Archives‎ > ‎

Solving 9-11 : The Deception that Changed the World, by Christopher Bollyn (6)

Solving 9-11 -
 The Deception that Changed the World 

Chapter XIII - XIV

Ptech, 9-11, and the Financial Collapse   

P-Tech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on, and all of this is unraveled. ... All of this stuff took money to fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering, and looting, looting of the S&L’s, looting of the banking’s all being done systematically to keep the slush funds up for the game at play. 
– Indira R. Singh

On 9-11, the world witnessed a horrific terror spectacle when the World Trade Center (WTC) was attacked, bombed, and demolished into a pile of rubble in broad daylight. The demolition of the twin towers is an unprecedented event in world history.  The terror attacks of 9-11 and the financial crisis that exploded in September 2008 are similar and connected. The similarity between the two events that occurred almost exactly seven years apart reveals the criminal thinking behind both events – and the method. 

The terror bombings of 9-11 are related to the financial collapse of 2008 and involve the same criminal elements.

What we know about the destroyed towers is that they had recently come under the control of two Zionist Jews -- Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando fighter, Frank Lowy. With the connivance of fellow Zionist Jews, these two active and dedicated Zionists obtained the leases, with borrowed funds, for the WTC properties at the end of July 2001 and immediately insured them to the hilt – including anticipated future earnings – against a terror attack precisely like the one that occurred six weeks later on 9-11, when they hit the jackpot, blood and all.

All three towers that were demolished on 9-11 were owned or leased by Larry Silverstein, a dedicated Zionist and strip club owner-cum-
real estate mogul.

Frank Lowy (right), a former Israeli commando, and his son are close friends of Rupert Murdoch, a fellow Australian Zionist Jew and owner of FOX News and News Corporation.  Lowy is Silverstein's business partner in leasing the World Trade Center, a lease that was funded by the Zionist-run -- and now bankrupt -- GMAC, the financial branch of General Motors.   Silverstein and Lowy obtained the lease six weeks before 9-11 and made several billion dollars on the destruction of the World Trade Center.

The security of the Twin Towers was also in the hands of a Zionist firm and had been since 1993. That company was under the control of Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll. The first plane that struck the World Trade Center homed in on a secure computer room in the northeast section of the North Tower.  The plane went directly into the computer room of a company named Marsh that was run by Greenberg's son.  What a coincidence.

Michael Chertoff, an Israeli-American orthodox Jew and devoted Zionist, headed the criminal division of the Department of Justice from 2001 to 2003.  From this position, Chertoff -- whose mother was an Israeli intelligence agent -- supervised and controlled the non-investigation and destruction of evidence of 9-11.

Michael Chertoff, an Israeli citizen and son of the Mossad, oversaw the destruction of the evidence from the demolition of the World Trade Center as the head of the criminal division of the U.S. Dept. of Justice. 

The Zionist-controlled media promoted the preposterous and unproven theory that Osama Bin Laden and his twenty hijackers had carried out the attack from their headquarters in Afghanistan. The United States went to war against the Taliban regime inAfghanistan based on unproven allegations and false evidence as the real evidence of mass murder was furtively being shipped to various Asian ports where it was destroyed in smelters. 

Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy received huge pay-outs from the insurance companies. The American people and U.S. taxpayers were left with a pile of incredibly hot rubble and an immense price tag which continues to grow with the passage of time.  Seven years later, to the exact day, two immense pillars of the financial world collapsed in a strikingly similar fashion. These two columns were Lehman Brothers bank and the American International Group (A.I.G.), managed and controlled for decades by the very same Maurice R. Greenberg. 

Like the twin towers, both companies were thought to be too large and powerful to simply collapse, but collapse they did. By September 11, 2008, these companies seemed to have lost both their foundations and core columns and were in a state of free fall. Investors pulled their money, and global panic ensued. Like the Twin Towers, both Lehman and A.I.G. were Zionist-controlled organizations. 

