil. Here’s how, theoretically, the plan seems to be unfolding. FORENSIC ANALYSIS: Now let me first start out by saying that after thoroughly examining the 17 minute video of the shooter frame-by-frame, and after applying deductive reasoning in the forensic analysis, I am convinced this was a false-flag event for the following reasons: No bullet holes or shattered wood or glass or clouds of sheet rock or exploding plaster or cement can be observed or heard as the guns are firing into them and the victims. This is possible only when no solid projectile is fired from the muzzle, which means no solid bullets were fired into the walls, doors, windows, or victims bodies—only the concussion of air—which means either blanks or paint or gas or other non-solid projectiles were fired from the guns. This means, essentially, nothing solid impacted the victims bodies, therefore no physical damage resulted, which means no living person was lethally wounded or killed by an outside force. It’s simple physics, which Newton’s law establishes in the theorem: a body at rest stays at rest; a body in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. Applied to this situation, we might similarly establish that a living body remains living unless impacted by an outside force that lethally disrupts the body’s life processes, such as a bullet destroying arteries and vital organs. No blood splatter from the close-range impact of the high-caliber bullets upon the victims can be observed anywhere on the walls, doors, floors or furniture. Several of the victims are shot at point-blank range as they are crawling or passing by the shooter, yet no visual impact of the bullets can be observed, which would have undoubtedly “kicked” or “thrown” the victim with tremendous force. Only one victim lying on the ground appears to have a red spray appear next to his head as he is allegedly shot, but this could be explained as a “paint round”, since no physical impact of the bullet or explosion upon the head is observed. Additionally, no pools of blood can be seen either around the bodies on the floor after being shot, except from one body which strangely appears lying next to the first victim in the doorway, which was not present when the shooter initially entered. So this suggests the body or actor was placed in that position, with blood added afterwards. The victims’ physical reactions to being shot, especially at close-range, are not at all typical human reactions, as military and law enforcement experience and data confirm. Typically, the moment a person—especially a civilian—is shot, they instantly fall into a state of hysterical physical and emotional shock, delirium, panic, and desperation. Their bodies are flooded with adrenaline, triggering them to violently sprint, run, or crawl away from the source of the muzzle blast and deafening concussion. They do not simply fold up and fall to the ground like a sack of sand, and lie motionless. It is pure subconscious, animalistic instinctual self-preservation. Their body and instincts explode with movement in the first three (3) seconds, and their minds have no ability to stop it. There are also no screams of horror, rage, fear, or agony filling the air, only seemingly muffled moans. Upon leaving the Mosque, the shooter allegedly fires at a woman about 25 feet away at a corner of the yard, and upon walking outside, finds crying, “Help me, help me”, and lying on her side on the street, her face looking away, and holding her right wrist with her left hand. The shooter aims and fires at her at about 5-7 feet away, blowing a wad of her hair off of her scalp and seemingly causing a red substance to exit her wrist—which may have been a controlled device activated by the woman’s left hand which was holding her right. The presence of music playing in the background during the shooting event is also quite significant. At the beginning of the event, as the shooter is walking around the property, a pipe and drums band is playing an American patriotic tune, suggesting some kind of mission equivalent of a “American Founding Father type revolution.” Then as the shooter re-enters his car to escape; a voice giving a religious sermon begins screaming a bombastic “fire-and-brimstone” punishment type intro to a song that plays as the shooter drives away, running over the woman allegedly shot on the ground. Finally, as the shooter is driving down the street, several times he presses his shotgun muzzle against the windshield of his car and fires, but the windshield is not damaged or broken or penetrated by any bullet. Instead a smoky cloud bursts against the window and temporarily fills the cab of the car. He then fires out of the side passenger window at a man, and seemingly shatters the passenger door window. This may have been caused by the muzzle of the shotgun hitting the window of course, and not the result of a projectile being fired through it. The shooter then drives off with music playing in the background, either from his car radio or bluetooth headset, that resembles some kind of hokey Pulp Fiction type soundtrack, as he comments on the shooting thrills and challenges to his Youtube type audience. The video then stops. This has been excerpted from the Veterans Today article titled Undeniable Proof: CGI Used in New Zealand Shooting (continuing updates), which opens with the following video excerpt showing how the bullet casings magically disappear before falling to the ground {visit the link}
(14) Brendon O'Connell: Mosque Shooter Was Professionally Trained https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/03/brendon-oconnell-false-flag.html March 16, 2019 This newsletter is at http://mailstar.net/Christchurch-Big-Picture.doc (1) Christchurch Massacre: the Big Picture (2) NZ mosque chairman Ahmed Bhamji blames Christchurch shooting on Mossad (3) Jews outraged after mosque leader blames Mossad for Christchurch attack (4) NZ mosque chairman slammed for blaming Christchurch shooting on Mossad - Times of Israel (5) Wikipedia on Christchurch mosque shootings (6) Economist: Muslim & non-white 'invaders' imported by cosmopolitan elite to replace ethnic Europeans (7) Reaction in Australia: put Anti-Immigrant Parties last, in Preferential Voting (8) There was a police & military training course in Christchurch on the day of the attack (9) Vinny Eastwood & Barry Prince: when Sandy Hook happened, there was also a drill going on (10) Vinny Eastwood & Ole Dammegard: signs of a False Flag (11) Alan Sabrosky & Kevin Barrett say Christchurch Massacre was a 'False Flag' (12) Alan Sabrosky: Christchurch New Zealand - Tragedy or Travesty? (13) The New Zealand Shooting: What Happened And Why? - Scott Bennett, Ph.D (14) Brendon O'Connell: Mosque Shooter Was Professionally Trained (15) Why the New Zealand Mosque Attack Could Be a 'False-Flag' Mossad Operation (16) Gates of Vienna, far from supporting Breivik & Tarrant, calls them 'Nut Cases' (17) Port Arthur massacre: another False Flag, attested by Brigadier Ted Serong (18) Mossad's history of Deception, Assassination, Impersonation and Betrayal
(1) Christchurch Massacre: the Big Picture by Peter Myers, March 28, 2019 The information supplied here about the Christchurch massacre comes not from myself, but from dissident experts in New Zealand, the United States and elsewhere. My job has been to collate the material, to assemble it into a coherent story. Lest our dissident experts be dismissed as unqualified, they include Alan Sabrosky, who was Director of Studies at the US Army War College. And, on the Port Arthur Massacre, Brigadier Ted Serong, the leader of the Australian force in the Vietnam War (now deceased). I support Gun Control; in particular, curtailment of civilian ownership of military-style weapons (automatic & semi-automatic). But, in Australia, Gun Control was achieved via the Port Arthur massacre, which bears the marks of a False Flag operation. Brigadier Ted Serong said so (see item 17). In the 2 weeks or so since the Christchurch massacre, anti-immigration parties have been publicly blamed in a trial-by-media. Yet I have not found any so-called 'Far Right' persons or websites who praise Brenton Tarrant, who celebrate him or regard him as a leader. Even the 'Gates of Vienna' website repudiates him. So why are White Nationalists held to blame? Because he depicted himself as one. Please remember the Anthrax Letters of 2001. They purported to come from Moslems, proclaiming "Death to America ... Death to Israel ... Allah is Great". Subsequent analysis showed that the anthrax strain came from government laboratories, and was not sent by Moslems. Yet these letters may have influenced the decision to invade Iraq in 2004. Or consider the case of Jussie Smollet, recently exposed as a hoaxer. If the maxim "Believe the victim" were always followed, such hoaxes would not be exposed. Jewish activists have gone wild over Mosque chairman Ahmed Bhamji's claim that Mossad was behind the Christchurch massacre. As if it's unthinkable (see item 18, on Mossad's history of Deception). Yet White people, who have been accused of complicity in this atrocity for the last 2 weeks, stand defenceless before the media onslaught. Now for the big picture. 