(1) Error: Photo with Rabbis is not Bill Gates(2) Emails reveal Fauci knew that COVID-19 may have been 'engineered', as he was downplaying it(3) Fauci & Daszak colluded to suppress Lab Origin evidence(4) Amazon and Barnes & Noble bury Fauci's book amid email revelations(5) "The spike protein is a toxin ... we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin"(6) CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'd(7) Michael Yeadon sees "a serious attempt at mass depopulation"(1) Error: Photo with Rabbis is not Bill GatesFrom: "Henry Balfour" <henry@404.co.nz>Subject: RE: Bill Gates with two Rabbis, Gates wearing yarmulkeBill Gates with the two rabbis  -  but it's not Bill Gates.  Why did you dothis?It's clearly a photo of the journalist writing the article ...Reply (Peter M.)Someone sent it to me, as a photo of Bill Gates.It very much looked like Bill Gates in his moptop days. I did a Google image search, and found the Jerusalem Post article.But you must be right. This must be a photo of Yosef I. Abramowitz.(2) Emails reveal Fauci knew that COVID-19 may have been 'engineered', as he was downplaying it - NY POST EDITORIALhttps://nypost.com/2021/06/02/fauci-emails-all-the-more-reason-for-us-to-get-to-bottom-of-covid-origins/OPINION EDITORIALFauci emails all the more reason for US to get to bottom of COVID originsBy Post Editorial BoardJune 2, 2021 | 10:39pm | UpdatedEmails reveal Fauci knew that COVID-19 may have been 'engineered' – as he was downplaying itSo Dr. Anthony Fauci in the pandemic's early months was casting doubt on the lab-leak theory of COVID's origins — even as he was also receiving at least one alert from a genomic researcher that "some of the features look (potentially) engineered."Notably, he forwarded "anti-conspiracy theory" articles that quoted Peter Daszak — the head of a US nonprofit that used some grant money from Fauci's agency to fund coronavirus work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — -attacking the lab-leak idea. Daszak and others wrote Fauci personally to thank him for dumping on the theory.We still don't know if the virus evolved normally and somehow jumped to humans, but Chinese researchers have been searching hard for evidence of the bug in some intermediate species (as the "natural" theory would require) and have so far come up empty.Meanwhile, Beijing refuses to cooperate in any meaningful independent investigation — and even launched a trade war with Australia after Aussie leaders called for such a probe.For a year, we've been told to "trust the science" — but Fauci, our leading scientist, made declarations that certain theories were "debunked" when they weren't. Why did he back up Daszak's self-serving dismissal of the lab theory with no real evidence — when, in fact, he was getting e-mail evidence to the contrary?These revelations don't ease the growing concern that US taxpayer cash might have helped unleash this plague.All of it is just more reason for the Biden administration to get to the bottom of the mystery — and make getting China to cooperate at last the No. 1 issue in talks with Beijing. And all the more reason, as we've argued before, that Fauci needs to stop being the spokesperson for America's pandemic response.(3) Fauci & Daszak colluded to suppress Lab Origin evidencehttps://meaww.com/peter-Daszak-disease-expert-wuhan-lab-thanked-fauci-email-wuhan-lab-leakAnthony Fauci emails: Who is Peter Daszak? Expert thanked doc for denying Wuhan lab theoryPeter Daszak, who had collaborated with the director at Wuhan Institute of Technology, Shi Zhengli, thanked Dr Anthony Fauci for supporting the 'bat-to-human' virus origin theoryBy Sayantani NathUpdated On : 01:39 PST, Jun 2, 2021In the wake of the Fauci email leak, another name has come to light in connection with US funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, had thanked Dr Anthony Fauci for publicly dismissing the Wuhan lab-leak theory in an April 2020 email, published by BuzzFeed. EcoHealth Alliance is the organization that granted $3.4 million funding from the National Institutes of Health to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).Daszak has always denied the Wuhan lab-leak theory. He has vehemently refuted allegations that the Covid-19 virus was the product of an experiment and originally was leaked from the WIV, before creating a worldwide pandemic. However, in his mail to Fauci dated April 18, 2020, Daszak wrote, "I just wanted to say a personal thank you on behalf of our staff and collaborators, for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for Covid-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology."The British zoologist and disease ecology expert was a member of the WHO team sent to China to probe the origin of the novel coronavirus. Daszak had previously collaborated with Shi Zhengli for many years, who is the director at Wuhan Institute of Technology. His nonprofit organization EcoHealth Alliance helps support several public health programs across the globe and facilitates, specifically targeted actions on pandemic prevention.Daszak holds a PhD in parasitic infectious diseases from the University of East London. He started his career at the School of Life Sciences at Kingston University, before moving to the US. There he worked at the Institute of Ecology at University of Georgia, followed by the National Center of Infectious Diseases. With commendable success in his field, Daszak became the executive director at Consortium for Conservation Medicine. He also held adjunct positions at top universities of the UK and USA.Peter Daszak (TEDMED)Peter Daszak's research primarily