The systems of corporate financial security, enforcement, and investigation were also under Zionist control. Despite repeated warnings, indictments, and violations of the law by A.I.G., the heads of the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank called for theU.S. taxpayer to bail-out these corrupt and criminal enterprises. The key player in this huge and historic bail-out was Ben Shalom Bernanke, a dedicated Zionist who spent summers working for a well-known Jewish criminal who controlled elections in Dillon, South Carolina. 

Maurice Greenberg, the disgraced head of the criminal A.I.G. and chairman and CEO of C.V. Starr & Co., Inc., testifies before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on "The Collapse and Federal Rescue of A.I.G. and What It Means for the U.S. Economy" in Washington, D.C. on April 2, 2009.  The Securities and Exchange Commission accused Greenberg of numerous improper accounting moves between 2000 and 2005.  The false accounting amounted to more than $5 billion and resulted in A.I.G. paying more than $1 billion in fines. Greenberg was personally fined more than $130 million in August 2009 from the SEC case and a lawsuit filed on behalf of defrauded workers in Ohio.  Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, a devoted Zionist, will certainly go down as one of the greatest criminals in history.  (UPI Photo)

An immense amount of taxpayer money, some $180 billion, has been poured into the financial black hole known as A.I.G. This is roughly equivalent to taking $600 from every man, woman, and child in the United States and using it to prop up (or absorb the losses of) the criminal and fraudulent financial/insurance structure built by Maurice Greenberg. 

The profits made by Lehman Brothers and A.I.G. have gone into private off-shore accounts, while the debts and obligations have been passed on to the U.S. taxpayer. These companies were looted and plundered and then allowed to collapse. Once again, the rubble and costs were forced upon the American people against their will. The American public was shown to be 1,000-to-1 against the Zionist bail-out. 

The fact that the first plane that hit the World Trade Center flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh, a company run by Maurice Greenberg's son Jeffrey, is just one of the most obvious connections between these two catastrophic events.  Ptech's dodgy enterprise software is another. 

The first plane nosed right into the secure computer room of Marsh, a Greenberg-run company.  The unusual bursts of white smoke and light orange flame that accompanied the explosions came from the Marsh computer room on the north and east sides of the tower and suggest that the room had been loaded with Thermate and equipped with a homing device that guided the plane into the tower. 

In the first part of this chapter, the key role of Ptech enterprise software in 9-11 was discussed. The person who first brought public awareness to the Ptech problem is a "risk architect" named Indira R. Singh, who lived near the World Trade Center and was working with JP Morgan Chase on 9-11. Singh is very knowledgeable about Ptech and what such enterprise software can do in situations like 9-11 -- and the financial crisis that gripped Wall Street in September 2008. 

My research found that one of the key people involved in the founding of Ptech was a Jewish lawyer from Worcester, Massachusetts, named Michael S. Goff. Goff's father and grandfather had both been highest level Freemasons in the Zionist secret society of B'nai B'rith. Michael was Ptech's first marketing manager and all-around general director in 1994, according to his own published statements about his role with the company. He was responsible for all hiring, training, and procurement for the company. 

Goff went on to work for Guardium, an Israeli enterprise software company founded and headed by individuals from Israeli military intelligence. As I explain in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11," one of the founders and directors of Guardium is Gill Zaphrir (a.k.a. Zafrir), an Israeli colonel who "headed the research and development department of the Israel Air Force." Goff was working for Zaphrir's Guardium in 2005 when I discovered his role in founding Ptech.

Col. Gill Zaphrir headed the R&D Department of the Israel Air Force. 

Singh doesn't say anything about Goff at Ptech, but that is understandable. This Israeli connection is something I discovered in 2005 and it has not been discussed in any of the mainstream media. It is unlikely that anybody else would have told Singh about Goff's key role in building Ptech in the mid-1990s. Furthermore, Israelis are generally seen as allies of the United States. 

Understanding the role of Ptech's dodgy enterprise software and the connection between Ptech and Israeli military intelligence requires reading my articles about Ptech and Mitre. With this Israeli conection to Ptech in mind, I recommend reading "The Story of Indira Singh" from an interview she did in April 2005. This is one of the most informative and least biased interviews she has done. It's rather long, but well worth reading for anyone interested in understanding 9-11 and the financial crisis. This interview also has extremely interesting testimony about the downing of Flight 93 and extremely mysterious demolition of the forty-seven-story WTC 7, which was the third tower owned by Larry Silverstein. 