911 was a Mossad operation using Moslem patsies. The result was the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria - 18 years of war and still going on. Not for Oil, but for Israel. Costing American lives, American debt. The main aim of Zionism is the build the Third Temple - from which, they believe, the Messiah will rule us all (but for Christians, he will be the AntiChrist). However the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque stand in the way. To remove them means war with Islam. The war - between Judaism and Islam - must come either before or after the demolition. It's not a war between Christians and Islam, but Christians are being suckered into it. Just as Moslems were framed for 911, White Nationalists are being framed for the massacres of Breivik and Tarrant. The aim in both cases is to get them to fight each other. But NZ mosque chairman Ahmed Bhamji is right. Instead of fighting each other, Moslems and whites/Christians should work together to jointly expose the conspiratorial forces. (2) NZ mosque chairman Ahmed Bhamji blames Christchurch shooting on Mossad If you look this up in Google, you will be hard put to find it except at a Jewish website with Jewish commentary and Jewish Outrage. To see the Video WITHOUT any commentary: https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZHIOYKygOh0 Video with commentary by Melana Chasmata: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHIOYKygOh0 Ahmed Bhamji on Christchurch Shooter Melana Chasmata Published on 27 Mar 2019 New Zealand's Jewish community is outraged and revolted after a prominent mosque leader blamed Mossad for being behind the Christchurch terror attack. On Saturday, a group called Love Aotearoa Hate Racism organised a rally for the victims in Auckland's Aotea Square. Ahmed Bhamji, chairman of the Mt Roskill Masjid E Umar, gave a speech questioning where the gunman got his funding from. He said he suspected it came from "Mossad" and "Zionist business". Mossad is the foreign intelligence agency of Israel responsible for covert operations, intelligence gathering and counterterrorism. "I really want to say one thing today. Do you think this guy was alone… I want to ask you - where did he get the funding from?" he can be heard saying in video footage. "I stand here and I say I have a very very strong suspicion that there's some group behind him and I am not afraid to say I feel Mossad is behind this." One person can be heard shouting in support: "It's the truth. Israel is behind this. That's right!" A video of the speech was posted to Twitter, where it's caused outrage in the Jewish community. "These conspiracy theories are dangerous lies. They put the Jewish community at risk, at a time of heightened security concerns," New Zealand Jewish Council spokesperson Juliet Moses told Newshub. "Conspiracy theories - particularly the idea that Jews (whether through the Jewish state or otherwise) are a malevolent controlling force in the world - are at the very core of anti-Semitism." Several attendees at the event have already called out the event, saying they were "disappointed by some of the hate rhetoric". "The speaker talking about Mossad conspiracy theories already left me speechless," one person wrote on the event's Facebook page. "Mentioning Mossad was deeply, deeply disappointing. And pretty racist," another person said. Newshub spoke to Love Aotearoa Hate Racism co-founder Joe Carolan, who said Bhamji was one speaker out of 30 and there were many
(3) Jews outraged after mosque leader blames Mossad for Christchurch attack 26/03/2019 Scott Palmer New Zealand's Jewish community is outraged and revolted after a prominent mosque leader blamed Mossad for being behind the Christchurch terror attack. On Saturday, a group called Love Aotearoa Hate Racism organised a rally for the victims in Auckland's Aotea Square. Ahmed Bhamji, chairman of the Mt Roskill Masjid E Umar, gave a speech questioning where the gunman got his funding from. He said he suspected it came from "Mossad" and "Zionist business". Mossad is the foreign intelligence agency of Israel responsible for covert operations, intelligence gathering and counterterrorism. "I really want to say one thing today. Do you think this guy was alone... I want to ask you - where did he get the funding from?" he can be heard saying in video footage. "I stand here and I say I have a very very strong suspicion that there's some group behind him and I am not afraid to say I feel Mossad is behind this." One person can be heard shouting in support: "It's the truth. Israel is behind this. That's right!" A video of the speech was posted to Twitter, where it's caused outrage in the Jewish community. "These conspiracy theories are dangerous lies. They put the Jewish community at risk, at a time of heightened security concerns," New Zealand Jewish Council spokesperson Juliet Moses told Newshub. "Conspiracy theories - particularly the idea that Jews (whether through the Jewish state or otherwise) are a malevolent controlling force in the world - are at the very core of anti-Semitism." Several attendees at the event have already called out the event, saying they were "disappointed by some of the hate rhetoric". "The speaker talking about Mossad conspiracy theories already left me speechless," one person wrote on the event's Facebook page. "Mentioning Mossad was deeply, deeply disappointing. And pretty racist," another person said. Newshub spoke to Love Aotearoa Hate Racism co-founder Joe Carolan, who said Bhamji was one speaker out of 30 and there were many different points of view at the event. When asked whether he agreed with or believed the theory that Mossad were behind the attack, Carolan told Newshub "absolutely not". But Moses says the event organisers should have publicly disagreed with Bhamji. "It is unfortunate that they did not appear to put its anti-racism message into practice, by challenging or condemning the racism in their midst," she told Newshub. "We must call out hateful dehumanising language, whatever the source, target and circumstances, and even when it is not politically expedient to do so." Newshub contacted Bhamji, who accused Newshub of singling him out. "I made a statement, a lot of other people made statements," he said. Bhamji defended his speech, saying an inquiry is needed into where the alleged gunman got his money from. He didn't offer any proof to his speculation Mossad had funded the alleged gunman. "Mossad is up to all these things," he said. "When I talk about Mossad, why should the Jews be upset about it? Give me an answer?" Newshub.
(4) NZ mosque chairman slammed for blaming Christchurch shooting on Mossad - Times of Israel New Zealand mosque chairman slammed for blaming Christchurch shooting on Mossad Ahmed Bhamji filmed during Auckland rally suggesting Israeli spy agency and ‘Zionist business houses’ funded Australian gunman who massacred 50 Muslim worshipers By MICHAEL BACHNER 27 March 2019, 4:32 pm The chairman of New Zealand’s biggest mosque has come under fire for suggesting Israel’s Mossad spy agency and “Zionist business houses” were behind the Christchurch massacre that killed 50 Muslim worshipers. The country’s Jewish community and national human rights institution both condemned the remarks, made on Saturday at a rally in Auckland organized by a group called Love Aotearoa Hate Racism and streamed live on local broadcaster Apna TV’s Facebook page. One of the speakers at the rally was Fiji Indian businessman Ahmed Bhamji, who is the chairman of Masjid E Umar in the Auckland suburb of Mount Roskill — which describes itself on its Facebook page as the “busiest and biggest” mosque in New Zealand. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern had visited that mosque on the same day as the rally, mourning the victims of the massacre committed by Australian white supremacist Brenton Tarrant. ... The Human Rights Commission, New Zealand’s national human rights institution, said: “Prejudice against Jewish people has no place in New Zealand. We must condemn racism, hate and anti-semitism whenever we see it.” ...