centered around conservation medicine and is one of the early proponents of the concept. He has investigated and predicted the impact of new diseases on human population, wildlife, and livestock. As a matter of fact, he has been involved in extensive research on past epidemics like Nipah virus, Hendra virus, SARS-1, Avian influenza, and West Nile virus.Since 2014, Daszak has led a project on the emergence of novel zoonotic coronaviruses (CoV) that originate from bats. After the breakout of the Covid-19 virus in China, he wrote an op-ed article in February 2020 for New York Times, where he stated that he had warned WHO experts about the next pandemic. The pandemic would be "caused by an unknown, novel pathogen that hadn't yet entered the human population," he claimed to have said back in 2018, naming it Disease X.Did Covid-19 come from a lab leak?A recent paper published by scientists Angus Dalgleish and Birger Sørensen claimed that Covid-19 was made by China in Wuhan Lab. Now, the leakage of Fauci's emails and the mail sent to him by Daszak, has urged many to suspect a conspiracy behind the pandemic.Daszak and his nonprofit EcoHealth had been researching coronavirus in China for quite a while, even prior to the pandemic. In May 2020, it emerged that the Trump administration had abruptly frozen the funding for his research. "President Donald Trump alleged – without providing evidence – that the pandemic virus had escaped from a Chinese laboratory supported by the NIH grant, and vowed to end the funding," claimed an article published in the journal Science.In his April 18 mail to Fauci, Daszak further added, "From my perspective, your comments are brave, and coming from your trusted voice, will help dispel the myths being spun around the virus's origins." He received a reply as well from the Chief Medical Advisor, who wrote, "Many thanks for your kind note." Though Fauci had consistently maintained the natural origin theory of the coronavirus, in May 2021 he stated that he was 'not convinced' the virus developed naturally.If you have a news scoop or an interesting story for us, please reach out at (323) 421-7514(4) Amazon and Barnes & Noble bury Fauci's book amid email revelationshttps://www.rt.com/usa/525519-fauci-book-disappears-amazon/That was unexpected: Amazon, Barnes & Noble memory-hole Fauci's book amid email revelations2 Jun, 2021 22:57That was unexpected: Amazon, Barnes & Noble memory-hole Fauci's book amid email revelationsMajor book retailers have scrubbed Dr. Anthony Fauci's book on "leadership" in times of the pandemic just a day after announcing it, as a massive cache of emails emerged painting the coronavirus czar in less than flattering light.Searches for 'Expect the Unexpected: Ten Lessons on Truth, Service, and the Way Forward' on both Amazon US and Barnes & Noble booksellers returned "page not found" results on Wednesday.No official explanation was offered by either company. Fauci's publisher, National Geographic Books, said in a statement that the book was taken down because it had been "prematurely posted for pre-sale."They also said the book was being developed "in connection" with the upcoming National Geographic documentary about Fauci, and that he would not be earning any profits or royalties from it.However, the website of National Geographic Books made no mention of Fauci's book, not even as an upcoming release (unlike several others, some still lacking titles). 'Expect the Unexpected' book was also still available for preorder on Amazon's overseas websites – UK, Germany and Japan – as well as the Australian retailer Booktopia.Announced Tuesday for publication on November 2, the book was supposed to be a compilation of interviews over Fauci's 34-year career as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and discuss his role in leading the US response to the Covid-19 pandemic."Those looking to live a more compassionate and purposeful life will find inspiration in his unique perspective on leadership, expecting the unexpected, and finding joy in difficult times," said the overview at the Barnes & Noble website, now removed. It had also described Fauci as "America's most trusted doctor."What changed between Tuesday and Wednesday was the publication of a massive cache of emails to and from Fauci, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by BuzzFeed. While it and other corporate outlets – such as the Washington Post and CNN – put a positive spin on the revelations, internet sleuths quickly posted screenshots of emails that painted an entirely different picture.Among them was Fauci's correspondence with Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance nonprofit, thanking the bureaucrat for "publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology." Daszak was working with the WIV to research bat coronaviruses, using money given to EcoHealth by Fauci's institute.Another shows his deputy Hugh Auchincloss telling Fauci about a 2015 report on gain-of-function research on a "SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses," adding that he was looking to establish "if we have any distant ties to this work abroad."Fauci famously denied that his institute had any role in any gain-of-function research last month, when grilled by Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) in the latest of their many committee clashes.Unnamed Trump administration officials also reportedly claimed Fauci was the key force behind the US government lifting a longstanding ban on such research – back in December 2017, when the Department of Health and Human Services issued a revised gain-of-function guidance though it was under an acting secretary at the time.Fauci, reportedly the highest-paid official in the US government, was a key player on the White House coronavirus task force during the Trump administration, advocating for lockdowns, mask mandates and school closures. He has been a fixture on cable news channels and magazine covers, and has come to be regarded by Democrats as the highest authority on how to deal with the pandemic. President Joe Biden elevated him to his chief medical adviser.