Archives‎ > ‎

Peter Myers Digest: Nikolai Petrovsky says Pfizer & Moderna rDNA vaccines use Gene Therapy

(1) Nikolai Petrovsky says Pfizer & Moderna rDNA vaccines use Gene Therapy(2) Approved and Unapproved Vaccines(3) Luc Montagnier on France-Soir(4) RFK jr: surveillance architecture links Covid to 911 & JFK assassination(5) Dissident medical voices speak out - Richard Gale & Gary Null PhD - Progressive Radio Network(6) FDA Investigates Allergic Reactions to Pfizer Vaccine After More Healthcare Workers Hospitalized(7) NSW Police blow whistle on coronavirus deception(1) Nikolai Petrovsky says Pfizer & Moderna rDNA vaccines use Gene TherapyDr David Lim speaks to Professor Nikolai Petrovsky about the unknowns surrounding COVID-19 vaccination this episode:– These technologies were originally developed as gene therapy and have never before been used in humans– Efficacy and safety data on Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have significant limitations– Public trust requires objective discussion of these issuesHost: Dr David Lim, GPGuest: Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, Director of Endocrinology, Flinders Medical Centre; Professor of Medicine at Flinders University; Vice-President and Secretary-General of the International Immunomics Society; Founder of Vaxine, maker of the COVAX-19 vaccineTotal time: 32 minsaudio: Approved and Unapproved VaccinesFrom: Steve Campbell <>Subject: Re: The Future of Vaccines Future of Vaccines 24 Dec 2020 05:18 AM PSTIf the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines. ==Comment (Peter M.):The MSM are only pushing certain vaccines, which have the approval of Big pharma.These are the ones made by Pfizer, Moderna and Astrozeneca.They are certainly not pushing "Sputnik V". That Russian one was the first off the block, and is the cheapest, at less than $10 a shot.Nor are they pushing "Covax-19", the Covid vaccine being developed by Nikolai Petrovsky at the University of Adelaide. He stated that Covid bears signs of having been created in a lab. That statement is anathema, and has rendered him persona not grata. The Australian Government has provided very little funding for Petrovsky's vaccine, even though the only other Australian one, that of the University of Queensland, has been withdrawn, on account of producing false positives to HIV.Pay attention to which vaccines the MSM are pushing - and don't take those ones. One reason not to take them is that most are covered by US legislation which provides immunity from prosecution.If you take a vaccine, try to get one that's NOT favoured by the MSM. But will they be available in Western countries? Please let me know, if you find any info about this.(3) Luc Montagnier on France-SoirFrom: JP Desmoulins <>Hi PeterI suggest you to watch : can turn on the subtitles, choose "translate" and then "english"Montagnier says :- Fierce fight on the information on the origin of Covid-19 in Wuhan. He is a target but used to it- He maintains that the genetic structure of the virus proves that it is man made. Says that it was probably to search (and perhaps experiment) a vaccine agains VIH- Raoult's cure, Hydroxychloroquin + azythromycin, works. Most countries in the world use it and refuse to do it in France is the result of a cabal- Efforts and money should be put to find other possible herbal or other treatments- Moderna / Pfizer vaccine, based on RNA, could be harmful on the long term, perhaps after a few generation, which implies that dramatic secondary effects could be found in one century- Accuses Bill Gates of incompetence on the subject, as an example of rich people who should mind their own business.Refreshing thoughts, but dreadfull also !Best regards(4) RFK jr: surveillance architecture links Covid to 911 & JFK assassinationRFK jr asks for for support fall of the Berlin Wall signified the end of the war on communism leaving U.S. intelligence workers with nothing to fight and the need to create a "war" to justify their existence.The "war on terrorism" and the "bio-security agenda" became the new focal points of government intelligence with communism no longer a threat.The installation of surveillance architecture ensures the capacity to keep track of every square foot of the planet and obliterate privacy.   12/23/20Censorship and Oppression Threaten America’s Trademark Standards of Democracy and Open Debate(5) Dissident medical voices speak out - Richard Gale & Gary Null PhD - Progressive Radio NetworkA new article from Dr Gary Null and Richard Gale powerfully exposing the PCR Test as FraudulantGary Kohls <>The article below by Gale and Null powerfully exposes Big Pharma’s ubiquitous, highly profitable PCR test as unreliable, yielding large numbers of false positives that have dramatically skewed and misrepresented EVERY statistic that has been propagandized by the universally vaccine illiterates that are everywhere in journalism, the media, the government, politics, public health bureaucracies, Big Medicine (all of whom seem to blindly believe, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that vaccines are ALL safe and effective – as any parent of a vaccine-damaged or vaccine-killed child about that false assumption).All the many, very cunning propaganda efforts have totally overshadowed – and totally silenced – every true scientist that understands vaccinology and virology. As the article below points out, there are thousands of truly objective scientists (those that are not in the employ of profiteering vaccine corporations, that is) that have been appalled at what has been happening.The propaganda has been amplified by Wall Street and their global multimillionaire investors, who saw early on an golden opportunity to make a killing in the stock market by promoting the anti-scientific fast-tracking of unapproved experimental vaccines. Most once-honorable charitable family