Singh's comments about Ptech and her work at JP Morgan shed a great deal of light on how this Ptech enterprise software may have played a role in both 9-11 and the financial meltdown. I recommend reading the entire interview. To give an idea of what Singh discusses, I have provided some of the most interesting extracts below. 

Extracts from "The Story of Indira Singh" from Our World in Balance, April 27, 2005: 

Indira Singh has been working on Wall Street since 1975. On 9-11 she was working as a senior consultant for JP Morgan Chase. She was tasked with developing a next-generation, operational, risk-blueprint. Which would proactively identify exposures, including money laundering, rogue trading, and illicit financing patterns. It was in this capacity nine months later, [that] she became aware of the biggest threat to our country, a trans-nationally protected terrorist cartel that brought us 9-11. Indira Singh is a private pilot and a climber. Prior to 9-11, she volunteered as a civilian emergency medical technician, until she was injured at ground zero. 

They [the Twin Towers] were mysterious international structures that were the center and the heart of our Western Civilization, basically. 

- Indira Singh

Singh: September 11th I was a senior consultant for JP Morgan Chase and Risk. I had cycled through several of their Risk areas as an enterprise architect, or an information architect, technology architect… which basically means that you take a look at the entire enterprise and come up with a blueprint, make sure that all the systems, not just one system, but all the systems, the blueprints for all the systems that are developed to support the business, are in-line, in tune with the business goals and the business architecture and the business processes and where the business is going. So it’s pretty high-level, we call it the CXO level, or the Chief Information Officer, Chief Technology Officer levels and there are disciplines and methodologies and very esoteric software that’s used to manage this. I did that at JP Morgan Chase and I also worked for a small company in Washington, D.C. that was doing some very innovative work regarding technology interoperability, they were developing some inference engines to think about how to put technology architectures together and I wanted to use that for my risk work, basically. …we were seeking funding from In-Q-Tel, which was the CIA’s information technology seeking arm, I had been spending pretty much every Friday, Thursday-Friday down in D.C. trying to get that project off the ground, and trying to get it funded ...

Singh: P-Tech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on, and all of this is unraveled. Because it goes into the corporations, it goes into these government entities, it goes into the terrorism financing entities… none of which have been taken to task… there are just so many questions about what does this all mean? And as I investigated further, we found that the origins of P-Tech were very interesting. Where did this company come from? Obviously, that is the first question. And how did they get to be so powerful? Who were the people, who were the organizations that brought them in who knew, who gave them the power? ...

Singh: BMI was identified as being involved with terror financing, but this is just not going to be, ‘The Muslims Hate America!’, that’s not what it is, there is something else going on here, they’re being used as a tool, just as the good people of the U.S. are being used, are being misled, and frightened and terrorized into, ‘if we don’t wage these horrific wars, our way of life will be over’. Who benefits? ...

Singh: The FBI. In fact, this has to be made very clear, there are some extraordinarily real patriotic Americans, and good people in the FBI, as has been said by Colleen Rowley, one of the FBI whistleblowers, there’s a wall in the FBI. And this has been validated to me by various in Houston who are very close to the power bases and are pretty ticked off at what’s happening in this country and are speaking out. As are many CIA agents who are very concerned that it has gone too far, as are many NSA agents who are concerned that it has gone too far, and FBI agents. So we have a lot of people who are speaking out, they have kept quiet too long, they’re afraid, they are afraid of what’s happening to this country …

Singh: Ari Fleischer spun it to find sugar that day. He said, ‘There’s nothing wrong. Nothing to see here, everything’s fine.’ So they did a token raid and that was basically it. But everything that I have done since that time has been for one reason and one reason only, that there may come a time, that people will find the trail to P-Tech, and it won’t be hidden or buried, I’ve kept it alive, whether they’ve renamed their company and moved on I want to keep the names, the details, everything alive, no matter what I have to do, so that, should there come a time for justice and accounting for 9-11, and for what’s happening in the world today, it makes it easier for other people to unravel the truth… Whatever you’re political inclinations, this is wrong. This is criminal, this is murder, this is worldwide atrocity. And I have reached some very good people on the left and on the right, who are willing to speak out about P-Tech. ...