(5) Wikipedia on Christchurch mosque shootings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchurch_mosque_shootings The Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive terrorist attacks at mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, during Friday Prayer on 15 March 2019.[9] The attacks began at the Al Noor Mosque in the suburb of Riccarton a 1:40 pm, and continued at the Linwood Islamic Centre[10][11][12] at about 1:55 pm.[13] The gunman live-streamed the first attack on Facebook Live.[14] Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive terrorist attacks at mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, during Friday Prayer on 15 March 2019.[9] The attacks began at the Al Noor Mos The attacks killed 50 people and injured 50 others.[15][16] A 28-year-old Australian man, described in media reports as a white supremacist and part of the alt-right, was arrested and charged with murder.[17][18][19] The attacks have been linked to an increase in white supremacism and alt-right extremism globally[20][21] observed since the mid-2010s.[22][23] Politicians and world leaders condemned the attacks,[24] and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern described the attacks as "one of New Zealand's darkest days". It is the deadliest mass shooting in modern New Zealand history.[25] The gunman began shooting worshippers at the Al Noor Mosque, Riccarton, at around 1:40 pm. Police received the first emergency call at 1:41 pm.[36] Between three hundred and five hundred people may have been inside the mosque attending Friday Prayer at the time of the shooting.[37] A neighbour of the mosque told reporters he saw the gunman flee and drop what appeared to be a firearm in the driveway.[38] The witness said the gunman appeared to be wearing military-style clothing.[39] The gunman live-streamed the first 17 minutes of this attack on Facebook Live, starting with the drive to the mosque and ending with the drive away.[40] Moments before the shooting, the gunman played several songs including a traditional marching song of the British military called "The British Grenadiers", and "Serbia Strong", a Serb nationalist song from the Bosnian War (1992–1995) celebrating Radovan Karadzˇic´, who was found guilty of genocide against Bosnian Muslims.[41][42][43][44] One witness said the gunman continued to play "military music" from a portable speaker inside the mosque.[45] Just before the shooting, the gunman appeared to be greeted by one of the worshippers, who said "Hello, brother" and who was amongst the first people to be killed.[39][46][47] The gunman spent several minutes inside the mosque, shooting attendees indiscriminately. He killed three people near the entrance, and many others inside a larger room. During the attack, a worshipper, Naeem Rashid, charged at the gunman and was shot; he later died from his injuries.[48][49][50][51] The gunman approached wounded victims, firing at them multiple times. He then left the mosque and fired at people outside. He retrieved another weapon from his vehicle before returning to the mosque to murder more victims, many of whom were already wounded and unable to escape. The gunman then exited the mosque for a second time and killed a woman near the footpath as she pleaded for help. He left the scene shortly thereafter, in his car,[39][52] to the music of "Fire" by The Crazy World of Arthur Brown,[53][54][55] where the singer proclaims: "I am the god of hellfire!"[56][57][58] He had spent about six minutes at the Al Noor Mosque.[59] The gunman shot other civilians in the area and drove away at high speed, heading in the direction of the Linwood Islamic Centre.[59][60][61] A second attack began at about 1:55 pm[62] at the Linwood Islamic Centre,[63][64] a mosque 5 kilometres (3 mi) east of the Al Noor Mosque.[39] According to a survivor, the gunman initially did not find the door, and shot people outside and through a window, which alerted those inside.[65] The mosque's acting imam credited a worshipper named Abdul Aziz Wahabzadah with stopping the attack.[66][67][68] Wahabzadah told reporters he had taken a credit-card reader and ran at the gunman, hoping to distract him. When the gunman retreated, Wahabzadah threw the credit-card reader at him. The gunman took a firearm from his car and fired at Wahabzadah, who took cover among nearby cars and retrieved an empty shotgun the gunman had dropped. The gunman continued firing at the mosque. When the gunman returned to his car again, Wahabzadah threw the shotgun at the car, which shattered one of its windows or its windscreen. The gunman then drove away.[67][68][69][70] Early reports indicated "multiple, simultaneous attack[s]",[71] but later only a single suspect was implicated.[72][73] He was arrested on Brougham Street in Sydenham, 21 minutes after the first emergency call.[74][75] Video footage showed his car had been rammed against the kerb by a police car before his arrest at gunpoint.[76][77] Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the suspect had been planning to continue the attacks at a third location,[78] possibly the mosque in Ashburton or the An-Nur Child Care Centre in Hornby;[75] Police Commissioner Mike Bush corroborated this, saying police had stopped the suspect on his way to a third location.[79] A total of 50 people (46 of them male, and 4 female) were killed in the attacks: 42 at the Al Noor Mosque; 7 at the Linwood Islamic Centre,[11] and one who died later in Christchurch Hospital.[60][80] The victims were aged between 3 and 77 years old.[81] Greg Robertson, Chief of Surgery at the hospital, stated on 16 March that four of the victims had died in ambulances en route to the hospital.[82] On 17 March, Commissioner Bush said 50 other people had been injured in the attacks, 36 of whom were being treated for gunshot wounds in hospital.[15][16] Two were in a serious condition, and a 4-year-old girl was transferred to Starship Hospital in a critical condition.[83] In the days following the attacks, dozens of people remained missing[84] and several diplomatic offices and foreign ministries released statements regarding the number of victims from their respective nations.[85][86][87] Police requested that those listed as missing who were in fact not missing register themselves as safe on the Restoring Family Links website.[88] The New Zealand Red Cross published a list of missing people which included nationals of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Jordan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Indonesia.[89] New Zealand Police media releases list among the dead citizens of Bangladesh, Egypt, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, Malaysia, Mauritius, New Zealand, Pakistan and Palestine.[90][91][92][93] Atta Elayyan, an IT entrepreneur and player in the national futsal team, was among those killed.[94][95] Police have charged Brenton Harrison Tarrant, a 28-year-old Australian man, with murder in relation to the attacks.[96] At the time of his arrest, he lived in Andersons Bay in Dunedin. He was a member of a South Otago gun club and practised shooting at its range.[97] He grew up in Grafton, New South Wales, attended Grafton High School,[98] and worked as a personal trainer in his hometown from 2009 to 2011.[99] Around 2012, he started visiting a number of countries in Asia and Europe. Police in Bulgaria and Turkey are investigating his visits to their nations.[100][101] He became obsessed with terrorist attacks committed by Islamic extremists in 2016 and 2017, started planning an attack about two years prior to the shootings, and chose his targets three months in advance.[102] Security officials suspect he had come into contact with far-right organisations about two years before the shooting, while visiting European nations.[103] Captivated with sites of battle between Christians and the Ottoman Empire, he went on another series of visits to the Balkans in 2016–2018, with Croatia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Turkey and Bosnia-Herzegovina confirming his presence there in these years.[104] He posted a slew of Balkan nationalist material on social-media platforms,[105] and called for the United States to be weakened in order to prevent events such as the NATO intervention in Kosovo in response to a Serbian ethnic-cleansing campaign against Kosovar Albanians.[42][104][106] He said he was against intervention by NATO because he saw the Serbian military as "Christian Europeans attempting to remove these Islamic occupiers from Europe".[42][106] Three years prior to the attacks, he praised Blair Cottrell as a leader of the far-right movements in Australia. He made more than 30 comments on the now-deleted "United Patriots Front" and "True Blue Crew" Facebook pages, one calling the election of US President Donald Trump in 2016 "[s]imply one of the most important events in modern history." An Australian Broadcasting Corporation team who studied the comments called them "fragments and digital impressions of a well-travelled young man who frequented hate-filled anonymous messaging boards and was deeply engaged in a global alt-right culture."[107] According to Commissioner Bush, the gunman held a firearms licence with an "A" endorsement.[108] Police recovered five guns at the scene: two semi-automatic weapons, two shotguns and a lever-action firearm.[109] According to a city gun store, the gunman bought them online.[110] Additionally, he illegally replaced the semi-automatic rifles' small, legal magazines with 30-round magazines, also legally purchased online.[111][112] The guns and magazines used were covered in white writing naming historical events, people, and motifs related to historical conflicts, wars, and battles between Muslims and European Christians, as well as the names of recent Islamic-terrorist-attack victims and the names of far-right attackers such as Josué Estébanez and Luca Traini.[113][note 1] Police also found two improvised explosive devices attached to a car; these were defused by the New Zealand Defence Force.