foundations, even the ones that fund the PBS NewsHour, are not ethical investors and highly likely are heavily invested in sociopathic Big Vaccine corporations, all of whose share prices have made them so much money. (Share prices can go up on the thinnest of rumors – which are used/invented by investment advisors when they recommend otherwise unethical investments that may also be known to be unwise in the long-term.)Anyway Gale and Null newest article is irrefutable – but it will be ignored by those who have convinced we sheeple that what is going on is an epidemic of PCR Tests rather than an epidemic of actual Covid-19, as real as that viral illness is.Gale and Null point out that a medical diagnosis (and that should include a CDC/Dept of Health medical disease statistic) can never be made by a lab test. Such important diagnoses must be made by a qualified medical doctor following a good history and physical, a reality of which the CDC seems to have no understanding. The CDC only deals with sterile statistics and relies on positive PCR tests (intentionally ignoring the fact that some studies show PCR false positivity is in the range of 40% - 70%.Reliance upon such a worthless, misleading and provably inaccurate test, upon which economic shutdowns, school closings, suicidality, loss of income/savings and the widespread destruction of small businesses, needs to be re-thought, reversed and repented of  - and the highly successful Swedish experience – where the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays were and are being celebrated mask-less and small businesses are thriving. - needs to be employed.Please study this article and pass it on widely, especially to those accused of vaccinology illiteracy in the first paragraph. Gary G. Kohls, MD ==A More Honest Perspective of the Covid-19 PandemicRichard Gale and Gary Null PhD - Progressive Radio Network, December 23, 2020 (1827 words) the first cases of the new coronavirus strain outside of China, every aspect of the pandemic’s ever-changing amoebic narrative has been carefully controlled by the World Health Organization and major government health agencies. High officials within a syndicate of institutions, including the CDC, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and the UK’s National Health Service, have largely dictated government responses to lessen the pandemic.The Sars2-Cov19 pandemic is not the first time unelected medical bureaucrats, who the average person assumes to possess an enduring expertise, have guided global policies against pandemics and serious infectious outbreaks.  The most recent example was the 2009-2010 HIN1 Swine Flu pandemic that never truly happened according to plan. Subsequently that effort revealed a surprising incompetence in the international medical hierarchy that can be blamed on the entire system rather than a few inept individuals.However, during the current pandemic scare, something unusual and remarkably radical has happened.Historically, voices of opposition within institutionalized medicine usually remain relatively silent. Most often it is only a handful of health professionals who come forward to challenge official statements or to uncover the serious flaws in the scientific literature to support their actions.Yet for the past year we have witnessed tens of thousands of physicians, medical experts and researchers coming forward publicly with harsh and even damning criticisms of how the ruling medical agencies have mishandled the pandemic.  They easily recognize these agencies’ contradictions, the conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry, the large body of medical literature deconstructing and discrediting their fundamental claims, and the evidence to prove their policies are scientifically baseless.These are not dissident mavericks. Over 52,000 medical professionals representing some of the world’s leading medical schools and research institutions have already signed the Great Barrington Declaration in protest against the official Covid-19 strategies and these policies’ serious adverse effects on the physical and mental health of children, working class citizens and the poor.  Moreover, the signatories have nothing to gain. No financial interests jeopardize their judgments. And they are fully aware of the pushback and blacklisting that may follow and would injure their reputations.Around the world, dissident medical voices are warning us that:1. The official death counts, particularly in the US and the UK are grossly exaggerated2. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test was never created to be used as a diagnostic tool to determine Covid-19 infection or any other virus. Overreliance upon PCR testing is a travesty that has created a Case-pandemic rather an actual symptomatic scourge.3. The evidence to support the belief that large social lockdowns and social distancing, perhaps even mask wearing, will deter the spread of the virus is overstated and inaccurate.4. America’s official narrative, where the number of cases per capita far surpass any other nation, that effective, safe and cheaper drugs such as Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have no value and post serious harm is completely unfounded. Rather, if used wisely it is highly effective and safe as a preventative measure for first stage treatment of mild and moderate infections.A compilation of 210 studies on HCQ’s effectiveness against Covid-19, 145 peer-reviewed, only found 26 showed that the cheap, widely used drug posed some risks or was ineffective. The remainder clearly indicate that HCQ is one of our best and most reliable courses of treatment. For example, a study of 585 patients treated with HCQ along with azithromycin and zinc were relieved in under 3 days and none were hospitalized, required ventilation or died. Another study published in the journal Clinical and Translational Science reported 73% reduction in hospitalization with no serious adverse events.5. In the meantime, we are told we must wait for a vaccine or a new miracle drug and no other medical intervention is warranted other than personal hygienic practices, masks and social distancing.6. The New York Times and other major media outlets are misrepresenting positive PCR tests as new cases of Covid-19 with the actual disease thereby grossly inflating those who may be test-positive but are asymptomatic, otherwise healthy, posing no public threat.The WHO’s, CDC’s and NHS’ internal confusion and culture of inconsistency is leaving more and more citizens questioning who can be trusted. Even the otherwise conservative British Medical Journal published a rare and brutal condemnation of the corruption and commercialization throughout the official Covid-19 narrative.  