Singh: It was possible that there was an alternate command and control system. Could you technically use P-Tech software to do the surveillance and intervention? Well, gosh, yes, that’s exactly what I was planning on using it for in one of the largest banks in the world. ...

Singh: The Towers came down, 3,000 people were killed, and what I know is the characters behind the funding of it, were totally in bed with characters in the U.S. And not only just for 9-11, but going on through our nation’s history, and the big question is, “Why?” What are they up to?

Question: Could you describe the relationship of P-Tech with the FAA? P-Tech worked with the FAA for several years, didn’t they?

Singh: It was a joint project between P-Tech and Mitre, and they were looking at holes, basically in the FAA’s interoperability, responding with other agencies, law enforcement, in the case of an emergency such as hijacking. So they were looking for… what people would do, how they would respond in case of an emergency, and find the holes, and make recommendations to fix it. Now, if anyone was in a position to know where the holes were, P-Tech was. And that’s exactly the point. If anybody was in a position to write software to take advantage of those holes, it would have been P-Tech. ...

Singh: Now, with the FAA in particular, if something goes wrong, and there is an emergency with a particular flight, and the DOD needs to be notified, well that’s a really major interoperability thing, a signal has to be sent in some way, shape or form, either mediated by a human in most cases, or automatically, or even if its mediated by a human something needs to be initiated on a separate computer to start a whole other sequence of events, interventions, scrambling a jet, notification up and downstream with many other organizations, such as NORAD, such as other terminal radar areas, such as local law enforcement, you name it. So, this all has to be blueprinted, mapped out, and that’s where Enterprise Architecture comes in, you need some kind of blueprint to keep all of this together and that’s what P-Tech was so good at. 

Question: Now was there a reference to P-Tech having operated in the basement, out of the FAA? 

Singh: Yes. Now, typically, because the scope of such projects are so overarching and so wide-ranging, when you are doing an enterprise architecture project, you pretty much have access to how anything in the organization is being done, where it’s being done, on what systems, what the information is, and you pretty much have carte blanche. Now if it’s a major project that spans several years, the team that comes in has literally access to almost anything they want because you’re operating on a blueprint level, on a massive scale. So, yes, they were everywhere, and I was told that they were in places that required clearances, I was told they had log-on access to FAA flight control computers, I was told that they had passwords to many computers that you may not on the surface… let’s say you… isolated part of a notification process that was mediated by a computer, and you wanted to investigate it further, then you typically get log-on access to that computer, and from that back upstream or downstream, so, who knows? In my experience, I could have access to almost anything I wanted to in JP Morgan Chase… and didn’t, for the reason if anything went wrong, I didn’t wanna have the access. But if you were up to no good, as an enterprise architect, with such a mandate, you typically could have anything you wanted. Access to anything. ...

Singh: But there were 4 war games, 4 simulations going on the morning of 9-11, and I just want people to remember that the whole nature of what Mitre, they also developed software for intelligence, which includes the CIA, Mitre and P-Tech would have, if they were going to test whether they had fixed these holes, would have probably run a simulation. I don’t know that they did, but that’s how we do things, but there were 4 of them going on. So was there room for confusion? I don’t think these people were stupid, I think they were deliberately confused, if anything. 

Q. Well we know very well that there was a simulation of the very event taking place during the event. 

Singh: And I believe there is proof there was more than one. Just in case the first one didn’t confuse people enough. So what does this say? I can be very objective about this and say, “Well, the terrorists knew that there were war games scheduled for this day and they took advantage of it and called 9-11 a particular day, however, we do know that 9-11 had been selected prior… ok, so maybe the war games were set many weeks prior for 9-11…” and you can play this game over and over and over. Yes, it was the perfect day, and yes, you needed inside knowledge, and yes, P-Tech with all its myriad associations would have had the inside knowledge, and yes, P-Tech was a CIA front, and yes, P-Tech was protected. ...