[119] No explosives were found on the gunman.[120] Tarrant is allegedly the author of a 73-page manifesto titled "The Great Replacement", a reference to the "Great Replacement" and "white genocide" conspiracy theories.[121] It said the attacks were planned two years prior, and that the location was selected three months prior.[122] Nine minutes before the attacks, the manifesto was emailed to more than 30 recipients, including the Prime Minister's office and several media outlets.[123] Links to the manifesto were also shared on Twitter and 8chan immediately before the attacks.[124][125] In the manifesto several anti-immigrant sentiments are expressed, including hate speech against migrants, white supremacist rhetoric, and calls for all non-European immigrants in Europe who are claimed to be "invading his land" to be removed.[126] The author also describes himself as an ethno-nationalist.[106][127][128] In the manifesto, the author names dozens of people from around the world, ranging from politicians whose ideas he supports[129][130][131][132] to terrorists and murderers whose actions he applauds.[133] In particular, the author cites Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik as an inspiration, and claims he had had been in "brief contact" with Breivik.[134][135] He also calls for the assassination of several politicians with whom he disagrees.[1][136][note 2] He says he supports President Trump as "a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose", but not as a leader or policy-maker.[126] The manifesto displays neo-Nazi symbols such as the Black Sun and Odin's cross.[137] However, the author denies being a Nazi, and professes instead to be an "eco-fascist"[138][139][140] and a "kebab removalist", in reference to a meme exalting the genocide of Bosnian Muslims by the Bosnian Serb army.[141] The manifesto states that the alleged shooter targeted Muslims as a form of "revenge against Islam for 1,300 years of war and devastation that it has brought upon the people of the West and other peoples of the world".[4][5][142] The manifesto mentions Pope Urban II regarding a crusade against "the impious race of the Saracens [Muslims]", and also calls for the Christian reconquest of Constantinople (Turkey's Istanbul).[143] The manifesto contained many explicit references to the Ottoman Empire and Turkey[144] and expressed a desire to "drive a wedge between the nations of NATO that are European and the Turks that also make a part of the NATO".[145] The manifesto says that the main goal of the attacks was to accelerate anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant sentiment across majority-white nations in order to fight growing numbers of "invaders", and ignite an eventual "race war".[146] The manifesto was described by some media outlets as "shitposting"—trolling designed to engender conflict between certain groups and people.[129][130][147] On 23 March 2019, the manifesto was deemed "objectionable" by the Chief Censor of New Zealand, making it unlawful to possess or distribute it in New Zealand.[148] Police in Hamilton, Ontario are investigating a white nationalist, Paul Fromm, for posting the manifesto on his website.[149] ... This page was last edited on 26 March 2019, at 21:15 (UTC).
(6) Economist: Muslim & non-white 'invaders' imported by cosmopolitan elite to replace ethnic Europeans Far right and very wrong Why white nationalist terrorism is a global threat The Christchurch killer acted alone but followed a terrifying trend Print edition | International Mar 21st 2019 CHRISTCHURCH, ISTANBUL, MOSCOW AND WASHINGTON, DC He seems to have been a classic “lone wolf”. As far as police can tell, the man who murdered 50 worshippers, and critically wounded nine more, at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on March 15th was not part of any organisation. The 28-year-old Australian, Brenton Tarrant, claimed to have developed his violent beliefs on his own, surfing the internet and visiting Europe. He bought his weapons himself. He honed his skills at a suburban shooting-range. No one there suspected that he was preparing a massacre. Yet he was part of something much bigger. The names and slogans scrawled on his weapons were familiar to extreme white nationalists all around the world—but hardly anyone else. His ranting internet manifesto, “The Great Replacement”, repeated a staple far-right conspiracy theory: that non-white and Muslim immigrants in Western countries are invaders, ushered in by scheming elites to replace ethnic-European populations. Variants of that once-fringe idea are now common, not just in social-media posts by anonymous wackos but in the speeches of elected politicians from Hungary to Iowa. ... Islamic State tries to provoke the West into persecuting Muslims and thus driving sympathisers from the “grey zone” towards radical participation. Right-wing extremists may also hope to provoke an Islamist backlash. Police are investigating a possible terrorist motive behind the murder of three people on a tram in Utrecht in the Netherlands, three days after the massacre in Christchurch. A Turkish-born suspect has been arrested. In Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has seized on the attack in Christchurch as evidence of a broad conspiracy against Turkey and Islam. He has quoted from the killer’s manifesto, which includes calls to expel Turks from Europe and to kill Mr Erdogan. The president’s not-so-subtle message is that only he can protect Turks from rampant white nationalism. The Christchurch killer also hoped to provoke stricter gun laws, so that gun-owners would rise up in revolt. There is not much chance of more gun control in America, Mr Tarrant’s primary target. However, Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand’s prime minister, is moving to tighten her country’s lax gun laws. This will not start a civil war. New Zealand prides itself on multiculturalism (see article). Its politics are more moderate than Australia’s. That, along with its easy gun laws, may have been why Mr Tarrant picked New Zealand. He wrote that he wanted to prove that nowhere was safe. Muslims in Christchurch have lost all sense of security. Tofazzal Alam, who survived the attack, says he is now afraid “to go to mosque, afraid of any crowd, afraid even to open the door”. Yet the killer’s manifesto was inspired by events far away in Europe. He claimed he was converted to radical-right ideology on a trip to France in 2017, when he saw how much of the population was Muslim. He decorated his flak jacket with a “black sun”, a symbol traced to a floor motif used in his castle by Heinrich Himmler, a Nazi leader. He decorated his weapons with the names of victims of jihadist attacks in Stockholm and Paris. Before the shootings, he listened in his car to “God is a Serb”, a song written in 1993 in support of Radovan Karadzic—a Bosnian Serb leader convicted of genocide for his role in the massacre of 8,000 Muslims at Srebrenica in 1995. The idea that Muslims and non-whites are “invaders” imported by a cosmopolitan elite to replace ethnic Europeans has its roots in thinkers of the French “new right” of the 1970s, such as Alain de Benoist and Renaud Camus. It is often linked to the belief that multicultural societies, far from promoting diversity, extinguish it by mixing distinct cultures and races together. The nuttiest apostles of such notions equate immigration with genocide. These ideas attracted the anti-Muslim populist politicians who sprung up across Europe around the turn of the millennium, especially after the September 11th attacks in America. They inspired the far-right youth network Generation Identity. But the big impetus came in 2015-16, when some 2m asylum-seekers, mostly from the Middle East, poured into Europe. [...] This article appeared in the International section of the print edition under the headline "No safe places"
(7) Reaction in Australia: put Anti-Immigrant Parties last, in Preferential Voting CHRISTCHURCH SHOOTING putting One Nation and Senator Anning last Political forces unite to reject far right and deny One Nation preferences By David Crowe March 18, 2019 — 11.45pm A series of powerful political campaigns will seek to defeat far-right candidates at the federal election as major parties and activist groups warn against the rise of extremism in the wake of the Christchurch terror attacks. Australians will be urged to reject Pauline Hanson’s One Nation and controversial Queensland senator Fraser Anning amid accusations they have inflamed racial hatred. The fortunes of the far-right have depended in the past on preference deals with the major parties, but similar arrangements are now off the agenda ahead of the election. Labor has vowed to put One Nation and Senator Anning last on its how-to-vote cards at the election in May, while the union movement and activist group GetUp! are also preparing to mobilise against right-wing candidates. A Liberal Party spokesman said the party "will not be doing any preference deals" with One Nation and would urge voters to reject Senator Anning. ... == Scott Morrison confirms Liberals will preference One Nation lower than Labor at federal election Scott Morrison confirms Liberals will preference One Nation lower than Labor at federal election By political reporter Brett Worthington Prime Minister Scott Morrison has announced the Liberals will preference One Nation below the Labor Party at the federal election. The commitment comes after an Al Jazeera investigation revealed One Nation tried to solicit millions of dollars in donations from a US gun lobby last year. That same investigation has obtained footage of the party's leader Pauline Hanson appearing to suggest the Port Arthur massacre was part of a conspiracy. Mr Morrison has faced repeated calls for the Coalition to preference One Nation last at the election. His comments today relate to candidates running under the Liberal banner and it will be for the Nationals, the junior Coalition partner, to decide its own preferences for its candidates. ...