BMJ’s executive editor Kamran Abbasi wrote:"Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science."Sadly, mainstream media such as the New York Times, Washington Post and BBC are revealing a lack of journalistic integrity despite the open accessibility of medical studies to the contrary. Instead, the media serves as an echo chamber to continue advancing this international debacle created by our leading health officials.To understand the miscalculation of deaths that can be directly attributed to Covid-19 we can begin with the CDC’s own website:"Due to the ongoing COvID-19 pandemic, this system will suspend data collection for the 2020-2021 influenza season."In other words, the CDC’s monthly mortality reports will no longer be monitoring actual influenza deaths, which are more often than not also conflated with deaths due to pneumonia.William Briggs, a former professor at Cornell University noted that last summer the CDC ceased counting flu and pneumonia deaths "because, we suppose, of the difficulty telling these deaths from doom deaths [Covid-19]." So how will these deaths be entered into mortality reports?In early December, an assistant director at Johns Hopkins Medical School’s Department of Applied Economics examined death statistics during the Covid pandemic and previous years. Due to the high percentage of non-Covid deaths decreasing during the pandemic, her conclusion was that these deaths were intentionally being labeled as Covid-caused. Her colleague Dr. Yanni Gu summarized the problem:"The CDC classified all deaths that are related to Covid-19 simply as Covid-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with Covid-19 count as Covid-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why Covid-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease."This irrational discrepancy in causes of death is not solely an American problem. Globally there has been a 98% percent decrease in diagnosed flu cases compared to 2019. Australia alone has recorded a 96% drop off.There may be a sensible way to explain the decrease in flu and this in turn helps explain the dramatic increase in Covid-19 cases due to inaccurate testing and an infestation of false positive PCR tests. Given the enormous impact of lockdowns, closing of businesses and public spaces, social distancing and masks, it is feasible that flu rates would decline noticeably. However, then the rise in Covid-19 cases becomes completely nonsensical unless spurious testing is the culprit.Recently, even the World Health Organization had to acknowledge PCR’s failures. Despite the mincing of words, the WHO reported,"The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus so the Ct [cycle threshold] will be low. Conversely when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect the virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain"Most testing labs are using a cycle threshold of 40 amplifications, consequently the high rate of false positives. This is the reason for cases rising exponentially while actual deaths had leveled in mid-summer until more recently. In the UK, Public Health England states, "if a person has both a negative and positive test, then only their positive test will be counted." The US does likewise.University of California virologist Dr. Juliet Morrison stated, ‘I’m shocked that people think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive." She recommends a reasonable cutoff at 35, and Dr. Michael Mina at Harvard’s School of Public Heath suggests 30 or less. University of North Carolina’s director of clinical microbiology Melissa Miller has called the application PCR for all situations "completely irresponsible."The most damning indictment against every governor across the US who continues to rule on lockdowns, school closures and draconian police enforcement and yet has failed to reign in the plague of erroneous PCR testing in his or her state is found in a recent study by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Using as a low a 25 cycle threshold, 70% of positives were not actual cases because the virus was unable to be cultured. In other words, the virus was already dead.And yet when PCR cycle thresholds are adjusted, the number of cases plummet. This was observed in efforts made in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada where it was discovered that 90% of those patients testing positive carried "barely any virus."Fortunately, some countries are waking up to PCR’s unreliability that was originally perpetuated by a very entrepreneurial German doctor Christian Dosten.  Dosten also happens to be an advisor to the Germany’s Federal Ministry of Health.A Portugal appeals court ruled PRC is unreliable for testing Covid-19 and any enforced quarantine based on a positive PCR test would be illegal. As for Dosten and his paper –published in the journal Eurosurveillance - it has served as the rationale for widespread PCR use. But the paper is substantially inaccurate but helped serve as a means for Dosten to gain a patent for coronavirus PCR testing.  