Singh: Interestingly enough, I did not let people know that it was P-Tech until maybe August, 2002 at ICH… we had pretty much moved on and uh, I accidentally let slip to one of my colleagues there that the name of the company that was being investigated was P-Tech. And she was horrified… she said, “They’re everywhere.” And I said, “Yeah, fancy that. Wonder who put them there.” ...

Singh: Before P-Tech was ever raided, before it ever became public, I took it all the way up to the top of the FBI. I took it everywhere. The reality of the situation is proven by the response I got there. More telling than the actual deed itself. Their response to that is really what indicts them all. 

Q. What was their response? 

Singh: Uhm, “Shut up and go away, or you will be killed.” Basically. 

Q. Now, you got that response from all different levels in government … 

Singh: I got that response from JP Morgan. I got that response from P-Tech. I got that warning from people within the FBI. Mostly the FBI …

Q. And what kind of response did you get from JP Morgan Chase, your employers at the time when you went to them with what you had found out about P-Tech? 

Singh: Well, they had told me that I should be killed for getting all this evidence… I was intimidated. I wrote a letter to my boss saying that I had been intimidated, and the person who had intimidated me, the 3rd highest ranking person in the bank, the General Auditor, so this has gone all the way up to the top, they were very aware of it, and that they were going to deny using P-Tech at JP Morgan Chase. In fact they would even explicitly deny the URL to the website, so that no one could even look into them. Now the name has changed, so you wonder what is going on there, but, when he asked me, ‘where did you get this from and that from?’, I was basically thoroughly intimidated. They treated me as though I was the bad guy. That’s what happened. They treated me as if I was the bad guy for having dug up all of this stuff. 

Q. And you were told by the Chief Auditor at JP Morgan Chase that the different individuals that you had gotten this information from should have been killed? 

Singh: Yeah… I pointed down the street, I said, “I lost people there.” And he said, “I lost people there, too. Look, look, this is about 9-11… I put it in a folder named 9-11…” and it got pretty ugly from that point on. Basically he said that, “He needed to be sure that I would never mention P-Tech again.” And I said, “Here’s the problem. I’m a senior consultant, I consult with a lot of people… you may deny P-Tech business here… what happens to Citibank, what happens to Goldman-Sachs, what happens to the rest?” He said, “That’s not my problem.” And I said, “That’s why we have that hole in the ground up the street. It is everyone’s problem.” ...

Singh: All of this stuff took money to fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering, and looting, looting of the SNL’s, looting of the banking system, what we’re in the middle of now which is the looting of Social Security. And this is all being done, the looting of HUD, it’s all being done systematically to keep the slush funds up for the game at play.


Q. Where do you think this is headed? 

Singh: Not any place good for people. And it isn’t just going to be America, it is going to be global.


Sources and Recommended Reading

"The Story of Indira Singh", Our World In Balance, April 27, 2005

Ptech, 9-11, and the Financial Collapse of 2008, March 13, 2009
Final Edit – August 27, 2009 
Latest Correction - February 24, 2010

Chapter XIV 

Game Over:  Evidence of Super-Thermite in the Rubble

The red-gray chips of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center. 

"The evidence for active, highly energetic thermitic material in the WTC dust is compelling...these data suggest that the thermitic material found in the WTC dust is a form of nanothermite, not ordinary (macro-) thermite."
- "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al, March 2009

One of the most significant events in the search for the truth of 9-11 was the publication in March 2009 of a peer-reviewed scientific paper, written by nine scientists, about the discovery of "active thermitic material" in dust samples from the collapsed towers of theWorld Trade Center.  A twenty-five-page scientific paper entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9-11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" presents physical evidence that an extremely powerful form of super-thermite was used to demolish the twin towers. 

The research paper written by nine scientists, including Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University, analyzes red-gray chips of a highly-explosive thermitic material, "characterized as nano-thermite or super-thermite," found in five dust samples from the collapsed towers.  The paper was published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal and marks a historic breakthrough in the scientific investigation of the explosive collapses of the Twin Towers, although it has not been covered by the media outside of Salt Lake City. If we had a truly free press in the United States this discovery would be front page news and a subject of discussion on every news outlet in the nation. 