(8) There was a police & military training course in Christchurch on the day of the attack The New Zealand training force included the Armed Offenders Squad (AOS) NB: At 9/11 and 7/7, drills simulating the REAL even were under way on the same day. - PGM. Global sharpshooters trained in Christchurch as mosque shooting unfolded Katie Kenny 21:03, Mar 19 2019 MORNING REPORT/RNZ A veteran ambulance officer who worked through the Canterbury earthquakes says the mosque terror attack was the worst scene he's ever attended. Thanks to a police training course the same day as the Christchurch terrorist attack, specialist staff from overseas, as well as New Zealand's Defence Force, were on hand to help. Personnel taking part in the course in the city centre were already wearing their gear when the first 111 call was received at 1.41pm on Friday, March 15. Fifty people were killed and dozens more injured in the massacre, which had been timed to coincide with Jumu'ah, a congregational prayer that has Muslims shoulder-to-shoulder in mosques not long after noon each Friday. Fortunately, it also happened to coincide with a gathering of some of the world's best sharpshooters. Individuals from the police special tactics group (STG), NZDF, Australian and Hong Kong police, were involved in the response, a New Zealand Police spokesperson said.
(9) Vinny Eastwood & Barry Prince: when Sandy Hook happened, there was also a drill going on Vinny Eastwood is a local New Zealander who insists that this was a False Flag attack https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaYOUkTCdzI Christchurch Mosque Massacre EXPOSED, Vinny Eastwood, The Big Puzzle With Barry Prince Barry Prince: "When Sandy Hook happened, there was a drill going on, four miles away from the school; and when 911 happened, there was a drill going on." False Flag: a Drill goes L:ive. It does not mean that people did not die. Vinny Eastwood: the perpetrator wore police-issue Body Armour; and the weapons he used were police-issue weapons.
(10) Vinny Eastwood & Ole Dammegard: signs of a False Flag https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GoyYbgzL9o From Day 1, Christchurch Mosque Massacre Ole Dammegard & Vinny Eastwood How many out of Kurt Ritchard Haskell's 41 signs of a a false flag did this incident display? 18 so far! (below)
(11) Alan Sabrosky & Kevin Barrett say Christchurch Massacre was a 'False Flag' Alan Sabrosky is a US Marine Corps Veteran who completed two tours in Vietnam. He was later Director of Studies at the US Army War College. Kevin Barrett hosts False Flag Weekly News. Alan Sabrosky watched the video, twice, and observed No screaming, no blood, no holes in walls. This does not mean that there were no deaths; the deaths are real. But he assesses the video as Fake. Says a 2nd shooter much more likely. He also read the Manifesto, and pronounced it a pastiche of bits cobbled together from various sources, to make it look White Nationalist. But he said it's just as fake as the Anthrax Letters sent after 911. Those Anthrax Letters were intended to frame Muslims; just as 911 was blamed on Muslims. Sabrosky assessed Mossad as the real culprits behind 911. Barrett says that the agenda is the Clash of Civilizations. Mossad stages attacks to provoke the West to destroy Israel's enemies (Islam in particular). But it also stages attacks such as the Christchurch Massacre, to weaken the anti-Globalist forces (White Nationalists) and to provoke a further round of Islamic retaliation. See the discussion between Sabrosky & Barrett at https://vimeo.com/325778913 Also see the No Lies archive on the Christchurch Mosque shooting http://noliesradio.org/archives/163398
(12) Alan Sabrosky: Christchurch New Zealand - Tragedy or Travesty? Dr. Alan Ned Sabrosky Most people were shocked to hear that a shooter had invaded mosques in Christchurch New Zealand last week, killing 49 people and wounding others. Word that he was a white nationalist (the Left’s favorite villain these days) spread rapidly, as did the determination by New Zealand’s prime minister to undertake a major reappraisal of the country’s gun laws. Rather less publicity was given some oddly dissonant details that gradually seeped out. There were claims that the shooter had some Jewish heritage, although that was hotly disputed by others, and that Communist China was his favorite country – not exactly a favorite of real white nationalists anywhere, I believe. Israel took up the cause of the victims with Netanyahu condemning the attack, itself a bit strange as he and the Israeli government have never cared overmuch about what happened to Muslims anywhere, and occurred while Israeli warplanes were busily savaging Gaza in one of their periodic onslaughts against the Palestinians cringing in their fish-barrel there. A VIDEO TOO MANY? But the oddest thing was the appearance of a video supposedly recorded by the shooter as his attack unfolded – I saw the short version on YouTube twice before it was pulled, with some sources claiming that the New Zealand government threatened severe criminal penalties for re-posting it. (ER: links to the longer version of the video can be found below) Now I am not in New Zealand so I cannot independently verify what did or did not happen. But I can tell you that I had the oddest reaction to the video of the actual shootings, apparently looking down the length of the rifle (presumably a variant of an AR-15) as the shooter fired while walking forward, then paused briefly to change magazines, then continued to shoot. My impression was that I was watching a sanitized version of one of those “soldier in combat” action games, and not an actual shooting. Why? My ten years in the US Marine Corps, including two tours in Vietnam with the 1st Marine Division, had me watching the video with a growing sense of disbelief. First, for all of the shooting going on, there were no screams – not from the wounded or the dying, and not from others present in the mosque, when there should have been a cacophony of screams – people generally do that when they are shot or in fear of being shot, yet not here. All one could hear was murmuring or chanting from somewhere in the near distance. Second, in the short video, as the shooter walked down halls firing as he went, there was no blood or other offal anywhere – yet .223 rounds make nasty wounds so there ought to have been blood – LOTS of blood – on the floors and walls everywhere. Nor was there any evidence of the outpouring of vomit, urine and feces that accompanies violent death, especially in those numbers. And third, there was no visible evidence along the shooter’s walkway of physical damage to walls, windows or doors from errant rounds or rounds that passed through victims and went on to hit something else. Yet from the amount of shooting going on, there ought to have been lots of physical damage visible to even the casual observer. There surely was no reason for anyone to feel the need to conceal it, so where was it? I cannot say. AND IN ANOTHER TIME AND PLACE The whole thing reminded me of other tragedies in other places that had different inconsistencies standing in stark contrast to the preferred official narrative of “whodunit” and why. One was the massacre in a gay night club in Florida, where a lone gunman stacked up scores of victims. Yet to be able to do that, he would have had to walk down the street and through the club with 20 or more magazines for his rifle, shooting & reloading as he went. It isn’t obvious to me how anyone even in prime condition (which the person named as the Florida shooter was not) could pull that off. Another was the San Bernadino CA incident, which I first heard about on the BBC (I prefer to get my news there rather than from the gossip gangs passing for newscasters in the U.S.). They described the shooters – based on a woman eye-witness in the building where the attacks were occurring – as three tall white men in black military fatigues with rifles (ER: see two eyewitness videos here). Yet they somehow morphed into a diminutive South Asian couple (conveniently dead), which took some serious magic. There were doubtless real tragedies in any or all of these and other incidents. But the devil is in the details, as the saying goes, and way too many of the details in way too many assassinations and mass shootings simply do not add up and are contrary to reason. Do I hear the phrase “false flag” anywhere?_______________________________________________________________________ *Dr. Alan Ned Sabrosky (PhD, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran. He served two tours in Vietnam with the 1st Marine Division and is a graduate of the US Army War College. He can be contacted at docbrosk@comcast.net ******** ER: The full-length version of the video (around 17 minutes) and the manifesto of Tarrant can be found at the Charles Carroll Society website. Scroll down through this article to obtain links to both.