(5) "The spike protein is a toxin ... we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin"https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/06/03/21BIG PHARMA › NEWS'We Made a Big Mistake' — COVID Vaccine Spike Protein Travels From Injection Site, Can Cause Organ DamageResearch obtained by a group of scientists shows the COVID vaccine spike protein can travel from the injection site and accumulate in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in "quite high concentrations" in the ovaries.By Megan RedshawCOVID vaccine researchers had previously assumed mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like traditional vaccines. The vaccine's spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the injection site at the shoulder muscle or local lymph nodes.But new research obtained by a group of scientists contradicts that theory, a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher said last week."We made a big mistake. We didn't realize it until now," said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario. "We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin."Bridle, who was awarded a $230,000 grant by the Canadian government last year for research on COVID vaccine development, said he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to Pfizer's "biodistribution study."Biodistribution studies are used to determine where an injected compound travels in the body, and which tissues or organs it accumulates in."It's the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination," Bridle said in an interview with Alex Pierson where he first disclosed the data. "Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It's very disconcerting."The Sars-CoV-2 has a spike protein on its surface. That spike protein is what allows it to infect our bodies, Bridle explained. "That is why we have been using the spike protein in our vaccines," Bridle said. "The vaccines we're using get the cells in our bodies to manufacture that protein. If we can mount an immune response against that protein, in theory we could prevent this virus from infecting the body. That is the theory behind the vaccine.""However, when studying the severe COVID-19, […] heart problems, lots of problems with the cardiovascular system, bleeding and clotting, are all associated with COVID-19,"  he added. "In doing that research, what has been discovered by the scientific community, the spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation."When the purified spike protein is injected into the blood of research animals, they experience damage to the cardiovascular system and the protein can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to the brain, Bridle explained.The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle shows the COVID spike protein gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulates in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in "quite high concentrations" in the ovaries."We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein, Bridle said. "It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation."A large number of studies have shown the most severe effects of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID, such as blood clotting and bleeding, are due to the effects of the spike protein of the virus itself.A recent study in Clinical and Infectious Diseases led by researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard Medical School measured longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 recipients of the Moderna vaccine 1 and 29 days after the first dose and 1-28 days after the second dose.Out of these individuals, 11 had detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 protein in blood plasma as early as one day after the first vaccine dose, including three who had detectable levels of spike protein. A "subunit" protein called S1, part of the spike protein, was also detected.Spike protein was detected an average of 15 days after the first injection, and one patient had spike protein detectable on day 29 –– one day after a second vaccine dose –– which disappeared two days later.The results showed S1 antigen production after the initial vaccination can be detected by day one and is present beyond the injection site and the associated regional lymph nodes.Assuming an average adult blood volume of approximately 5 liters, this corresponds to peak levels of approximately 0.3 micrograms of circulating free antigen for a vaccine designed only to express membrane-anchored antigen.In a study published in Nature Neuroscience, lab animals injected with purified spike protein into their bloodstream developed cardiovascular problems. The spike protein also crossed the blood-brain barrier and caused damage to the brain.It was a grave mistake to believe the spike protein would not escape into the blood circulation, according to Bridle. "Now, we have clear-cut evidence that the vaccines that make the cells in our deltoid muscles manufacture this protein — that the vaccine itself, plus the protein — gets into blood circulation," he said.Bridle said the scientific community has discovered the spike protein, on its own, is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels, Bridle said. "When that happens it can do one of two things. It can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting — that's exactly why we've been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding," he added.Both clotting and bleeding are associated with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Bridle also said the spike protein in circulation would explain recently reported heart problems in vaccinated teens.Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientists at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said it is now clear vaccine content is being delivered to the spleen and the glands, including the ovaries and the adrenal glands, and is being shed into the medium and then eventually reaches the bloodstream causing systemic damage."ACE2 receptors are common in the heart and brain," she added. "And this is how the spike protein causes cardiovascular and cognitive problems."Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric rheumatologist, warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December mRNA vaccines could cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways not assessed in safety trials.In a public submission, Whelan sought to alert the FDA to the potential for vaccines designed to create immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to instead cause injuries.Whelan was concerned the mRNA vaccine technology utilized by Pfizer and Moderna had "the potential to cause microvascular injury (inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi) to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials."(6) CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'dhttps://off-guardian.org/2021/05/18/how-the-cdc-is-manipulating-data-to-prop-up-vaccine-effectiveness/May 18, 2021  616How the CDC is manipulating data to prop-up "vaccine effectiveness"New policies will artificially deflate "breakthrough infections" in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.Kit KnightlyThe US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for "Covid19" in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy "vaccines" are effective at preventing the alleged disease.They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).The trick is in their reporting of what they call "breakthrough infections" – that is people who are fully "vaccinated" against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:False-postive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of "Covid case", used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a "Covid19 case", even if they never experienced any symptoms.Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.Firstly, they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected "breakthrough infections".From the CDC's instructions for state health authorities on handling "possible breakthrough infections" (uploaded to their website in late April):For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ?28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s.Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of "breakthrough infections" being officially recorded.Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as "covid cases".That's right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don't result in hospitalisation or death.From their website:As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a "Covid case" but only if you've been vaccinated.The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.Consider…Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a "covid case".Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn't die they are NOT a Covid case.Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they're not officially a Covid case either.The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a "disease" that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to "Covid" since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show "Covid" is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimise the other.What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?(7) Michael Yeadon sees "a serious attempt at mass depopulation"https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/05/15/planet-lockdown.aspxAre We Being Set Up for Mass Depopulation?by Dr. Joseph MercolaMay 15, 2021STORY AT-A-GLANCEMichael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer, fears the combination of vaccine passports and booster vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants may be part of a mass depopulation agendaAsymptomatic spread is a fallacy capitalized upon to spread fear and induce compliance. Only people who have discernible symptoms of a respiratory infection pose any health risk to others, because to be an efficient source of infection, you need a high viral load. If you have a high viral load, your immune system will fight back, which always induces symptomsThe myth of asymptomatic spread was used to justify lockdowns, which in turn were a tool get you used to giving up your freedoms and go along with the intentional decimation of the global economy and old way of life, thereby justifying the Great ResetThe Great Reset is about transferring global wealth and ownership rights to the technocratic elite, and giving them the power to control the world's nationsDigital vaccine passports will form the foundation of an unprecedented surveillance and control platform into which your entire life will be tied, from health records to biometric ID, to an all-digital centralized banking system and a social credit system, all of which can be turned off in order to coerce you into a particular behaviorHow do you market and implement a financial system that nobody would want if they understood its full ramifications — a change so huge that it not only would mean the end of currency as we know it, but a total revision of sovereignty and individual rights?In the interview above, which is part of the full-length documentary "Planet Lockdown,"1 Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer, shares his views on the COVID-19 pandemic, fast-tracked COVID-19 "vaccines," the issue of mutated virus variants and the need for booster shots, and how this manufactured crisis is being used to strip us of our civil liberties.Are You Putting the Pieces Together?Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based Ph.D. in respiratory pharmacology. He's spent 32 years of his career working for large pharmaceutical companies, and 10 years in the biotechnology sector."I'm in favor of all modes of new medical treatments, whether they're biologicals or vaccines, small molecules, creams, sprays, ointments, whatever, but I'm fervently against unsafe medicines or medicines used in an inappropriate context," Yeadon says."Some of the things I'm going to say are not favorable to the current crop of gene-based vaccines and it's [because] they're being inappropriately used. I don't think they have a sufficient safety profile to be used as a sort of wide-spectrum public health prophylactic …A few things have allowed me, I think, to spot what's going on in the world at the moment. One, I've loved biology since I was little. I've been continuing to learn and to apply biology broadly, whether it's pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology [or] toxicology. I've got a very broad grounding in all things to do with life science, in terms of health and disease.[Secondly], one of my former supervisors said that I had a remarkable facility that stood out above the sort of ordinary things you'd have to do to be a vice president or a CEO. He said I was able to spot patterns in sparse data earlier than my peers. So, when there's not enough data for most people to judge what was going on, I would often be able to see it.I could see a pattern forming when there wasn't quite enough information … On this occasion, it allowed me, quite quickly, to work out that what we were being told about this virus and what we needed to do in order to stay safe was simply not true."A Massive Fraud Has Been PerpetratedYeadon starts out by highlighting the "enormous changes" made in the U.K.'s attribution of causes of deaths. If you die within 28 days of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, you are counted as a COVID-19 death, regardless of other underlying conditions. The same thing was done in the U.S. As noted by Yeadon:"We've never had anything as absurd as the rule that is now used. It's not just a matter of disagreeing professionally. It's just complete nonsense."The shutdown of businesses and forcing healthy people to self-isolate also makes no sense. Yeadon points out that only people who are ill, who have discernible symptoms of a respiratory infection, pose any health risk to others:"To be a good, efficient source of infection, you have to have a lot of virus. And if you have a lot of viruses attacking you, you are fighting back. That process produces symptoms, inevitably, not just occasionally. It must always happen …And those people are not people who are walking around in the community, because if you're full of virus and symptomatic, you are also ill, and ill people tend to stay at home or in bed."Asymptomatic spread, which has no sound basis, was used to justify lockdowns, which never had any basis in fact or science either. Lockdowns were implemented for entirely other reasons, namely to get you used to giving up your freedoms and your normal way of life, and to make you psychologically dependent on an outside source telling you when it's OK to do what.It's obedience training and a tool to get the population of the world to go along with the intentional decimation of the global economy and old way of life, thereby justifying the Great Reset, which is about transferring global wealth and ownership rights to the technocratic elite, and giving them the power to control the world's nations."Basically, everything your government has told you about this virus, everything you need to do to stay safe, is a lie," Yeadon says. "Every part of it … None of the key themes that you hear talked about — from asymptomatic transmission to top-up vaccines [i.e., booster shots] — not one of those things is supported by the science.Every piece is cleverly chosen adjacently to something that probably is true, but is itself a lie, and has led people to where we are right now. I don't normally use phrases like this, but I think we are standing at the very gates of hell … It's all about control …The reason I'm commenting is because I believe it's not just about my life. More importantly, [it's the lives] of my children and grandchildren that are being stolen … by a systematic process of fear and control that's going to culminate in, I think, some very horrible times, and I'm desperate to wake you up …We're probably quite used to politicians occasionally telling white lies, and we kind of let them, but when they lie to you about something technical, something that you can check, and they do it [with] many, many elements of the whole event, then please, you've got to believe me, [they're] not telling the truth.And if they're not telling the truth, that means there's something else. And