Now 22 leading medical professionals from the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences have filed for the paper’s retraction due to "a tremendous number of very serious design flaws… which make the PCR test completely unsuitable as a diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus."The real crime is that none of the above failures were inevitable.There is no reasonable explanation for miscalculating actual deaths associated with Covid-19 other than sheer stupidity or gross, intentional neglect.  PCR’s unsuitability to accurately diagnose the presence of active Covid-19, or any other infectious virus, has been well documented for many years. Even PCR’s inventor Dr. Kary Mullis has stated it is unsuited for clinical diagnosis.Yet, despite all of the foreknowledge of these facts, countless people have had their lives devastated by the choices our federal health officials and politicians have made based upon severely flawed science. Unnecessary quarantining, loss of income, lockdowns, and mental stress have adversely effected millions of Americans and people around the world.  Again, we might to turn Abbasi’s article in the BMJ:"… as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die."(6) FDA Investigates Allergic Reactions to Pfizer COVID Vaccine After More Healthcare Workers Hospitalized Investigates Allergic Reactions to Pfizer COVID Vaccine After More Healthcare Workers HospitalizedThe FDA is investigating allergic reactions in "multiple states." The agency acknowledged the reactions may have been caused by PEG, a compound in the Pfizer vaccine that CHD previously told the FDA could put millions of people at risk.By Children's Health Defense TeamThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) told reporters late Friday the agency is  investigating "about five" allergic reactions to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in "multiple states."The announcement followed Friday’s news that an Illinois hospital temporarily shut down its COVID vaccination program after four healthcare workers there experienced allergic reactions — one of which was severe — to the vaccine.Also on Friday, CNN reported that a third healthcare worker in Alaska was hospitalized for six hours for an anaphylactic reaction to the Pfizer vaccine. The report came on the heels of last week’s news that two Alaskan healthcare workers had severe allergic reactions — including one woman who was hospitalized for at least two nights after going into anaphylactic shock.Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that can occur within seconds or minutes of exposure to something a person is allergic to. If not treated immediately, it can be fatal, the Mayo Clinic explains.According to Reuters and other news reports, the director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Dr. Peter Marks, said polyethylene glycol (PEG), a compound in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, may have triggered the allergic reactions in the U.S.The Pfizer and newly approved Moderna vaccines contain PEG. Both vaccines were approved by the FDA for emergency use, but are not yet licensed.Lyn Redwood, president of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said there shouldn’t be any mystery at this stage about whether or not PEG caused the reactions. "It’s a simple blood test," Redwood said. "If they’ve tested the people who had these allergic reactions for anti-PEG antibodies, then they know. If they haven’t, why haven’t they?"FDA’s Marks on Friday also acknowledged that allergic reactions to PEG could be "somewhat more common than previously understood."But, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD chairman and chief legal counsel, said: "As we told the FDA in September, studies show that one in seven Americans may unknowingly be at risk of experiencing an allergic reaction to PEG.""At the very least, everyone should be screened for anti-PEG antibodies before getting the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines," Kennedy said. "It is unconscionable that instead, the FDA and CDC are encouraging people to go ahead and risk a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction and just assume that someone will be on hand to save them."In September, before either vaccine had been approved, CHD asked the FDA to inform Moderna trial participants that the vaccine contained PEG, and to inform them of the "well-documented evidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylactic immune reactions."In a letter to Marks and FDA Commissioner Stephan Hahn, Kennedy also said Moderna should ask trial participants if they’d ever had an allergic reaction to any other drug containing PEG, and the company should prescreen trial participants for PEG allergies, as many people who have anti-PEG antibodies don’t know they have them.The FDA responded by suggesting that CHD take its concerns directly to Moderna. On Saturday, after the reports of allergic reactions in Alaska and Illinois, Hahn told the Hill:"One of the things that the FDA does very well and uniquely is really   getting to the bottom of events like allergic reactions so we can completely understand the circumstances and better inform the public and also our regulatory decisions."Following last week’s reports of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, the FDA said it is "working closely" with the Centers for Disease Control (which has officially acknowledged six allergic reactions) and "colleagues" in the UK, where the first allergic reactions to the Pfizer vaccine were reported. ...