(13) The New Zealand Shooting: What Happened And Why? - Scott Bennett, Ph.D The New Zealand Shooting: What Happened And Why? By Scott Bennett, Ph.D. (abd) Former U.S. Army Psychological Operations Officer and State Department Counterterrorism Contractor OVERVIEW There may be more to the New Zealand shooting event which just occurred than meets the eye. In fact, there is a very real possibility that it may have been the “Pearl Harbor” attack in a long campaign against President Trump, designed ultimately to neutralize the conservative republican base, weaken President Trump, and take-over America in a blitzkrieg of political turmoil. Here’s how, theoretically, the plan seems to be unfolding. FORENSIC ANALYSIS: Now let me first start out by saying that after thoroughly examining the 17 minute video of the shooter frame-by-frame, and after applying deductive reasoning in the forensic analysis, I am convinced this was a false-flag event for the following reasons: No bullet holes or shattered wood or glass or clouds of sheet rock or exploding plaster or cement can be observed or heard as the guns are firing into them and the victims. This is possible only when no solid projectile is fired from the muzzle, which means no solid bullets were fired into the walls, doors, windows, or victims bodies—only the concussion of air—which means either blanks or paint or gas or other non-solid projectiles were fired from the guns. This means, essentially, nothing solid impacted the victims bodies, therefore no physical damage resulted, which means no living person was lethally wounded or killed by an outside force. It’s simple physics, which Newton’s law establishes in the theorem: a body at rest stays at rest; a body in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. Applied to this situation, we might similarly establish that a living body remains living unless impacted by an outside force that lethally disrupts the body’s life processes, such as a bullet destroying arteries and vital organs. No blood splatter from the close-range impact of the high-caliber bullets upon the victims can be observed anywhere on the walls, doors, floors or furniture. Several of the victims are shot at point-blank range as they are crawling or passing by the shooter, yet no visual impact of the bullets can be observed, which would have undoubtedly “kicked” or “thrown” the victim with tremendous force. Only one victim lying on the ground appears to have a red spray appear next to his head as he is allegedly shot, but this could be explained as a “paint round”, since no physical impact of the bullet or explosion upon the head is observed. Additionally, no pools of blood can be seen either around the bodies on the floor after being shot, except from one body which strangely appears lying next to the first victim in the doorway, which was not present when the shooter initially entered. So this suggests the body or actor was placed in that position, with blood added afterwards. The victims’ physical reactions to being shot, especially at close-range, are not at all typical human reactions, as military and law enforcement experience and data confirm. Typically, the moment a person—especially a civilian—is shot, they instantly fall into a state of hysterical physical and emotional shock, delirium, panic, and desperation. Their bodies are flooded with adrenaline, triggering them to violently sprint, run, or crawl away from the source of the muzzle blast and deafening concussion. They do not simply fold up and fall to the ground like a sack of sand, and lie motionless. It is pure subconscious, animalistic instinctual self-preservation. Their body and instincts explode with movement in the first three (3) seconds, and their minds have no ability to stop it. There are also no screams of horror, rage, fear, or agony filling the air, only seemingly muffled moans. Upon leaving the Mosque, the shooter allegedly fires at a woman about 25 feet away at a corner of the yard, and upon walking outside, finds crying, “Help me, help me”, and lying on her side on the street, her face looking away, and holding her right wrist with her left hand. The shooter aims and fires at her at about 5-7 feet away, blowing a wad of her hair off of her scalp and seemingly causing a red substance to exit her wrist—which may have been a controlled device activated by the woman’s left hand which was holding her right. The presence of music playing in the background during the shooting event is also quite significant. At the beginning of the event, as the shooter is walking around the property, a pipe and drums band is playing an American patriotic tune, suggesting some kind of mission equivalent of a “American Founding Father type revolution.” Then as the shooter re-enters his car to escape; a voice giving a religious sermon begins screaming a bombastic “fire-and-brimstone” punishment type intro to a song that plays as the shooter drives away, running over the woman allegedly shot on the ground. Finally, as the shooter is driving down the street, several times he presses his shotgun muzzle against the windshield of his car and fires, but the windshield is not damaged or broken or penetrated by any bullet. Instead a smoky cloud bursts against the window and temporarily fills the cab of the car. He then fires out of the side passenger window at a man, and seemingly shatters the passenger door window. This may have been caused by the muzzle of the shotgun hitting the window of course, and not the result of a projectile being fired through it. The shooter then drives off with music playing in the background, either from his car radio or bluetooth headset, that resembles some kind of hokey Pulp Fiction type soundtrack, as he comments on the shooting thrills and challenges to his Youtube type audience. The video then stops. This has been excerpted from the Veterans Today article titled Undeniable Proof: CGI Used in New Zealand Shooting (continuing updates), which opens with the following video excerpt showing how the bullet casings magically disappear before falling to the ground {visit the link}
(14) Brendon O'Connell: Mosque Shooter Was Professionally Trained https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/03/brendon-oconnell-false-flag.html March 16, 2019 Vimeo took down Brendon's channel at 12.30 am EST Sunday but it is now on Bitchute (Video, left, updates us on Brendon O'Connell's quest for UN refugee status and his focus on Israeli/Russian penetration of US high tech. He also believes white nationalists are playing into the hands of the Illuminati. He says our legislators are uninformed and he urges listeners to lobby them.) Brenton Tarrant was no amateur gun nut. He displayed complete cold detachment when murdering 39 human beings in the first Mosque. No fear, no heavy breathing, no excitement. Just cool and calm. When driving to the second location he calmly states that if he had got to the Mosque a bit later he would have gotten more women. On viewing his self-made horror movie, the most glaring "fact" is the "fact" he is no amateur. by Brendon O'Connell (henrymakow.com) The guy was clearly trained. No if's, no buts. He was cool as a cucumber. He has done this before. The way he would reload - step back in the narrow hallway so there was less chance of being jumped as he reloaded. He is totally confident. The video is very disturbing, especially the young Muslim woman on the ground in front of the Mosque whimpering "Help me! Help me!" He blew the top of her head off. You do not handle an AR15, military-style semi-automatic assault rifle like that unless you have trained to clear jams and misfires in the efficient manner he displays. He darts back into cover, out of the expansive prayer hall into a narrow hallway to change magazines - this is not something you do naturally. This is military training. House clearing - to make it harder to be attacked while changing magazines. It is impossible to obtain an AR15 style assault rifle in Australia. Even a well connected organised crime figure would have trouble and you would immediately risk being on the "police radar" if you tried. So where did he train in their operation, tactics and handling? He was not long in New Zealand. He cannot buy firearms in New Zealand as an Australian citizen. Who brought them for him? Who supplied them? It is legal to own the AR15 he used and semi-automatic shotguns with the appropriate hunting licenses. Some claim his AR15 magazines were illegal 30 round. In the dock, he looks 5ft 4inches. Muscular. He looks special forces - small and powerful. How they like them. Travelled extensively. Especially in Europe. Claimed he was a simple working class lad - made his money investing in crypto, ie: he's a drug dealer. Absolutely he is. I knew a guy who worked security in Palestine when Arafat had casinos. He had no military training. He learned on the job. That's where I think that guy has come from. They claim he was in Pakistan, who knows. I just know what I saw in that video. He espouses a multitude of this-and-that politics claiming communist then anarchist, then libertarian and now he is not sure BUT he mentioned Mao and he draws from Julius Evola and "Sacred Tradition" which was Hitler's favourite book and Steve Bannon's too. Even though drawing from pure National Socialist water wells, the word "Jew" or "Jewish" never leaves his lips. He was playing Serbian folk music at one stage which the Chetniks would play as they fought the Croatian fascists. What a grab bag. I smell Bi Bi Henry. Who benefits? BiBi is about to make his own shooting video in Syria. Wag The Dog - "Change the story, change the lead, it's not a new concept."