Super-thermite is a highly energetic form of thermite (iron oxide and aluminum) in which at least one component is in the extremely fine or nano-size range with particles 100 nanometers (1 nm = 1 billionth of a meter) or smaller, often along with silicon and carbon.  Super-thermite is an extremely powerful explosive that releases much more energy per gram than any other conventional explosive used in demolition.  The chips found in the World Trade Center dust were an extremely powerful form of super-thermite.

The pyroclastic dust clouds of 9-11 were created by the super-thermite that was combined with an organic compound to create the intense gas pressure that propelled the clouds over lower Manhattan. 

Two of the four chips tested released more energy by mass (kJ/g) than HMX, TNT, TATB explosives, and normal thermite.  These chips released between 50 to nearly 100 percent more energy that the four conventional explosives.  One of the chips released twice as much energy per gram than Xerogel, a similar super-thermite nanocomposite, and the chips all ignited at 430 degrees C., 100 degrees lower than the ignition temperature for Xerogel. 

This paper proves that the official explanation for the explosive destruction of the Twin Towers is false.  For 9-11 truth seekers, this paper is crucial because it means we can no longer be dismissed as "conspiracy theorists."  We now have solid evidence of the advanced super-thermite that was used to demolish the twin towers.  For the criminals of 9-11 and their supporters, the writing on the wall is now clear.  It says, "Game Over!" 

The discovery of this active thermitic material is critical to understanding what really happened on 9-11.  This scientific discovery reveals that sophisticated demolition explosives had been applied to the interiors of the Twin Towers long before the two planes struck them on 9-11.  Although we already had evidence that the towers were demolished with thermitic explosives, this is the first time we have pieces of the actual explosives involved in the demolition of the Twin Towers.  This crucial discovery is not front-page news in the United States only because our "free press" is actually very tightly controlled.  But the truth cannot be so easily controlled.  Americans now live in an uncomfortable and conflicted state in which provable scientific evidence tells us that our leaders are complicit in a criminal cover-up of the truth of what really happened on 9-11.  This is the state I have been in since September 2001. 

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was all grins during a community meeting in Los Angeles on May 15, 2009 until two 9-11 truth activists asked him about the evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center.  Presented with the paper by Steven E. Jones and eight other scientists Biden gave a terse one-word response and retreated to his security cordon.  The truth of 9-11, however, will not be as easy to avoid.

The evidence that Jones and his team examined was in the form of very small particles found in five different samples of WTC dust.  In each sample they found small chips that were composed of two layers, a red layer and a gray layer.  The gray layer consisted mostly of iron oxide, while the red layer contained iron, oxygen, aluminum, silicon, and carbon -- all the components of super-thermite.  The analysis and testing of the red and gray chips revealed that the super-thermite composite ignited at the surprisingly low temperature of 430 degrees Celsius and caused an explosive reaction which resulted in iron spheroids, exactly like thermite.  In other words, the heat-producing explosive reaction created temperatures hotter than 1400 degrees Celsius, the melting point of iron. 

The U.S.G.S. survey of the dust found large amounts of iron-rich spheres that were evidence that molten iron had accompanied the destruction of the World Trade Center.  Nothing in the government version of the collapse of the Twin Towers explains the large amounts of molten iron found in the rubble.  Thermite does.

The Jones paper concludes: 

The small size of the iron oxide particles qualifies the material to be characterized as nanothermite or super-thermite...Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material. 


Super-thermite, which has been fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and other places, can be sprayed or even “painted” onto surfaces, effectively forming an energetic or even explosive paint, the study pointed out. “The sol-gel process is very amenable to dip-, spin-, and spray-coating technologies to coat surfaces," scientists from Lawrence Livermore wrote in a 2002 paper entitled "Energetic nanocomposites with sol-gel chemistry: Synthesis, safety, and characterization." 

"The red chips we found in the WTC dust conform to their description of 'thin films' of 'hybrid inorganic/organic energetic nanocomposite'," the Jones paper says. "Indeed, the descriptive terms 'energetic coating' and 'nice adherent film' fit very well with our observations of the red-chips which survived the WTC destruction." 