(7) NSW Police blow whistle on coronavirus deception Police blow whistle on coronavirus deceptionNOV 2Posted by Editor, cairnsnewsBy TONY MOBILIFONITISA LETTER written by a senior constable from the Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol in NSW and signed by colleagues, has exposed the COVID-19 narrative for its deception and the harm it is causing to police and their relations with the public.The letter, dated October 26, is addressed to NSW Commissioner of Police Michael Fuller and is one of the best rebuttals of the COVID narrative of fear and control written anywhere, noting false predictions of its severity, false and misleading statistics, flaws in testing and serious questions around the virus itself.The letter makes the very strong point that in the same way they cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device on motorists, the same must be demanded of the RT PCR test and as such, "police should not in any way" mandate testing for COVID-19, or rely on the results.For police to raise this within their own ranks may be portrayed as controversial but the action is consistent with common law enforcement, e.g. investigating, exposing and prosecuting a crime of deception carried out against the public.The letter signatories are urging fellow police officers across the country to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or to sign their form at this link. letter reads:RE: Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictionsWe are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19, which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force. Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus, our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens, using the police to enforce their rules. Due to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed, until more was learnt about the virus.With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK [1] and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia, indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to 150,000 Australian deaths [2], it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast population would comply.With these frightening projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease. Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that "no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available". [3] So even without the virus being isolated, the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing.We note that the modelling was later found to have serious calculation errors, such that experts who later reviewed it have said "no serious scientist gives (it) any validity". [4, 5] And now the RT PCR test has been proven to be unreliable at best, with the inventor stating it should "never be used to diagnose infectious disease", because it cannot tell if what it detected is alive or dead. [6, 7, 8] This test is still being relied upon to make critical decisions in the interest of public health and safety.In the same way we cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device to proctor a civilian’s speed, the same must be demanded of a faulty RT PCR test and as such, police should not in any way mandate testing for covid-19, or rely on any outcome of the results. Now that we have almost 12 months of statistical data that can be relied upon, in place of flawed computer modelling, these statistics show a reality that is far from the modelling projections, which were relied upon by National Cabinet in their response. Here are some statistics which reflect this reality:For example, we now know that around 45% of people who contract the virus are asymptomatic [9] and asymptomatic transmission is between 0-2.2% [10]. We also know that 80% of people who contract the virus will only have mild symptoms [11] and it is overwhelmingly the elderly and immuno-compromised who are at risk of severe symptoms that could result in death. [12] At the time of writing, the world-wide survival rate for covid-19 is 97.3%. [13] The ordinary flu is 99.9%. [14] Furthermore, statistics clearly show that while the confirmed cases may be on the rise, the percentage of deaths is plummeting.Sweden and Taiwan did not enforce lockdown on its citizens like much of the world did. Although Sweden failed to take better precautions to protect the elderly in the early stages, their death rate is comparable, and Taiwan’s is outstanding. The statistics show there is a high infection rate across the globe, but very low deaths; regardless of whether there was forced lockdowns or not. What we can derive from analysis of this is that these two distinctly different ways have resulted in much the same outcome.We note from the recent Federal budget, huge debt and unemployment, is that our lockdowns have created a series of problems that now seem to outweigh the threat this virus poses. In our line of work, we know that the socioeconomical problems created here will transpire into a greater threat down the track, as people struggle to deal with the collateral damage this is causing.We have been told that the advice from the World Health Organization is a key aspect to the National Cabinet response, yet Dr David Nabarro of the WHO recently stated "We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus," [15] So in spite of the facts, as they stand now, it would appear that the National Cabinet has been lagging in its capacity to adapt to the reality of the situation and this is causing them to fail in their duty to respond in proportion to the risk. The risk being overwhelmingly with the elderly and immunocompromised. [16, 17, 18]What is even more concerning is the prohibition on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 [19], when over 121 peer reviewed scientific studies have shown it to be effective in treating and preventing the disease [20, 21, 22]. Instead, the federal government has done a vaccine deal with AstraZeneca [23] and Australians told we cannot expect to go back to normal until a vaccine arrives.AstraZeneca has been found guilty of offences relating to off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products, making false