(15) Why the New Zealand Mosque Attack Could Be a 'False-Flag' Mossad Operation baldrmedia On page 19 of his manifesto, the New Zealand shooter jokingly remarked: "Are you a Fed/shill/mossad agent/false flag/patsy/infiltrator/antifa/glow in the dark etc? No, but the next person to attack could be, so a healthy scepticism is a good thing." The shooter, Brenton Tarrant was, indeed, likely a CIA/Mossad asset. This becomes clear when observing that the shooter's writing and actions before the massacre associate himself, a "right-wing white male", with all of Israel's enemies and pro-European movements, discrediting them. Here are the clues. 1 The Dog Whistle: My Fellow White People On page 5 of the shooter's manifesto, Tarrant twice mentions he is "just a [sic] ordinary White [sic] man". It's the well-known dog whistle that some Jewish Twitter users have used to stealthily accuse white people of evil ("My fellow white men, ..."). Why would a white man need to stress he is, in fact, a white man? It should be more than obvious that Tarrant is white. 2 The "Uneducated White Male" Caricature The shooter claims to be uneducated, of lower class stock. Indeed, the manifesto is riddled with mixed writing styles, grammar, and spelling errors. The errors appear to make the shooter look "uneducated", which, in itself, is a pet peeve of the anti-white movement. They love to paint their white political adversaries as uneducated and ignorant. However, the poorly written manuscript could have been greatly improved had the author merely used a spelling checker. Since the document was posted as an MS Office .docx file, one has to wonder why the author didn't use the spelling and grammar tools? Or re-read his writing just once? The manifesto's poor writing quality was faked. 3 Too Stupid For Grammar, Yet So Smart He Profits from Bitconnect/Bitcoin On page 5, the author claims he invested in Bitconnect, and used the proceeds to fund his travels abroad since 2012. But Bitconnect.co was a Bitcoin lending platform that launched in 2016, along with its own cryptocurrency. Apparently, the shooter claims to have made a profit but Bitconnect went bankrupt in january of 2018. The currency dropped in value from $500 to $1. Unless it was the Mossad that ran Bitconnect, it is highly unlikely that an apparently uneducated white male like Brenton Tarrant could have made a profit of Bitconnect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitConnect
4 Iran Connection (1): Visits to North Korea, One of Iran's Few Political Allies 10907164-3x2-940x627.jpg (Picture of "Brenton Tarrant" visiting North Korea.) Though the manifesto fails to mention the shooter's trips to North Korea and Pakistan (the manifesto was intended for a white audience), Brenton visited both North Korea and Pakistan some time in 2018 or before. North Korea has economic and possibly nuclear ties with Iran, Israel's archenemy. It helps to associate the dictatorial regime of NK with the NZ massacre, especially if you are Israel and looking to further incriminate the regime. The subliminal message is, "white right-wing extremists love authoritarian regimes like North Korea's" 5 Iran Connection (2): Visits Shia-Muslim Hotel in Pakistan But NZ Victims Were Sunni-Muslim D1tU3vXX0AMSRSz.jpg The shooter visited Pakistan, a neighbor of Iran, just months before the attacks. During or shortly after the visit, he praised the Pakistani people for their hospitality. He posted this message on the Facebook page of Osho Than, the hotel he stayed at, which is run by Shia Muslims. The subliminal message is, "this white guy was influenced by Shia Muslims, then killed 49 Sunni Muslims". Shia Muslims, of course, are the majority in Iran, Israel's enemy. Sunni are the majority outside of Iran. The Sunni Muslims will want to retalliate against the evil Shia, which serves Israel's upcoming war against Iran. 6 Confirmed Presence of Paid Crisis Actors in the Massacre's Aftermath D1uWSjcWoAAKhcM.jpg 7 The Attack in Christchurch Will Forever Associate the Attacks with Christianity 8 The New Zealand Prime Minister Met with John Podesta in the Days Before the Shooting, and With Globalist Matriarch Hillary Clinton a Few Months Earlier download (1).jpg Podesta praised the female Prime Minister of New Zealand,https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12211429 9 NZ Prime Minister Fails to Lie to Your Face During the Press Conference After the attacks, the NZ Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern held a press conference. She emphasized that Muslims seeking a "better life" in NZ "are us" and that there might have been refugees and migrants among the dead. In the video, on three occasions, she says the attacks were "clearly" a vile act. The first time she says this, she looks straight into the camera with unblinking eyes. But the second and third time, she looks down and away. It's hard to lie to people's faces. A body language expert might need to look into this: 10 The "Doom"-Style First-Person Shooter Video Helps Condemn Video Games (That Teach White Kids How to Fight Back) 11 Tarrant's Strange Association with Serbian Nationalists (Who Opposed Islamic Immigration) In the live-streamed video, Tarrant played some music of an old Serbian nationalist outfit that supported Karadzic. The Serbs fought to keep mass Muslim immigration out of their country. The subliminal message is, "it is bad to keep Muslims out of your country". The link is also made with Russia, another supporter of Iran and enemy of Israel. 12 Tarrant Was an Expert Marksman In the live-stream, Tarrant hit moving targets from quite a distance. He had done this before. Where did he receive his training? Likely, from the Mossad/CIA. 13 Tarrant Made Sure His Face and License Plate Were Captured on Video download.jpg Why? It means he wanted to be caught (for the ensuing media and court show). It also means he wanted the media to show his white/whitish face to the world. Media complied. 14 Tarrant Was a Breivik-Copycat Like Breivik: Tarrant wore full military custume (to scare and paralyze people); had an overkill of guns, ammo and bombs at his disposal; shot people at point-blank range to make sure they were dead; worked calm and desensitized (like a trained soldier); shot unarmed people; killed people at two different places, traveled by car in between; didn't kill himself; showed a "right-wing" hand gesture in court (Breivik's fist, Tarrant's O.K. sign); smiled in contempt of court; had many if not hundreds of hours of target practice; It's almost... as if both attacks were orchestrated by the same outfit? They followed the same recipe, for sure. (16) Gates of Vienna, far from supporting Breivik & Tarrant, calls them 'Nut Cases' https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/03/pigs-and-monkeys-and-mossad-oh-my/ Pigs and Monkeys and Mossad, Oh My! Posted on March 27, 2019 by Dymphna [...] The nutjob who massacred those Muslims in New Zealand is being compared to Breivik. As I said at the time of ABB’s massacres, first in Oslo and later on Utøya island, people in a position of power who sincerely wanted to know the deeper reality behind his Manifesto needed to have a forensic analysis done on his work. Of course, they didn’t want the truth; they wanted the circus they created, so the real authors got away with murder. More murder than they’d planned on perpetrating, perhaps. Their monster had a mind of his own; he got away and then went off-script. They didn’t know ABB didn’t care if he got caught. ABB had plans for his incarceration. Besides, I think they sold him a bill of goods about being the leader of a neo-Nazi movement which would rise up and free him from that court. Later on, in prison, after Breivik sent out a formal retraction of “his” ideas to the major news media, admitting he’d been a neo-Nazi the whole time, the MSM ignored this plot twist. They liked him stuck in the hardened concrete they’d poured into his place in history so there he would stay, anti-Islamic to the end. This new nutjob, at the other end of the earth, is even now having the cement poured around him before it’s been determined if he’s sane. Or if he had help with composing his “manifesto”. Nope, they’re setting him in stone, and will carve the narrative to fit their own nefarious needs, Truth be damned. You can bet the annual OIC report on “Islamophobic attacks” will feature this one big time. Usually, all they have to write about is endless accounts of bacon left on the threshold of a mosque or some (easily removed) graffiti. Now they have a story with teeth, and we will hear them growling over it far longer than we heard about 9/11 or 7/7. Don’t you wonder what PR term will come to designate this NZ massacre? A mass killer is, ipso facto, crazy. It doesn’t matter if he’s legally ‘sane’, he’s still a whackjob. But then, so are those who claim his weapons belong to Mossad also insane. They are not only whackjobs, they’re selling their souls for anti-Semitic ABCs they took in with their mother’s milk.