I'm here to tell you that there is something very, very bad happening. If you don't pay attention, you will soon lose any chance to do anything about it."Science Has Been Turned on Its HeadYeadon rightly notes that everything we've known about virology and infectious disease has been turned upside down during this pandemic. None of the standard responses known to protect people from infectious disease was followed. Normally, you quarantine the sick to contain the infection.Locking down entire societies has never been done and has no foundation in science or the history of epidemic control. Similarly, mass testing people without symptoms is without precedence. It simply isn't done, and for good reason. It's a waste of resources because as Yeadon explained earlier, we know how viruses spread. This isn't our first rodeo. We've dealt with infectious epidemics before.We know how viruses work in the body. When you have an active infection, you develop symptoms as your body mounts its defense. Without symptoms, your viral load is too low to pose a threat, either to yourself or others. The myth about asymptomatic spread has been a fear tactic.T-Cell Immunity Is Far More Important Than AntibodiesYeadon goes on to review how we've been misled about immunity and how your body fights off viruses. You've probably heard that the thing that gives you immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies.The entire vaccination campaign is built around the premise that by injecting a synthetic piece of viral RNA into your cells, your body will start producing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, in response to which your body will produce specific antibodies that recognize that protein. This is also known as humoral immunity.However, while antibodies are important, especially in bacterial infections, antibodies are not the only part of your immunity. More importantly, immunity against viruses — opposed to bacteria — actually does not depend on antibodies. Yeadon explains:"Viruses are really tiny, and their business is to get as quickly as they can inside your cells. So, they bind to a receptor on the surface and inject themselves into your cell. So, they're inside. Antibodies are big molecules and they're generally outside your cells.So just think about that for a moment. Antibodies and viruses are in separate compartments. The virus is inside the cell, the antibodies outside the cell. I'm not saying antibodies have no role, but they're really not very important. This has been proven. There are some people in whom a natural experiment has occurred.They have a defect and they actually don't make antibodies, but they're able to fight off COVID-19, the virus SARS-CoV-2, quite well. The way they do that is, they have T-cell immunity, cellular immunity. [T-cells] are cells that are trained to detect virus-infected cells and to kill those cells. That's how you defend yourself against a virus.So, all of these mentions of antibody levels, it's just bunk. It is not a good measure of whether or not you're immune. It does give evidence that you've been infected, but their persistence is not important as to whether you've got immunity …We've known this for decades. We've known about T-cells for decades. They were clearly in my undergraduate textbooks. And we've known about their importance in defending you against respiratory viruses since probably the 1970s, certainly the 1980s. So, don't believe anything where people suggest to you that their role is uncertain. We've known for a very long time that they are absolutely central."Antibodies Are Not the Answer to VariantsThe central role of T-cell immunity, or cellular immunity, becomes particularly pertinent when discussing the threat of variants, mutated forms of SARS-CoV-2. As mentioned, your immune system is a multifaceted system that allows your body to mount defenses against all sorts of threats. Parasites, fungi, bacteria and viruses are the main threat categories.Each of these invades and threatens you in completely different ways, and your immune system has ways of dealing with all of them, using a variety of mechanisms."You've got four or five different arms of the immune system: innate immunity, mucosal, antibody, T-cells and compliment[ary systems]," Yeadon says."There are all of these different wonderful systems that have integrated, one with another, because it needs to defend you against all sorts of different threats in the environment. What I'm telling you is that the emphasis on antibodies in respect of respiratory viral infections is wrong, and you can establish that quite easily by doing some searching."In essence, what Yeadon is saying is that whether you're going to be susceptible to variants has very little to do with whether or not you have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, because antibodies are not your primary defense against viruses. Your T-cells are the ones doing the heavy lifting.What this means then, is that getting booster shots for different variants is not going to help you. It will not solve the problem, because these shots do not strengthen your T-cell immunity.Carefully Rethink Need for Booster ShotsOf all the lies we've been told over the past year, the ones that worry and frighten Yeadon the most are the lies about virus variants and booster shots. In fact, he believes not buying into these lies may be key to your very survival, and here's why:"It's quite normal for RNA viruses like SARS-CoV-2, when it replicates, to make typographical errors. It's got a very good error detection, error correction system so it doesn't make too many typos, but it