The published documentation of evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center has taken the 9-11 truth movement to a new level.  If Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida did not spray super-thermite in the Twin Towers, who did? 

It is now evident that a solution of super-thermite had been applied to large sections of the World Trade Center, including walls, floor sections, structural beams, and columns in the core section.  It may have been applied as a thin spray coating applied to the undersides of the floor pans under the guise of fire-proofing, asbestos abatement, or some other form of building maintenance.  Super-thermite is safe to handle and only becomes dangerous when it is dry. 

We need to find out who manufactured this nano-composite thermite and who applied the bi-layered film of super explosive to the interior surfaces of the buildings.  This certainly must have been a task that involved a team of men working for weeks, if not months, and their presence must have been observed by security and other personnel involved in maintaining the buildings.  Finding the source of the super-thermite and identifying the people who applied it to the Twin Towers will reveal the true culprits of 9-11. 

Several years ago, I contacted Burton Fried, president of LVI Services, Inc., a demolition company that reportedly had done extensive "asbestos abatement" work in the twin towers.  I considered LVI's work in the twin towers as suspicious because the company is primarily known for asbestos abatement and preparing structures for demolition.  LVI has done millions of dollars of research and development for the U.S. Department of Defense.  In 2000, for example, shows that LVI Group, Inc. received $3.246 million worth of contracts with the U.S. Army, of which $2.967 million was for "Applied Research and Exploratory Development." It should be noted that the military is the main user and developer of super-thermite. 

Burton Fried of LVI

LVI has also worked closely with Controlled Demolition Inc. on large demolition projects.  LVI's role in these projects is reportedly preparing the structure for demolition prior to the placement of charges.  LVI advertises that it sets up "turn key" demolition projects.  Is this the kind of work LVI did at the World Trade Center?  Although Mr. Fried denied having done the extensive "asbestos abatement" work in the towers as reported in Engineering News-Record on September 13, 2001, Debra Rubin, one of the journalists who wrote the piece, confirmed that the source of this information had been LVI.  Fried's quick reaction, "I didn't do it," only increased my suspicions. 

What happens from this point on depends a great deal on what the people do with the information about what really destroyed the towers on 9-11:  The three buildings that collapsed were not brought down by the fires caused by the burning fuel of two airliners; they were demolished with pre-planted explosives, including large amounts of an extremely potent form of super-thermite, which had been applied to surfaces of the building in the months prior to 9-11.  Osama Bin Laden and his gang of twenty certainly did not spray super-thermite throughout the towers of World Trade Center in the weeks and months before 9-11 – so who did? 

What we have to do as concerned citizens with moral courage seeking the truth of what really happened on 9-11 is to spread this information to our local news media and ask them to publish the information about this crucial discovery.  We also have to bring this discovery to the attention of our local politicians, representatives, and senators in the U.S. Congress.  We the people have to use our power to force this issue to be discussed in the media and the halls of power.  It is time for us to stand up against those who have hijacked the truth about 9-11. 


Bollyn, Christopher, "Super-Thermite Demolished TwinTowers on 9-11: Game Over for Criminals and Cover Up," April 14, 2009 

Bollyn, Christopher, Did LVI Work in the TwinTowers Before 9/11? March 20, 2005 

Bollyn, C., "Super-Thermite Found in World Trade Center Dust," April 5, 2009 

Harrit, Niels H. et al, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," The Open Chemical Physics Journal, Volume 2, 2009, ISSN: 1874-4125, pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen

Harrit, Niels, Interview with Danish scientist and co-author of paper on evidence of super-thermite in the WTC dust, TV2 News,Denmark, April 6, 2009        

Rubin, Debra, and Richard Korman and Gary Tulacz, "Industry Firms Pitch in for World Trade Cleanup While Others Account for Employees in Doomed Buildings," Engineering News-Record, September 13, 2001

The End of the Cover Up: The Discovery of Super-Thermite in the Rubble of 9-11, April 5, 2009
Final Edit – August 29, 2009 
Latest Correction - February 24, 2010

Continue to Part 7...