(17) Port Arthur massacre: another False Flag, attested by Brigadier Ted Serong Pauline Hanson was caught on camera suggesting that the Port Arthur massacre was a government conspiracy; there were fresh calls for One Nation to be preferenced last at elections. Paulinesuggests Port Arthur massacre was a government conspiracy One Nation leader tells al-Jazeera reporter there are ‘a lot of questions’ about 1996 attack {end quote} Wikepedia's page on that massacre is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Arthur_massacre_(Australia) It makes no mention of Serong, or of 'conspiracy theories'; as if the facts are uncontested. But Brigadier Ted Serong, who was the commander of the Australian force in Vietnam, and an adviser to the US Army in Vietnam, said otherwise. Wikipedia's page on Serong is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Serong It makes no mention of his statements on the Port Arthur massacre. However, Serong's Obituary in the Sydney Morning Herald does so: https://www.smh.com.au/national/counter-insurgency-jungle-warrior-20021112-gdft9q.html Counter-insurgency jungle warrior John Farquharson November 12, 2002 {quote} His connection as patron of an extremist citizens' militia group called Ausi Freedom Scouts (Australians United for Survival and Freedom) caused some controversy, as did his conspiracy theory after the mass shootings at Port Arthur in 1996 and his opposition to the restrictive gun laws imposed after the Port Arthur killings. Serong contended that Martin Bryant could not have been the only shooter. Had Bryant been acting alone, there would have been fewer dead and more wounded. {end quote} The following is from the Foreword of Deadly Deception at Port Arthur, by Joe Vialls: https://www.2012unlimited.net/DPP_deadly.html {quote} In an interview with Frank Robson in the Sydney Morning Herald on 10 April 1999, Brigadier Serong makes it plain that Martin Bryant could not have been responsible for the mass murder at Port Arthur. "There was an almost satanic accuracy to that shooting performance;" he says. "Whoever did it is better than I am, and there are not too many people around here better than I am". He continues "Whoever did it had skills way beyond anything that could reasonably be expected of this chap Bryant ... if it was someone of only average skills, there would have been many less killed and many more wounded. It was the astonishing proportion of killed to wounded that made me open my eyes first off!" Brigadier Serong believes more than one person was involved and directly infers that the mass murder at Port Arthur was a terrorist action designed to undermine Australian national security. "It was part of a deliberate attempt to disarm the population, but I don't believe John Howard or his Government were involved. Howard is being led down a track. He doesn't know where it's leading, and he doesn't much care..." {endquote}
(18) Mossad's history of Deception, Assassination, Impersonation and Betrayal - by Peter Myers, March 28, 2019; update March 29, 2019 Victor Ostrovsky, a former Mossad agent, revealed that its motto is "By way of deception, thou shalt do war". Israel used Deception to seize East Jerusalem during the 1967 war, as explained by by Peter Hounam: Operation Cyanide: Why the Bombing of the USS Liberty Nearly Caused World War III by Peter Hounam (London, 2003, Vision publishers) Using American-supplied technology, the Israelis intercepted messages between Egypt and Jordan, reconstructed them, and passed them on. This is called 'coooking'. The Egyptians told the Jordanians that Israel was winning the war. But, Anthony Pearson explained, "The Israelis blocked these transmissions and re-worded them to misinform Hussein that three-quarters of the Israeli Air Force had been destroyed over Cairo and the 300 plus aircraft he was now picking up on radar approaching Jordan were Egyptian jets sent to raid targets in Israel. They were, in fact, Israeli aircraft returning from the destruction of Egyptian airfields." ... "the Israelis continued to cook the Arab transmissions to give both the Egyptians and the Jordanians an impression the war was going favourably for the Arabs." (pp. 193-4). "The falsified signals deceived Jordan into believing Egypt was winning the war; it helped lure King Hussein into making a military gesture of support and thereby provided Israel with the pretext it needed to grab the West Bank and the prized parts of Jerusalem" (pp. 251-2). Pearsons' account of 'cooking' signals was confirmed by Joe Sorrels, a former correspondent for The Guardian. He stated that he had helped train a team of Israelis to do it. "One of his team was a fluent Egyptian speaker who could imitate voices - for example, those coming from the Egyptian high command. "Exactly as Pearson had described, the special equipment could suppress incoming signals coming from Cairo and misleading messages could be transmitted to field units in the Sinai, or Egypt's allied forces in Jordan." (p. 198) Mahmoud Kassem, a senior official in the Egyptian Foreign Ministry, claimed that the USS Liberty was sunk because it had picked up evidence of compromising covert operations. ... Kassem focused on the 'cooking' of signals. Jordan had not joined the war. "But suddenly, after what was believed to be a telephone call from President Nasser alleging the sweeping advances of Egyptian troops into Israeli territory, King Hussein decided to join the fighting. He hoped to be included in a victory of the Egyptian Army with little or no Jordanian sacrifice. Unfortunately, President Nasser never telephoned King Hussein. It was a trap set by the Israelis to bring Jordan into the fiasco. For the Israelis, the big prize for such a fatal jump by the Jordanians was to conquer not only the West Bank of the Jordan, but all of East Jerusalem. ... 'As to how the Israelis managed to imitate Nasser's voice, it was not a problem. They recorded a voice and words from previous speeches and calls and composed the fake call to King Hussein.'" (pp. 211-2) Ostrovsky wrote that Mossad later 'cooked' signals - ostentibly from Libya - to deceive Western intelligence agencies and governments into bombing Libya. The following is from his book The Other Side of Deception (HarperCollinsPublishers, New York 1994): "Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world (or, as they were called by the Libyans, Peoples' Bureaus). As the Mossad had hoped, the transmissions were deciphered by the Americans and construed as ample proof that the Libyans were active sponsors of terrorism. What's more, the Americans pointed out, Mossad reports confirmed it." (pp. 113-6) As a result, on April 14, 1986, American aircraft dropped over sixty tons of bombs on Libya. More at http://mailstar.net/ostrovsky.html Ari Ben-Menashe, another former Israeli intelligence officer, revealed Israel's impersonation of Palestinian terrorists, in his book Profits of War: The Sensational Story of the World-Wide Arms Conspiracy (Allen & Unwin, Sydney 1992). During the Iran-Iraq War, Israel accumulated a slush fund from arms sales to Iran; the US was supplying Iraq, the aim being to get them to destroy each other. Ben-Menashe states that {quote} the slush fund helped finance the intelligence community's "black" operations around the world. These included funding Israeli-controlled "Palestinian terrorists" who would commit crimes in the name of the Palestinian revolution but were actually pulling them off, usually unwittingly, as part of the Israeli propaganda machine. {endnote, p. 120} More at http://mailstar.net/vanunu.html 911 was a Mossad operation using Moslem patsies. The result was the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria - 18 years of war and still going on. Not for Oil, but for Israel. Why shouldn't Mossad impersonate White Nationalists, too? Mossad's Dubai Assassination used stolen identities. In 2004, Mossad was caught trying to obtain New Zealand identities for its spies. They also fraudulently used Canadian passports. Mossad's caputure of Modecai Vanunu made fools of the Australian and British intelligence agencies, as Ben-Menashe shows (above). Ostrovsky revealed that Mossad is assisted by a network of Sayanim. -- Peter Myerswebsite: http://mailstar.net/index.html |
Archives >