claims, kickbacks and bribery, consumer protection violation, healthcare offences, government-contracting violations and more. Since 2000 they have been fined over US$1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations. [24] Still, they have been granted protection from future product liability claims relating to its COVID-19 vaccine [25].Alarmingly, Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine "as mandatory as you can possibly make it" [26], in spite of the criminal record of its producer, their exemption from liability claims, the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin [27] and hydroxychloroquine; shown to be effective treatments and the reality that the virus does not pose a serious threat to the healthy. It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests, not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed.All this indicates that the ongoing restrictions on the healthy population is a disproportionate response, yet the police are still expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent, with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon the population. The evidence would suggest resources are better directed to protect the vulnerable.We are concerned with the legitimacy of the actions we are being told to take against the citizens of Australia. States and territories cannot rise above the commonwealth constitution as well as international treaties we are signatories to, yet this is occurring. Under the state of emergency, the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015. [28] (Emergency and public health powers, at the States and Territories, do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual’s human rights by isolating them, or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first).There is an inter-governmental agreement [29] which places the Commonwealth in the lead as well as the Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan [30]. This ensures that the States and Territories act to compliment the Federal Legislative Framework. Article 7 of the international convenient of civil and political rights states "no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation." [31]Article 27 of the Vienna convention on the law of treatise "A party may not invoke the provision of its internal law as justification of its failure to perform a treaty." [32] Article 7 of the Australian human rights commission Act 1986 states "no-one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subject without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. [33]Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states "when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall to the extent of the inconsistency being valid." [34] With federal and international legislation breaches, it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia, potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914 [35], as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995 [36].Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression, so we are writing to you to raise the following issues:-Police Force employees have ‘choice’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines;The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines;Police do not participate in any way in the forcing of vaccines upon the population;That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinatedTo raise the alarm that there is a global dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population; andTo warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests, rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population, not tyranny of government.Recently letters have been written to our leaders from the legal fraternity, including high profile Judges and QC’s [37], The Australian Institute for Progress penned by 30 public intellectuals including 15 professors of relevant disciplines, one of whom is an advisor on health and well-being economics to the UK government [38], Advocate Me’s open letter to all leaders seeking to review disproportionate response to SAR-CoV-2 [39], as well as hundreds of doctors from the medical fraternity [40]. Despite the government continually parroting that they are following the advice of ‘the experts’, all these requests have been ignored and the police used as the enforcers of these senseless rules. We ask that you consider the information provided herein and the NSW Police Force statement of values: –Each member of the Police Force is to Act in a manner which: Places integrity above all; Upholds the rule of law; Preserves the rights and freedoms of individuals; Seeks to improve the quality of life by community involvement in policing; Strives for citizen and police personal satisfaction; Capitalises on the wealth of human resources; Makes efficient and economical use of public resources; and Ensures that authority is exercised responsibly.Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community, including our family and friends. And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around peaceful freedom protests and how inconsistent this was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests. This contradiction is further destroying public confidence.We are reaching out to all our fellow police officers across the country, to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or sign our form at to show your support for this stance, which we have called Cops for Covid Truth. With trust in our police force now seriously eroded, we ask you to consider now challenging the necessity of the ongoing restrictions to restore community trust, by being an integral part of returning our State and Country back to normality.RegardsAlexander Cooney Senior Constable Coffs/Clarence Highway PatrolNSW Police Force Grafton Police Station5 Duke Street Grafton NSW 2460And other signatories