does make some, and those are called 'variants.'It's really important to know that if you find the variant that's most different from the sequence identified in Wuhan, that variance … is only 0.3% different from the original sequence.I'll say it another way. If you find the most different variance, it's 99.7% identical to the original one, and I can assure you … that amount of difference is absolutely NOT possibly able to represent itself to you as a different virus."He explains how, earlier in the pandemic, scientists obtained blood from patients who had been sickened with the SARS virus 17 or 18 years ago. SARS-CoV-1, responsible for that SARS outbreak, is 80% similar to SARS-CoV-2.They wanted to know if the immune systems of these patients would be able to recognize SARS-CoV-2. They did. They still had memory T-cells against SARS-CoV-1, and those cells also recognized SARS-CoV-2, despite being only 80% similar. Now, if a 20% difference was not enough to circumvent the immune system of these patients, why should you be concerned with a variant that is at most 0.3% different from the original SARS-CoV-2?"When your government scientists tell you that a variant that's 0.3% different from SARS-CoV-2 could masquerade as a new virus and be a threat to your health, you should know, and I'm telling you, they are lying," Yeadon says."If they're lying, and they are, why is the pharmaceutical industry making top-up [booster] vaccines? You should be terrified at this point, as I am, because there's absolutely no possible justification for their manufacture. And the world's medicines regulators have said, 'Because they are quite similar to the original vaccines … we won't be asking them to do any clinical safety studies.'"Are We Seeing a Mass Depopulation Agenda in Action?Yeadon stresses that variants simply aren't different enough to represent a threat, which is why you don't now, and won't in the future, need one or more booster shots. Yet they're already being made, and regulators are giving them a free pass when it comes to safety and efficacy studies."I'm very frightened of that. There's no possible benign interpretation of this," Yeadon says. "I believe they're going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. Seriously. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation.This will provide the tools to do it, and plausible deniability. They'll create another story about some sort of biological threat and you'll line up and get your top-up vaccines, and a few months or a year or so later, you'll die of some peculiar inexplicable syndrome. And they won't be able to associate it with the vaccines.That's my belief — that they're lying to you about variants so they can make damaging top-up vaccines that you don't need at all. I think they will be used for malign purposes … We know that the people [SARS-CoV-2] injures and kills are only people who are elderly and or ill, usually both, so we're talking about less than 0.1% [of the population] …Given that this virus represents, at worst, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than influenza, and a smaller risk [than influenza] to almost everyone else … it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn't need to do anything. [We didn't need] lockdowns, masks, mass testing, vaccines.There are multiple therapeutic drugs that are at least as effective as the vaccines are. They're already available and cheap. Inhaled corticosteroids that are used in asthma reduced symptomatology by about 90%.An off-patent drug called ivermectin, one of the most widely-used drugs in the world, is also able to reduce symptoms at any stage of the disease, including lethality by about 90%. So, you don't need vaccines and you don't need any of the measures that have been introduced at all."Key Safety Concerns of mRNA 'Vaccines'In December 2020, Yeadon filed a petition2 calling on the European Medicine Agency to halt Phase 3 clinical trials of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine until they've been restructured to address critical safety concerns. Of course, those trials were not halted. The four key safety concerns Yeadon specified in his petition3 were:1.The potential for formation of non-neutralizing antibodies that can trigger an exaggerated immune reaction (referred to as paradoxical immune enhancement or antibody-dependent immune amplification) when the individual is exposed to the real "wild" virus post-vaccination.Antibody-dependent amplification has been repeatedly demonstrated in coronavirus vaccine trials on animals.4 While the animals initially tolerated the vaccine well and had robust immune responses, they later became severely ill or died when infected with the wild virus. Put plainly, the vaccine increased their susceptibility to the virus and made them more likely to die from the infection.2.Pfizer's mRNA vaccine contains polyethylene glycol (PEG), and studies have shown 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance. This suggests PEG may trigger fatal allergic reactions in many who receive the vaccine.Indeed, within days of the vaccine's release, reports started coming in of people having life-threatening anaphylactic reactions,5 leading to warnings that people with known allergies should not take the Pfizer vaccine.6 Since then, anaphylactic reactions have been reported by recipients of the Moderna mRNA vaccine as well.73.The mRNA vaccine triggers your body to produce antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and spike proteins in turn contain syncytin-homologous proteins that are essential for the formation of placenta. If a woman's immune system starts reacting against syncytin-1, then there is the possibility she could become infertile.This is an issue that none of the vaccine studies is looking at specifically. Mass vaccinating women of childbearing age against COVID-19 could potentially have the devastating consequence of causing mass infertility if the vaccine triggers an immune reaction against syncytin-1.4.The studies are far too brief in duration to allow a realistic estimation of side effects. Depending on what those effects end up being, millions of people may be exposed to unacceptable risk in return for a very minor benefit.Health Freedom Undermined in the Name of 'Emergency'Even more fundamental than any particular safety concern is the fact that a vaccination campaign of this magnitude, using an entirely novel technology, sets a most dangerous public health precedent. By drumming up unnecessary panic, many are now willing to forgo all manner of freedom in the name of responding to a global health emergency.One of these core freedoms is your right to refuse an experimental medical procedure. This freedom was acknowledged in the Nuremberg Code of 19478 and enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which states that "no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation."9Yet despite that, and despite the fact that clinical vaccine trials are still two years out from being completed, governments around the world are talking about making these vaccinations mandatory, or blackmailing people to take them against their will by encouraging private businesses to restrict access to vaccinated-only.As noted by Yeadon and many others, the implementation of vaccine passports has nothing to do with protecting public health and everything to do with setting into place a surveillance, tracking and control mechanism that can easily be expanded into all other areas of life, thereby controlling your every move."[Vaccine passports] are not required at all," Yeadon says. "What they provide, though, is complete control over your movements to whoever controls the database that your vaccination status is connected to. I hope you grasp this because this is not optional.This is what's going to take over your life in a way that George Orwell in '1984' didn't even dream of. Imagine you've been vaccinated and you've been awarded a vaccine passport on an app. It's going to be the world's first database that contains your name, a unique digital ID in the same format as absolutely everybody else on the planet on the same database.It'll have like an editable health-related flag that will say [whether] you've been vaccinated. If you haven't been, the algorithm that rules that works out what you can do … That's what's going to control the rest of your lives until you die."Vaccine Passport Is a Ticket to Tyranny, or WorseIndeed, I've written several articles detailing how the tracking of vaccination status will usher in a surveillance apparatus greater than anything we've ever experienced before.The precedent being set up right now is one that, in the future, will grant health authorities the "right" to force any number of experimental drugs, vaccines and technologies upon us in the name of public health. If the right to refuse an experimental medical procedure is not upheld now, the entire population of the earth will be available for experimentation without recourse.I'm absolutely terrified that the combination of vaccine passports and top-up vaccines is going to lead to mass depopulation, deliberate execution, potentially of billions of people. ~ Michael Yeadon, Ph.D.But that's not all. This initial vaccine surveillance system will ultimately be tied into other digital systems, such as all other medical records, biometric ID and an all-digital banking system.The implementation of a Google-based social credit system, similar to that implemented in China in 2018, is also highly likely. Under a social credit system, points are awarded or subtracted for certain types of behavior. When your score falls below a certain point, punishment is meted out in the form of travel restrictions or the inability to obtain a loan, for example."Don't allow their system to come into force," Yeadon says. "It's going to be used to coerce you. I believe if you allow a vaccine passport to come into force, you'll be pinged one day and it'll advise you to go to the medical center to have your top-up vaccine.If you choose not to get your vaccine, your passport validity will expire, which means you won't be able to enter a shop. You may not be able to use your bank card. All somebody needs to do is set a rule that says 'After a given a date, before any bank card can be used, a vaccine passport has to be [validated] …I'm absolutely terrified that the combination of vaccine passports and top-up vaccines is going to lead to mass depopulation, deliberate execution, potentially of billions of people.You can stop it once you've heard what I'm saying. Even if you like the idea of vaccine passports, put the thing in place using written records or something … but do not allow it to be on an interoperable global fixed-format database, because that will be the end of human freedoms. And I just see no way of recovering from that."- Sources and References1 Planet Lockdown2, 3 Wodarg, Wolfgang and Michael Yeadon, Petition/Motion for Administrative/Regulatory Action Regarding [...], 20204 C-span Hotez Coronavirus Vaccine Safety Testimony May 4, 20205 New York Post December 19, 20206 The Conversation December 10, 20207 New York Post December 25, 20208 Nuremberg Code of 19479 Corbett Report Episode 392, The Future of Vaccines Transcript